Wow Bob! This is great! The 1000000 pixel page sounds like a fantastic idea. I'de be down for at least 100 pixels. I came to the thought process last year that if I am really occupying my own timeline (arguable crazy talk) the only way such a revolutionary energy technology will ever manifest in my world is if I am integral in having it built, funding it, or building it myself. This is possibly the only competition type mechanism I've seen that might just do the trick. I don't know if you could attach the payout to a smart contract of which you and two other independent parties were designated as the oracles to certify payment of the payout. I don't think your going to have any issue getting the first 50k, but for those who aren't familiar with your work and are worried you might abscond with the money a smart contract might ease their worries.
Regarding the optimal operating range or possible circuit designs for a xenon bulb based system. I would direct people to Moray B King's book quest for zero point. On page 71 he says the following "A super tube which combines the use of the hollow cathode discharge, radioactive cathodes, and inert gas mixtures should create an axcessive energy output when tuned to cycle in the abnormal glow discharge regime. Output energy in the form of large voltage spikes are efficiently absorbed by a Pulse Current Multiplier circuit which might offer a solid state means of tapping the zero-point energy". On later pages he gives multiple examples for circuits as well as cathode designs and a discussion of the "abnormal glow discharge", it might be worth looking at for anyone considering attempting this challenge. https://ipfs.io/ipfs/bafykbzacecf5htpql3x2ogyin4ixcn6bhdzhmocjukg6gnkl3ifaxm7ytf5ta
Also I've had a number of people tell me that emails I've sent them have never arrived, so I'm going to paste some information below that I emailed to you but think may have just disappeared.
"""
I recently saw a video on youtube and then shortly after had a family member also contact me about the specific paper covered in that video.
Anyways I was trying to explain to my family that the most important take away from this experiment and effect isn't even what they are talking about in the paper.
It is the relation to micro-ball lightning or EVO's. The centripetal accelerations experienced inside a ball lightning or EVO is going to be well within the range that it could be extracting at least 1K thermal energy just from the quantum background field.
I think this may be something worth considering as a mechanism that feeds energy to EVO's in addition to the energy achieved by transmuting matter and compressing it into a smaller box.
I lack the mathematical understanding to fully digest how this works, but I think I have a fair intuitive understanding.
Anyways I have some back of the napkin calculations below just to illustrate what I mean.
If we have a micro ball lightning of radius 0.002 m (this is a typical size in an experiment if I remember correctly) with an outside velocity of 1/3 rd the speed of light (also reasonable I believe).
Ac=(299792458/3)^2/0.002=4.993084326×10¹⁸
One can see that it is just two orders of magnitude off, but it is in the range of the aforementioned effect that would generate a 1 K thermal photon temperature per some unit area I presume.
If you take the micro ball lightning and drop it's size to 20 micron, now you have 4.993084326×10^20, which would generate energy comparible to that described in the paper.
This also gives a very good intuitive explanation in my mind as to why these EVO's and ball lightnings might tend towards smaller sizes as they decay. (I say might as I don't really know if this is the case or not)
Basically the amount of energy they can extract from the quantum background field would be higher they smaller they are because of the centripital acceleration they experience.
I'll leave it there but this line of thinking very much ties back into the work of Konstantin Meyl and his explanation/derivations of subatomic particles as combinations of nested vortex fields.
Bob, the process you describe in this video (EVO -> UV -> light/heat/electricity) is very straightforward and quite convincing. However this process should imply an energy gain (otherwise it would be just a kind of exotic light bulb). It is not clear to me which part of the process generates this energy gain. Did I missed something?
I'm not trying to be a pain, Bob, I'm just trying to understand what you're saying. If anyone else wants to explain what I'm missing, I really just WANT THIS TO WORK! Thanks.
Cell phones are typically 2.45 GHz, same as a microwave oven.
Experiment: Call a cell phone from a remote phone, then once connection is established, put the phone into a microwave oven (don't be silly... don't turn it on...). When you make a sound ouside the oven see if you can hear it in the remote phone.
I have done this several times with two different microwave ovens.
The radiation to/from the cell phone from a cell tower appears to be MUCH greater than just inefficiency in the shielding and since the oven is designed to block microwaves, as a Faraday Cage, it's possible/probable that there is a large component of scalar radiation passing through the sheilding. Cell phones use a PIFA antenna (Planar Inverted 'F' Antenna).
If this also works for anyone here, your phone might be a cheap source of microwaves for rough experiments just to check for 'any effect' before going wild with something more extensive.
This is somewhat off-topic, but I was cogitating on osama gas and the explosive transmutation experiments and results from the Bockris work done in the early 1990's at Texas A&M.
I wonder what would happen with the same mixes being exposed to osama gas instead of being exploded. The mix included Carbon, Oxygen, Silicon, Sulfer, Iron , Cadmium, Lead, Silver, Calcium, Potassium, and Chlorine
If making your own cathode and anode shapes is of interest, to put in a homemade xenon glass bulb, a search for 'alumina ignitor insulator' will find some products. I think these insulators MUST have serious ribs on the outer surface, otherwise an evo ring could stretch/reorganize to fit the outer diameter and follow the insulator tube surface until it destroys whatever is holding it. I think the sides of the cathode should also have some ribs in the metal.
I wondered how to make a xenon bulb. I found a video about making neon signs. Having the ability to make your own bulb, could be handy for hands-on experimenters. Posted for inspiration. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYoqhRNg8gM And if this glassware needs strength to withstand implosion vacuum force, or not melt, a discussion of glass considerations would be desirable.
Bob, great presentation and fair discussion of Rossi. Regarding your point #2 below, just came across this ambitious paper that mentions relic neutrino capture in beta-decaying tritium reactions, p. 4. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-04264-y.pdf
Wow Bob! This is great! The 1000000 pixel page sounds like a fantastic idea. I'de be down for at least 100 pixels. I came to the thought process last year that if I am really occupying my own timeline (arguable crazy talk) the only way such a revolutionary energy technology will ever manifest in my world is if I am integral in having it built, funding it, or building it myself. This is possibly the only competition type mechanism I've seen that might just do the trick. I don't know if you could attach the payout to a smart contract of which you and two other independent parties were designated as the oracles to certify payment of the payout. I don't think your going to have any issue getting the first 50k, but for those who aren't familiar with your work and are worried you might abscond with the money a smart contract might ease their worries.
Regarding the optimal operating range or possible circuit designs for a xenon bulb based system. I would direct people to Moray B King's book quest for zero point. On page 71 he says the following "A super tube which combines the use of the hollow cathode discharge, radioactive cathodes, and inert gas mixtures should create an axcessive energy output when tuned to cycle in the abnormal glow discharge regime. Output energy in the form of large voltage spikes are efficiently absorbed by a Pulse Current Multiplier circuit which might offer a solid state means of tapping the zero-point energy". On later pages he gives multiple examples for circuits as well as cathode designs and a discussion of the "abnormal glow discharge", it might be worth looking at for anyone considering attempting this challenge. https://ipfs.io/ipfs/bafykbzacecf5htpql3x2ogyin4ixcn6bhdzhmocjukg6gnkl3ifaxm7ytf5ta
Also I've had a number of people tell me that emails I've sent them have never arrived, so I'm going to paste some information below that I emailed to you but think may have just disappeared.
"""
I recently saw a video on youtube and then shortly after had a family member also contact me about the specific paper covered in that video.
The paper itself is available at https://www.nature.com/articles/s42005-021-00622-3
The article shared by my family member is this one https://scitechdaily.com/clever-physics-experiment-that-produces-something-from-nothing/
The youtube video is this one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaSeEDlR5bY
Anyways I was trying to explain to my family that the most important take away from this experiment and effect isn't even what they are talking about in the paper.
It is the relation to micro-ball lightning or EVO's. The centripetal accelerations experienced inside a ball lightning or EVO is going to be well within the range that it could be extracting at least 1K thermal energy just from the quantum background field.
I think this may be something worth considering as a mechanism that feeds energy to EVO's in addition to the energy achieved by transmuting matter and compressing it into a smaller box.
I lack the mathematical understanding to fully digest how this works, but I think I have a fair intuitive understanding.
Anyways I have some back of the napkin calculations below just to illustrate what I mean.
In that paper at https://www.nature.com/articles/s42005-021-00622-3 they say
"to measure for example a 1 K thermal photon temperature, a uniform detector acceleration a = 2.47 × 10^20 m/s^2"
Centripital acceleration is defined as follows for a circular path https://opentextbc.ca/openstaxcollegephysics/chapter/centripetal-acceleration/
Ac=V^2/r
If we have a micro ball lightning of radius 0.002 m (this is a typical size in an experiment if I remember correctly) with an outside velocity of 1/3 rd the speed of light (also reasonable I believe).
Ac=(299792458/3)^2/0.002=4.993084326×10¹⁸
One can see that it is just two orders of magnitude off, but it is in the range of the aforementioned effect that would generate a 1 K thermal photon temperature per some unit area I presume.
If you take the micro ball lightning and drop it's size to 20 micron, now you have 4.993084326×10^20, which would generate energy comparible to that described in the paper.
This also gives a very good intuitive explanation in my mind as to why these EVO's and ball lightnings might tend towards smaller sizes as they decay. (I say might as I don't really know if this is the case or not)
Basically the amount of energy they can extract from the quantum background field would be higher they smaller they are because of the centripital acceleration they experience.
I'll leave it there but this line of thinking very much ties back into the work of Konstantin Meyl and his explanation/derivations of subatomic particles as combinations of nested vortex fields.
"""
Bob, the process you describe in this video (EVO -> UV -> light/heat/electricity) is very straightforward and quite convincing. However this process should imply an energy gain (otherwise it would be just a kind of exotic light bulb). It is not clear to me which part of the process generates this energy gain. Did I missed something?
I see 1.551 MeV for Zr^40 and N, but not for K^40
1.551543
Video at 43:25.
https://youtu.be/ihLLttc_eKo?t=2605
I'm not trying to be a pain, Bob, I'm just trying to understand what you're saying. If anyone else wants to explain what I'm missing, I really just WANT THIS TO WORK! Thanks.
select * from FusionAllNewPlus where
(MeV < 2 and MeV > 1) order by MeV desc limit 100
searching "marine searchlight xenon" finds some bigger bulbs, compared to automotive size.
re. EVO Blaster challenge.
1. LTSPICE free download for modelling cincuitry.
2. A cell phone might be a source of scalar waves for experimenting.
LTSPICE is a freeware download. It will also run well on Linux with Wine.
https://ltspice-iv.en.lo4d.com/windows
Cell phones are typically 2.45 GHz, same as a microwave oven.
Experiment: Call a cell phone from a remote phone, then once connection is established, put the phone into a microwave oven (don't be silly... don't turn it on...). When you make a sound ouside the oven see if you can hear it in the remote phone.
I have done this several times with two different microwave ovens.
The radiation to/from the cell phone from a cell tower appears to be MUCH greater than just inefficiency in the shielding and since the oven is designed to block microwaves, as a Faraday Cage, it's possible/probable that there is a large component of scalar radiation passing through the sheilding. Cell phones use a PIFA antenna (Planar Inverted 'F' Antenna).
If this also works for anyone here, your phone might be a cheap source of microwaves for rough experiments just to check for 'any effect' before going wild with something more extensive.
FWIW.
This is somewhat off-topic, but I was cogitating on osama gas and the explosive transmutation experiments and results from the Bockris work done in the early 1990's at Texas A&M.
https://coldfusionnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/BockrisJthehistory-1.pdf
I wonder what would happen with the same mixes being exposed to osama gas instead of being exploded. The mix included Carbon, Oxygen, Silicon, Sulfer, Iron , Cadmium, Lead, Silver, Calcium, Potassium, and Chlorine
NASA Enters the Solar Atmosphere for the First Time, Bringing New Discoveries
Is it strange radiation we see in the pictures
https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/wispr_image.jpg
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2021/nasa-enters-the-solar-atmosphere-for-the-first-time-bringing-new-discoveries
If making your own cathode and anode shapes is of interest, to put in a homemade xenon glass bulb, a search for 'alumina ignitor insulator' will find some products. I think these insulators MUST have serious ribs on the outer surface, otherwise an evo ring could stretch/reorganize to fit the outer diameter and follow the insulator tube surface until it destroys whatever is holding it. I think the sides of the cathode should also have some ribs in the metal.
I wondered how to make a xenon bulb. I found a video about making neon signs. Having the ability to make your own bulb, could be handy for hands-on experimenters. Posted for inspiration. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYoqhRNg8gM And if this glassware needs strength to withstand implosion vacuum force, or not melt, a discussion of glass considerations would be desirable.
Bob, great presentation and fair discussion of Rossi. Regarding your point #2 below, just came across this ambitious paper that mentions relic neutrino capture in beta-decaying tritium reactions, p. 4. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-04264-y.pdf
That's a great idea, and what fun. Put me down for $200, and I'll submit a design.
Bob. Are EVOs black holes? YN___ ?
I thought I had finally cracked the code, lol.
28:37 (exactly) is where this definition occurs in the video.