Remote View

Share this post

Fixing Fukushima - 09 - Writing a shorter letter

remoteview.substack.com

Discover more from Remote View

Looking back to the future through insight and critical fiction
Continue reading
Sign in

Fixing Fukushima - 09 - Writing a shorter letter

New equivalent call starting Oct 1st 2021

Bob Greenyer
Sep 29, 2021
4
Share this post

Fixing Fukushima - 09 - Writing a shorter letter

remoteview.substack.com
7
Share

From the below link…

Technology to Separate Tritium from Water Treated with Multi-Nuclide Removal Equipment (ALPS)

It says:

In this project, an open request is planned to be issued every quarter from October 2021.

  • As of May 2021, the existence of a technology to separate tritium from water treated with multi-nuclide removal equipment (ALPS) (hereinafter, “ALPS treated water, etc.) at Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, Inc., (hereinafter, “TEPCO”) Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station.

  • In response to the government's basic policy of the handling of ALPS treated water, etc., TEPCO announced the measures regarding ALPS treated water, etc. in April 2021 as follows:

  • TEPCO will proceed with the preparation for establishing the necessary facilities, etc. aiming for starting discharge of ALPS treated water into the sea in around two years' time.

  • Large amounts of the water will not be discharged at once and the time required for decommissioning will be used effectively.

  • In the meantime, TEPCO will continue to keep a close eye on new developments in the technology to separate tritium from water.

  • A new scheme will be considered involving third parties on implementing a wide range of surveys and accepting proposals for new developments in the tritium separation technology.

  • If any realistically practical technology to separate tritium from ALPS treated water, etc. is identified, TEPCO will vigorously proceed with the verification and adoption.

Here is the main public facing site on the decommissioning.

Here is the RFP

Note, previous RFP responses from November 2013 included ‘nuclear transmutation’ proposals including those claiming to leverage ‘Electromagnetic wave, Cold fusion, HHO gas, Brown gas’.

So OUR solution needs to be watertight and worth pursuing because the argument is clear and WELL SUPPORTED by data and prior publications / observations.

4
Share this post

Fixing Fukushima - 09 - Writing a shorter letter

remoteview.substack.com
7
Share
7 Comments
Share this discussion

Fixing Fukushima - 09 - Writing a shorter letter

remoteview.substack.com
Arkmode
Sep 29, 2021Liked by Bob Greenyer

Another bot on today's video. 'Lib Kristin' left a sketchy URL and the insightful one-word comment: 'neat' (lol). Looks like another phishing attempt. I'm noticing this crop up on a couple of YT channels of folks in this network.

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
1 reply by Bob Greenyer
Curbina
Sep 29, 2021

I think we have to seize the momentum gathered, I am notorious for working better under pressure, so will keep going just now, so I was meaning to ask but refrained in honor of time and was going to offer alternatives, but as an opportunity opens, I will ask: do we want the references in any particular academic literature format? I was going to go by the classic in alphabetical order and standard citation format with a separate section for documents with an available source, is that Ok or we need something different?

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
4 replies by Bob Greenyer and others
5 more comments...
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Robert William Greenyer B.Eng. (Hons.)
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing