Now I feel bad that I have known about what is called remote viewing for nearly two decades, and I assumed you also had a long knowledge about it and used the name because of that. Now, for a shcoker, What are the odds that just a few minutes before reading this blog I read part IV of Space.Earth.Human, prompted by a conversation this morning with a friend I met years ago in the environment of so called Ufology, and that talked me about his focus changing currently to the phenomena of conciousness? And all this while a few days ago in the Utah desert was found a so called Monolith in the middle of nowhere, that many have associated with Kubrik's 2001 Monolith, and that the conversation with my friend started exactly because he asked me what I knew about this so called recently found monolith (of which I became aware past sunday)?
Very Interesting. Not a strange story. Tom Campbell https://www.tomcampbell.info/ has much experience with consciouness. I read his book a year ago. He can 'expand' his consiousness and can pick up things 'out of the 'collective consciousness'. I follow some remote viewers. So I understand your story. Sometimes I see things others don't see, I don't know if it is the same. But when I found Safire I knew this was great, and now I find you.. is also a nice 'coincidence'.
Hi all, very interesting. Consciousness is a very interesting concept. We all know we have minds. Convention tells us it’s all a product of chemical reactions in our brains. My thoughts, certainly my feelings are that we are receivers and decoders of consciousness. It’s not a product of or our brains.
I think we are receivers
Our brains have various filters to give the sober reality we are all familiar with. I’d suggest that society is constructed to allow certain filters to work very well.
The argument of psychedelics turning off these filters is an interesting one.
I don’t think everyone needs psychedelics to tap in to other levels of consciousness. I have a strong feeling that aether and consciousness could well be intrinsically linked.
Over my life I have had moments which would sound preposterous a feeling of knowing or almost having information from a remote source.
...third post connected to this. Where I wrote about low energy photons, you can also speak of “cold neutrinos” or N-radiation as described by Parkhomov in Space. Earth. Human (thank you Bob Greenyer for the project to get this translated!). To me, these are the same, but just need some redefinition. These Low Energy particles, whichever name you give them, are the key to our physics, our biology, our thoughts, our consciousness and our connectedness.
I have shared a QR code linked paper in the launch video to the translation of SPACE. EARTH. HUMAN. that calculates that natural cold neutrinos (Relic Neutrinos) are effectively a universe wide coherent condensate.
Also, whilst they are partially reflected by dense matter as Alexander Parkhomov showed, they also are highly penetrating.
Given these points together, one can imagine that they would provide access to telepathy, TX/RX of any information instantly to any point in the universe and access to the Akashic records.
What interests me is the theory of Orch-OR by Penrose and Hameroff. This details where our minds and souls could be, in hydrophobic pocket in our microtubules organised into a quantum state. It could/can prove the existence of god and provides a door to the rest everything after death. I apologise if I am telling my granny how to suck eggs, but i find it difficult finding others who know what I am talking about, so when I get the chance to talk I take it.
Hello Shane, my first post here on Remote View. Interesting that you write about our brains being receivers. I have for a very long time thought about this transmitter and receiver concept, but just this this morning I thought about filtering as well. Why? Very close experience with autism has made me think that it is (also) an issue of filtering. I just couldn’t understand how non-autistic brains can learn to filter important things out of less important things before knowing what those latter are. I now think that children get help from people very close to them, Through resonance of their brains. A baby not only feels how a parent responds to another person (like family vs stranger) but also gets help directly at brain level. Same with learning new concepts. Most people seem to learn from hearing someone, but I’m convinced that those concepts are also conveyed more directly at brain level. And autistic brains do not have that same resonance and must learn the concepts by building them up out of all details.
...continued from previous post. Yes, I also think that aether is related to this, and the microtubules mentioned by Toronto. Many think that there is a level of physics beneath the known particles and electro magnetism. (I find it easy to think in terms of ubiquitous very low energy photons as in the model of Miles Mathis). That is what forms the aether, and that is the level where I think that resonance of brains occurs. Organic molecules, DNA, microtubules all have ring like structures which allow these photons to circulate, which forms patters that can travel in that same aether of those same photons.
When I was younger I had precognitive dreams. I dreamt of a field full of vegetables and them my dad took me too some allotments which I recognised as my dream. More and more of these dreams happened but tapered off around my 16th year. I gather this is quite common.
Thankyou for sharing, yes, often these dreams are experienced by the young, perhaps as adults we do not get the proper rest and so our minds are never in the right state.
Now I feel bad that I have known about what is called remote viewing for nearly two decades, and I assumed you also had a long knowledge about it and used the name because of that. Now, for a shcoker, What are the odds that just a few minutes before reading this blog I read part IV of Space.Earth.Human, prompted by a conversation this morning with a friend I met years ago in the environment of so called Ufology, and that talked me about his focus changing currently to the phenomena of conciousness? And all this while a few days ago in the Utah desert was found a so called Monolith in the middle of nowhere, that many have associated with Kubrik's 2001 Monolith, and that the conversation with my friend started exactly because he asked me what I knew about this so called recently found monolith (of which I became aware past sunday)?
Synchronicity
This is something I am constantly seeing.
Times on clocks
Saying exactly what my wife was just thinking.
Reading something in a book and that information coming up in seemingly unrelated media elsewhere.
Very Interesting. Not a strange story. Tom Campbell https://www.tomcampbell.info/ has much experience with consciouness. I read his book a year ago. He can 'expand' his consiousness and can pick up things 'out of the 'collective consciousness'. I follow some remote viewers. So I understand your story. Sometimes I see things others don't see, I don't know if it is the same. But when I found Safire I knew this was great, and now I find you.. is also a nice 'coincidence'.
Hi Henk, thanks for sharing and the link also, I will check it out. Russel Targ says everyone has the ability to a varying degree.
I think you can train it. Tom Campbell did. I get the idea it is 'simple' when you find out how to 'tune' your consciousness and listen to it.
Perhaps I will try. Maybe I should get one of Targ's books
Hi all, very interesting. Consciousness is a very interesting concept. We all know we have minds. Convention tells us it’s all a product of chemical reactions in our brains. My thoughts, certainly my feelings are that we are receivers and decoders of consciousness. It’s not a product of or our brains.
I think we are receivers
Our brains have various filters to give the sober reality we are all familiar with. I’d suggest that society is constructed to allow certain filters to work very well.
The argument of psychedelics turning off these filters is an interesting one.
I don’t think everyone needs psychedelics to tap in to other levels of consciousness. I have a strong feeling that aether and consciousness could well be intrinsically linked.
Over my life I have had moments which would sound preposterous a feeling of knowing or almost having information from a remote source.
I make no claims, and could argue with my self.
...third post connected to this. Where I wrote about low energy photons, you can also speak of “cold neutrinos” or N-radiation as described by Parkhomov in Space. Earth. Human (thank you Bob Greenyer for the project to get this translated!). To me, these are the same, but just need some redefinition. These Low Energy particles, whichever name you give them, are the key to our physics, our biology, our thoughts, our consciousness and our connectedness.
Hi MH,
I have shared a QR code linked paper in the launch video to the translation of SPACE. EARTH. HUMAN. that calculates that natural cold neutrinos (Relic Neutrinos) are effectively a universe wide coherent condensate.
Also, whilst they are partially reflected by dense matter as Alexander Parkhomov showed, they also are highly penetrating.
Given these points together, one can imagine that they would provide access to telepathy, TX/RX of any information instantly to any point in the universe and access to the Akashic records.
What interests me is the theory of Orch-OR by Penrose and Hameroff. This details where our minds and souls could be, in hydrophobic pocket in our microtubules organised into a quantum state. It could/can prove the existence of god and provides a door to the rest everything after death. I apologise if I am telling my granny how to suck eggs, but i find it difficult finding others who know what I am talking about, so when I get the chance to talk I take it.
I recall reading about microtubules a few years back. I will go off and have a look. Cheers
Hello Shane, my first post here on Remote View. Interesting that you write about our brains being receivers. I have for a very long time thought about this transmitter and receiver concept, but just this this morning I thought about filtering as well. Why? Very close experience with autism has made me think that it is (also) an issue of filtering. I just couldn’t understand how non-autistic brains can learn to filter important things out of less important things before knowing what those latter are. I now think that children get help from people very close to them, Through resonance of their brains. A baby not only feels how a parent responds to another person (like family vs stranger) but also gets help directly at brain level. Same with learning new concepts. Most people seem to learn from hearing someone, but I’m convinced that those concepts are also conveyed more directly at brain level. And autistic brains do not have that same resonance and must learn the concepts by building them up out of all details.
...continued from previous post. Yes, I also think that aether is related to this, and the microtubules mentioned by Toronto. Many think that there is a level of physics beneath the known particles and electro magnetism. (I find it easy to think in terms of ubiquitous very low energy photons as in the model of Miles Mathis). That is what forms the aether, and that is the level where I think that resonance of brains occurs. Organic molecules, DNA, microtubules all have ring like structures which allow these photons to circulate, which forms patters that can travel in that same aether of those same photons.
Thanks for coming out and saying something.
When I was younger I had precognitive dreams. I dreamt of a field full of vegetables and them my dad took me too some allotments which I recognised as my dream. More and more of these dreams happened but tapered off around my 16th year. I gather this is quite common.
Thankyou for sharing, yes, often these dreams are experienced by the young, perhaps as adults we do not get the proper rest and so our minds are never in the right state.