17 Comments

Rube Goldberg

Expand full comment

That's the fella!

Expand full comment

Another great video, I set an alert on youtube and still missed it.

So, a comment and a question here. Nasa may still be stuck showing a public face of, yes we can do it, but in the hardest way possible; like mining H3 from the moon for fusion. Are you giving any thought how to make the paradigm shift to a post scarcity society? I've listened to futurist try to talk about life after, but getting there always is left out.

Expand full comment

Well this tech does not play well with semiconductors. There are a number of hurdles to overcome. It would replace much of construction, but forget the builders using cell phones. A very different approach is needed.

It will still be easier to mine important heavy elements as this is better for making anything into the elements for life. The ability to get all the elements we need from asteroids and moons in our solar system is very interesting.

Expand full comment

Oh was that a thinly veiled red mercury reference?

Expand full comment

no

Expand full comment

Okay, this may be indicative of nothing but just going to put it out there anyway. I was reading https://www.geopolymer.org/archaeology/tiahuanaco-monuments-tiwanaku-pumapunku-bolivia/ and there is mention of the effects of carboxylic acids on the stones. In the 1970s kansas UFO case there were traces of hydrophobic carboxylic acid left in a ring. There may be some merit to examining the effects of carboxylic acids on crystal grain boundaries.

Expand full comment

Geopolymer Institute conducted chemical composition analysis (EDS) of Puma Punku stone which can be found here: https://youtu.be/ULpenmcHORA?t=989 Presentation also includes some SEM images. Binder supposedly a "thick fluidal red ferro-sialate matrix".

Expand full comment

Sorry that was the Spanish version. English found here: https://youtu.be/rf9qK9QTlq0?t=970

Expand full comment

This is interesting, as I have said before, Na is a single isotope 23Na, and so it maybe easier to influence this material by focussing on that atom resonance.

Expand full comment

Wouldn't there be naturally occurring EVOs aiding in the process, from the plan and animal matter, even the sunshine; even before a mechanism?

Expand full comment

Yes, I tried to make a point along those lines - but Parkhomov showed that whilst they can penetrate dense matter, they are reflected too. So having the magnetic particles exposed to the sun in a dry climate may enhance the loading.

Expand full comment

I think I have seen this before, but you have to take into account that Any analysis that is done without considering the existence of a completely unacknowledged technology that can explain many features at once, will be flawed. The scoop marks and perfect fitting of polygonal stones requires tremendous work within a classical paradigm, but can be achieved easily within a EVO based technological paradigm in which matter can be handled at will.

Expand full comment

At 20:40 ish,

https://youtu.be/rf9qK9QTlq0?t=1243

he hypothesises that the crystallisation could have happened over the 1400 years of burial - however, we know from Hutchison samples and from Ohmasa Gas samples that you can get instantaneous crystallisation - this is also noted in the Solin patent.

Expand full comment

He goes on to say that you get other crystallisation

Look at this close up of the Hutchison "coral twist" sample.

https://youtu.be/YhNl7_6HSI8

Expand full comment

The arguments he makes overall are very good. That being said.

From around 37:26

https://youtu.be/rf9qK9QTlq0?t=2246

He claims that the observation of carbon rich material is evidence of organic material, however, we know that EVOs reduce almost anything to Carbon, in one EVO flux loop, we found glassy crystals rich in carbon,

https://youtu.be/At2hUvA_-cI?t=891

There are two elements that are not in any of the materials at that point in the LION reactor.

C - Carbon (Tri Alpha)

Ca - Calcium (Dec Alpha)

In both his analysis and ours, we found C, Ca and O. These are the elements he highlighted.

O - Oxygen (Quad Alpha) is in the rest of the materials in both cases.

So in the case of the EVO theory, we have proven instant crystallisation in multiple experiments to glassy homogenous phases (no need to postulate that it may have happened over 1400 years), Ohmasa Gas + PTFE/Ti, and LION reactor, the latter is more important as there os no C or Ca at that point. We have another experiment that produced glassy C, N, O amorphous material - it was in the Ohmasa Gas + 10Yen coin. There are other examples.

Expand full comment

In the video, from 33:52, he reports that there are 'holes' and makes a big thing of it. If you look at the previous blog here:

https://remoteview.substack.com/p/does-this-explain-geo-polymer-casting-927

You can see in the study of andesites, the black areas are marked as 'vesicles' these are holes!

https://sites.wustl.edu/meteoritesite/items/vesicles-in-meteorites/

Moreover, EVO induced effects in Hutchison's and Matsumoto's samples resulted in holes forming in the centre of samples.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz7lTfqkED9WcW9ZNk54UFBfZFE/view?usp=sharing

In this paper by Matsumoto, the holes formed in the metal have new elements synthesised in them.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JpYYsB-kZ-P1sns4eo0udK1F3hmuTxE4/view?usp=sharing

Expand full comment