5 Comments

I've just watched most of this and found it very interesting. I have spent over ten years visiting Tiwanaku and Puma Punku as well as undertaking research in university libraries in South America on this and related subjects. I hope you find my initial comments on the video helpful:

1). The geometries of the polygonal blocks used to construct Sacsayhuayaman and similar Andean sites is fundamentally different from those of the grey andesite blocks at Tiwanaku/Puma Punku. The former have rounded edges, whereas the Tiwanaku blocks have precise right-angles and other equally crisp angles;

2). There is no evidence of vitrification on the surfaces of the Tiwanaku andesite blocks, but they do show evidence of cavitation;

3). Geological analysis of the Tiwanaku andesite shows that most of it comes from an extinct volcano called Khapia. Prof. Davidovits suggests that the geoplymer was made from volcanic tuffs gathered from its slopes. However, a Peruvian geological survey did not find andesite tuffs on the slopes of Khapia. (Volcanic Tuffs form as extrusions from the slopes of volcanoes).

4). The magnetic anomalies in the Tiwanaku andesite are caused by the presence of large seams of magnetite and lodestone within the rock. This is formed within the magma chamber and is present only in what erupts from the volcanic cone - hence this andesite cannot be made from a tuff geopolymer. (In the early part of your video you mentioned how iron formed near to the centre of where the plasmoid had interacted with the solid material. Perhaps this happens macroscopically too).

5) The ancient aliens circus stole what I had come across at Tiwanaku and publicised it without attribution. What they haven't realised is that only some of the andesite blocks containing magnetite show magnetic anomalies, others do not.

My own research has led me towards an alternative interpretation of quantum theory, which was made famous (some would say infamous) by David Bohm. Let's just say that Bohm began his professional career as a plasma physicist and, at the end of his life, he became interested in how plsmas involve all of what most interests you.

I'd be happy to discuss any of this further. I came across your work only a couple of weeks ago, but it's made me rewrite the first chapter of the book I'm preparing on Tiwanaku - so my deepest thanks for your insights.

Expand full comment
author

Dear David, thank you for sharing your experiences and your considered opinion and insights. As I said, I am no expert in this field, I am coming from a completely different angle, that a scientific principle, derived from independent experiments, may make it possible to produce Geopolymers

1). Like any technology in development over time, there will be better and less good versions of it and indeed, having done landscape gardening as a young man, I sometimes rendered walls, laid pre-cut ordinary stone or cast slabs and bricks. Some of the materials for rendering were very fine, others were crude and this is true for the raw stone pieces and the cast slabs, blocks or bricks. Some bricks and tiles are fully vitrified, such as engineering blocks and others are little more than earthenware, porous and not really suitable for use in areas of regular freeze/thaw without a dense rendering layer.

I would therefore suggest that aspects of the same approach could be used in various places, but that, based on available local materials and time and even fashion, there would appear a range of different applications.

With a suitable plastic material, one could produced the rendered layers on the lower natural blocks as determined by the Russian research at Sacsayhuayaman and also the higher, all geopolymer blocks.

Moreover, a suitable mixture could be cast to an extremely high precision in a rough mould lined with beeswax or carnauba wax (the latter is a wax of the leaves of the carnauba palm Copernicia prunifera that grows in northeastern Brazilian states, though a long distance away, it is conceivable they traded), possibly even Tallow could be used. I see the Tiwanaku blocks as a similar product of an engineering mind to the modern interlocking cast building blocks.

2). I am not arguing that Tiwanaku has vitrification on the surface, I am saying that it is an option for the vitrified surfaces in Austrian tunnels and on some stones in Egypt, when you have metals and NaOH to produce electricity and by extention HHO. HHO material ‘polishing’ is an option. In experiments, we have produced glass-like material on CaCO3 and Basalt using HHO-type gasses. We also know that it will even produce glassy-like beads on other materials. I Ieft a part out of the presentation above that I will add to this blog separately, it relates to sound manipulation outside of the potential Windhexe material pulverising process.

3). I agree that the vast majority of material likely came from local sources, this is a time honoured practical approach the world over. We know from the work of Hutchison, Solin and others, that temporary magnetism is produced by the process. Naturally Andesite can contain Magnetite / lodestone. The hardness of Andesite is not an issue, as shown before, the process is able to disrupt Diamond (hardest material and highest melting point elemental material), Boron Nitride (second hardest material and hardest compound), Silicon Carbide, Tungsten (Highest melting point metal had one of the hardest).

https://youtu.be/cUul-6yp8G8

https://remoteview.substack.com/p/matsumoto-in-the-flesh#details

https://remoteview.substack.com/p/practical-applications-of-the-fractal#details

Andesite and basalt contain elements and compounds that researchers in our field have readily observed being consumed or their rigidity compromised. Elements and molecules are often different at grain boundaries and this is, as Identified by Dr. Takaaki Matsumoto in PdD in early 1990s and verified by us in Cu + H in 2023 where the materials fragment first. Indeed, in testing of Ohmasa Gas (HHO) on Tungsten in 2019, the fumes (which were not a vapour of tungsten as assumed by so many before) were caught in a filter and it included fragments of tungsten and transmuted elements - the ‘negative’ of the disrupted tungsten on the surface which had the same transmuted elements.

From 44:14 here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndiA2RutUic

https://youtu.be/SoCwLSLul1k

https://youtu.be/ZCLw27UvILA

https://youtu.be/xucI4GkQa-g

4). The process is scale invariant. We have seen it at work at the sub-micron scale to the multiple cm. It is the same thing as Ball Lightning and this is known to go to the many metres. It is a fractal process and the effect is more intense at the smaller levels (in smaller fractal sub-quanta).

5). It is a shame that people steal others work without credit. You are free to use work from the project or myself with attribution. If you need high res images of our research, including SEMs etc. let me know.

Regarding your consideration of Bohm, you may be interested to look at the very first article on RemoteView.ICU

https://remoteview.substack.com/p/making-coherent-matter-wave-beams

The point of my effort, is not the be right all the time, it is to share ideas and data for consideration. Nature cannot lie, but we can misinterpret its message, time and effort will resolve the mis-match.

If we can make geopolymers based on technology that is simple (say using bellows supplied air through a pipe in a fire) and is an exact match for both the sacred geometry and the most famous symbol of power the world over spanning all of human history - then perhaps the people that revered those symbols and appeared to make geopolymers used it too.

Expand full comment

Dear Bob,

Thanks for your reply. Please don't think I was being critical of your work. Nothing could have been further from the truth. In fact, it is I who should thank you. When I saw one of your videos only three weeks ago, I realised that your work provided the missing piece to the jigsaw that I had been putting together. In return, I'd like to offer some of the insights I've gained from over ten years of studying Tiwanaku. I can't go into specifics here, but it's not just because I don't want it widely publicised before the book comes out. Knowledge about the true age and purpose of the Tiwanaku complex is being deliberately suppressed from the public domain. I know that sounds like a paranoid rant, but let me just say that I was introduced to the magnetic anomalies at the site by two French aerospace engineers back in 2013. There was a reason Tiwanaku was built at over three miles above sea level and it's to do with the plasmasphere, which is the inner part of the Earth's magnetic field; and its geometry is toroidal.

Thanks for your kind offer of high resolution photographs. I'd like to show you some of my pictures of andesite blocks I've taken at Tiwanaku and to explain how I think it might fit with your work. (The 'H' blocks were almost certainly covered in gold, or gold alloy, plate originally).

Like you, I believe the world needs this information right now more than ever, but disinformation can be used strategically to confound our efforts. Hence my reluctance to blurt out everything in a semi-public domain right now.

Expand full comment

For anyone interested, Lynne Kelly has researched into the reason WHY the Easter Island monuments were built, and she has come up with very persuasive conclusions.

https://www.amazon.com/Memory-Code-Secrets-Stonehenge-Monuments/dp/1681773252

I first came into contact with her work on Sean Carroll's Mindscape podcast, if you prefer listening to reading.

https://open.spotify.com/episode/5goOFvldFU6JRPdQYDvrQB?si=6iVJkGFjRLi60yseMNkwyw

Expand full comment

Came across something today. It’s an image and I can’t post it here in the comments. But to describe it. Look at the shapes of the corn on a corn cob. How each is shaped to fit the next. Then look at the stone South American walls. A possible inspiration?

Expand full comment