Hi Simeon, Peter Lindemann’s focus on Gerry Vassilatos’s work is, as they say, spot on - and once more highlights Tesla’s work bringing the Aether - and (Voltage as) Aether Currents to the fore.
Interestingly, in the following, Tom Bearden states (back in 2008) that the Michelson-Morley experiment “disproved” the existence of the Aether, which, of course, it did not, rather it laid the foundations for special relativity (basically, a null result meant the beams moved as if they were not moving in space at all, but rather just relative to the source and targets as if the Earth were not moving or rotating at all). He then went on to describe the omnipresent spacetime as “acting on and being acted on by matter”, and “being capable of being curved, compressed/ expanded and twisted”, and really being better described as space-energy than spacetime something quite remarkable for a non-physical entity. After that he then went on to describe the active vacuum as being basically the same, only seen as a sea of virtual particles / energy. It is quite clear, on other words, that what he described as spacetime or the active vacuum are really just synonyms for the Aether, and that both the non-physical spacetime and the (empty) Vacuum as originally described have long since been abandoned even though there has been an attempt to hide this by redefining the terms spacetime and the vacuum while continuing to use those terms.
On the other hand his observations re. Oliver Heaviside’s simplification of Maxwell’s equations and Lorentz’s regauging are spot on, with Tesla likely referring to these truncated versions of Maxwell’s equations (which did away with the real scalar element leaving just the imaginary vector elements) as being not applicable to his research. In fact, aside from this sleight of hand w.r.t. the Aether and his rather rise-tinted views of Patents? Tom Bearden’s observations are ones I very much agree with.
Anyway, many thanks for the link to Peter Lindemann’s presentation - 2 hours 50 minutes well spent 🙂
Thanks for sharing Gordon. There's a YouTube presentation about Vassilatos and his book, which I'll dig up for you. The link is somewhere on these substack pages. Bob has explained a lot of this over the years and it's interesting to see it from another angle, radiant energy.
I’m thinking of putting together a presentation to present at a small hotel I go to each year on the Lake District (after the owner invited me to do so last year following an enthusiastic and warmly received discussion I was having with a farmer, another guest, up from round Nottingham). Now, I still have a couple of months to produce a presentation and, having recently changed jobs following an extended period searching for a new job (the company I worked for “pivoted” to India but at least I had 9 months to find a new job) . Anyway, to cut a long story short, I would like to include the “sacred geometry slides” and pictures of the ULTR , VEGA, LION and TSG reaction sites and, if possible, the pyramid cut-aways, so I am wondering if I could obtain copies of the above to put in my presentation (happy to pay - if I can afford it!). Please let me know if this is possible.
I’m looking for slides showing the fractal toroid in graphical form from the side and from above (suitably attributed, of course, both to give credit where credit is due AND add weight to the presentation - as an observation of human behaviour, person A presenting work from person B / group C carries far more weight than person A presenting work without attribution, something I have often seen at work (sadly) as one person tries to swipe the work from another as if they had originated it). If I ever get around to doing this presentation, I would first want to pass it to you for fact checking and approval (I want to avoid any obvious gaffes!). Also, as I said, happy to pay for things so long as I can afford it!
Many thanks - and the video showing the CO concentration from an ICE before and after the use of Martin Bendall’s TSG is very interesting. I was wondering whether the CO that was still produced might not be down to a very small percentage of the Oxygen emerging from the ENG torus being captured by the Carbon also emerging from there, with the caveat, of course, that the Carbon is ejected at speed due to being diamagnetic while the Oxygen, being paramagnetic, is released more slowly (possibly even as the toroid either “breathes” or fractures completely. Now, why CO would be favoured over CO2 maybe down to the Oxygen still emerging and being captured at that point rather than in its fully emerged form when it would surely have formed O2 - that, and O is less “magnetic” than O2 by quite a margin (if I remember correctly)
Makes sense - I was also wondering, if O3 (Ozone) is generated, O3 being only very weakly paramagnetic, if that could not also be drawn out and react with the Carbon to get CO + O2 - although the Nitrogen route where the two “Hs” are grabbed from the H2O to leave a free “O” to react with the Carbon does make more sense - or, of course, perhaps both 🤔 Testing for Nitrogen would make a lot of sense. Ozone, of course, is often produced from sparking electrical brushes in motors - maybe toroids are the reason why!
In fact, aren’t Nitrogen and Ozone produced in lightning storms? Just saying.
Great one bob thanks I understand this one thing I can say in othe diamentions or six sense radio mouse to me is lije that I see in my minds eye what’s going on
Yes, exactly. Dinosaurs (and that's being mean to Dinosaurs). No curiosity whatsoever, just "it's not true if I didn't learn about it in high school or college." Bet they'd react the same way if you posted about a new application of superconductivity or quantum computing, for Pete's sake. They're not even ready for Zeldovich in 1958 let alone Dubovik.
And one quick note: Hal Puthoff and colleague have been granted yet another patent (Oct. 2023) for communications using the AB effect since your ESP presentation about it last summer. https://patents.justia.com/inventor/harold-e-puthoff
I've spent several hours reading through these patents. (I happen to be giving a presentation on RV to the Colorado MUFON group in Denver this weekend.) While it's not apparent from the patent names, these are intended to create secure communications for submarines (second part of the recent patent application). Of course. Just like the 38 science papers (DIRDs) written for the AAWSAP program, of which Hal was the science director, sounded pretty dull too. Except they were meant for the US DOD to figure out how much anyone out there already knew about UFO/UAP propulsion systems, as Hal told us at the IRVA/SSE conference in 2018.
If you take a look at the Aharanov-Bohm effect in Wikipedia it explains a lot for us lay people. And there's academic debate about what it means except that EM quantum potentials (electromagnetic four-potential) can be more important than EM classical fields. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aharonov–Bohm_effect
And this is the basis for the Lockheed Martin patent Bob has talked about many times, to create coherent matter wave beams, AKA, Tesla's "death rays" or whatever else you want to use them for such as cloaking or affecting things at a distance without an actual, detectable EM signal or force. That's why they're called "force free" signals including the AF paper (2003) on ball lighting that we've discussed on this channel. It's all fascinating stuff! Cheers.
Of course, these are my pictures taken directly from Google earth while scanning and closing in on the geology of certain areas (in this case one area) of the world with apparent recent geological activity, lava flows etc. There appears to be in this area in Africa recent terraforming caused by, I assume, the EVOs. I can give you some co-ordinate locations if you prefer so you can review directly.
Thank you for taking the time to review, I do appreciate that and I fully understand your comments which has given me some additional perspective and cause for reflection.
I look forward to viewing the next video, the continuing series of which has to be some of the best informative viewing on YouTube at the moment.
I'm still really confused what makes it a (quasi/topological) monopole. Every time I look at the toroidal component of the current it's generating a magnetic dipole, and every time i look at the cross section it's generating a toroidal magnetic loop. does the axial component add a "radial north" field to the already present north-south dipole, supressing the south and extending the north, whilst all the toroidal-magnetic-loop's southyness is confined to the inside of the torus?
As soon as you have poloidal current loops, you have a toroidal moment NOT and electric or magnetic dipole.
When these are fractal, depending on their phase, the E and H fields can cancel at a distance beyond which there is zero E and H and only scalar and vector potentials propagate.
They still have a weak point and that is in the cone area that comes into the phase singularity.
That being said, What I am arguing for the spherical / toroidal cluster arrangement, is that they can have many of these 'weak points' facing outwards, which would imply something more like one would consider a true monopole (though it has volume) instead of the topological monopole.
I think i understand you on both of those so i must be confused about something else. I just dont yet get how something would ever appear with that mushroom shape. I suppose its a property of the toroidal magnetic structure but im having a hard time imagining the current that would be needed to shape this field asymetrically. Im having a hard time visualizing what the structure would look like building up from cooper pairs, but when i try simplifying it i end up with something that should produce a symmetric field. Do you have a specific video in mind that might clear this up? It very clearly behaves like you describe i just cant visualize what that really means for when i try to mental-model what's going on in there.
It might also have to do with me having a hard time visualizing the scalar vs vector waves... scalar, vector, what else was there, torsion? I have a lot to read/watch up on
Im sorry I didnt mean the birdies i meant those UFO shaped renders that you sometimes add to images to visualize the EVOs, with the red tor of tors in the center. All the behavior that could be dipole like is buried within the subtors, cancelling eachother out at the event horizon, and what remains as expressed field is the pseudomonopole? I still dont really get the overexpression of one pole compared to the other, i feel it might have to do with my poor understanding of scalar waves, if they're in some way involved with or responsible for the field. Im gonna see if i can find some videos for that.
I found how where the 2 overlapped displayed the triple overlayed vortex on the artifact to be extremely interesting. How could they know these things with such precision and clarity?
Some more interesting background information that underlines what has been missing for the last 120 years (including the unification of gravity with e-m fields as originally described in the FULL quaternion equations of Maxwell's Unified Field Theory) and why gravity modification is possible!!!
The following PERFECTLY explains Oliver Heaviside's excision (removal) of the scalar e-m wave component from Maxwell's Unified Field Theory quaternions to leave just consideration of the vector components to simplify calculation through vector analysis - and why this mutilation of Maxwell's Field Theory explains the problems Physics is facing today and also why works !!!
It also explains why non-radiating configurations - such as those consisting of a toroidal dipole (represented by a solenoid (in this case a circular electric current generating magnetic oscillating poloidal currents) - and an electric dipole, represented by a pair of opposite "charges", oscillating on the same frequency as the current flows still radiate !!! They radiate scalar aether waves, as the vector components cancel out.
Equivalently, on reception, aether scalar waves hitting atoms cause the lighter electrons of the atoms to move transversely (pushing them to one side, so giving the appearance of light as a wave) while moving the much heavier nucleus in the direction of travel of the scalar wave, but that is another matter.
He also goes a lot into "dimensions", where the 4th and 5th dimensions are curled round the nuclei - these are mathematical dimensions, so should be understood as such, and he also talks about positive and negative "time", where time is the rate of change one way or another, and where "delta t's" in equations can vary - they are not dimensional units", So, time is not a dimension, but a rate of change (one way or another) - hence, there is positive time and negative time - and the two can, of course, sum. In this way, the vector components of positive and negative waves can sum to 0, leaving just the scalar component - the non-radiating configurations that nonetheless pack a mighty (longitudinal) scalar punch - with scalars also being capable of summed together or subtracted.
As to “dimensions” curled in around nuclei, where have we seen such structures before spiralling inward that feed a kernel in the centre? Sort of sounds like another fractal toroid - nuclei as (composite) toroids? - forming the nucleus.
I notice he talks about virtual particles in "spacetime", which he sees as a physical medium, so it's really an aether, albeit with virtual particles that form and break apart "in an instant", so actually also seeing space as being full of particles, albeit transient ones forming from a deeper sea...
So, in effect, he is talking about an aether with particles that can act as a medium and that can also change states in a way described as "forward" or "backward" in time, but not in a time-machine sense... you will never be able to meet a younger or older version of yourself!!!
A quaternion is a complex number of the form w + xi + yj + zk, where w, x, y, z are real numbers and i, j, k are imaginary units that satisfy certain conditions. So, in effect, Oliver Heaviside's excision removed a major REAL component and left us with just the IMAGINARY components so to speak...
Thinking about this last night, the return converging stream "reflected" back to the source along the path of the pilot low-frequency wave from the Phase Conjugation Mirror (which also offers up the possibility to add much extra energy to the return stream or absorb energy from the return stream, with the mirror acting as a pump) is likely to form aether filament streams that wrap around each other and converge ((kind of like a Birkeland Current only at the aether level, or even like strings on a maypole!) to form a single stream: depending on its form, it could also resemble a Marklund Convection (again at the aether level) in cross-section. The important point is that, with negative entropy / delta-T ("time" factor) this single stream would be travelling at supra-light speed, reaching back to the point of origin more-or-less instantaneously as far as the external observer in "normal space" is concerned. In this way, the return stream would not violate that most basic of laws "Action and Reaction / Cause and Effect" so avoiding the "impossible" scenario of the return stream knocking out the object from which the pilot wave emanated in the first place before the pilot wave was emanated! So, the "time travel" is really negative entropy and travelling faster than light rather than reaching a point before the pilot wave set off - and is confined to the stream. As to the added energy, if the phase conjugation is extended to full coherence, what this looks like is an aether-level vortex - a worm hole - along which collapsed matter (or EVOs?) will travel until it reaches the (metallic) object from which the pilot wave came, when it will "open out" - dumping of a lot of energy back into "normal space". Alternatively, when run in reverse, the aether level vortex would pull matter / energy in from the object from which the pilot wave came. So, this "aether stream" is either sourcing energy/matter or dumping energy/matter at it's end point in a way similar to the way the Sothic triangle does from the "sacred geometry" structure - so that the aether stream is a form of open-ended soliton formed with negative entropy / delta T factor. What I find particularly interesting is that this type of stream backtracks along the path of the pilot wave (in an effectively instantaneous fashion), including being able to follow the path at its inflection point as it met the ionosphere coming forward from "over the horizon". The FULL Maxwell's Unified Field Theory really does reveal an amazing, (almost) magical universe
Another idea - Lt. Colonel Thomas Bearden referred to the Russian (?) research from the 1920s that talked about, in addition to the 3 dimensions “x, y and z” there were 2 further dimensions that “curled round”. Now, what else do we know that “curls round”? Vortices, perhaps? And could electricity and magnetism be related in some way (given their propensity to twist and curl)? Could those 2 curl dimensions be inward/outward flowing aether vortices that either tighten into deeper fractal levels and decrease entropy (the negative delta T) or emerge from those deeper levels, loosening the aether , allowing it to reform into the stable matter we are familiar with but increasing entropy in the process (the positive delta T).
The universe then oscillates between increasing entropy (in radiating stars, and their “solar winds” with an increasingly positive delta T the further from the star you travel for example) and decreasing entropy (in black holes and the vortices spiralling in toward them with an increasing negative delta T the closer in to the black hole centre, for example)
Thus, with a Falaco soliton, matter can be “hoovered up” at one end as entropy/degrees of freedom are decreased as the matter is drawn into the wormhole at deeper levels in the aether and expelled at the other end as the matter te-emerges at the cost of increasing entropy/degrees of freedom.
Anyway, just a thought - the two extra dimensions are concerned with “depths/heights” in the fractal structure of the universe, which also relate to degrees of freedom and entropy (or how the aether is packaged), with different levels in the fractal structure to do with stability - or the balance of flows into and out of the level. This tendency to curl would also explain why aether flows like to curve round depending on the speed of flow -and bias when multiple flows converge - between one stable fractal level and another.
https://youtu.be/I92tQpAJfxw?si=lf6U1HZ7uGgdeLzp I'm not sure if you've seen or heard of this gent. Rather stunning experiences of Tesla himself. A forward thinker, who remains open to aspects like the work at MFMP. RIP Mr. Terbo.
Once again, thank you Gordon. The man who got me this far. Col. Tom. This may be my third run through this interview over the decades, and boy, what a difference a couple of years studying with the MFMP can make. My son and I got the Energy from the Vacumm text and have maintained a sense of how tis works. It's exciting to see a probable future, as T. Campbell might say. Limited EM VS EXTENDED (love that usage) EM brings us to where Bob has brought us on his own journey into this truly global/historical (no longer) MYSTERY. Methinks the art, craft, and science of ETHICS, as in a certain META-Ethics may now pertain, given the Kosmic-Centric grasp we seem to be gaining here. Thanks to all for being so generous, patient and supportive as we layman share in the mainstreaming of LENR now current, pun intended. People and natural physics re-integrated is becoming possible. May the smart and the good prevail. Amen.
For those with 1.5 hours to spare the following interview with Lt. Col. Thomas Bearden provides interesting background information
The TRUE story of Nikola Tesla - told by Lt. Col. Thomas Bearden - Free Energy device explained !!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7yJnYCpboGU
Also, on the Aether Force Website (another few hours):
The True Story of Tesla’s Greatest Discovery Radiant Matter by Gerry Vassilatos
https://www.aetherforce.energy/the-true-story-of-teslas-radiant-matter/
Thanks Gordon, been busy few days, hoping to get to do the stuff for you in next few.
Hi Gordon, here's the video I mentioned "Secrets of Cold Electricity" by Peter Lindemann: https://youtu.be/rXX_g49tLeU
Hi Simeon, Peter Lindemann’s focus on Gerry Vassilatos’s work is, as they say, spot on - and once more highlights Tesla’s work bringing the Aether - and (Voltage as) Aether Currents to the fore.
Interestingly, in the following, Tom Bearden states (back in 2008) that the Michelson-Morley experiment “disproved” the existence of the Aether, which, of course, it did not, rather it laid the foundations for special relativity (basically, a null result meant the beams moved as if they were not moving in space at all, but rather just relative to the source and targets as if the Earth were not moving or rotating at all). He then went on to describe the omnipresent spacetime as “acting on and being acted on by matter”, and “being capable of being curved, compressed/ expanded and twisted”, and really being better described as space-energy than spacetime something quite remarkable for a non-physical entity. After that he then went on to describe the active vacuum as being basically the same, only seen as a sea of virtual particles / energy. It is quite clear, on other words, that what he described as spacetime or the active vacuum are really just synonyms for the Aether, and that both the non-physical spacetime and the (empty) Vacuum as originally described have long since been abandoned even though there has been an attempt to hide this by redefining the terms spacetime and the vacuum while continuing to use those terms.
https://youtu.be/FP6oWupODRg?si=igpnvaE9jg444Mma
On the other hand his observations re. Oliver Heaviside’s simplification of Maxwell’s equations and Lorentz’s regauging are spot on, with Tesla likely referring to these truncated versions of Maxwell’s equations (which did away with the real scalar element leaving just the imaginary vector elements) as being not applicable to his research. In fact, aside from this sleight of hand w.r.t. the Aether and his rather rise-tinted views of Patents? Tom Bearden’s observations are ones I very much agree with.
Anyway, many thanks for the link to Peter Lindemann’s presentation - 2 hours 50 minutes well spent 🙂
Thanks for the ideas Gordon, the Aether is alive and well.
Thanks for sharing Gordon. There's a YouTube presentation about Vassilatos and his book, which I'll dig up for you. The link is somewhere on these substack pages. Bob has explained a lot of this over the years and it's interesting to see it from another angle, radiant energy.
This one has stuff I’ve never seen. https://youtu.be/C6nKj-hvbQ0?si=t_b4VRyvkKzqL0kn
Hi Bob,
I’m thinking of putting together a presentation to present at a small hotel I go to each year on the Lake District (after the owner invited me to do so last year following an enthusiastic and warmly received discussion I was having with a farmer, another guest, up from round Nottingham). Now, I still have a couple of months to produce a presentation and, having recently changed jobs following an extended period searching for a new job (the company I worked for “pivoted” to India but at least I had 9 months to find a new job) . Anyway, to cut a long story short, I would like to include the “sacred geometry slides” and pictures of the ULTR , VEGA, LION and TSG reaction sites and, if possible, the pyramid cut-aways, so I am wondering if I could obtain copies of the above to put in my presentation (happy to pay - if I can afford it!). Please let me know if this is possible.
Sure, let me know what you think is missing that is not already public.
Hi Bob,
I’m looking for slides showing the fractal toroid in graphical form from the side and from above (suitably attributed, of course, both to give credit where credit is due AND add weight to the presentation - as an observation of human behaviour, person A presenting work from person B / group C carries far more weight than person A presenting work without attribution, something I have often seen at work (sadly) as one person tries to swipe the work from another as if they had originated it). If I ever get around to doing this presentation, I would first want to pass it to you for fact checking and approval (I want to avoid any obvious gaffes!). Also, as I said, happy to pay for things so long as I can afford it!
Hi Gordon,
I hope to be able to do this for you tomorrow.
Hi Bob,
Many thanks - and the video showing the CO concentration from an ICE before and after the use of Martin Bendall’s TSG is very interesting. I was wondering whether the CO that was still produced might not be down to a very small percentage of the Oxygen emerging from the ENG torus being captured by the Carbon also emerging from there, with the caveat, of course, that the Carbon is ejected at speed due to being diamagnetic while the Oxygen, being paramagnetic, is released more slowly (possibly even as the toroid either “breathes” or fractures completely. Now, why CO would be favoured over CO2 maybe down to the Oxygen still emerging and being captured at that point rather than in its fully emerged form when it would surely have formed O2 - that, and O is less “magnetic” than O2 by quite a margin (if I remember correctly)
Well - there is no H2S also in the TSG Honda 5500, but you can see it in the unmodified generator.
I am considering that Nitrogen may be being synthesised from
p + e- + cold antineutrino + p + 12C > 14N
the two p coming from H2O and this leaves excess Oxygen.
The detectors are not set to observe Nitrogen.
Makes sense - I was also wondering, if O3 (Ozone) is generated, O3 being only very weakly paramagnetic, if that could not also be drawn out and react with the Carbon to get CO + O2 - although the Nitrogen route where the two “Hs” are grabbed from the H2O to leave a free “O” to react with the Carbon does make more sense - or, of course, perhaps both 🤔 Testing for Nitrogen would make a lot of sense. Ozone, of course, is often produced from sparking electrical brushes in motors - maybe toroids are the reason why!
In fact, aren’t Nitrogen and Ozone produced in lightning storms? Just saying.
I am supporting Malcolm in UK at the moment, but will get you the things you need ASAP
Great one bob thanks I understand this one thing I can say in othe diamentions or six sense radio mouse to me is lije that I see in my minds eye what’s going on
Thanks
25 kilohertz is this radio vlf ? Tganks
Is what 25 kHz?
On your video latest one
Is this a premiering video or is it actually live? after 1.5 months i'm very excited to finally join a livestream. I missed the new years call.
It will be live stream.
Bob, you know you're right over the target when you start getting a lot of antiaircraft rounds coming at you:)
Most of them are from self-admitted ignorant people who just enjoy in getting scalps. So sad.
Yes, exactly. Dinosaurs (and that's being mean to Dinosaurs). No curiosity whatsoever, just "it's not true if I didn't learn about it in high school or college." Bet they'd react the same way if you posted about a new application of superconductivity or quantum computing, for Pete's sake. They're not even ready for Zeldovich in 1958 let alone Dubovik.
And one quick note: Hal Puthoff and colleague have been granted yet another patent (Oct. 2023) for communications using the AB effect since your ESP presentation about it last summer. https://patents.justia.com/inventor/harold-e-puthoff
Hi Simeon,
Many thanks for this info.
So, the invention utilises “Scalar waves unaffected by matter in between”. Aether waves, in other words!
Yet, there are still too many that keep talking about waves in non-physical spacetime. How can something non-physical be a wave carrier?
So, will the “aether doesn’t exist” proponents finally accept that actually it does, or is the dinosaur behaviour just too ingrained?
I do hope Hal Puthoff acknowledges the debt we all owe to Nikola Tesla’s work - who worked all this out over 80-100 years ago now.
Hi Gordon,
I've spent several hours reading through these patents. (I happen to be giving a presentation on RV to the Colorado MUFON group in Denver this weekend.) While it's not apparent from the patent names, these are intended to create secure communications for submarines (second part of the recent patent application). Of course. Just like the 38 science papers (DIRDs) written for the AAWSAP program, of which Hal was the science director, sounded pretty dull too. Except they were meant for the US DOD to figure out how much anyone out there already knew about UFO/UAP propulsion systems, as Hal told us at the IRVA/SSE conference in 2018.
If you take a look at the Aharanov-Bohm effect in Wikipedia it explains a lot for us lay people. And there's academic debate about what it means except that EM quantum potentials (electromagnetic four-potential) can be more important than EM classical fields. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aharonov–Bohm_effect
And this is the basis for the Lockheed Martin patent Bob has talked about many times, to create coherent matter wave beams, AKA, Tesla's "death rays" or whatever else you want to use them for such as cloaking or affecting things at a distance without an actual, detectable EM signal or force. That's why they're called "force free" signals including the AF paper (2003) on ball lighting that we've discussed on this channel. It's all fascinating stuff! Cheers.
oooo - please record and share your presentation!
Yes, here it is, "Remote Viewing, PK, and Dark Matter—The Secret Connection (Presentation to CO MUFON w/ RV Practice)": https://youtu.be/EawLhGqmxW4
Of course! Cheers.
Hi Bob, as per your request please see link to 28 pages of EVOS. if it asks for password its Bobevo1
https://1drv.ms/b/s!AnuViAtnBlFsiijGMOH9oTT6iIpe?e=wFVmJF
Thanks - A little context would help assessment.
Of course, these are my pictures taken directly from Google earth while scanning and closing in on the geology of certain areas (in this case one area) of the world with apparent recent geological activity, lava flows etc. There appears to be in this area in Africa recent terraforming caused by, I assume, the EVOs. I can give you some co-ordinate locations if you prefer so you can review directly.
These don't look like EVOs in my view. EVOs have well defined form.
Thank you for taking the time to review, I do appreciate that and I fully understand your comments which has given me some additional perspective and cause for reflection.
I look forward to viewing the next video, the continuing series of which has to be some of the best informative viewing on YouTube at the moment.
keep up the good work.
I'm still really confused what makes it a (quasi/topological) monopole. Every time I look at the toroidal component of the current it's generating a magnetic dipole, and every time i look at the cross section it's generating a toroidal magnetic loop. does the axial component add a "radial north" field to the already present north-south dipole, supressing the south and extending the north, whilst all the toroidal-magnetic-loop's southyness is confined to the inside of the torus?
As soon as you have poloidal current loops, you have a toroidal moment NOT and electric or magnetic dipole.
When these are fractal, depending on their phase, the E and H fields can cancel at a distance beyond which there is zero E and H and only scalar and vector potentials propagate.
They still have a weak point and that is in the cone area that comes into the phase singularity.
That being said, What I am arguing for the spherical / toroidal cluster arrangement, is that they can have many of these 'weak points' facing outwards, which would imply something more like one would consider a true monopole (though it has volume) instead of the topological monopole.
I think i understand you on both of those so i must be confused about something else. I just dont yet get how something would ever appear with that mushroom shape. I suppose its a property of the toroidal magnetic structure but im having a hard time imagining the current that would be needed to shape this field asymetrically. Im having a hard time visualizing what the structure would look like building up from cooper pairs, but when i try simplifying it i end up with something that should produce a symmetric field. Do you have a specific video in mind that might clear this up? It very clearly behaves like you describe i just cant visualize what that really means for when i try to mental-model what's going on in there.
It might also have to do with me having a hard time visualizing the scalar vs vector waves... scalar, vector, what else was there, torsion? I have a lot to read/watch up on
The mushroom shape appears on x-rays during the EXPLOSIVE UNPACKING of the structures.
https://youtu.be/gcF-KSLIAWs
Im sorry I didnt mean the birdies i meant those UFO shaped renders that you sometimes add to images to visualize the EVOs, with the red tor of tors in the center. All the behavior that could be dipole like is buried within the subtors, cancelling eachother out at the event horizon, and what remains as expressed field is the pseudomonopole? I still dont really get the overexpression of one pole compared to the other, i feel it might have to do with my poor understanding of scalar waves, if they're in some way involved with or responsible for the field. Im gonna see if i can find some videos for that.
You should read this
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xWupxVOWvaZIVJWE7pEb5ZKQlnDdNHaM/view?usp=sharing
and this
https://remoteview.substack.com/p/dynamics-of-moving-electron-vortices
And contemplate
I found how where the 2 overlapped displayed the triple overlayed vortex on the artifact to be extremely interesting. How could they know these things with such precision and clarity?
Very much surprised me, and then it didn't
+very keen eye on detail by you!
Some more interesting background information that underlines what has been missing for the last 120 years (including the unification of gravity with e-m fields as originally described in the FULL quaternion equations of Maxwell's Unified Field Theory) and why gravity modification is possible!!!
The following PERFECTLY explains Oliver Heaviside's excision (removal) of the scalar e-m wave component from Maxwell's Unified Field Theory quaternions to leave just consideration of the vector components to simplify calculation through vector analysis - and why this mutilation of Maxwell's Field Theory explains the problems Physics is facing today and also why works !!!
Tom Bearden - PSYCHOTRONICS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-pTERbyEsY
It also explains why non-radiating configurations - such as those consisting of a toroidal dipole (represented by a solenoid (in this case a circular electric current generating magnetic oscillating poloidal currents) - and an electric dipole, represented by a pair of opposite "charges", oscillating on the same frequency as the current flows still radiate !!! They radiate scalar aether waves, as the vector components cancel out.
Equivalently, on reception, aether scalar waves hitting atoms cause the lighter electrons of the atoms to move transversely (pushing them to one side, so giving the appearance of light as a wave) while moving the much heavier nucleus in the direction of travel of the scalar wave, but that is another matter.
He also goes a lot into "dimensions", where the 4th and 5th dimensions are curled round the nuclei - these are mathematical dimensions, so should be understood as such, and he also talks about positive and negative "time", where time is the rate of change one way or another, and where "delta t's" in equations can vary - they are not dimensional units", So, time is not a dimension, but a rate of change (one way or another) - hence, there is positive time and negative time - and the two can, of course, sum. In this way, the vector components of positive and negative waves can sum to 0, leaving just the scalar component - the non-radiating configurations that nonetheless pack a mighty (longitudinal) scalar punch - with scalars also being capable of summed together or subtracted.
As to “dimensions” curled in around nuclei, where have we seen such structures before spiralling inward that feed a kernel in the centre? Sort of sounds like another fractal toroid - nuclei as (composite) toroids? - forming the nucleus.
I notice he talks about virtual particles in "spacetime", which he sees as a physical medium, so it's really an aether, albeit with virtual particles that form and break apart "in an instant", so actually also seeing space as being full of particles, albeit transient ones forming from a deeper sea...
So, in effect, he is talking about an aether with particles that can act as a medium and that can also change states in a way described as "forward" or "backward" in time, but not in a time-machine sense... you will never be able to meet a younger or older version of yourself!!!
A quaternion is a complex number of the form w + xi + yj + zk, where w, x, y, z are real numbers and i, j, k are imaginary units that satisfy certain conditions. So, in effect, Oliver Heaviside's excision removed a major REAL component and left us with just the IMAGINARY components so to speak...
Thinking about this last night, the return converging stream "reflected" back to the source along the path of the pilot low-frequency wave from the Phase Conjugation Mirror (which also offers up the possibility to add much extra energy to the return stream or absorb energy from the return stream, with the mirror acting as a pump) is likely to form aether filament streams that wrap around each other and converge ((kind of like a Birkeland Current only at the aether level, or even like strings on a maypole!) to form a single stream: depending on its form, it could also resemble a Marklund Convection (again at the aether level) in cross-section. The important point is that, with negative entropy / delta-T ("time" factor) this single stream would be travelling at supra-light speed, reaching back to the point of origin more-or-less instantaneously as far as the external observer in "normal space" is concerned. In this way, the return stream would not violate that most basic of laws "Action and Reaction / Cause and Effect" so avoiding the "impossible" scenario of the return stream knocking out the object from which the pilot wave emanated in the first place before the pilot wave was emanated! So, the "time travel" is really negative entropy and travelling faster than light rather than reaching a point before the pilot wave set off - and is confined to the stream. As to the added energy, if the phase conjugation is extended to full coherence, what this looks like is an aether-level vortex - a worm hole - along which collapsed matter (or EVOs?) will travel until it reaches the (metallic) object from which the pilot wave came, when it will "open out" - dumping of a lot of energy back into "normal space". Alternatively, when run in reverse, the aether level vortex would pull matter / energy in from the object from which the pilot wave came. So, this "aether stream" is either sourcing energy/matter or dumping energy/matter at it's end point in a way similar to the way the Sothic triangle does from the "sacred geometry" structure - so that the aether stream is a form of open-ended soliton formed with negative entropy / delta T factor. What I find particularly interesting is that this type of stream backtracks along the path of the pilot wave (in an effectively instantaneous fashion), including being able to follow the path at its inflection point as it met the ionosphere coming forward from "over the horizon". The FULL Maxwell's Unified Field Theory really does reveal an amazing, (almost) magical universe
Hi Gordon, I may have some time today, what exactly do you need from me for your presentation?
I can get the anapole diagrams from:
https://www.reddit.com/r/observingtheanomaly/comments/10vg16y/magnetohydrodynamic_propulsion_nonradiating/
and the Lockheed Martin Patent:
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/03/ce/8b/79a466f75c7f39/US9502202.pdf
and the just-published nature paper
and the running ULTR experiment:
https://youtu.be/1Wac3mywVJs
and VEGA videos - e.g.
https://youtu.be/lvtzxt9Duz4
(I can include these as links to play)
What I am hoping for however are clear slides for
1. Dr. Takaaki Matsumoto's Black Hole Diagram as displayed here:
https://youtu.be/eT2r3IxRgVg?t=4605
2. The Sacred Geometry views:
https://youtu.be/kVo5YdCFZnw?t=1684
https://youtu.be/kVo5YdCFZnw?t=1685
https://youtu.be/kVo5YdCFZnw?t=2056 (flower of life '2' top)
https://youtu.be/kVo5YdCFZnw?t=2299 (flower of life '4' top)
https://youtu.be/kVo5YdCFZnw?t=2430 (flower of life '3' top)
https://youtu.be/kVo5YdCFZnw?t=2643 (flower of life '6' top)
https://youtu.be/kVo5YdCFZnw?t=2674 (flower of life '5' top)
https://youtu.be/kVo5YdCFZnw?t=2743 (flower of life '8' top)
https://youtu.be/_GO_3A8hcwc?t=3910
https://youtu.be/_GO_3A8hcwc?t=8420
(basically, top elevation, front/end elevation showing fractal nature)
3. The Sacred Geometry / Great Pyramid overlays:
https://youtu.be/_GO_3A8hcwc?t=5633
https://youtu.be/_GO_3A8hcwc?t=5658
4. Yin-yang pattern picture:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9NdtG_D9Qk&t=115s
5. Crenelated sphere:
https://youtu.be/qK7W53JN1gc?t=544
6. Fractal Toriod Bagel Structure
https://youtu.be/qK7W53JN1gc?t=1090
7. Interlocking Bagel Structures:
https://youtu.be/qK7W53JN1gc?t=1178
https://youtu.be/qK7W53JN1gc?t=1223 (overlapping sphere)
8. The hand drawn vortex diagram - artist : R. Greenyer :)
9. George Oshawa Cycle
https://youtu.be/fw6lQHVoIhw?t=5141
and
10. a screenshot of the New Zealand calculator based on Dr. Alexander Parkhomov's work (showing URL in the address bar!)
Sorry for the late reply, been a busy day
Another idea - Lt. Colonel Thomas Bearden referred to the Russian (?) research from the 1920s that talked about, in addition to the 3 dimensions “x, y and z” there were 2 further dimensions that “curled round”. Now, what else do we know that “curls round”? Vortices, perhaps? And could electricity and magnetism be related in some way (given their propensity to twist and curl)? Could those 2 curl dimensions be inward/outward flowing aether vortices that either tighten into deeper fractal levels and decrease entropy (the negative delta T) or emerge from those deeper levels, loosening the aether , allowing it to reform into the stable matter we are familiar with but increasing entropy in the process (the positive delta T).
The universe then oscillates between increasing entropy (in radiating stars, and their “solar winds” with an increasingly positive delta T the further from the star you travel for example) and decreasing entropy (in black holes and the vortices spiralling in toward them with an increasing negative delta T the closer in to the black hole centre, for example)
Thus, with a Falaco soliton, matter can be “hoovered up” at one end as entropy/degrees of freedom are decreased as the matter is drawn into the wormhole at deeper levels in the aether and expelled at the other end as the matter te-emerges at the cost of increasing entropy/degrees of freedom.
Anyway, just a thought - the two extra dimensions are concerned with “depths/heights” in the fractal structure of the universe, which also relate to degrees of freedom and entropy (or how the aether is packaged), with different levels in the fractal structure to do with stability - or the balance of flows into and out of the level. This tendency to curl would also explain why aether flows like to curve round depending on the speed of flow -and bias when multiple flows converge - between one stable fractal level and another.
The spiral jet here fits the geometry, hard to tell if it's on the galactic plane or going straight up though: https://imgur.com/a/olcvqhk
Picture is from here: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=382210164507567
For an excellent exploration and demystification of the patents of Nikola Tesla I strongly recommend the following presentation by Peter Lindemann :
https://youtu.be/cmfWGDKVHRE?si=gYZek-xVZbvGTLsx
Not only that, but it also discusses the war Tesla lost - closed versus open systems - a loss we have been paying for ever since.
https://youtu.be/I92tQpAJfxw?si=lf6U1HZ7uGgdeLzp I'm not sure if you've seen or heard of this gent. Rather stunning experiences of Tesla himself. A forward thinker, who remains open to aspects like the work at MFMP. RIP Mr. Terbo.
Once again, thank you Gordon. The man who got me this far. Col. Tom. This may be my third run through this interview over the decades, and boy, what a difference a couple of years studying with the MFMP can make. My son and I got the Energy from the Vacumm text and have maintained a sense of how tis works. It's exciting to see a probable future, as T. Campbell might say. Limited EM VS EXTENDED (love that usage) EM brings us to where Bob has brought us on his own journey into this truly global/historical (no longer) MYSTERY. Methinks the art, craft, and science of ETHICS, as in a certain META-Ethics may now pertain, given the Kosmic-Centric grasp we seem to be gaining here. Thanks to all for being so generous, patient and supportive as we layman share in the mainstreaming of LENR now current, pun intended. People and natural physics re-integrated is becoming possible. May the smart and the good prevail. Amen.
Sellafield again:
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/jan/08/sellafield-nuclear-safety-and-security-director-to-leave?CMP=share_btn_link
Lucky there’s no radioactive waste or Plutonium stored here. Oh, wait…
Still, I’ve no doubt the nuclear waste storage facility currently being in preparation to store waste for hundreds of years will be entirely safe 🤔
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/aug/23/nuclear-storage-plans-for-north-of-england-stir-up-local-opposition