7 Comments

Another bot on today's video. 'Lib Kristin' left a sketchy URL and the insightful one-word comment: 'neat' (lol). Looks like another phishing attempt. I'm noticing this crop up on a couple of YT channels of folks in this network.

Expand full comment

Actually, YT are pretty good at culling these - I can see on my side - many more that don't get through - thanks for alerting me though.

Expand full comment

I think we have to seize the momentum gathered, I am notorious for working better under pressure, so will keep going just now, so I was meaning to ask but refrained in honor of time and was going to offer alternatives, but as an opportunity opens, I will ask: do we want the references in any particular academic literature format? I was going to go by the classic in alphabetical order and standard citation format with a separate section for documents with an available source, is that Ok or we need something different?

Expand full comment

I think it should ideally be in academic format

Sci-hub.se prevents it's papers like this

Lam, C. S., & Lo, S. Y. (1984). Mechanism for Charge Bunching of Bosons in High-Energy Collisions. Physical Review Letters, 52(14), 1184–1187. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.52.1184

url to share this paper:

sci-hub.se/10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.1184

Expand full comment

Ok, will follow this model and if not available at sci-hub will link any other source if possible.

Expand full comment

By “an available source” I meant a link to the complete document when possible.

Expand full comment

Perfect

Expand full comment