21 Comments

Great news. The model is clear, it’s fit with observations clearly demonstrable, and it’s fit with ancient symbols is, to use mystery history’s favourite turn of phrase, very compelling.

Further, the ULTR experiment is easy to replicate and perform, producing elements in distributions that would be very hard (actually, impossible) to explain any other way, while Henk Jurren’s VEGA system clearly demonstrates a mechanism that generates EVOS that are actually observed as micro-ball lightning. Add to this the fastidiously and comprehensively documented experiments of Dr. Takaaki Matsumoto, the experimental work of John Hutchison, the over unity of the hydrosonic pump (that nearly cost Mark LeClaire his life) and the very extensive research of the Russian scientific community into MTECs (FTMs) and inventions therefrom and it is clear that not only do FTMs exist everywhere in nature at every level but that they also can deliver many, many benefits via a set of tools and enhanced capabilities to either partially or fully address the existential issues now facing humanity.

And with Bob’s inimitable presentation style and encyclopaedic knowledge on the subject, I, for one, feel confident that this presentation will “shift the dial” toward a more favourable consideration of FTMs, EVOs, ElectroNuclear Collapse and reGeneration and the many other constructs and observations across an ever greater cross-section of the world wide scientific (on the true sense of the word) research community.

Expand full comment
Jul 28Liked by Bob Greenyer

Of course, there will be resistance from those invested in other approaches, to which it must be said many of these approaches can easily be reframed and explained in FTM terms without throwing out the baby with the bath water

Expand full comment
author

Exactly.

In my ULTR presentation a few years back, I mentioned how FTMs are planned for data storage and have discussed a paper that shows there are TMs in perovskite.

Well, here is a paper that discusses vortexes in perovskite being responsible for its solar photon to electron capabilities (and also mentions the potential use in data storage).

https://tacc.utexas.edu/news/latest-news/2024/06/25/surprising-vortex-behind-new-solar-cell-and-lighting-materials/

Expand full comment

Oh, and like from me (it’s this iPhone bug again that means I hit the like button on comments and … nothing happens. Ah, well, onward and upward as they say 🙂

Expand full comment

“Lumps of charge”, “quasi particles of electrons and atoms” - sounds like EVOs and/or EVO carcasses to me 🙂

Expand full comment

Well said my friend. "Shift the dial" or as I like to say, just One Click more TOWARD PEACE. Just One Click. The Controllers will not, it seems, allow ONE IOTA of Solutions Toward Peace. The self-contradictions. Imagine, we are trying to solve problems, and only chosen problems THAT DO NOT MATTER are allowed to market, like new nappies, or a better dog waterer. This "water-treading" can't prevent a paddling onward....Seeing around the bend of History and into the fog of the Future is what Indigo Adults are stuck with. Welcome.

Expand full comment

This is just one of the many reasons I like you Corky!

You are always on point

These reactions are denied and those who attempt to bring them to the forefront are demonized or simply removed

Fleschmann Pond’s and John Hutchison are prime examples

Expand full comment
Jul 31·edited Jul 31

I've just finished watching a YT presentation covering the Essential Nikola Tesla Lecture from 1891 by Master Ivo and feel I need to include here a RECOMMENDATION OF THE HIGHEST ORDER to watch said presentation. Part 2, in particular, drives home in a very visual way the importance of true poloidal fields as opposed to fields that wind round a torus in a helical structure and the critical role of contracting or expanding ELECTROSTATIC (as opposed to electromagnetic) fields in the generation of scalar "radiant" energy.

The first part (from time t=0 to time t=1517) covers the transcript from the 1891 lecture:

https://youtu.be/J_da1nvla7Q?t=0

The second part (from time t=1518 to time t=2499) provides the clearest VISUAL explanation of static electric fields (relevant to both Tesla's work and the FTM), and the difference between Transverse ElectroMagnetic (TEM) effects and Longitudinal Magneto Dielectric (LMD) Resonance effects (the latter being directly relevant to the formation of Fractal Toroids using a VR 3D Whiteboard. As they say, a picture paints a thousand words - or, in this case, 10,000 words!

https://youtu.be/J_da1nvla7Q?t=1518

The final part covers an experiment showing an LMD setup.

https://youtu.be/J_da1nvla7Q?t=2500

Expand full comment

1891 a magical year fo Tesla amount many duplication is possable threw materielsifvthe time finding materials is had but not impossable see dr koonzt observation building again the disruptive discharge transformer https://youtu.be/OL88SuyERTw?si=nwmSEotNqBcdOgND thanks

Expand full comment

Although I am in no way qualified to correct your comment, seeing as I lack any base knowledge in this field. However I do feel I am more than qualified to point out that the time 2499 just does not exist. I am fairly sure you mean 24:59 minutes into the video.

Expand full comment

2499 seconds, I believe - like 2500 - it’s how YouTube offsets from the start of a video

Expand full comment

Oh, really? That's the first I've heard. I have always been living in the "minute has 60 seconds" world, but what do I know, Nothing about how YouTube controls their world, that's for sure. Thanks you for taking the time to correct me.

Expand full comment

So Bob, if this is correct we should see very small evos on Radar tubes from the transmitter to the feed horn. Lots of old radar parts around to test that too.

Expand full comment

Hi rebuilding teslas disruptive discharge tranformer 1891 does anybody got old wire from that time it was available in Vancouver as I built one years ago stolen by canadas enviomentsl gruop while I was in Germany the cystaline structures of the time where differant in wire and msterielal then and dislecteices I could find some old junk on eBay see bearden s article on electron gas and dr koonzt on the topics thanks unless I visit the scrap yard in Petaluma hmmmm I can ask my duplicate friend bak east he is like a brother does the same things I do I got pictures of what I built beorefrom los alamos anyway to upload it ?

Expand full comment

Why do I never hear even a whisper of this science in Main Stream Media? Is it simply because they can't appreciate it? Why don't I hear scientists themselves talking about this? And finally, are these sort of physical reactions not accepted by current scientists? If so, why?

Expand full comment

Hey Daryl, The reason I return here since 2017 or so is because MFMP has always grounded a significant part of the research and lung power to ACTUAL LENR EXPERIMENTAL OUTCOMES BY REAL LIVE SCIENTISTS. Simeon Heins compiled an excellent timeline of them. But part of that is MFMP has diligently compiled all Governmental interest in this field, from white papers, to patents to cover-ups. I trust the US Navy has this form of engineering built into subs., Stealth tech as well uses charge to allow lift when air is scarce. Charles Buhler at Exodus industries is a NASA engineer in electro-statics bringing this to market. Ken Wheeler on YT also helpful on this topic. But the other reason among others is Bob can easily fold many HISTORICAL THREADS that allow a glimpse into engineering of the past (Great Pyramid is merely the tip.) I'll stop there, but for me this is not only the only engineering I want to understand, it's the only topic I want to understand. We are made from this and I am a Taoist. So it lines up when in the School of Complete Reality. But I found your questions compelling to me to craft some answers from my Joe Layman perspective. Cheers.

Expand full comment

Please study my friend dr koonzt https://youtu.be/OL88SuyERTw?si=nwmSEotNqBcdOgND

Egards teslas work heers john

Expand full comment

This is a major source of great scientific information thank you Bob ! Loved this cheers john

Expand full comment

2499 seconds, I believe - like 2500 - it’s how YouTube offsets from the start of a video

Expand full comment