I can only interpret these new links as the following:
- Matsumoto had the SAFIRE reactor’s core idea already figured out 25 years ago.
- All Plasma arcs have some of these reactions as potential results.
- We have much yet to learn, but first than anything, come to terms that completely unacknowledged and unpredicted / unexpected reactions can happen in plasmas, therefore our current understanding is sorrily incomplete,
You have to start with Winston Bostick, he was funded from 1949 along with I think a number of national labs, to make the H-Bomb into a practical domestic fusion power generation technology. Is path was 'plasmoids' which he organised by passing them over MAGNETS.
The purpose was FUSION.
There is no guess work. It has to have been known that self organised 'plasma' could manipulate nuclei.
Matsumoto refers to Bostick and Nardi's work in his 2001 letter to Fusion Technology saying that 'if they had looked at their ring products, they would have seen Carbon' - He was, in my opinion, pointing out what must have been obvious to Bostick and Nardi, but never disclosed. Matsumoto said it does not matter what you put in, heavy or light nuclei, you nearly always get carbon.
That is a wonderful set of videos, however, I would have to see it up close and then think about it.
However, on the specific time frame you give, there are two of the tel-tale 'triangles' which I have seen (and published) in the LION quartz liner and Hutchison steel sample. I mentioned that I felt these triangles were very important as a witness mark of the process in my 2018 Sochi presentation.
I will take about these in a different blog/live stream. They have a particular aspect and, from memory, it is similar to that observed in Egyptian Hieroglyphs...
... ok, I just went to check my facts, and my god, you literally could not make this up!
Firstly, I made this image to illustrate what I was trying to say.
Then I thought, I should give credit to the source, so I went and tracked down the source.
At the bottom of the page, it said this.
"The Sothic Triangle, forming the ancient hieroglyph for Sirius (Sothis) was constructed by using a cord 22 units long, with markers at 9 and 13 units from the start. Then, with the cord pulled taut at these markers, and the end meeting the beginning, the triangle denoting sothis was formed as the drawing shows; the base being 4 units wide and each sloping side 9 units from a corner of the base to the vertex, in 4-to-9 proportion (see for example the inscriptions at Abydos)...
...The Sothic triangle is GENERALLY ADJACENT TO AN ANKH as seen below:
A sonic device shaped like THE ANKH, according to an unpublished Seth session, WAS USED BY ANCIENT PEOPLE TO SOFTEN STONE so that it could be carved easily. I would imagine that softened stone would be easier to extract the m-state from.
The 4/9 ratio is the reverse of the 5/9 ratio of the weight that Hudson claims remains when metal is converted to m-state. 4/9 would be the portion which is no longer physically measurable.
These last two observations may not have any scientific validity; they may be just coincidence."
- Hi Bob, well, I googled the Matsumoto reference #77, which looks like a particularly useful one: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/829469/metrics#metrics
- but it is paywalled.
Thanks Phillip, one step closer.
https://zero.sci-hub.se/3329/8c5a1af870bb47a1cc367d29ebad904e/electronuclear-reactions-in-micro-ball-lighting.pdf#metrics
It’s just the abstract, but you can always hope that sci-hub has it (donate some money to them whenever you can afford it).
All being well guys, we will have it next week. I will work to get permission from the Author
Still not arrived yet - but hoping.
You mention how in a lightning strike, there's an evo travelling first and then it connects and discharges through.
I found a great video showing this event in slow motion. https://youtu.be/qQKhIK4pvYo?t=300
To me, it looks exactly like a mould looking for food, then finding it and strengthening the shortest path for maximal efficiency.
Here's an example of a mould in timelapse. https://youtu.be/GY_uMH8Xpy0?t=28
So amazing how those structures behave the same despite being in the opposite sides of the speed spectrum.
https://youtu.be/GY_uMH8Xpy0?t=87 <- Some sense of the timescale, a snail passes by.
Saku - yes, this is a brilliant video of the EVO leader. The comparison with the slime mould is very nice too.
I can only interpret these new links as the following:
- Matsumoto had the SAFIRE reactor’s core idea already figured out 25 years ago.
- All Plasma arcs have some of these reactions as potential results.
- We have much yet to learn, but first than anything, come to terms that completely unacknowledged and unpredicted / unexpected reactions can happen in plasmas, therefore our current understanding is sorrily incomplete,
To put it mildly.
You have to start with Winston Bostick, he was funded from 1949 along with I think a number of national labs, to make the H-Bomb into a practical domestic fusion power generation technology. Is path was 'plasmoids' which he organised by passing them over MAGNETS.
The purpose was FUSION.
There is no guess work. It has to have been known that self organised 'plasma' could manipulate nuclei.
Matsumoto refers to Bostick and Nardi's work in his 2001 letter to Fusion Technology saying that 'if they had looked at their ring products, they would have seen Carbon' - He was, in my opinion, pointing out what must have been obvious to Bostick and Nardi, but never disclosed. Matsumoto said it does not matter what you put in, heavy or light nuclei, you nearly always get carbon.
Bob, at 1:01:00 you talk about how that type of a surface formation is the sign of this technology.
What do you make of the pattern of holes on this megalithic stone in megalithic Sacsayhuaman? https://youtu.be/BrrQtmBDlUU?t=2541
That is a wonderful set of videos, however, I would have to see it up close and then think about it.
However, on the specific time frame you give, there are two of the tel-tale 'triangles' which I have seen (and published) in the LION quartz liner and Hutchison steel sample. I mentioned that I felt these triangles were very important as a witness mark of the process in my 2018 Sochi presentation.
I will take about these in a different blog/live stream. They have a particular aspect and, from memory, it is similar to that observed in Egyptian Hieroglyphs...
... ok, I just went to check my facts, and my god, you literally could not make this up!
Firstly, I made this image to illustrate what I was trying to say.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Ha4__e_wKvzJTQBPvQT0UN8hFTgWJbX6/view?usp=sharing
Then I thought, I should give credit to the source, so I went and tracked down the source.
At the bottom of the page, it said this.
"The Sothic Triangle, forming the ancient hieroglyph for Sirius (Sothis) was constructed by using a cord 22 units long, with markers at 9 and 13 units from the start. Then, with the cord pulled taut at these markers, and the end meeting the beginning, the triangle denoting sothis was formed as the drawing shows; the base being 4 units wide and each sloping side 9 units from a corner of the base to the vertex, in 4-to-9 proportion (see for example the inscriptions at Abydos)...
...The Sothic triangle is GENERALLY ADJACENT TO AN ANKH as seen below:
A sonic device shaped like THE ANKH, according to an unpublished Seth session, WAS USED BY ANCIENT PEOPLE TO SOFTEN STONE so that it could be carved easily. I would imagine that softened stone would be easier to extract the m-state from.
The 4/9 ratio is the reverse of the 5/9 ratio of the weight that Hudson claims remains when metal is converted to m-state. 4/9 would be the portion which is no longer physically measurable.
These last two observations may not have any scientific validity; they may be just coincidence."
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/shewbread.htm