5 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

The way polaritons are produced in nanoplasmonic is convincing to me. This is where coherence comes from. Polariton condensation is superconducting and this is where the dark universe come from. In my view, vacuum decay is what produces transmutation. It pains me that you are on the wrong track with this obsession with neutrinos. Even Fleischmann new that the key was collective behavior.

Quote

We consider now the difficult problem of hydrogen delocalisation inside the lattice of deep electrostatic holes. As delocalisation depends on the occupancy by the protons of highly excited states of the well, this configuration must be energetically advantageous. It then becomes clear that collective phenomena must come into play as, otherwise, the hydrogen nuclei (H+, D+ or T+) could not avoid going into the ground state. The many-body interactions of the hydrogen nuclei must therefore be able to supply the energy required to raise the nuclei to highly excited states of oscillation. It is again evident that this cannot be achieved through short-range forces, thus providing another clear illustration of the inadequacy of conventional theories. On the other hand, the superradiant plasma of hydrogen nuclei considered elsewhere [70] leads immediately to such highly excited states of the oscillating nuclei by virtue of the superradiant behaviour of the ideal plasma: the highly excited states of the oscillating nuclei compensate their high kinetic energy by the interaction energy with the coherent superradiant electromagnetic field. If this is kept in mind, then one can readily understand the odd properties of H in Pd: thus the high diffusion coefficients reflect the «quasi-free» character of the hydrogen «band» in the lattice of deep holes; the inverse isotope effects of the diffusion coefficients and of the critical temperatures for transition to the superconducting states are due to the bosonic character of D+ as opposed to the fermionic character of H+ and T+, the Pauli principle restricting the configuration space of H+ and T+ but not of D+ . Finally, the high chemical potentials are a likely consequence of the formation of clusters in the size range of a few microns, the size of the coherence domains of hydrogen plasmas [15]. A further aspect of the superradiant behaviour of these systems is referred to in sect. 5.

Ever before polariton condensation is discovered, M Fleischmann posited that such a condition must have existed in the LENR reaction. Also a condensate of a micron sized cluster (aka EVO) that forms a coherent domain is the active factor in the reaction.

How was this original thinking about LENR reaction theory of M Fleischmann lost or ignored over all these many years?

I will beleive M Fleischmann over Parkhomov any day. Don't let friendship blind you.

Expand full comment

Condensed cluster of RELIC neutrinos is a collective behaviour.

Can a polariton condensate discriminate between spin and non spin nuclei?

Can they produce 'footprints' and swept materials?

Can they be focussed?

How do they cause inverse beta decay where only the maximum beta energy is observed?

Have they been shown to transport atoms through metals?

Martin Fleischmann was never able to consider RELICNeutrino condensates and the potential for their analogue technological production (COLD neutrinos), there is also no evidence he was aware of the Toroidal moment and was averse to discussing aspects of the science that related to gravity. See the 1996 Infinite Energy interview (section copied below).

http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue11/fleishmann2.html

------------

F: Well, it is the interaction of physical chemistry and theory. You know, it is the combination

of knowledge. Your knowledge base which would make you pose the question, "Is it not possible

to induce anomalous nuclear reactions from deuterium in palladium?"

T: So, you would say that an electrochemist is rather like someone standing where three

countries meet?

F: Yes. A gas-phase man wouldn't think of it all.

T: Are you interested in any other, shall we say, "controversial" areas of science at all? Are

there any things which most people would perhaps dismiss, but perhaps you have a less certain

view.

F: Yes. Well, cold fusion is part of a much wider area, and I have been really quite uncertain

that our theory and understanding of condensed matter is at all satisfactory. However, I'm not

interested in some of the more extreme ideas which have been put forward and which interest

you, you know in the future of energy.

T: I will say that some of this gravity modification stuff does, in fact, appear to have a

theoretical basis as well as some experimental evidence...

F: Well, if you think about gravitation, until we have a unified field theory, then you can't be

sure what is going to happen.

T: Even Frank Close said that we don't know much about gravity, and anything might happen.

F: We really have an incomplete understanding. This will change, but there are one or two

notable exceptions, which I don't want to talk about now. We have no understanding of quantum

gravity and until that happens we can't be sure that nature won't play some rather strange tricks.

As I told you when we were talking before, we had about four projects which we were working

towards, one was to do with gravitation, one was actually to do with the behavior of electrons in

metals. We actually started to collect equipment together to investigate the behavior of electrons

in metals. But...

I have told you there have been certain themes which have run through my work, although

they have never really been disclosed. I have often worked on topics where something short of

the final answer would nevertheless be quite interesting.

When I think about what I have done, I find that I have failed to achieve any of my longer term

objectives.

T: A pretty impressive failure, surely?

F: I have been content with what I have achieved, but I have not achieved what I wanted to

achieve.

T: Which was?

F: To gain a better understanding of condensed matter. In order to do so, as with the cold

fusion story, I find the answers to the global questions have eluded me.

Expand full comment

Neutrinos have neither spin or charge, therefore a collective condensate will not have any spin or charge. From Ken Shoulders, we know that the EVO has huge spin but no charge or mass. The polariton have no positive mass or charge and its condensat has huge spin. The polariton condensate has a dark and a bright mode just like the EVO. The neutrino condensate has never been observed.

Nanoplasmonic and optics is an established science with people getting PHDs in that science and there is a load of papers and equations on this subject. The RELIC neutrinos have never been detected and the condensate is speculative.

The polariton condensate has a toroidal condensate called petal. The polariton condensate also has a supersolid nature where the hexagonal shape comes from when the EVO grows large. Neutrinos have none. No one has ever shown neutrinos can become coherent. You don't demain proof from Parkhomov about the neutrino theory and his reflector experiment could be actioned by any LENR activated particle. I now think that reflected particle is the zero mass long ranged Z and W boson coming from the EVO. These particles come from the anti universe vacuum nature of the EVO.

The EVO as dark matter has an anti gravity property called MOND that is enabled through the EVOs superfluidic nature of the condensate.

Expand full comment

You need to read one of the references to the key paper in one of my recent live streams. It may make my recent statements clearer.

Anapole dark matter (Physics Letters B) peer reviewed major journal

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269313003286

And EVO can have variable charge, The words of Ken I transcribed from his only on-camera appearance said he could vary their charge 100 billion to 1. They can shield mass.

Anapoles cannot be interacted with by electric or magnetic fields or waves, however, they can be interacted with by external electromagnetic currents.

EVOs have closed electromagnetic currents.

------------

Furthermore, from the reference of one of my recent live streams.

Helical Solenoid Model of the Electron (PROGRESS IN PHYSICS) 2018

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326835988_Helical_Solenoid_Model_of_the_Electron

"In 2013, Ho and Scherrer [27] hypothesized that Dark

Matter is formed by neutral subatomic particles. These particles

of cold dark matter interact with ordinary matter only

through an anapole electromagnetic moment, similar to the

toroidal magnetic moment described above. These particles

are called Majorana fermions, and they cannot have any other

electromagnetic moment apart from the toroid moment."

The Toroidal moment is what a fractal EVO, as determined by physical phantom witness marks on Hutchison sample, has.

-----------

Emergent Electroweak Gravity - Bob McElrath, CERN theory group

https://arxiv.org/pdf/0812.2696v1.pdf

"We have shown that massive cosmological relics are not classical gasses. If they have attractive interactions or are fermions, they instead are a super-fluid....

...Cosmic background neutrinos must exist. They are a super-fluid, and their self-interactions are a gravita- tional theory. These dynamics arise in the SM, which is a renormalizable quantum field theory. We suggest that this may actually be the gravity that we observe."

Expand full comment

The EVO is a condensate of atoms, electrons and photons that was once visible matter but now acts as a single cold atom that does not interact in any way with the universe. Having once been visible matter, one of the indicators that the EVO is dark matter is that the EVO satisfies the Tully–Fisher relation (TFR). In the dark matter paradigm, a galaxy's rotation velocity is determined by the mass of the dark matter halo in which the visible matter is embedded, establishing a connection between visible and dark matter mass. The relationship between visible and dark matter begins when particle generation processes in stars create the metal nanoparticles that act like a seed that will eventually cool below their superconductor threshold when this nano-dust finds its way into cold space. The EVO is a special state derived from superconductivity in a condensed matter system that transforms visible matter into non interacting dark matter. Once the visible matter is transformed into dark matter, the dark matter becomes disconnected from the universe that it lives in by a domain wall enabled by a reversal of the vacuum state within the EVO. In effect, the change in the vacuum state of the EVO creates another universe. Superconductivity creates a tachyonic based anti vacuum with a vacuum field potential that is opposite in curvature to that of our universe. The superconductive transition enabled by a Higgs mode based condensed matter system also transforms the spacetime inside the EVO to anti de-Sitter space through tachyon condensation.

Expand full comment