Only 3 times by the original claimant. When Looking For Heat and Alan Goldwater originally tried - we were working on the described protocol that the max temperature was no higher than 850ºC. It later turned out that the thermocouple was off-set and that it was actually around 1050ºC which is above the temperature necessary to synthesise cold neutrinos and the temperature above which we triggered "Signal" in our *GlowStick* 5.2 experiment before Parkhomov had made this understanding public.
In addition, both attempts had changed aspects of the reactor. In Alan Goldwater's apparatus, he replaced the cheap power-supply that had a >20kHz ripple on it with a lab-grade, steady DC supply. This may have been important as the soft-iron bolt, the two layers of tight copper windings may have coupled to the few turns of the Kanthal heater solenoid to produce a high frequency stimulation of the system. Moreover, Alan Goldwater replaced the potentially key Ferro-magnetic bolt with a non-magnetic stainless steel thermo-well. Since then we have established that there were magnetic charges (we know this because of the correlation between the LION paw prints in Cu2O and the work of Urutskoyev, Shishkin et. al. and Bogdanovich) involved that would have aggregated on the iron and been released at its curie point of 770ºC as I have suggested occurs in Yull Browns method of radionuclide remediation where he used Iron chips and aluminium shavings with the radionuclide and Brown Gas.
Our first challenge with subsequent replication is that we never got our set-up back from Aarhus university (or the remaining Russian made PNK-02 nickel powder we had), despite requests, and we now know from a US Freedom of Information request that one of the people that invited me there had been in communication with the US DOE people that were connected all the way back to Pons and Fleischmann and so that whole episode may have been not in our best interests. It does explain why for most of the time I was shipped from person to person to be told that what we were witnessing was impossible and we needed to go and read a textbook to find out how impossible it was.
There is a follower in Germany that has a set up and we have a standing plan to execute a replication when possible - however, Corona got in the way. It is intended and we now have a better idea of the replication parameters that are important.
I think this is a very good Idea. I used to enjoy the formatting options on Steemit, however I chose steemit for two reasons
1. It is locked in the block chain - cannot be edited after 1 week, so this can serve as proof of date.
2. There were no adverts
When the adverts came - I had to find another option. I like substack even though it has less format options for these reasons
1. No adverts
2. You can have public content and privileged content (where you can be even more free-thinking) and you can specify who can comment on blog articles per article. For instance, you can allow only paid subscribers to comment on even individual public articles, though I have not done that yet.
3. You can edit and add say references or other details. In part I am using substack as a public draft for content I may ultimately compile into books.
4. If I feel I need to date stamp things, I will produce a short video and post a link to it to Twitter and Facebook - all three then datestamp the content generation.
5. I never knew the people behind my steemit support - but in Substack, subscribers agree to have newsletters sent to them. With FB and TW and YT the reach is a fraction of the people that subscribe - when I send a letter to a class of substack subscribers, they all get it.
6. I have learned to live on very little, the support I get from subscriptions on substack actually makes a meaningful difference to my life and I thank my subscribers heartily! It helps me to respect my family in the time I use to make content.
I will be transferring my content from Steemit and updating it when I have some time, likely first for the subscribers.
Slightly off subject but what do people make of this footage from China just before an earthquake: https://t.me/auraxchan/35913
There is a strange flash and then a glowing ball of something - that seems to split - skitters from behind the horizon. My initial thoughts were some kind of directed energy weapon that sets off a ball lightning effect - as well as an earthquake.
This does look interesting, however, EVOs are produced in the events that surround earthquakes. I encourage you to read Matsumoto's book where he observed the production of 'Itonic Cluster' effects during Japanese earthquakes.
Has LION been reproduced ?
Only 3 times by the original claimant. When Looking For Heat and Alan Goldwater originally tried - we were working on the described protocol that the max temperature was no higher than 850ºC. It later turned out that the thermocouple was off-set and that it was actually around 1050ºC which is above the temperature necessary to synthesise cold neutrinos and the temperature above which we triggered "Signal" in our *GlowStick* 5.2 experiment before Parkhomov had made this understanding public.
In addition, both attempts had changed aspects of the reactor. In Alan Goldwater's apparatus, he replaced the cheap power-supply that had a >20kHz ripple on it with a lab-grade, steady DC supply. This may have been important as the soft-iron bolt, the two layers of tight copper windings may have coupled to the few turns of the Kanthal heater solenoid to produce a high frequency stimulation of the system. Moreover, Alan Goldwater replaced the potentially key Ferro-magnetic bolt with a non-magnetic stainless steel thermo-well. Since then we have established that there were magnetic charges (we know this because of the correlation between the LION paw prints in Cu2O and the work of Urutskoyev, Shishkin et. al. and Bogdanovich) involved that would have aggregated on the iron and been released at its curie point of 770ºC as I have suggested occurs in Yull Browns method of radionuclide remediation where he used Iron chips and aluminium shavings with the radionuclide and Brown Gas.
Our first challenge with subsequent replication is that we never got our set-up back from Aarhus university (or the remaining Russian made PNK-02 nickel powder we had), despite requests, and we now know from a US Freedom of Information request that one of the people that invited me there had been in communication with the US DOE people that were connected all the way back to Pons and Fleischmann and so that whole episode may have been not in our best interests. It does explain why for most of the time I was shipped from person to person to be told that what we were witnessing was impossible and we needed to go and read a textbook to find out how impossible it was.
There is a follower in Germany that has a set up and we have a standing plan to execute a replication when possible - however, Corona got in the way. It is intended and we now have a better idea of the replication parameters that are important.
Interesting thoughts.
Inspired by Mr G, I am moving my entire blog from Blogger to Substack.
I want a platform where I am the customer, not the product.
Hi Michael,
I think this is a very good Idea. I used to enjoy the formatting options on Steemit, however I chose steemit for two reasons
1. It is locked in the block chain - cannot be edited after 1 week, so this can serve as proof of date.
2. There were no adverts
When the adverts came - I had to find another option. I like substack even though it has less format options for these reasons
1. No adverts
2. You can have public content and privileged content (where you can be even more free-thinking) and you can specify who can comment on blog articles per article. For instance, you can allow only paid subscribers to comment on even individual public articles, though I have not done that yet.
3. You can edit and add say references or other details. In part I am using substack as a public draft for content I may ultimately compile into books.
4. If I feel I need to date stamp things, I will produce a short video and post a link to it to Twitter and Facebook - all three then datestamp the content generation.
5. I never knew the people behind my steemit support - but in Substack, subscribers agree to have newsletters sent to them. With FB and TW and YT the reach is a fraction of the people that subscribe - when I send a letter to a class of substack subscribers, they all get it.
6. I have learned to live on very little, the support I get from subscriptions on substack actually makes a meaningful difference to my life and I thank my subscribers heartily! It helps me to respect my family in the time I use to make content.
I will be transferring my content from Steemit and updating it when I have some time, likely first for the subscribers.
Who is the DOE guy?
Slightly off subject but what do people make of this footage from China just before an earthquake: https://t.me/auraxchan/35913
There is a strange flash and then a glowing ball of something - that seems to split - skitters from behind the horizon. My initial thoughts were some kind of directed energy weapon that sets off a ball lightning effect - as well as an earthquake.
This does look interesting, however, EVOs are produced in the events that surround earthquakes. I encourage you to read Matsumoto's book where he observed the production of 'Itonic Cluster' effects during Japanese earthquakes.
https://remoteview.substack.com/p/matsumoto-collected-papers-1989-1999
You can download the latest version and search for "Earthquakes" as we have made the document searchable.
Interesting.