Electromagnetic fields of current structures
N.E. NEVESSKY
Below you will find a draft translation and equation reconstruction of N.E. Nevessky’s 1993 mathematical proof for the viability of an electro-magnetic (EM) ‘phantom’ / invisible ball lightning, as discussed in and article written by V.E. Zhvirblis called “The Bagel Game” which essentially describes a fractal EM structure equivalent to the one derived by myself from study of a John Hutchison sample as the basic form of an EVO, and fundamental structure in nature and cause of many novel energy technologies and other effects and observations in history.
Please refer to the original russian document and confirm equation accuracy and report any inconsistencies so that the English version can be made whole. Version 2.0 has 7 corrections to equation transcriptions.
You can download a high-quality printable English pdf (V2.0) from here.
Original Russian document can be downloaded here.
Hey Bob, This is fantastic. I think you've atoned for your sin of saying in every video "I don't really like to confuse people with formulas an mathematics and prefer to explain things such that any 5 year old could understand). Very good attention to detail you saw dots that were a single pixel in size ;)
Since you specifically asked I checked the formulas and I found afew differences.
I'm shocked you did as well as you did. My eyes are burning just from just comparing them for 20 minutes. This very much reminds me of some of Meyl's work in his vortex books where he discusses the symmetry for magnetic and electric fields that is missing due to the absence of scalar fields and does full derivations. This seems to be able to comfortable explain the effects without needing to make any fundamental adjustments though. I'm intrigued to see where this all goes. (As in are there "errors in the equations" as Ben said, and I felt Meyl presented a good argument for. Or can we muddle on with our existing formulas :)
eq 3) for Hd it ends with "e(phi)(0)" and you typed "e(theta)(0)"
between equations 5 and 6) it should read "(r0-r)/c" and you typed "(t*r0/c)/c"
eq 6) (same as equation 3) for Ak it ends with "e(phi)(0)" and you typed "e(theta)(0)"
eq 10) the denominator in the last term is "c^2r0" and you typed "c^2r"
eq 11) for ET the last term has an I with three dots above it, you typed 2
(now make a video explaining what this all means :D I know it's coming so I probably needn't ask).
This is supposedly the model of physical reality they were working with in the Philadelphia Experiment and Montauk time experiments https://youtu.be/rMir5NTkI80?t=1526 (a clear view of the Torus of Time slide: https://imgur.com/a/JZjZjnI ). They were using spinor electrodynamics, mentioned in this Nevessky paper (@17:06 in the video), since the model describes the 5th dimension as a spinor. The center of the torus is "zero time" (which could also be considered scalar or complex space), which is apparently how you can jump to other universes.