"To get to the roughly 300 micrometeorites, Onoue’s team crushed and sieved the rock, cleaned it with ultrasonic waves, then ran a magnet over the material. Under an electron microscope, they found 10-micron-wide spheres that somehow survived descent through Earth’s atmosphere, chemical weathering and 240 million years of punishing fossilization."
Maybe they should use a different method to get those meteorites out of the rock. Not that they create more of them :)
I had a good laugh watching your light speed presentation. I imagine how most people there must have been baffled. I reckon if one hasn’t been following you work most of this may sound like gibberish, but if one follows the logic and the references, there’s a perfect trail of evidence.
Thanks Bob, this was very nice to watch. Your lecture was a ' vortex (Tornado) you must have blown away some brain cells and transmuted some peoples believe systems! Well done!
Well - it started with a question that no one in the room could answer, it then proceeded through data that had been ignored, to a logical conclusion that Ball Lightning is the cause and like Kladov, Shoulders and Matsumoto said - it is also a micro black hole. When I referred to the structure being effectively unification of the forces (Solin and implied by Kladov, Matsumoto) and the central pattern of the bubble structure being the same as that of the James Webb telescope's phantom galaxy core (thought to be a black hole), then things lined up - and it all came from the finding of quantised phantoms in MFMP Hutchison Fracture sample.
Then we have the deep connection with dark matter, Shoulders and Dubovik, the gravity explained by the dark matter of relic neutrinos and the gravity waves of Matsumoto in the identified triangle form.
so i now look at the rusted bowl of my old broken ultrasonicator with new eyes... i zapped all sorts of things from rocks to graphite... i bet there is some spiral tracks and birdies in the rust. i really liked how at the end of your presentation, how you shut down the argumentitative fellow.
I could have dwelt on all the data, shared and to share, from the experiments so far - but I chose to focus on many of the experiments that have showed this since 1980s and that in the case of Kladov, he was ridiculed for 15 years until people at the top of their field replicated him.
I argue that whilst cavitation is there, it is the Yin-Yang fractal toroidal structures that lead to dark matter coherence and incident convergence with ordinary matter that is responsible for much of the transmutation via weak interactions and that, I believe, the same phenomena can be achieved in the simple ULTR experiment.
Hello Bob, That was quite the speed run. I bet if you upped the playback speed you would probably look like an evo ;). My question is did you have anyone approach you after the presentation saying that they will try the $35 experiment and get back to you?
I have already been informed that Lutz Jaitner has conducted ULTR experiments and has concluded that they produce what he calls "Condensed Plasmoids".
Following ICCF-24, I have been informed that the US Army will be conducting tests and that at least one other coherence attendee will be conducting tests.
Several researchers, some prominent, at ISCMNS-15 said they would attempt replications. They may not, but if they do and if they share their data, I will endeavour to get it out to everyone.
However, from experience, I will not be counting on it, so we plug onwards.
I could have included Suhas Ralkar's ultrasonic fuel processing and Roger Stringham's work, including that with Tom Claytor - but this time, I chose to focus on work I don't think the entire western world knew about and it pre-dates al of them and goes straight for matter synthesis and remediation of radio nuclides.
I believe that, just like in our replication of Ohmasa Gas on W, you will see Ca, Si and C in that feature assuming the coherence is lasting long enough.
W has a lot of the desirable properties that I have identified as relevant to be susceptible to the effect.
Oh - that is great, so can you specify the approximate distance? Is the fencing wire zinc anodised mild steel or really stainless steel? What is the diameter of the wire? What is the V and A? It sounds pulsed, is that deliberate or is it just due to the dynamics in the situation.
Yes this is MHD, and you are seeing it form orthogonal to the plate, same as we did in HHO Vs 10Yen coin and Vs W welding rod.
I think it is important you have the W wetted, that is leading to the production of HHO on the fly, which leads to the production of clusters leading to the observed mark.
I’ll update the slides with those details but in the mean time - air gap roughly 1.0 +/- 0.3mm. Wire 1.2mm dia. Zinc coated mild steel. Al adhesive tape dusted with FeTi wrapped around the cathode wire. Outer wrapping was PTFE tape.
Welder puts out a pulsed waveform 180A at up to 70V, though I didnt have the scope hooked up unfortunately.
Only one witness plate was wetted, it was the one that remained intact. PTFE would be a good source of H though for the ones that weren’t wetted. The intact plate shows the signature double indent a’la ULTRA.
Intend to measure the direct TDM of the MHD structure making these. Big enough bagel receiver fitting around the BL area, it will absolutely couple. I’ve got some interesting signal out of a lower power hv arc discharge doing exactly this. Happy to share, to get discussion flowing.
Hi Chris, yes, PTFE is great, but it contains no H. It does have C and F, and one reason I believe it worked so well in Ohmasa Gas + Ti vs PTFE is that F is a single isotope and one of the highest spin isotopes. We saw Alpha conjugate nuclei of F in the EVO track in that experiment.
The mark is essentially identical to the one produced on the 10 Yen coin by Ohmasa Gas, - even more so the fractal, orthogonal smaller structure which had 2xO > S in "Snowballs on Cobblestones"
Hi Bob, the disk plate is tungsten, I’ll update the linked slide with a more comprehensive set of electrode material combinations and highlight if the witness plate was wetted or not. The SS electrode is significantly more energetic. I tried capturing the TDM response on a W anode that fit into a 2-level Bagel, only captured the pre-BL signal which is just as interesting in my opinion. Will add to the slides as well.
Bob sorry to bother you. What is that book with the green cover you held up in a recent presentation and have referenced before. It have nature in the title and a green book cover. I’m looking everywhere and can’t find where I noted it
You might want to consider and explicate how an EVO can be formulated by various and vastly different mechanisms such as rotation, cavitation, a spark, a plasma, and in the gut of a chicken or the mitochondria of a bacteria.
Because all of these processes either spin spin nuclei / electrons (causing a toroidal moment leading to coherence of natural background flux of Relic Neutrinos) or they bust the already cohered relic neutrinos out of matter, with hydrogen isotopes apparently 2000-4000 times easier to break up in this matter into electron, protons/deuteron/triton and String Vortex Soliton (potentially condensed cluster of relic neutrinos).
Dubovik noted that Benzine rings create a toroidal moment. I would suggest that the two linked nitrogen containing, benzine like rings around the central Mg in Chlorophyll act as a natural Yin-Yang.
In seed germination, I believe the ability to capture Relic Neutrinos is absolutely critical when the germinating seed cannot use sunlight. Root tips emit UV, which I believe is an indicator of the presence of toroidal moments cohering Relic Neutrinos. That germination occurs when a seasonal region is passing through a greater density of Relic Neutrinos in the neutrinosphere of the sun is entirely consistent with this hypothesis.
In other biology, I expect there are similar benzine type rings also playing a role.
There is an experiment that disproves your assumption that Relic Neutrinos produce the LENR reaction. This experiment shows that the reaction is only active when light pumps nanoparticles to elicit the LENR reaction. It is the laser light that pumps the LENR reaction. Only when the laser is producing light does the reaction activate. The reaction has nothing to do with Relic Neutrinos. Your objectivity is compromised because of your affection for Parkhomov.
Parkhomov invented this Relic Neutrinos theory out of hole cloth with no proof. Just because Beta decay produces the reaction does not imply with certainty that neutrinos catalyze the reaction. The reaction can be pumped using the energy generated by the high speed electron produced in beta decay and not neutrino release. Here is the proof of the photon activation of the reaction. Other laser based experiments by A.V. Simakin show the production of tritium and transmutation using laser pulse pumping of nanoparticles.
Radioactive decay half-life acceleration caused by Electroweak force mediation.
232U is an alpha decay isotope and so will not be affected by Parkhomov's Relic Neutrino focussing apparatus. He showed this with another major Alpha decay nuclei.
You really should read Alexanders book, the digital version is just $9.99 at the moment, and I think if you have amazon unlimited you can read it for free!
So now you are saying that there are two types of LENR reactions, alpha and beta. You now must understand that the LENR reaction singualy stabilizes unstable isotopes. A single mechanism must produce a single LENR reaction from which there is no exceptions. Theories of LENR are always presented based on a limited set of experimental results. Taken down to its fundamental level, the true LENR theory covers all possible cases. If a theory does not cover all these cases, then it is fraud and must be rethought. Parkhomov never concerned himself with nanoparticle based LENR reactions, so his theory does not cover that case. The experiment that I provided will also stabilize any type of unstable isotope. Regarding experiments that undercut your position, take particular note below of laser-induced beta decay of caesium-137 and Laser-induced synthesis and decay of Tritium under exposure of solid targets in heavy water. There are many other like experiments that will stabilize any isotope as follows:
Initiation of nuclear reactions under laser irradiation of Au nanoparticles in the aqueous solution of Uranium salt.
Author(s): Simakin, A. V.; Shafeev, G. A.
Abstract:
Laser exposure of a suspension of either gold or palladium nanoparticles in aqueous solutions of UOCl of natural isotope abundance was experimentally studied. Picosecond Nd:YAG lasers at peak power of 10-10 W/cm at the wavelength of 1.06-0.355 μm were used as well as a visible-range Cu vapor laser at a peak power of 10 W/cm. The composition of colloidal solutions before and after laser exposure was analyzed using atomic absorption and gamma spectroscopy in the 0.06-1 MeV range of photon energy. Real-time gamma spectroscopy was used to characterize the kinetics of nuclear reactions during laser exposure. It was found that laser exposure initiated nuclear reactions involving both U and U nuclei via different channels in HO and DO. The influence of saturation of both the liquid and nanoparticles by gaseous H and D on the kinetics of nuclear transformations was found. Possible mechanisms of observed processes are discussed.
Experimental data are presented on the laser-induced beta decay of caesium-137. We demonstrate that the exposure of a gold target to a copper vapour laser beam (wavelengths of 510.6 and 578.2 nm, pulse duration of 15 ns) for 2 h in an aqueous solution of a caesium-137 salt reduces the caesium-137 activity by 70 %, as assessed from the gamma activity of the daughter nucleus 137mBa, and discuss potential applications of laser-induced caesium-137 decay in radioactive waste disposal.
---------------------------------------
Initiation of nuclear reactions under laser irradiation of Au nanoparticles in the presence of Thorium aqua-ions
A.V. Simakin and G.A. Shafeev Wave Research Center of A.M. Prokhorov General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 38, Vavilov street, 119991 Moscow Russian Federation
Abstract
Initiation of nuclear reactions in Thorium nuclei is experimentally studied under laser exposure of Au nanoparticles suspended in the aqueous solution of Th(NO3)4 (232Th). The solutions are analyzed using either Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS) or gamma-spectrometry in the range of gamma-photons energy from 0.06 to 1.5 MeV. Real-time acquisition of gamma-spectra of the probes is achieved using a portable scintillator -spectrometer. It is found that the reaction pathway depends in which water, either H2O or D2O, the laser exposure is carried out. Laser exposure at peak intensity of 1013 W/cm2 in D2O results in the decrease of probes activity of all elements of Th branching including that of 137Cs impurity. Exposure in H2O leads to the increase of activity of elements of Th branching as well as the one of the 137Cs impurity due to fission of Th nuclei. Saturation of the liquids (H2O or D2O) with gaseous H2 or D2, respectively, enhances the nuclear reactions under laser exposure allowing their excitation at peak intensity as low as 1010 W/cm2. Enhanced -activity of the probe is observed after the end of laser exposure for several hours.
Laser-induced synthesis and decay of Tritium under exposure of solid targets in heavy water
E.V. Barmina1, P.G. Kuzmin1, S.F. Timashev2,3, and G.A. Shafeev1
Abstract
The processes of laser-assisted synthesis of Tritium nuclei and their laser-induced decay in cold plasma in the vicinity of solid targets (Au, Ti, Se, etc.) immersed into heavy water are experimentally realized at peak laser intensity of 1010-1013 W/cm2. Initial stages of Tritium synthesis and their laser-induced beta-decay are interpreted on the basis of non-elastic interaction of plasma electrons having kinetic energy of 5-10 eV with nuclei of Deuterium and Tritium, respectively.
No, I am saying that strange radiation, String Vortex Solitons (SVS), AKA Black EVOs are the equivalent according to Shishkin of the relic neutrino cluster radiation that Parkhomov observes transmuting beta isotopes and NOT alpha isotopes in his telescope experiments.
Now these Black EVOs, can be made white, by feeding them electrons, since electrons have fractional spin, they sweep electrons and matter ( I believe fractional spin nuclei preferentially + entrained non fractional spin matter ) around them. Shishkin argues that ions are spun around them recently and it is similar to the argument of Hall Fox in the 1990s when he bought the patents from Shoulders. When electrons and fractional spin nuclei are there, the induced fractal toroidal moments enable coherence of matter into a focal point (I argue a monopole) into which dark matter is also forced by way of the intense toroidal moments.
Inside a sphere of influence, which is proportional to the size of the EVO and the EVOs fractal toroidal moment, there is a zone where all kinds of nuclear transformations can occur, including complete collapse of matter into light and leptons as well as re-birth of nucleons. I hypothesis that there is a resonance and energy / fractal toroidal moment quantisation that will pre-dispose a certain output of elements, though non-fractional nuclear spin isotopes predominate such as 12 and 14C, 24 and 26Mg, 28 and 30Si, all isotopes of Ca bar 43, all isotopes of Fe bar 57 etc. These get thrown out.
Interestingly, one might expect that at a particular resonance, fractional spin isotopes remain inside the zone, only to be revealed when the structure collapses. This I believe accounts for the 3H produced in LENR as wall as say the 61Ni over abundance we found in Hutchison Coral Twist that was later observed by Savvatimovva in corona discharge experiments which she published at ICCF-23.
One needs to separate therefore, as Shishkin/Dubovik do, Magneto Toro Electrical Clusters (MTEC) and String Vortex Solitons (SVS), both are EVOs, but they have different capabilities, and individually they do different things in different states/level of excitement.
Testing your theory as follows: When EVOs dig completely enclosed perfectly hexagonal profiled tunnels in a solid like diamond, these tunnels are empty. Where does the matter go that was removed from those tunnels? If the EVO is a torus, why are those tunnels hexagonal in profile (or sometimes triangular)?
Why are some EVOs shaped as spheres and some like a torus?
In your statement about the Ken Shoulders quote shown in the video, you did not include and explicate some important thoughts that Shoulders included about EVOs as follows:
"Apparently, a physical matter leak occurs between our Universe and another still unexplored one. All that has to be done to show this effect is to generate an EVO and let it subside to its natural black state limit, whereupon it disappears from our cognition. This produces a highly unexpected but actual disappearance of matter that is accomplished on an everyday basis. The frequency of this event occurs at an astoundingly high rate and the precursors can be seen in natural lightning events like that shown by the author in the essay, EVO Life Cycle.
This reference, along with other writings and background material on allied subjects, can be downloaded from: http://www.svn.net/krscfs/. This black EVO state can even be occasionally seen from such simple events as a spark discharge formed by moving ones body across a rug or car seat and then touching a conductor. The needed quiescent black state is not as frequent as the more normal visible spark, but it is common enough to be ranked above insignificant.
When seeking a physical analogy for the driving force behind this process, which always occurs to produce a blacker EVO state in the absence of disturbance, a pressure analogy can be evoked. A driving force is seen to occur between the higher-pressure side of our white Universe and the other or black Universe residing in an effectively lower pressure region of space. It might even be appropriate to signify that the black universe identified here is the much-touted dark matter regime, which is said to dominate in quantity over our normal matter.
If this interpretation can be taken as a valid analogy, then the black hole type of EVO we generate locally becomes a connector or conduit for all sorts of new communication to another Universe, albeit, at this time, a seemingly unidirectional one.
A reverse flow of matter, or recharge of our local domain on Earth from the dark domain, is possible through particle bombardment from the sun or from capture of WIMPS as matter supplied from the dark side. We could still benefit from this event if the WIMP captor were to be our sun, which then passed the normal matter on to us as a resupply of leaked matter." Endquote
---------------------------------
When Ken Shoulders discovered the true nature of the EVO, he renamed it "Exotic Vacuum Object" because it is a container of a vacuum state.
Shoulders did not have the background in science that could have framed this finding in proper theory. But this is what I have attempted to do in my LENR theory formulations.
Shoulders speaks about disappearance of matter as I have: "This produces a highly unexpected but actual disappearance of matter that is accomplished on an everyday basis."
Shoulders also describes the nature of the two universes that the EVO represents: "A driving force is seen to occur between the higher-pressure side of our white Universe and the other or black Universe residing in an effectively lower pressure region of space. It might even be appropriate to signify that the black universe identified here is the much-touted dark matter regime, which is said to dominate in quantity over our normal matter."
As Shoulders saw in his experimentation that the EVO exists in a state properly describes as a universe, and I have stated in my theory of the EVO that the EVO exists in anti de-Sitter spacetime which is the anti universe in regards to our universe which is called de-Sitter spacetime. The EVO is a "false" or different state of the vacuum which is a vacuum state that differs in its negative cosmological constant to our universe which has a positive cosmological constant. Being separated by a domain barrier, these two types of universes do not interact which leads to the disappearance of matter that flows between them when the EVO converts matter to energy. It is a good bet that the EVO is in fact dark matter because of this lack of interaction between the two types of spacetimes.
Shoulders remarks about the connection between the two universes: "If this interpretation can be taken as a valid analogy, then the black hole type of EVO we generate locally becomes a connector or conduit for all sorts of new communication to another Universe, albeit, at this time, a seemingly unidirectional one."
I have stated as follows: centered at the heart of the EVO, a magnetic conduit exists between the EVO and matter in our universe. A singularity exists where matter that has been absorbed by the magnetic vortex flux tubes is transmuted into the form of a hollow crenulated hollow sphere that takes the form of the singularity that has formed it. Shoulders uses the term Black Hole, but consistent with current research in the associated fields of science related to that term, the proper term used by Ed Witten is "naked singularity".
It is unlikely that these insights formulated by Shoulders will gain any traction in the understanding of the LENR reaction since the science that Shoulders references is not studied and therefore unfamiliar to those interested in what LENR is.
The German physicist Max Planck said that science advances one funeral at a time. Or more precisely: “A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.”
Ken is not saying it is literally another universe, he is saying it is our universe and the Neutrino universe that exists within our universe. I have argued at length how Relic Neutrino flux is the cause of gravity and it is a pressure phenomena akin to those models considered up until the early 1900s. CERN argues that Relic Neutrinos are the cause of gravity.
Boyd Bushmann talked about a next-generation energy that Lockheed Martin was investigating that was based on the Neutrino universe in the same video where he refers to the work of John Hutchison. He not only said that, he specifically said that gravity had a relationship to magnetism and had done experiments verifying this and had a related patent which is a physical analog of the natural String Vortex Soliton field - the n-th extension of which is the primer field bowls.
Here is the video, all of the links are in the description
Now, I believe that Shoulders and Matsumoto established there are at least two extremes - Matsumoto showed them as black and white holes. I refer to them as breaker and maker.
Yin-Yang structures, which I have shown present in Ultrasonics, HHO, Parkhomov 225, LION, Hutchison have, I argue, both maker and breaker and that is why we see both heavier and lighter elements synthesised in LENR. Of course, if you are using say HHO and W, you are more likely to get lighter elements.
From my (very!) lay understanding, unencumbered by the concept of spacetime (I do believe shared memories exist and that they do not always perfectly record what actually happened, but - past and future already existing, so everything is predetermined and there is no such thing as free will, but there are new, parallel spacetimes accessed via divergent timelines at every "point" in time in every point in the universe, but as the future already exists then changing from one timeline to another is already predetermined - NO WAY DO I BELIEVE THAT), then the difference between the "white" universe and the "black" universe is that the black universe is simply one or more fractal iterations below the white universe, and that moving from "white" to "black" means breaking down the white constructs into the finer-detailed / smaller black ones and moving from "black" to "white" means building up the finer-detailed / smaller black constructs to form larger white constructs further up the fractal iteration chain... in this way, matter/energy "disappears" and "appears" simply by virtue of its scaling up or down the fractal iteration chain - the links between the two then not being wormholes but flows at the finer scale. There is also no need for magical anti-universes in some separate existence, but rather the same universe where the observer travels up and/or down the fractal iteration chain - given the nature of fractals, of course, then it could well be that a torus / sphere at one level is a whole universe at another... with maybe the Plank Constant simply being the minimum distance that the toruses/spheres can be packed together, so giving a maximum density AT THE PARTICULAR LEVEL IN THE FRACTAL CHAIN (the extent, of course, can still be infinite - with the observation that the universe we are in may well be just one of a whole volume of tightly packed universes at our scale that form a self-similar Plank Constant type foam at a yet greater scale. This whole, infinite, fractal structure, however, is still just 3-dimensional and "In the now" only but still a "now" that contains e-m type fields (including consciousness / memory, energy and mass fields to name but a few) that result from "flows of structuring / form" up and down the fractal structure, the point being that one level of the fractal structure can be used to influence / reform one or more levels up or down - no time "dimension" or "physically totally detached, never to meet" universe required (for the fractal structure brings everything together at some level in its structure). Anyway, that's my tuppenceworth - and what black holes and white holes consequently are - namely fractal deconstructors (unravelling structure at "our" level" into more primitive self-similar building blocks and fractal constructors (forming structure at "our" level out of more primitive self-similar building blocks, with reductions /expansions in freedom playing a key role in this deconstruction / construction process)
What LENR experiments have shown is that the universes, one being our and the EVO being the anti universe, do not interact. That is why superconductivity can exist in a plasma and on the surface of the Sun.
I argued in my presentation (in the brief moment that I had to the best of my ability) that the dark matter universe of which Relic Neutrinos are one component, can be interacted with using the fractal toroidal moment. EVOs in the words of Ken Shoulders , are the "Universal Clutch" a phrase I twisted a little in my "Monopole Clutch" presentation some years ago.
They give us access to this force free world, and the evidence from Hutchison, Kladov, Shoulders, Matsumoto, Solin, Adamenko, Ohmasa, LeClaire, Ralkar, SAFIRE, NOVA, ULTR, VEGA etc. point to an ability to transform matter, including synthesis from dark matter and total conversion to photons and leptons and dark matter and everything in between.
Having now seen these 'Pretzels', these Vortex and 'Vortex Pairs' (Falico solitons and rings) in many of these peoples work and able to create them at will in MFMP
experiments (ULTR then VEGA being simplest), I have come to accept that perhaps 'cavitation' is not the main source of transmutation in systems where it is claimed to be, but rather the vortex and vortex pairs that may be created by cavitation, but that can also be created directly and through the interaction of rarefaction pulses.
The way polaritons are produced in nanoplasmonic is convincing to me. This is where coherence comes from. Polariton condensation is superconducting and this is where the dark universe come from. In my view, vacuum decay is what produces transmutation. It pains me that you are on the wrong track with this obsession with neutrinos. Even Fleischmann new that the key was collective behavior.
Quote
We consider now the difficult problem of hydrogen delocalisation inside the lattice of deep electrostatic holes. As delocalisation depends on the occupancy by the protons of highly excited states of the well, this configuration must be energetically advantageous. It then becomes clear that collective phenomena must come into play as, otherwise, the hydrogen nuclei (H+, D+ or T+) could not avoid going into the ground state. The many-body interactions of the hydrogen nuclei must therefore be able to supply the energy required to raise the nuclei to highly excited states of oscillation. It is again evident that this cannot be achieved through short-range forces, thus providing another clear illustration of the inadequacy of conventional theories. On the other hand, the superradiant plasma of hydrogen nuclei considered elsewhere [70] leads immediately to such highly excited states of the oscillating nuclei by virtue of the superradiant behaviour of the ideal plasma: the highly excited states of the oscillating nuclei compensate their high kinetic energy by the interaction energy with the coherent superradiant electromagnetic field. If this is kept in mind, then one can readily understand the odd properties of H in Pd: thus the high diffusion coefficients reflect the «quasi-free» character of the hydrogen «band» in the lattice of deep holes; the inverse isotope effects of the diffusion coefficients and of the critical temperatures for transition to the superconducting states are due to the bosonic character of D+ as opposed to the fermionic character of H+ and T+, the Pauli principle restricting the configuration space of H+ and T+ but not of D+ . Finally, the high chemical potentials are a likely consequence of the formation of clusters in the size range of a few microns, the size of the coherence domains of hydrogen plasmas [15]. A further aspect of the superradiant behaviour of these systems is referred to in sect. 5.
Ever before polariton condensation is discovered, M Fleischmann posited that such a condition must have existed in the LENR reaction. Also a condensate of a micron sized cluster (aka EVO) that forms a coherent domain is the active factor in the reaction.
How was this original thinking about LENR reaction theory of M Fleischmann lost or ignored over all these many years?
I will beleive M Fleischmann over Parkhomov any day. Don't let friendship blind you.
Condensed cluster of RELIC neutrinos is a collective behaviour.
Can a polariton condensate discriminate between spin and non spin nuclei?
Can they produce 'footprints' and swept materials?
Can they be focussed?
How do they cause inverse beta decay where only the maximum beta energy is observed?
Have they been shown to transport atoms through metals?
Martin Fleischmann was never able to consider RELICNeutrino condensates and the potential for their analogue technological production (COLD neutrinos), there is also no evidence he was aware of the Toroidal moment and was averse to discussing aspects of the science that related to gravity. See the 1996 Infinite Energy interview (section copied below).
Ken Shoulders discoveries are now being lost to the march of time. What Ken has said is what I am now saying; no more and no less. Ken stated that the EVO is a component of the dark universe. He believed that the EVO is dark matter. I have said the same thing because that is what the experiments in LENR indicate. Ken Shoulders was a preeminent observer and a careful scientist. He did not induge in flights of fancy. When Ken put something down on paper, it is the truth as he had proved to his satisfaction in his experimentation to be so.
When Ken said that the EVO is another universe, that is exactly what it is; and it is dark matter.
We (and many of the Russian researchers) are starting to fully appreciate what he realised in those 30+ years of building on the work of Hutchison, Bostick etc.
What a great presentation! You probably don't have time, but this is observations of so called 'M-State' (monatomic) water produced by one of those vortex traps. They see crystal structures and rings forming in it, and other phenomena.
0.8mm +/- 0.4 is ballpark. zinc anodised mild steel, but wrapped in PTFE/FeTi powder. Wire dia 0.8mm-TBC. From the specs of the welder it pushes out 200A up to 70v, initial voltage at breakdown would obviously be much higher. (As soon as I have a shunt I’m confident with I’ll measuring the pulse). The welder produces the pulsed waveform.
The two examples of partial and full anode penetration were completely dry, suspect the PTFE may have provided the H. The third example which is intact was the wetted sample, it had two little indentations.
I have some SS wire to try next. But most importantly I’m planning on doing this experiment in the centre of a bagel reciever. If the BL has significant TDL, we’ll measure it!
I’ve measured lower power, HV sparks. The V output of the bagel winding is very interesting, lots of action prior to the main arc discharge, spikes of pulses in both polarity. Looking forward to measuring the BL. Exciting times.
When looking arround I found: https://www.wired.com/2011/05/oldest-fossil-micrometeorites/
"To get to the roughly 300 micrometeorites, Onoue’s team crushed and sieved the rock, cleaned it with ultrasonic waves, then ran a magnet over the material. Under an electron microscope, they found 10-micron-wide spheres that somehow survived descent through Earth’s atmosphere, chemical weathering and 240 million years of punishing fossilization."
Maybe they should use a different method to get those meteorites out of the rock. Not that they create more of them :)
Oh - that is too funny, they may have made them!
The implication being - they did not 'survive' for 240 million years...
Good spot.
I suggest that it would be a convenience to your viewers if you link the Remote View to the associated YouTube videos.
I will publish the presentation slides as a pdf with all links embedded. I will also link to other references mentioned in the presentation.
I had a good laugh watching your light speed presentation. I imagine how most people there must have been baffled. I reckon if one hasn’t been following you work most of this may sound like gibberish, but if one follows the logic and the references, there’s a perfect trail of evidence.
I think you made a great impact.
It made a big impact on Iwamura and many others. There will be several replication attempts.
All that, and the only data I showed were the spheres - and there is SO MUCH MORE...
I’m really happy to read this. Iwamura must have realized that the oxygen rich spots he found in his material are not as random as he thought.
There was more he said, I hope to work with him to get these other aspects out.
Thanks Bob, this was very nice to watch. Your lecture was a ' vortex (Tornado) you must have blown away some brain cells and transmuted some peoples believe systems! Well done!
Well - it started with a question that no one in the room could answer, it then proceeded through data that had been ignored, to a logical conclusion that Ball Lightning is the cause and like Kladov, Shoulders and Matsumoto said - it is also a micro black hole. When I referred to the structure being effectively unification of the forces (Solin and implied by Kladov, Matsumoto) and the central pattern of the bubble structure being the same as that of the James Webb telescope's phantom galaxy core (thought to be a black hole), then things lined up - and it all came from the finding of quantised phantoms in MFMP Hutchison Fracture sample.
Then we have the deep connection with dark matter, Shoulders and Dubovik, the gravity explained by the dark matter of relic neutrinos and the gravity waves of Matsumoto in the identified triangle form.
so i now look at the rusted bowl of my old broken ultrasonicator with new eyes... i zapped all sorts of things from rocks to graphite... i bet there is some spiral tracks and birdies in the rust. i really liked how at the end of your presentation, how you shut down the argumentitative fellow.
I could have dwelt on all the data, shared and to share, from the experiments so far - but I chose to focus on many of the experiments that have showed this since 1980s and that in the case of Kladov, he was ridiculed for 15 years until people at the top of their field replicated him.
I argue that whilst cavitation is there, it is the Yin-Yang fractal toroidal structures that lead to dark matter coherence and incident convergence with ordinary matter that is responsible for much of the transmutation via weak interactions and that, I believe, the same phenomena can be achieved in the simple ULTR experiment.
Hello Bob, That was quite the speed run. I bet if you upped the playback speed you would probably look like an evo ;). My question is did you have anyone approach you after the presentation saying that they will try the $35 experiment and get back to you?
I have already been informed that Lutz Jaitner has conducted ULTR experiments and has concluded that they produce what he calls "Condensed Plasmoids".
Following ICCF-24, I have been informed that the US Army will be conducting tests and that at least one other coherence attendee will be conducting tests.
Several researchers, some prominent, at ISCMNS-15 said they would attempt replications. They may not, but if they do and if they share their data, I will endeavour to get it out to everyone.
I really hope this starts a revolution of replications.
here's hoping.
However, from experience, I will not be counting on it, so we plug onwards.
I could have included Suhas Ralkar's ultrasonic fuel processing and Roger Stringham's work, including that with Tom Claytor - but this time, I chose to focus on work I don't think the entire western world knew about and it pre-dates al of them and goes straight for matter synthesis and remediation of radio nuclides.
Unsurprisingly, we see the same hexagonal outer pattern with an internal yin-yang. Take this backside of a 0.3mm thick tungsten witness plate, 36mm dia. Steel electrode, water wetted W surface. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NdI8SzfpRjeJPUHCabD1iky7m0H7bHV2/view?usp=drivesdk
Hi Chris, well done, you have created the "Yin-Yang" pretzel, how did you achieve it?
A Tig welder and fencing wire! Arc gap length is critical. I've attached a slide with more details - https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1ed9k6R46WdtVcNr-3l-ptP0vhHp_EO4l/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=103956475152304938366&rtpof=true&sd=true
So this looks like a simplified approach to that conducted by Simon Brink
https://remoteview.substack.com/p/transmuting-tungsten-01#details
I believe that, just like in our replication of Ohmasa Gas on W, you will see Ca, Si and C in that feature assuming the coherence is lasting long enough.
W has a lot of the desirable properties that I have identified as relevant to be susceptible to the effect.
Oh - that is great, so can you specify the approximate distance? Is the fencing wire zinc anodised mild steel or really stainless steel? What is the diameter of the wire? What is the V and A? It sounds pulsed, is that deliberate or is it just due to the dynamics in the situation.
Yes this is MHD, and you are seeing it form orthogonal to the plate, same as we did in HHO Vs 10Yen coin and Vs W welding rod.
I think it is important you have the W wetted, that is leading to the production of HHO on the fly, which leads to the production of clusters leading to the observed mark.
What happens when you have no water?
I’ll update the slides with those details but in the mean time - air gap roughly 1.0 +/- 0.3mm. Wire 1.2mm dia. Zinc coated mild steel. Al adhesive tape dusted with FeTi wrapped around the cathode wire. Outer wrapping was PTFE tape.
Welder puts out a pulsed waveform 180A at up to 70V, though I didnt have the scope hooked up unfortunately.
Only one witness plate was wetted, it was the one that remained intact. PTFE would be a good source of H though for the ones that weren’t wetted. The intact plate shows the signature double indent a’la ULTRA.
Intend to measure the direct TDM of the MHD structure making these. Big enough bagel receiver fitting around the BL area, it will absolutely couple. I’ve got some interesting signal out of a lower power hv arc discharge doing exactly this. Happy to share, to get discussion flowing.
Hi Chris, yes, PTFE is great, but it contains no H. It does have C and F, and one reason I believe it worked so well in Ohmasa Gas + Ti vs PTFE is that F is a single isotope and one of the highest spin isotopes. We saw Alpha conjugate nuclei of F in the EVO track in that experiment.
The mark is essentially identical to the one produced on the 10 Yen coin by Ohmasa Gas, - even more so the fractal, orthogonal smaller structure which had 2xO > S in "Snowballs on Cobblestones"
https://youtu.be/3h3Gk4vatS8
Top left in this shot
https://youtu.be/gux490Oywoo?t=277
Need to work on bringing the details together to enable replication attempts. All details you can think of
Brand and model of welder
Source of witness plates
Source / brand of PTFE
Pulse rate
etc.
Sorry - I meant no H - corrected
Hi Chris, can you confirm the disk plate material?
Can you confirm if and when you were wetting the electrode and/or the disk plate?
Bob
Hi Bob, the disk plate is tungsten, I’ll update the linked slide with a more comprehensive set of electrode material combinations and highlight if the witness plate was wetted or not. The SS electrode is significantly more energetic. I tried capturing the TDM response on a W anode that fit into a 2-level Bagel, only captured the pre-BL signal which is just as interesting in my opinion. Will add to the slides as well.
Bob sorry to bother you. What is that book with the green cover you held up in a recent presentation and have referenced before. It have nature in the title and a green book cover. I’m looking everywhere and can’t find where I noted it
It has nature in the title***
Do you mean this one.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B6XS3M7D
I’m working on your list you sent me:
1. "EV - A Tale of Discovery" 1986, Kenneth Radford Shoulders. FREE
2. "Steps to the Discovery of Electro-Nuclear Collapse", 2000, Dr. Takaaki Matsumoto. FREE
3. "Controlled Nucleosynthesis", 2007, Stanislav Adamenko et. al.
4. "Space. Earth. Human." 2009 in Russian (2019 second edition in English), Dr. Alexander Parkhomov
I’m reading space earth human currently. My math level is low but I’m willing to do what it takes to learn.
Yes!!
You might want to consider and explicate how an EVO can be formulated by various and vastly different mechanisms such as rotation, cavitation, a spark, a plasma, and in the gut of a chicken or the mitochondria of a bacteria.
Because all of these processes either spin spin nuclei / electrons (causing a toroidal moment leading to coherence of natural background flux of Relic Neutrinos) or they bust the already cohered relic neutrinos out of matter, with hydrogen isotopes apparently 2000-4000 times easier to break up in this matter into electron, protons/deuteron/triton and String Vortex Soliton (potentially condensed cluster of relic neutrinos).
Dubovik noted that Benzine rings create a toroidal moment. I would suggest that the two linked nitrogen containing, benzine like rings around the central Mg in Chlorophyll act as a natural Yin-Yang.
http://www.chm.bris.ac.uk/motm/chlorophyll/chlorophyll_h.htm
In seed germination, I believe the ability to capture Relic Neutrinos is absolutely critical when the germinating seed cannot use sunlight. Root tips emit UV, which I believe is an indicator of the presence of toroidal moments cohering Relic Neutrinos. That germination occurs when a seasonal region is passing through a greater density of Relic Neutrinos in the neutrinosphere of the sun is entirely consistent with this hypothesis.
In other biology, I expect there are similar benzine type rings also playing a role.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adenosine_triphosphate#/media/File:ATP-ADP.svg
There is an experiment that disproves your assumption that Relic Neutrinos produce the LENR reaction. This experiment shows that the reaction is only active when light pumps nanoparticles to elicit the LENR reaction. It is the laser light that pumps the LENR reaction. Only when the laser is producing light does the reaction activate. The reaction has nothing to do with Relic Neutrinos. Your objectivity is compromised because of your affection for Parkhomov.
Parkhomov invented this Relic Neutrinos theory out of hole cloth with no proof. Just because Beta decay produces the reaction does not imply with certainty that neutrinos catalyze the reaction. The reaction can be pumped using the energy generated by the high speed electron produced in beta decay and not neutrino release. Here is the proof of the photon activation of the reaction. Other laser based experiments by A.V. Simakin show the production of tritium and transmutation using laser pulse pumping of nanoparticles.
Radioactive decay half-life acceleration caused by Electroweak force mediation.
Reference: https://arxiv.org/abs/1112.6276
Accelerated alpha-decay of 232U isotope achieved by exposure of its aqueous solution with gold nanoparticles to laser radiation
A.V. Simakin, G.A. Shafeev
232U is an alpha decay isotope and so will not be affected by Parkhomov's Relic Neutrino focussing apparatus. He showed this with another major Alpha decay nuclei.
You really should read Alexanders book, the digital version is just $9.99 at the moment, and I think if you have amazon unlimited you can read it for free!
So now you are saying that there are two types of LENR reactions, alpha and beta. You now must understand that the LENR reaction singualy stabilizes unstable isotopes. A single mechanism must produce a single LENR reaction from which there is no exceptions. Theories of LENR are always presented based on a limited set of experimental results. Taken down to its fundamental level, the true LENR theory covers all possible cases. If a theory does not cover all these cases, then it is fraud and must be rethought. Parkhomov never concerned himself with nanoparticle based LENR reactions, so his theory does not cover that case. The experiment that I provided will also stabilize any type of unstable isotope. Regarding experiments that undercut your position, take particular note below of laser-induced beta decay of caesium-137 and Laser-induced synthesis and decay of Tritium under exposure of solid targets in heavy water. There are many other like experiments that will stabilize any isotope as follows:
See
http://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2017/18/epjconf_smp2017_02017.pdf
Influence of intense coherent electromagnetic radiation on several types of radioactive decay
https://www.novapublishers.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/978-1-62081-207-5_ch4.pdf
LASER-INDUCED NUCLEAR DECAYS IN URANIUM
---------------------------------------------
Initiation of nuclear reactions under laser irradiation of Au nanoparticles in the aqueous solution of Uranium salt.
Author(s): Simakin, A. V.; Shafeev, G. A.
Abstract:
Laser exposure of a suspension of either gold or palladium nanoparticles in aqueous solutions of UOCl of natural isotope abundance was experimentally studied. Picosecond Nd:YAG lasers at peak power of 10-10 W/cm at the wavelength of 1.06-0.355 μm were used as well as a visible-range Cu vapor laser at a peak power of 10 W/cm. The composition of colloidal solutions before and after laser exposure was analyzed using atomic absorption and gamma spectroscopy in the 0.06-1 MeV range of photon energy. Real-time gamma spectroscopy was used to characterize the kinetics of nuclear reactions during laser exposure. It was found that laser exposure initiated nuclear reactions involving both U and U nuclei via different channels in HO and DO. The influence of saturation of both the liquid and nanoparticles by gaseous H and D on the kinetics of nuclear transformations was found. Possible mechanisms of observed processes are discussed.
-------------------------------------
http://www.is-si.ru/137.pdf
Laser-induced caesium-137 decay
Abstract.
Experimental data are presented on the laser-induced beta decay of caesium-137. We demonstrate that the exposure of a gold target to a copper vapour laser beam (wavelengths of 510.6 and 578.2 nm, pulse duration of 15 ns) for 2 h in an aqueous solution of a caesium-137 salt reduces the caesium-137 activity by 70 %, as assessed from the gamma activity of the daughter nucleus 137mBa, and discuss potential applications of laser-induced caesium-137 decay in radioactive waste disposal.
---------------------------------------
Initiation of nuclear reactions under laser irradiation of Au nanoparticles in the presence of Thorium aqua-ions
A.V. Simakin and G.A. Shafeev Wave Research Center of A.M. Prokhorov General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 38, Vavilov street, 119991 Moscow Russian Federation
Abstract
Initiation of nuclear reactions in Thorium nuclei is experimentally studied under laser exposure of Au nanoparticles suspended in the aqueous solution of Th(NO3)4 (232Th). The solutions are analyzed using either Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS) or gamma-spectrometry in the range of gamma-photons energy from 0.06 to 1.5 MeV. Real-time acquisition of gamma-spectra of the probes is achieved using a portable scintillator -spectrometer. It is found that the reaction pathway depends in which water, either H2O or D2O, the laser exposure is carried out. Laser exposure at peak intensity of 1013 W/cm2 in D2O results in the decrease of probes activity of all elements of Th branching including that of 137Cs impurity. Exposure in H2O leads to the increase of activity of elements of Th branching as well as the one of the 137Cs impurity due to fission of Th nuclei. Saturation of the liquids (H2O or D2O) with gaseous H2 or D2, respectively, enhances the nuclear reactions under laser exposure allowing their excitation at peak intensity as low as 1010 W/cm2. Enhanced -activity of the probe is observed after the end of laser exposure for several hours.
--------------------------------------------------------
Laser-induced synthesis and decay of Tritium under exposure of solid targets in heavy water
E.V. Barmina1, P.G. Kuzmin1, S.F. Timashev2,3, and G.A. Shafeev1
Abstract
The processes of laser-assisted synthesis of Tritium nuclei and their laser-induced decay in cold plasma in the vicinity of solid targets (Au, Ti, Se, etc.) immersed into heavy water are experimentally realized at peak laser intensity of 1010-1013 W/cm2. Initial stages of Tritium synthesis and their laser-induced beta-decay are interpreted on the basis of non-elastic interaction of plasma electrons having kinetic energy of 5-10 eV with nuclei of Deuterium and Tritium, respectively.
No, I am saying that strange radiation, String Vortex Solitons (SVS), AKA Black EVOs are the equivalent according to Shishkin of the relic neutrino cluster radiation that Parkhomov observes transmuting beta isotopes and NOT alpha isotopes in his telescope experiments.
Now these Black EVOs, can be made white, by feeding them electrons, since electrons have fractional spin, they sweep electrons and matter ( I believe fractional spin nuclei preferentially + entrained non fractional spin matter ) around them. Shishkin argues that ions are spun around them recently and it is similar to the argument of Hall Fox in the 1990s when he bought the patents from Shoulders. When electrons and fractional spin nuclei are there, the induced fractal toroidal moments enable coherence of matter into a focal point (I argue a monopole) into which dark matter is also forced by way of the intense toroidal moments.
Inside a sphere of influence, which is proportional to the size of the EVO and the EVOs fractal toroidal moment, there is a zone where all kinds of nuclear transformations can occur, including complete collapse of matter into light and leptons as well as re-birth of nucleons. I hypothesis that there is a resonance and energy / fractal toroidal moment quantisation that will pre-dispose a certain output of elements, though non-fractional nuclear spin isotopes predominate such as 12 and 14C, 24 and 26Mg, 28 and 30Si, all isotopes of Ca bar 43, all isotopes of Fe bar 57 etc. These get thrown out.
Interestingly, one might expect that at a particular resonance, fractional spin isotopes remain inside the zone, only to be revealed when the structure collapses. This I believe accounts for the 3H produced in LENR as wall as say the 61Ni over abundance we found in Hutchison Coral Twist that was later observed by Savvatimovva in corona discharge experiments which she published at ICCF-23.
One needs to separate therefore, as Shishkin/Dubovik do, Magneto Toro Electrical Clusters (MTEC) and String Vortex Solitons (SVS), both are EVOs, but they have different capabilities, and individually they do different things in different states/level of excitement.
Testing your theory as follows: When EVOs dig completely enclosed perfectly hexagonal profiled tunnels in a solid like diamond, these tunnels are empty. Where does the matter go that was removed from those tunnels? If the EVO is a torus, why are those tunnels hexagonal in profile (or sometimes triangular)?
Why are some EVOs shaped as spheres and some like a torus?
In your statement about the Ken Shoulders quote shown in the video, you did not include and explicate some important thoughts that Shoulders included about EVOs as follows:
http://www.rexresearch.com/shoulders/ALeakFromOurUniversetoAnother.pdf
A Leak From Our Universe to Another
by
Ken Shoulders © 2006
Quote
"Apparently, a physical matter leak occurs between our Universe and another still unexplored one. All that has to be done to show this effect is to generate an EVO and let it subside to its natural black state limit, whereupon it disappears from our cognition. This produces a highly unexpected but actual disappearance of matter that is accomplished on an everyday basis. The frequency of this event occurs at an astoundingly high rate and the precursors can be seen in natural lightning events like that shown by the author in the essay, EVO Life Cycle.
This reference, along with other writings and background material on allied subjects, can be downloaded from: http://www.svn.net/krscfs/. This black EVO state can even be occasionally seen from such simple events as a spark discharge formed by moving ones body across a rug or car seat and then touching a conductor. The needed quiescent black state is not as frequent as the more normal visible spark, but it is common enough to be ranked above insignificant.
When seeking a physical analogy for the driving force behind this process, which always occurs to produce a blacker EVO state in the absence of disturbance, a pressure analogy can be evoked. A driving force is seen to occur between the higher-pressure side of our white Universe and the other or black Universe residing in an effectively lower pressure region of space. It might even be appropriate to signify that the black universe identified here is the much-touted dark matter regime, which is said to dominate in quantity over our normal matter.
If this interpretation can be taken as a valid analogy, then the black hole type of EVO we generate locally becomes a connector or conduit for all sorts of new communication to another Universe, albeit, at this time, a seemingly unidirectional one.
A reverse flow of matter, or recharge of our local domain on Earth from the dark domain, is possible through particle bombardment from the sun or from capture of WIMPS as matter supplied from the dark side. We could still benefit from this event if the WIMP captor were to be our sun, which then passed the normal matter on to us as a resupply of leaked matter." Endquote
---------------------------------
When Ken Shoulders discovered the true nature of the EVO, he renamed it "Exotic Vacuum Object" because it is a container of a vacuum state.
Shoulders did not have the background in science that could have framed this finding in proper theory. But this is what I have attempted to do in my LENR theory formulations.
Shoulders speaks about disappearance of matter as I have: "This produces a highly unexpected but actual disappearance of matter that is accomplished on an everyday basis."
Shoulders also describes the nature of the two universes that the EVO represents: "A driving force is seen to occur between the higher-pressure side of our white Universe and the other or black Universe residing in an effectively lower pressure region of space. It might even be appropriate to signify that the black universe identified here is the much-touted dark matter regime, which is said to dominate in quantity over our normal matter."
As Shoulders saw in his experimentation that the EVO exists in a state properly describes as a universe, and I have stated in my theory of the EVO that the EVO exists in anti de-Sitter spacetime which is the anti universe in regards to our universe which is called de-Sitter spacetime. The EVO is a "false" or different state of the vacuum which is a vacuum state that differs in its negative cosmological constant to our universe which has a positive cosmological constant. Being separated by a domain barrier, these two types of universes do not interact which leads to the disappearance of matter that flows between them when the EVO converts matter to energy. It is a good bet that the EVO is in fact dark matter because of this lack of interaction between the two types of spacetimes.
Shoulders remarks about the connection between the two universes: "If this interpretation can be taken as a valid analogy, then the black hole type of EVO we generate locally becomes a connector or conduit for all sorts of new communication to another Universe, albeit, at this time, a seemingly unidirectional one."
I have stated as follows: centered at the heart of the EVO, a magnetic conduit exists between the EVO and matter in our universe. A singularity exists where matter that has been absorbed by the magnetic vortex flux tubes is transmuted into the form of a hollow crenulated hollow sphere that takes the form of the singularity that has formed it. Shoulders uses the term Black Hole, but consistent with current research in the associated fields of science related to that term, the proper term used by Ed Witten is "naked singularity".
It is unlikely that these insights formulated by Shoulders will gain any traction in the understanding of the LENR reaction since the science that Shoulders references is not studied and therefore unfamiliar to those interested in what LENR is.
The German physicist Max Planck said that science advances one funeral at a time. Or more precisely: “A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.”
Ken is not saying it is literally another universe, he is saying it is our universe and the Neutrino universe that exists within our universe. I have argued at length how Relic Neutrino flux is the cause of gravity and it is a pressure phenomena akin to those models considered up until the early 1900s. CERN argues that Relic Neutrinos are the cause of gravity.
Boyd Bushmann talked about a next-generation energy that Lockheed Martin was investigating that was based on the Neutrino universe in the same video where he refers to the work of John Hutchison. He not only said that, he specifically said that gravity had a relationship to magnetism and had done experiments verifying this and had a related patent which is a physical analog of the natural String Vortex Soliton field - the n-th extension of which is the primer field bowls.
Here is the video, all of the links are in the description
https://youtu.be/H_8Nsas5eY0
Here is the transcript of the bit where he specifically details this.
https://youtu.be/H_8Nsas5eY0?t=369
Now, I believe that Shoulders and Matsumoto established there are at least two extremes - Matsumoto showed them as black and white holes. I refer to them as breaker and maker.
Yin-Yang structures, which I have shown present in Ultrasonics, HHO, Parkhomov 225, LION, Hutchison have, I argue, both maker and breaker and that is why we see both heavier and lighter elements synthesised in LENR. Of course, if you are using say HHO and W, you are more likely to get lighter elements.
From my (very!) lay understanding, unencumbered by the concept of spacetime (I do believe shared memories exist and that they do not always perfectly record what actually happened, but - past and future already existing, so everything is predetermined and there is no such thing as free will, but there are new, parallel spacetimes accessed via divergent timelines at every "point" in time in every point in the universe, but as the future already exists then changing from one timeline to another is already predetermined - NO WAY DO I BELIEVE THAT), then the difference between the "white" universe and the "black" universe is that the black universe is simply one or more fractal iterations below the white universe, and that moving from "white" to "black" means breaking down the white constructs into the finer-detailed / smaller black ones and moving from "black" to "white" means building up the finer-detailed / smaller black constructs to form larger white constructs further up the fractal iteration chain... in this way, matter/energy "disappears" and "appears" simply by virtue of its scaling up or down the fractal iteration chain - the links between the two then not being wormholes but flows at the finer scale. There is also no need for magical anti-universes in some separate existence, but rather the same universe where the observer travels up and/or down the fractal iteration chain - given the nature of fractals, of course, then it could well be that a torus / sphere at one level is a whole universe at another... with maybe the Plank Constant simply being the minimum distance that the toruses/spheres can be packed together, so giving a maximum density AT THE PARTICULAR LEVEL IN THE FRACTAL CHAIN (the extent, of course, can still be infinite - with the observation that the universe we are in may well be just one of a whole volume of tightly packed universes at our scale that form a self-similar Plank Constant type foam at a yet greater scale. This whole, infinite, fractal structure, however, is still just 3-dimensional and "In the now" only but still a "now" that contains e-m type fields (including consciousness / memory, energy and mass fields to name but a few) that result from "flows of structuring / form" up and down the fractal structure, the point being that one level of the fractal structure can be used to influence / reform one or more levels up or down - no time "dimension" or "physically totally detached, never to meet" universe required (for the fractal structure brings everything together at some level in its structure). Anyway, that's my tuppenceworth - and what black holes and white holes consequently are - namely fractal deconstructors (unravelling structure at "our" level" into more primitive self-similar building blocks and fractal constructors (forming structure at "our" level out of more primitive self-similar building blocks, with reductions /expansions in freedom playing a key role in this deconstruction / construction process)
Nicely put Gordon
What LENR experiments have shown is that the universes, one being our and the EVO being the anti universe, do not interact. That is why superconductivity can exist in a plasma and on the surface of the Sun.
I argued in my presentation (in the brief moment that I had to the best of my ability) that the dark matter universe of which Relic Neutrinos are one component, can be interacted with using the fractal toroidal moment. EVOs in the words of Ken Shoulders , are the "Universal Clutch" a phrase I twisted a little in my "Monopole Clutch" presentation some years ago.
They give us access to this force free world, and the evidence from Hutchison, Kladov, Shoulders, Matsumoto, Solin, Adamenko, Ohmasa, LeClaire, Ralkar, SAFIRE, NOVA, ULTR, VEGA etc. point to an ability to transform matter, including synthesis from dark matter and total conversion to photons and leptons and dark matter and everything in between.
Having now seen these 'Pretzels', these Vortex and 'Vortex Pairs' (Falico solitons and rings) in many of these peoples work and able to create them at will in MFMP
experiments (ULTR then VEGA being simplest), I have come to accept that perhaps 'cavitation' is not the main source of transmutation in systems where it is claimed to be, but rather the vortex and vortex pairs that may be created by cavitation, but that can also be created directly and through the interaction of rarefaction pulses.
Maker and Breaker
Dark and Light
Yin and Yang
The way polaritons are produced in nanoplasmonic is convincing to me. This is where coherence comes from. Polariton condensation is superconducting and this is where the dark universe come from. In my view, vacuum decay is what produces transmutation. It pains me that you are on the wrong track with this obsession with neutrinos. Even Fleischmann new that the key was collective behavior.
Quote
We consider now the difficult problem of hydrogen delocalisation inside the lattice of deep electrostatic holes. As delocalisation depends on the occupancy by the protons of highly excited states of the well, this configuration must be energetically advantageous. It then becomes clear that collective phenomena must come into play as, otherwise, the hydrogen nuclei (H+, D+ or T+) could not avoid going into the ground state. The many-body interactions of the hydrogen nuclei must therefore be able to supply the energy required to raise the nuclei to highly excited states of oscillation. It is again evident that this cannot be achieved through short-range forces, thus providing another clear illustration of the inadequacy of conventional theories. On the other hand, the superradiant plasma of hydrogen nuclei considered elsewhere [70] leads immediately to such highly excited states of the oscillating nuclei by virtue of the superradiant behaviour of the ideal plasma: the highly excited states of the oscillating nuclei compensate their high kinetic energy by the interaction energy with the coherent superradiant electromagnetic field. If this is kept in mind, then one can readily understand the odd properties of H in Pd: thus the high diffusion coefficients reflect the «quasi-free» character of the hydrogen «band» in the lattice of deep holes; the inverse isotope effects of the diffusion coefficients and of the critical temperatures for transition to the superconducting states are due to the bosonic character of D+ as opposed to the fermionic character of H+ and T+, the Pauli principle restricting the configuration space of H+ and T+ but not of D+ . Finally, the high chemical potentials are a likely consequence of the formation of clusters in the size range of a few microns, the size of the coherence domains of hydrogen plasmas [15]. A further aspect of the superradiant behaviour of these systems is referred to in sect. 5.
Ever before polariton condensation is discovered, M Fleischmann posited that such a condition must have existed in the LENR reaction. Also a condensate of a micron sized cluster (aka EVO) that forms a coherent domain is the active factor in the reaction.
How was this original thinking about LENR reaction theory of M Fleischmann lost or ignored over all these many years?
I will beleive M Fleischmann over Parkhomov any day. Don't let friendship blind you.
Condensed cluster of RELIC neutrinos is a collective behaviour.
Can a polariton condensate discriminate between spin and non spin nuclei?
Can they produce 'footprints' and swept materials?
Can they be focussed?
How do they cause inverse beta decay where only the maximum beta energy is observed?
Have they been shown to transport atoms through metals?
Martin Fleischmann was never able to consider RELICNeutrino condensates and the potential for their analogue technological production (COLD neutrinos), there is also no evidence he was aware of the Toroidal moment and was averse to discussing aspects of the science that related to gravity. See the 1996 Infinite Energy interview (section copied below).
http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue11/fleishmann2.html
------------
F: Well, it is the interaction of physical chemistry and theory. You know, it is the combination
of knowledge. Your knowledge base which would make you pose the question, "Is it not possible
to induce anomalous nuclear reactions from deuterium in palladium?"
T: So, you would say that an electrochemist is rather like someone standing where three
countries meet?
F: Yes. A gas-phase man wouldn't think of it all.
T: Are you interested in any other, shall we say, "controversial" areas of science at all? Are
there any things which most people would perhaps dismiss, but perhaps you have a less certain
view.
F: Yes. Well, cold fusion is part of a much wider area, and I have been really quite uncertain
that our theory and understanding of condensed matter is at all satisfactory. However, I'm not
interested in some of the more extreme ideas which have been put forward and which interest
you, you know in the future of energy.
T: I will say that some of this gravity modification stuff does, in fact, appear to have a
theoretical basis as well as some experimental evidence...
F: Well, if you think about gravitation, until we have a unified field theory, then you can't be
sure what is going to happen.
T: Even Frank Close said that we don't know much about gravity, and anything might happen.
F: We really have an incomplete understanding. This will change, but there are one or two
notable exceptions, which I don't want to talk about now. We have no understanding of quantum
gravity and until that happens we can't be sure that nature won't play some rather strange tricks.
As I told you when we were talking before, we had about four projects which we were working
towards, one was to do with gravitation, one was actually to do with the behavior of electrons in
metals. We actually started to collect equipment together to investigate the behavior of electrons
in metals. But...
I have told you there have been certain themes which have run through my work, although
they have never really been disclosed. I have often worked on topics where something short of
the final answer would nevertheless be quite interesting.
When I think about what I have done, I find that I have failed to achieve any of my longer term
objectives.
T: A pretty impressive failure, surely?
F: I have been content with what I have achieved, but I have not achieved what I wanted to
achieve.
T: Which was?
F: To gain a better understanding of condensed matter. In order to do so, as with the cold
fusion story, I find the answers to the global questions have eluded me.
Bob, which CERN paper are you referencing?
This one, which was included as part of my trailer for Alexander Parkhomov's SPACE. EARTH. HUMAN. book.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/0812.2696v1.pdf
Ken Shoulders discoveries are now being lost to the march of time. What Ken has said is what I am now saying; no more and no less. Ken stated that the EVO is a component of the dark universe. He believed that the EVO is dark matter. I have said the same thing because that is what the experiments in LENR indicate. Ken Shoulders was a preeminent observer and a careful scientist. He did not induge in flights of fancy. When Ken put something down on paper, it is the truth as he had proved to his satisfaction in his experimentation to be so.
When Ken said that the EVO is another universe, that is exactly what it is; and it is dark matter.
We (and many of the Russian researchers) are starting to fully appreciate what he realised in those 30+ years of building on the work of Hutchison, Bostick etc.
Awesome bob thank you
What a great presentation! You probably don't have time, but this is observations of so called 'M-State' (monatomic) water produced by one of those vortex traps. They see crystal structures and rings forming in it, and other phenomena.
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/research/Vortrap.htm
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/patterns.htm
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/m-seeps.htm
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/twdiary4.htm
0.8mm +/- 0.4 is ballpark. zinc anodised mild steel, but wrapped in PTFE/FeTi powder. Wire dia 0.8mm-TBC. From the specs of the welder it pushes out 200A up to 70v, initial voltage at breakdown would obviously be much higher. (As soon as I have a shunt I’m confident with I’ll measuring the pulse). The welder produces the pulsed waveform.
The two examples of partial and full anode penetration were completely dry, suspect the PTFE may have provided the H. The third example which is intact was the wetted sample, it had two little indentations.
I have some SS wire to try next. But most importantly I’m planning on doing this experiment in the centre of a bagel reciever. If the BL has significant TDL, we’ll measure it!
I’ve measured lower power, HV sparks. The V output of the bagel winding is very interesting, lots of action prior to the main arc discharge, spikes of pulses in both polarity. Looking forward to measuring the BL. Exciting times.
A fine summary, followed by superb dialogue in the comments. Onward.
Thanks Corky
I don't know, maybe?