Nice and now we all need to make the language simple, so I child can understand. Then we really know what we are talking about. Nature is not complicated and so is this. Love ( with L) is simple, not complicated and nature drives on it. Yes, I know but I’m not talking about fluffy snowflake love, but the real natural one. All we see outside of us, we have it all inside of us. My bet is that we will come to learn also that our body can do fusion. There are examples enough of people not eating like they should because of not that much variety of nutrients, but they look znd are very healthy. Body has a way to create a balance even when there is not a good variety of food around. Like I see it, nature works with Natural Laws and I see fMHD, ftm, mhd, etc as degrees of attraction and repulsion from a mid-point. Nature works with 7 degrees and 1 degree has 7 transitions. 7x7=49. Earth has also 7 degrees of atmosphere and so on. Also the basic equation of nature which you can use to explain all micro and macro, are the 3 Laws where all life is based on and works with. It’s: M+F=R (e). This is how simple She is 🙂
Yes, that’s your thinking language, Bob but what I’m trying to say is that nature doesn’t work with these words. Most have no clue what you are saying here. For me it’s also saying that our body’s work with fractal MHD structure that builds optimally using orthogonally arranged golden ratio synthesis. In nature there are no mhd, orthogonal, golden ratio, etc.
If your child can understand this, then yes I’m the dumb human here but my bet she doesn’t understand this. Here this is a good talk that brings this home. We are using to complicated words and math, but does it all really exist in nature like we think it exists, is the question we need to ask ourselves honestly?
In nature, wherever there is fluid that is a liquid, a gas, or a plasma moving against something in a different phase or viscosity, there will be shear. If that fluid is polar or charge-separated or ionic, it will create magnetohydrodynamics. To some degree, it also occurs where you have standing waves. Standing waves can be created by sound or shock waves. The shock or standing waves can be induced by magnetostrictive, or piezoelectric effects, for instance. Even shock induced by high dI/dT discharge, especially in situations where you have protons dissolved in metals. This works from metals through liquids, gases, plasma. It includes where fluids go through capillaries, blood vessels, and through cell membranes, for instance.
If you can spin fluid-like matter (liquid, gas, plasma, etc) in a certain way, its rotating magnetic field will cause it to collapse in on itself in a mini blackhole that as it decays spits out new matter and energy.
How you spin it and the resulting geometric structures is how you stabilize the event horizon.
Whats a black hole? Are there really shock waves in nature? Shock does not add up here. What’s spin fluid matter? And on and on. Yes, you think you explain it for yourself, but is this really so? Does t really exist? Just like the hypotheses that plasma is 4th state of matter. It ain’t. Its the first state before any matter. See, keep it logical and simple and think too nature, not against it or we lose and do not know really. This is mine thinking of the moment and these guys have a point also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=om2k1BeASAs
I'm sorry these concepts are hard for you to grasp. Spinning and fluids seem like basic toddler level concepts to most, but there are many disadvantaged people in the world. I apologize.
Such a nice new piece of information. He knew and THEY also knew that he knew. It's ridiculous how much time we lose not getting this breakthrough out. My kids could be flying into another stars if only..... thanks
Bob, thanks much for this. Very glad people still looking, thinking, researching, and experimenting with this.
Subscribed and hope to see more (now that you re-lit the flame) but two hipshots for now:
1) does your use of fractal here mean mathematically fractal (lots of tiered/scaled repetition) or practically fractal (same structure repeated a few/several times) in tiers?
2) are you familiar with the work of John G. Williamson (RIP), Arnie Benn, Martin D. van der Mark and others at the Quantum Bicycle Team quicycle.com ?
Their electron/proton model is very reminiscent of what you portray here (i think...) and they have a classical nuclear model. or, at least, a comprehensible one, based on parse-able theory and not 75 dimensional Medusa group manifolds at 27 Terawatts. (sorry, got carried away there...)
last thought: I dread the 'next' evolution of physics. "We need a planet-spanning quadrillion buck accelerator to find the next particle". Energy and transmutation can't be practical at that level.
It's a pleasure. Thank you for your subscription. Very much appreciated.
1) The minimum stable structure appears to be the basic EVO, which was identified as being around about 1 μm by Ken Shoulders. This, in my view, must be at least a wheel within wheel within wheel structure, possibly a fourth wheel in there, in order for it to be a stable, long-lived exotic vacuum object. From there on, it can scale effectively indefinitely from staple virial solutions as substructures, with at least two substructures needed to produce the next quantised level up. We have verified the 1-micron structure in many experiments. It seems to be the key approximate level of a crenellation on an iron-rich crenellated microsphere and other substructures by other parties. Every substructure within a structure is, as I say, comprised of a minimum of two, and these are orthogonally and opposite to each other, arranged. So it's basically a simple rule of a self-similar object that has a simple orthogonal spatial change and fixed scale change at each fractal level. It is a little bit more interesting because at the sub-levels there can be two or more up to 48 subdivisions.
Nature uses a very easy way to do this. I believe it is torsion combined with coherence, leading to topological magnetic monopoles, and these then lead to coherence of other matter.
Many thanks Bob. This information is the missing piece of a jigsaw that I needed to find fpr my own research. I look forward to watching Martin Fleischmann's complete talk.
I'll get that out as soon as I can. It is a doozy. I feel Martin was trying to push things as far as he could and still remain respectable in the eyes of those that would criticise comments that would be considered more outlandish. He notes that he's actually conservative in his claims, as you will see, regarding staying clear of the subject of transmutation, but qualifying what data would constitute real transmutation signals.
Nice and now we all need to make the language simple, so I child can understand. Then we really know what we are talking about. Nature is not complicated and so is this. Love ( with L) is simple, not complicated and nature drives on it. Yes, I know but I’m not talking about fluffy snowflake love, but the real natural one. All we see outside of us, we have it all inside of us. My bet is that we will come to learn also that our body can do fusion. There are examples enough of people not eating like they should because of not that much variety of nutrients, but they look znd are very healthy. Body has a way to create a balance even when there is not a good variety of food around. Like I see it, nature works with Natural Laws and I see fMHD, ftm, mhd, etc as degrees of attraction and repulsion from a mid-point. Nature works with 7 degrees and 1 degree has 7 transitions. 7x7=49. Earth has also 7 degrees of atmosphere and so on. Also the basic equation of nature which you can use to explain all micro and macro, are the 3 Laws where all life is based on and works with. It’s: M+F=R (e). This is how simple She is 🙂
The fractal MHD structure builds optimally using orthogonally arranged golden ratio synthesis.
Yes, that’s your thinking language, Bob but what I’m trying to say is that nature doesn’t work with these words. Most have no clue what you are saying here. For me it’s also saying that our body’s work with fractal MHD structure that builds optimally using orthogonally arranged golden ratio synthesis. In nature there are no mhd, orthogonal, golden ratio, etc.
If your child can understand this, then yes I’m the dumb human here but my bet she doesn’t understand this. Here this is a good talk that brings this home. We are using to complicated words and math, but does it all really exist in nature like we think it exists, is the question we need to ask ourselves honestly?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=om2k1BeASAs
In nature, wherever there is fluid that is a liquid, a gas, or a plasma moving against something in a different phase or viscosity, there will be shear. If that fluid is polar or charge-separated or ionic, it will create magnetohydrodynamics. To some degree, it also occurs where you have standing waves. Standing waves can be created by sound or shock waves. The shock or standing waves can be induced by magnetostrictive, or piezoelectric effects, for instance. Even shock induced by high dI/dT discharge, especially in situations where you have protons dissolved in metals. This works from metals through liquids, gases, plasma. It includes where fluids go through capillaries, blood vessels, and through cell membranes, for instance.
Here's simple language for you:
If you can spin fluid-like matter (liquid, gas, plasma, etc) in a certain way, its rotating magnetic field will cause it to collapse in on itself in a mini blackhole that as it decays spits out new matter and energy.
How you spin it and the resulting geometric structures is how you stabilize the event horizon.
Whats a black hole? Are there really shock waves in nature? Shock does not add up here. What’s spin fluid matter? And on and on. Yes, you think you explain it for yourself, but is this really so? Does t really exist? Just like the hypotheses that plasma is 4th state of matter. It ain’t. Its the first state before any matter. See, keep it logical and simple and think too nature, not against it or we lose and do not know really. This is mine thinking of the moment and these guys have a point also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=om2k1BeASAs
I'm sorry these concepts are hard for you to grasp. Spinning and fluids seem like basic toddler level concepts to most, but there are many disadvantaged people in the world. I apologize.
Yeah bro have a good one 🙄😵💫
Ah look here: https://youtu.be/ETjYwztslOM
Such a nice new piece of information. He knew and THEY also knew that he knew. It's ridiculous how much time we lose not getting this breakthrough out. My kids could be flying into another stars if only..... thanks
Don't put down to malice what can be explained by sheer stupidity.
Bob, thanks much for this. Very glad people still looking, thinking, researching, and experimenting with this.
Subscribed and hope to see more (now that you re-lit the flame) but two hipshots for now:
1) does your use of fractal here mean mathematically fractal (lots of tiered/scaled repetition) or practically fractal (same structure repeated a few/several times) in tiers?
2) are you familiar with the work of John G. Williamson (RIP), Arnie Benn, Martin D. van der Mark and others at the Quantum Bicycle Team quicycle.com ?
Their electron/proton model is very reminiscent of what you portray here (i think...) and they have a classical nuclear model. or, at least, a comprehensible one, based on parse-able theory and not 75 dimensional Medusa group manifolds at 27 Terawatts. (sorry, got carried away there...)
last thought: I dread the 'next' evolution of physics. "We need a planet-spanning quadrillion buck accelerator to find the next particle". Energy and transmutation can't be practical at that level.
It's a pleasure. Thank you for your subscription. Very much appreciated.
1) The minimum stable structure appears to be the basic EVO, which was identified as being around about 1 μm by Ken Shoulders. This, in my view, must be at least a wheel within wheel within wheel structure, possibly a fourth wheel in there, in order for it to be a stable, long-lived exotic vacuum object. From there on, it can scale effectively indefinitely from staple virial solutions as substructures, with at least two substructures needed to produce the next quantised level up. We have verified the 1-micron structure in many experiments. It seems to be the key approximate level of a crenellation on an iron-rich crenellated microsphere and other substructures by other parties. Every substructure within a structure is, as I say, comprised of a minimum of two, and these are orthogonally and opposite to each other, arranged. So it's basically a simple rule of a self-similar object that has a simple orthogonal spatial change and fixed scale change at each fractal level. It is a little bit more interesting because at the sub-levels there can be two or more up to 48 subdivisions.
https://youtu.be/9pw-BlrsvN0
https://youtu.be/yw15QYXqva8
https://remoteview.substack.com/p/ohma-plain-and-pd-coated-steel-vibrator
https://remoteview.substack.com/p/o-day-another-dimension
https://remoteview.substack.com/p/o-day-flower-of-life
https://remoteview.substack.com/p/o-day-flower-of-life-2
2) I am not. Thank you for the link.
Nature uses a very easy way to do this. I believe it is torsion combined with coherence, leading to topological magnetic monopoles, and these then lead to coherence of other matter.
Wow Bob, the synchronicities just keep comin! moving in a whirlwind toroid, not unlike everything 😜
What an exciting treasure to be shared!!
Honestly, it was a bit freaky listening to it, and he said quite a bit more. What a guy.
Many thanks Bob. This information is the missing piece of a jigsaw that I needed to find fpr my own research. I look forward to watching Martin Fleischmann's complete talk.
I'll get that out as soon as I can. It is a doozy. I feel Martin was trying to push things as far as he could and still remain respectable in the eyes of those that would criticise comments that would be considered more outlandish. He notes that he's actually conservative in his claims, as you will see, regarding staying clear of the subject of transmutation, but qualifying what data would constitute real transmutation signals.
wow
Indeed, wow.
"Nuno Loureiro hoped to replicate the energy of the Sun"