Hi everyone, it’s Bob Greenyer with Remote View and firstly I would like to say thank you to all those that have joined this place where we’ll be able to discuss a range of interesting topics.
I listened it back when you published it and I recall a good part of it, I wonder if you can clarify if you think that SR, the monopole, EVOs,
Cold neutrinos, UDH or Plasmoids are the same thing being somewhat incorporated to the narrative of each creator of the concept or is a broader phenomena with diverse manifestations that are being called different names because they are different albeit related to the same underlying origin.
From what I have seen and based on research starting with Bostick through to the present day, all of these are compositions, states and aggregation scales / geometries of EVOs, I do address it to a degree verbally and intend to discuss it further in the paper. There is good information in Shoulders book 'EV - A Tale of Discovery'. There is excellent insight in the Takaaki Matsumoto papers and in the Solin 1997 patent. The analysis on scales of geometries is explored in the work of Adamenko/Vysitskii, Urutskoyev et. al., Shishkin et. al., Bogdanovich et. al.
The paper by Perevozchikov N.F et. al. is useful for the basics and I agree with the bulk of the basic structural arguments made and they caught the best x-ray of the 'sliced muchroom' pseudo monopole structure, though I join Dr. Alexander Parkhomov in thinking that this is not due to some new sort of solar photon.
Thanks Bob. I had watched this other also. I am still in the first pages of "A tale of discovery", hard to find a lull with enough concentration power to properly absorb the work of Shoulders. I see I totally need to. Anyway I will rewatch your "monopole clutch" video to see if I spot anything that I would like to ask you to address in more depth.
Glad I got here as soon as I did, I didn't know there was homework. *wink*
I did rewatch the video, and I don't know where you could clarify. It was appetent you had a lot of material to get through in a short amount of time. I think you did a good job. The more I learn about the nature of it, the more I'm blown away by how ubiquitous it is.
Oh who was the guy interjecting during your talk? Where those time reminders?
That guy is quite a senior guy in the Russian research world. He is called Alexander Prosvirnov, he is head of "Research Program of low-energy nuclear reactions", "Nuclear Strategy"
In the subscription part of this podcast / newsletter, I will start to talk about the various parts of this presentation and show how they are all linked. This work will eventually become the paper.
No, disrespect was meant. I don't speak Russian, and this was the only question I came up with after rewatching.
I'll b looking forward to the upcoming talks. Just because I didn't come up with a question doesn't mean I understood all of it; or se it from your perspective.
I listened it back when you published it and I recall a good part of it, I wonder if you can clarify if you think that SR, the monopole, EVOs,
Cold neutrinos, UDH or Plasmoids are the same thing being somewhat incorporated to the narrative of each creator of the concept or is a broader phenomena with diverse manifestations that are being called different names because they are different albeit related to the same underlying origin.
Hi Curbina,
Thanks for your questions.
From what I have seen and based on research starting with Bostick through to the present day, all of these are compositions, states and aggregation scales / geometries of EVOs, I do address it to a degree verbally and intend to discuss it further in the paper. There is good information in Shoulders book 'EV - A Tale of Discovery'. There is excellent insight in the Takaaki Matsumoto papers and in the Solin 1997 patent. The analysis on scales of geometries is explored in the work of Adamenko/Vysitskii, Urutskoyev et. al., Shishkin et. al., Bogdanovich et. al.
The paper by Perevozchikov N.F et. al. is useful for the basics and I agree with the bulk of the basic structural arguments made and they caught the best x-ray of the 'sliced muchroom' pseudo monopole structure, though I join Dr. Alexander Parkhomov in thinking that this is not due to some new sort of solar photon.
https://youtu.be/Xn0NK30nk74
Thanks Bob. I had watched this other also. I am still in the first pages of "A tale of discovery", hard to find a lull with enough concentration power to properly absorb the work of Shoulders. I see I totally need to. Anyway I will rewatch your "monopole clutch" video to see if I spot anything that I would like to ask you to address in more depth.
Also, if you download the presentation - it has links to all the referenced materials.
As I say, I will be working on this paper over the next 2 weeks and dumping segments of it here for subscribers to preview and comment.
Glad I got here as soon as I did, I didn't know there was homework. *wink*
I did rewatch the video, and I don't know where you could clarify. It was appetent you had a lot of material to get through in a short amount of time. I think you did a good job. The more I learn about the nature of it, the more I'm blown away by how ubiquitous it is.
Oh who was the guy interjecting during your talk? Where those time reminders?
That guy is quite a senior guy in the Russian research world. He is called Alexander Prosvirnov, he is head of "Research Program of low-energy nuclear reactions", "Nuclear Strategy"
http://www.proatom.ru/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=5781
In the subscription part of this podcast / newsletter, I will start to talk about the various parts of this presentation and show how they are all linked. This work will eventually become the paper.
No, disrespect was meant. I don't speak Russian, and this was the only question I came up with after rewatching.
I'll b looking forward to the upcoming talks. Just because I didn't come up with a question doesn't mean I understood all of it; or se it from your perspective.
I didn't think you were disrespecting him, I was just answering your question.
I hope you have a different prospective and can challenge any thinking with references. Look forward to it