Using flat panel speakers, it's possible to create an amazing singing bowl experience, akin to being in the room with them. The secret, I've found, is to move away from sound-sources that are point-sources, as virtually all speakers are. When you play singing bowl frequencies through a panel resonator, it fills the room up with pressure waves at a totally different order of magnitude, and does wonders for sound-healing purposes. Just a fun tidbit for folks to consider.
These are good but work well only for detecting dissolved ions. I think these would be more suitable for analysis of before / after in a solution as what Omasa does in his lab. This is what I want to do but life has got in the middle of it.
That was one of the early experiments by Cardone et al, and they worked at a very sensitive level with deionized water. They saw a lot of new elements compared to the initial measurements but in low concentrations, as you already know that takes a while to build up nucleons. That’s why starting with a copper/Magnesium/Cesium or Calcium Chloride as Omasa does makes sense to see changes in less time, he notices dramatic changes in a few hours.
Right - but Ohmasa is using less focussing of sound. By keeping the resonant area fixed - the foil in our case and the perforated sheet in LeClaire - the coherence can build in the same place. This is where I think Prof. Huang is off, as it does not look like he fixed his foil.
You can see live in ULTR experiments that the 8s are fixed.
Moreover, Al seems to be very good CNT fuel as identified by Hutchison and LeClaire - I believe for its conductivity and paramagnetic nature.
Hi all. I’m doing this because I was invited to do so. If you disagree with the below comment I respect that as your view. It just happens to be what I believe following my own experiments and reading. If you can prove otherwise, I’d be happy to hear your views, but please have an open mind. Gustave Le Bon talked about the natural transmutation of matter in his book ‘The evolution of matter’ at the turn of the century. He was lambasted by all of the so called scientists then. These people are not scientists. They are socialites following a fashion. I watched the devil wears prada last night and found many common traits with the scientific community in it.
It’s no coincidence that Dr T. Henry Moray brandished the EOM book as important to his free energy device. I’ve been experimenting with these ideas using many pure materials and noticed some very weird magnetic effects and changes in electric energy levels when my central heating pump was running in the winters, especially when in the presence of a small radioactive source. I can literaly hear something hitting the solid state material receiver I have found like the sound of a Geiger counter, but intense enough to create electricity. The impacts generate a negative potential and electricity can be drawn in through a media. You can hear the media crackle when the conditions are right and the charge appears to regenerate. I also placed a magnet inside molten bismuth with some odd effects that appeared to demagnetise other strong magnets until they are no longer magnetic.
My experiments sometimes interrupt my TV signal and have made my car boot open through the key fob in my pocket. My car was so far away, the signal had to travel through 2 houses and around 100 ft. it can’t do that without an energy boost from somewhere. Please be careful everyone, I had the armed police visit because someone out there is watching the materials we all order. They scared my girlfriend. I think they thought I might be a loony. I think I explained my experiments sufficiently to avoid further visits. I’ve found many interesting things by mixing various near pure materials and their ability to create batteries (which generate electricity through cavitation) and some have reduced their impedance to near zero.
In my research, I’ve come to the conclusion that electricity is not the flow of electrons and no such particle exists. Electricity and light are just perturbations in the base dielectric we call the universe, some call it the aether some would call it the force after the 1970s.. The dielectric penetrates between the protons of all matter to some extent but is disturbed by magnets. I think protons are magnetic in nature and only become neutrons to balance the surrounding dielectric when protons are grouped together. The neutrons form the centre of the magnet between the poles if you like. I’m doubtful about the true existence of the neutron, since they appear to charge back to being protons when separated and the balance with the dielectric is restored. Magnets appear to disturb the dielectric by producing an anti-toroidal torsion (hour glass) in it at the poles, forcing the dielectric to become trapped and form a toroidal ring around the middle of the magnet, between the poles. When passed over a conductor, the dielectric is displaced and this is witnessed as electricity being forced through the conductor. Light also does not travel anywhere at any speed, it’s just a discharge into the dielectric and the disturbance it creates in the dielectric is what we see as light. No particles are present. No photons exist. The double slit experiment is just dielectric disturbance and interference patterns created through the slits.
If you’ve ever seen a picture of a collapsing cavitation bubble, you see the creation and annihilation of a galaxy on a micro scale. Yes, we have the ability to create and harness the power of a whole galaxy. I’ve seen it and so has Mr Dollard when his light bulb disintegrated during one of his experiments. Perhaps this universe is just one huge growing cavitation bubble inside the dielectric. Perhaps it will collapse in what we perceive as time.
Leedskalnin insisted the electron does not exist. Martin Fleischman was "extremely interested" in thermionic diodes. There is good reason to question the mainstream.
Also, could you be more specific regarding the experiment with bismuth? Was the magnetism lost after hysteresis, was it paramagnetic, etc...
I was reading Leedskalnin's classic 'Magnetic Current', and right there on the page, it became clear that the man had arrived at the same conclusion Bob et al describe regarding magnetic monopoles, re Vega and other examples like Birkland currents and so forth. From the book, page 6 of my copy (emphasis added):
"Now I will tell you what magnetic current is. Magnetic current is the same as electric current is a wrong expression. Really it is not one current, they are two currents, one current is composed of North Pole individual magnets in concentrated streams ad the other is composed of South Pole individual magnets in concentrated streams, and they are running one stream against the other stream in WHIRLING, SCREWLIKE FASHION, and with high speed. One current alone if it be North Pole magnet current or South Pole magnet current it cannot run alone. To run one current will have t run against the other."
Leedskalnin achieved this through the inadvisably dangerous (but cheap and effective) means of attaching some magnet wire to the terminals of a car battery, and shorting them together quickly. In other words, he was using a simple form of pulsed-DC.
The bismuth effects were totally unexpected and seemed to occur over a period of time (about a month or so) of repeated contact between a neodymium ball magnet that I submerged in bismuth before it solidified and two other neodymium ball magnets of the same type. I was interested at the time to see how the Crystal structure of bismuth, (being diamagnetic) would react to having a totally submerged strong magnet at close quarters on a semi-permanent basis. I also wanted to use it in a few other experiments. Needless to say, not a lot appeared to happen, the magnetism strength dipped initially. I put that down to the heat absorbed during solidification of the bismuth. However the longer the other two identical magnets spent attracted to the submerged magnet, the stronger it became and the other two appeared to get weaker. I have since broken the submerged magnet out of the bismuth and it appears to remain as strong as it was originally. As for the other two, they remain only very weakly magnetic when tested with a compass I have. Neither will support their own weight on an inclined steel surface. Well… a biscuit tin lid that is. This has bothered me enough to do the experiment again in the near future. This time I’ll take more notice and place better controls on it. I didn’t previously, because it wasn’t expected and it was outside the scope of what I was looking for really. I hope this explains things further.
Forgot to add that that micrograph of the outie and innie in the foil is breathtaking and awe inspiring. One can only wonder how such a prominent feature has been so far ignored, and this leads to an immense gratitude for your passionate work on making us look and understand what it implies. Hat off to you Sir!
Hey Bob I'm still only part way through the video but very much enjoying it.
At around 1:19:00 you are talking about the "cigar" and showing that it appears it has portions which are high aluminum and other portions which are high carbon in seeming alternate sample points.
If this sample was like the ones I was seeing in my tests 3-4 months ago I think I might have one possible explanation for this.
The parts of aluminum that were separated from the foil would appear to scrunch up into balls or roll up and then fly around the the surface of the foil.
Quite often they would get stuck spinning in the vortices at other places on the foil and if I remember correctly (I would need to find the footage) sometimes even appear to disappear (presumably through the holes in the foil).
I think what may be what is happening here, a loose piece of foil which has been ripped off and scrunched up is being pushed through the hole in the foil from the back side.
The way it has been folded (or rolled) may give the appearance of a "cigar" as you appropriately called it!
So I'm speculating it would be akin to rolling a cigar using paper that had carbon transmutation one one side and no transmutation on the other, then stuffing it into the hole from another tornado!
The second image shown at 1:30 with the second protrusion most certainly does not look like dislodged foil that was pushed through the hole.
At least not in any recognizable form, perhaps the metal that gets pulled into the vortex gets turned into coherent matter, then drops back out of coherency when it emerges, and if the volume of material entering the vortex is too high it doesn't all cohere entirely.
Anyways some of the later stuff you found on the foil (crystals, and Mo, wow just wow....)
I really need to just watch these videos to the end before I make any comments. ;)
One last thing since we are talking about crop circles, there was a site I liked back in the day where the guy was identifying correlations between various crop circle patterns, it's only available on archive.org now though.
Also there's a good video documentary called "A Field Full Of Secrets" (link below) that includes some good work by a fellow named "Nikola Romanski" who is one of the few people I have seen OPENLY working to attempt to create blueprints from crop circle embedded data.
I'm going to give some of this stuff a once over to see if any of it appears to relate specifically to what we are seeing on the evo front as it's been nearly 5 years since I looked at this stuff until today.
Well, I'm disappointed. The ultrasonic cleaner came in, yesterday, and it does not contain a round basin. It's a ovoid/almost rectangular basin. I can't think of any clear plastic that would fit in it. I'll send it back.
Still hunting for a different one. If I find it, I'll post!
Anne, the original one that suggested this experimental path and the one I have, that I used to produce the samples analysed in the video above are ellipsoid - the photo you sent me looks exactly like ours. DO NOT SEND IT BACK!
Thanks, Bob! I'll keep it. Will have to see if I have anything that'll fit in this, including one of my CD covers. My son said I should get rid of them, but they still work, and I still have a cd player (on my computers-- all three of them...)
Since I posted that link, I have been roaming the dark side of the skeptic's universe where some hopelessly angry people seem to live. I now understand that a lot (but not all) of those crop circles were made by the skeptics who want to prove ... something. So I am going to go through all the images and pull out the ones where the original photographs show super clean lines and perfect geometry. Those are the ones the skeptics did not make, in my opinion. Meanwhile I hope you don't waste too much time scanning the misleading ones.
I was aware that there were some people trying to do fear, uncertainty and doubt actions in this space - that is in part why I asked for experts to weigh in on the subject so we could, Ahem... sort the wheat from the chaff - so to speak.
Simeon Hein, who I understand has some expertise in this, Ahem... field, said the following the the YT comments:
Great presentation Bob. It’s wonderful to see all the dots connect. After a 30-year subscription to Science Magazine, and 20 years plus to New Scientist, I still haven’t seen any article, letter, or review in either publication pull as many ideas and experimental data together as you do in just ONE video. At some point those magazines are going to have a total disconnect from reality if they don’t cover what you’re talking about.
The crop formation you’ve presented here is the Oliver’s Castle 1997 circle. I wrote about it on pages 169-170 of my book “Opening Minds: A Journey of Extraordinary Encounters, Crop Circles, and Resonance” published in 2002 (and referenced by Cold Fusion pioneer John O’M Bockris in his book “The New Paradigm: A Confrontation Between Physics and the Paranormal Phenomena”). That particular crop formation caught my attention because a young women had a telepathic experience the day before it appeared, where she clearly saw that same pattern in her mind’s eye, and made a sketch of it, in another nearby crop circle. I’ll send the pictures to you, of her sketch and the formation, separately.
Here is the excerpt and subheading from those pages: “Resonant Viewing in a Crop Formation. People visiting crop formations often have clairvoyant experiences. In July 1997, Stacy Tussel was inside the beautiful formation at Upham (Figure 44). She decided to sit down and draw the formation. Suddenly, she saw a glimpse of a shape in her mind’s eye and drew it on the left side of the paper (Figure 45). To her surprise, a formation very similar to her minds’s-eye drawing appeared the next day at Oliver’s Castle (Figure 46).”
A GRP radome will cause air disturbance and cavitation above the boundary layer on subsonic aircraft. I think it’s called St Elmos fire and often seen outside cockpits by pilots. This might help make sense of the phenomenon reported. I don’t think the lightning strips are metallic, they discharge through thousands of exposed fibres. Helicopter rotor blades build up enormous static charges and are discharged through similar strips. My apologies if this is out of context.
Crazy intense singing bowls.
https://youtu.be/8COidxQ7d-A?t=145
https://www.bodhisattva.com
Using flat panel speakers, it's possible to create an amazing singing bowl experience, akin to being in the room with them. The secret, I've found, is to move away from sound-sources that are point-sources, as virtually all speakers are. When you play singing bowl frequencies through a panel resonator, it fills the room up with pressure waves at a totally different order of magnitude, and does wonders for sound-healing purposes. Just a fun tidbit for folks to consider.
Very interesting, thanks for sharing.
For those that do not have access to SEM with EDS - you can get dissolved ion tests. Like these.
https://www.simplexhealth.co.uk/product-category/water-test-kits/metals/
We used these type of tests for looking at Ohmasa vibrator experiments in Japan.
https://youtu.be/inItVAOSNIs
These are good but work well only for detecting dissolved ions. I think these would be more suitable for analysis of before / after in a solution as what Omasa does in his lab. This is what I want to do but life has got in the middle of it.
If using de-ionised water, one could focus on the after test first. If something is found then a before test could be considered on a before sample.
That was one of the early experiments by Cardone et al, and they worked at a very sensitive level with deionized water. They saw a lot of new elements compared to the initial measurements but in low concentrations, as you already know that takes a while to build up nucleons. That’s why starting with a copper/Magnesium/Cesium or Calcium Chloride as Omasa does makes sense to see changes in less time, he notices dramatic changes in a few hours.
Right - but Ohmasa is using less focussing of sound. By keeping the resonant area fixed - the foil in our case and the perforated sheet in LeClaire - the coherence can build in the same place. This is where I think Prof. Huang is off, as it does not look like he fixed his foil.
You can see live in ULTR experiments that the 8s are fixed.
Moreover, Al seems to be very good CNT fuel as identified by Hutchison and LeClaire - I believe for its conductivity and paramagnetic nature.
Someone sent me a link to this, looks interesting
https://vimeo.com/ondemand/afieldfullofsecrets
Hi all. I’m doing this because I was invited to do so. If you disagree with the below comment I respect that as your view. It just happens to be what I believe following my own experiments and reading. If you can prove otherwise, I’d be happy to hear your views, but please have an open mind. Gustave Le Bon talked about the natural transmutation of matter in his book ‘The evolution of matter’ at the turn of the century. He was lambasted by all of the so called scientists then. These people are not scientists. They are socialites following a fashion. I watched the devil wears prada last night and found many common traits with the scientific community in it.
It’s no coincidence that Dr T. Henry Moray brandished the EOM book as important to his free energy device. I’ve been experimenting with these ideas using many pure materials and noticed some very weird magnetic effects and changes in electric energy levels when my central heating pump was running in the winters, especially when in the presence of a small radioactive source. I can literaly hear something hitting the solid state material receiver I have found like the sound of a Geiger counter, but intense enough to create electricity. The impacts generate a negative potential and electricity can be drawn in through a media. You can hear the media crackle when the conditions are right and the charge appears to regenerate. I also placed a magnet inside molten bismuth with some odd effects that appeared to demagnetise other strong magnets until they are no longer magnetic.
My experiments sometimes interrupt my TV signal and have made my car boot open through the key fob in my pocket. My car was so far away, the signal had to travel through 2 houses and around 100 ft. it can’t do that without an energy boost from somewhere. Please be careful everyone, I had the armed police visit because someone out there is watching the materials we all order. They scared my girlfriend. I think they thought I might be a loony. I think I explained my experiments sufficiently to avoid further visits. I’ve found many interesting things by mixing various near pure materials and their ability to create batteries (which generate electricity through cavitation) and some have reduced their impedance to near zero.
In my research, I’ve come to the conclusion that electricity is not the flow of electrons and no such particle exists. Electricity and light are just perturbations in the base dielectric we call the universe, some call it the aether some would call it the force after the 1970s.. The dielectric penetrates between the protons of all matter to some extent but is disturbed by magnets. I think protons are magnetic in nature and only become neutrons to balance the surrounding dielectric when protons are grouped together. The neutrons form the centre of the magnet between the poles if you like. I’m doubtful about the true existence of the neutron, since they appear to charge back to being protons when separated and the balance with the dielectric is restored. Magnets appear to disturb the dielectric by producing an anti-toroidal torsion (hour glass) in it at the poles, forcing the dielectric to become trapped and form a toroidal ring around the middle of the magnet, between the poles. When passed over a conductor, the dielectric is displaced and this is witnessed as electricity being forced through the conductor. Light also does not travel anywhere at any speed, it’s just a discharge into the dielectric and the disturbance it creates in the dielectric is what we see as light. No particles are present. No photons exist. The double slit experiment is just dielectric disturbance and interference patterns created through the slits.
If you’ve ever seen a picture of a collapsing cavitation bubble, you see the creation and annihilation of a galaxy on a micro scale. Yes, we have the ability to create and harness the power of a whole galaxy. I’ve seen it and so has Mr Dollard when his light bulb disintegrated during one of his experiments. Perhaps this universe is just one huge growing cavitation bubble inside the dielectric. Perhaps it will collapse in what we perceive as time.
Thanks for sharing your experience and perspective. Would be great to see the experimental fruits of your labour at some point.
Leedskalnin insisted the electron does not exist. Martin Fleischman was "extremely interested" in thermionic diodes. There is good reason to question the mainstream.
Also, could you be more specific regarding the experiment with bismuth? Was the magnetism lost after hysteresis, was it paramagnetic, etc...
I was reading Leedskalnin's classic 'Magnetic Current', and right there on the page, it became clear that the man had arrived at the same conclusion Bob et al describe regarding magnetic monopoles, re Vega and other examples like Birkland currents and so forth. From the book, page 6 of my copy (emphasis added):
"Now I will tell you what magnetic current is. Magnetic current is the same as electric current is a wrong expression. Really it is not one current, they are two currents, one current is composed of North Pole individual magnets in concentrated streams ad the other is composed of South Pole individual magnets in concentrated streams, and they are running one stream against the other stream in WHIRLING, SCREWLIKE FASHION, and with high speed. One current alone if it be North Pole magnet current or South Pole magnet current it cannot run alone. To run one current will have t run against the other."
Leedskalnin achieved this through the inadvisably dangerous (but cheap and effective) means of attaching some magnet wire to the terminals of a car battery, and shorting them together quickly. In other words, he was using a simple form of pulsed-DC.
I should like to review more his work.
Leedskalnin, like Tesla, definitely had an intuition about nature.
Do you have any thoughts on his man-made a/c versus natural a/c idea?
No idea! Is that further on in Magnetic Current? Feel free to elaborate if you feel so inclined, I would enjoy learning the basic premise.
Hi ET.
The bismuth effects were totally unexpected and seemed to occur over a period of time (about a month or so) of repeated contact between a neodymium ball magnet that I submerged in bismuth before it solidified and two other neodymium ball magnets of the same type. I was interested at the time to see how the Crystal structure of bismuth, (being diamagnetic) would react to having a totally submerged strong magnet at close quarters on a semi-permanent basis. I also wanted to use it in a few other experiments. Needless to say, not a lot appeared to happen, the magnetism strength dipped initially. I put that down to the heat absorbed during solidification of the bismuth. However the longer the other two identical magnets spent attracted to the submerged magnet, the stronger it became and the other two appeared to get weaker. I have since broken the submerged magnet out of the bismuth and it appears to remain as strong as it was originally. As for the other two, they remain only very weakly magnetic when tested with a compass I have. Neither will support their own weight on an inclined steel surface. Well… a biscuit tin lid that is. This has bothered me enough to do the experiment again in the near future. This time I’ll take more notice and place better controls on it. I didn’t previously, because it wasn’t expected and it was outside the scope of what I was looking for really. I hope this explains things further.
Have something very special to share soon on Bismuth
Forgot to add that that micrograph of the outie and innie in the foil is breathtaking and awe inspiring. One can only wonder how such a prominent feature has been so far ignored, and this leads to an immense gratitude for your passionate work on making us look and understand what it implies. Hat off to you Sir!
Thanks. Would not have been possible if it were not for the community.
Thanks.
Hey Bob I'm still only part way through the video but very much enjoying it.
At around 1:19:00 you are talking about the "cigar" and showing that it appears it has portions which are high aluminum and other portions which are high carbon in seeming alternate sample points.
If this sample was like the ones I was seeing in my tests 3-4 months ago I think I might have one possible explanation for this.
The parts of aluminum that were separated from the foil would appear to scrunch up into balls or roll up and then fly around the the surface of the foil.
Quite often they would get stuck spinning in the vortices at other places on the foil and if I remember correctly (I would need to find the footage) sometimes even appear to disappear (presumably through the holes in the foil).
I think what may be what is happening here, a loose piece of foil which has been ripped off and scrunched up is being pushed through the hole in the foil from the back side.
The way it has been folded (or rolled) may give the appearance of a "cigar" as you appropriately called it!
So I'm speculating it would be akin to rolling a cigar using paper that had carbon transmutation one one side and no transmutation on the other, then stuffing it into the hole from another tornado!
The second image shown at 1:30 with the second protrusion most certainly does not look like dislodged foil that was pushed through the hole.
At least not in any recognizable form, perhaps the metal that gets pulled into the vortex gets turned into coherent matter, then drops back out of coherency when it emerges, and if the volume of material entering the vortex is too high it doesn't all cohere entirely.
Anyways some of the later stuff you found on the foil (crystals, and Mo, wow just wow....)
I really need to just watch these videos to the end before I make any comments. ;)
One last thing since we are talking about crop circles, there was a site I liked back in the day where the guy was identifying correlations between various crop circle patterns, it's only available on archive.org now though.
https://web.archive.org/web/20150204142841/http://www.cropcircleship.com/
Thanks - will check it out.
Hey Bob,
It seems archive.org selective deleted most of the pages from their history or there was some server error that failed to archive them.
The best way to see them appears to be to go from the following page
https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.cropcircleship.com/*
Most of the working links all start with
"http://www.cropcircleship.com:80/wiki/" the normal pages without ":80" aren't cached.
Also there's a good video documentary called "A Field Full Of Secrets" (link below) that includes some good work by a fellow named "Nikola Romanski" who is one of the few people I have seen OPENLY working to attempt to create blueprints from crop circle embedded data.
https://mega.nz/file/DzQnyCAJ#yJCLaGeOE-z00cACogVmzZc4kWoRu7PF59jyFV-UN4w
Nikola's youtube channel is still up at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCU5mXMhjHjEw46YVUOWBRuA and he appears to still be posting.
I'm going to give some of this stuff a once over to see if any of it appears to relate specifically to what we are seeing on the evo front as it's been nearly 5 years since I looked at this stuff until today.
Thanks Peter
I understood Archive.org had a power failure, yesterday. It should be back up, today, I hope!
For anyone looking to purchase a reasonably priced ultrasonic cleaner, for your own experimenting, here's what I finally found: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08L8N8K7L/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o00_s01?ie=UTF8&psc=1
I couldn't source the VIVReal, so went with this.
Cheers!
Thanks Anne - very helpful. I have to say, this looks very much like the Vivreal version and may be the same under a different brand.
Well, I'm disappointed. The ultrasonic cleaner came in, yesterday, and it does not contain a round basin. It's a ovoid/almost rectangular basin. I can't think of any clear plastic that would fit in it. I'll send it back.
Still hunting for a different one. If I find it, I'll post!
Anne, the original one that suggested this experimental path and the one I have, that I used to produce the samples analysed in the video above are ellipsoid - the photo you sent me looks exactly like ours. DO NOT SEND IT BACK!
You can see the original experiments in 2019 on Indium and the devices used here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rvVhRGGLSuIEpdXmj6jAbf0whitX1iFLiCpU2Wbpi64/edit
Thanks, again!
Thanks, Bob! I'll keep it. Will have to see if I have anything that'll fit in this, including one of my CD covers. My son said I should get rid of them, but they still work, and I still have a cd player (on my computers-- all three of them...)
Since I posted that link, I have been roaming the dark side of the skeptic's universe where some hopelessly angry people seem to live. I now understand that a lot (but not all) of those crop circles were made by the skeptics who want to prove ... something. So I am going to go through all the images and pull out the ones where the original photographs show super clean lines and perfect geometry. Those are the ones the skeptics did not make, in my opinion. Meanwhile I hope you don't waste too much time scanning the misleading ones.
I was aware that there were some people trying to do fear, uncertainty and doubt actions in this space - that is in part why I asked for experts to weigh in on the subject so we could, Ahem... sort the wheat from the chaff - so to speak.
Simeon Hein, who I understand has some expertise in this, Ahem... field, said the following the the YT comments:
Great presentation Bob. It’s wonderful to see all the dots connect. After a 30-year subscription to Science Magazine, and 20 years plus to New Scientist, I still haven’t seen any article, letter, or review in either publication pull as many ideas and experimental data together as you do in just ONE video. At some point those magazines are going to have a total disconnect from reality if they don’t cover what you’re talking about.
The crop formation you’ve presented here is the Oliver’s Castle 1997 circle. I wrote about it on pages 169-170 of my book “Opening Minds: A Journey of Extraordinary Encounters, Crop Circles, and Resonance” published in 2002 (and referenced by Cold Fusion pioneer John O’M Bockris in his book “The New Paradigm: A Confrontation Between Physics and the Paranormal Phenomena”). That particular crop formation caught my attention because a young women had a telepathic experience the day before it appeared, where she clearly saw that same pattern in her mind’s eye, and made a sketch of it, in another nearby crop circle. I’ll send the pictures to you, of her sketch and the formation, separately.
Here is the excerpt and subheading from those pages: “Resonant Viewing in a Crop Formation. People visiting crop formations often have clairvoyant experiences. In July 1997, Stacy Tussel was inside the beautiful formation at Upham (Figure 44). She decided to sit down and draw the formation. Suddenly, she saw a glimpse of a shape in her mind’s eye and drew it on the left side of the paper (Figure 45). To her surprise, a formation very similar to her minds’s-eye drawing appeared the next day at Oliver’s Castle (Figure 46).”
Cheers.
Bob, When do you think the last "Reset" was? I can only pinpoint 3 resets but they were more ancient.
I think around 12,000 years ago. I also think there were about 3 resets.
Wow, extremely interesting proposal on the title, I won’t be able to see it live but looking forward to it when is uploaded. Thanks!!!
Oh, you're gonna love it.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S136468262100208X just came across this re: bl
A GRP radome will cause air disturbance and cavitation above the boundary layer on subsonic aircraft. I think it’s called St Elmos fire and often seen outside cockpits by pilots. This might help make sense of the phenomenon reported. I don’t think the lightning strips are metallic, they discharge through thousands of exposed fibres. Helicopter rotor blades build up enormous static charges and are discharged through similar strips. My apologies if this is out of context.
This looks to me to be an experiment that is creating a CMWB from helium atoms or it maybe something else entirely.
Still think it might have some relevence.
https://www.livescience.com/amp/swirling-vortex-of-atoms.hmtl