Demonstration by Andrea Rossi and reports by Giuseppe Levi
The light spread of the SKLED and the control LED were very different. I think it would have been better to have a mirrored tube that covered both sources with a diffusor at the end and put the light meter at the end of that.
One also needs to know the spectrum of both lights, it may be that one outputs photons that the light meter is more sensitive to.
Both of these things should have been done IMHO.
If I had not been disappointed before with Rossi (at the point of have a certain PTSD about how much he has disappointed in the past) I would be furious. Now I am mildly sad for the people that fell for it.
If this was supposed to be a sales demonstration, Rossi would do well to study Steve Jobs' presentations of the new iPhone in 2007 and 2008. Few thought Apple could pull it off, competing with all the big wireless services' branded phones, but they did. With all the new evidence presented on this blog and MFMP Youtube, Rossi should have been able to hit a home run and convince us that the future had indeed arrived today.
He lost me at "AI"...
Off topic, but this did remind me of Leedskalnin stating that we measure current wrongly. If Leedskalnin's theory was correct then we'll never get an accurate account of what's actually happening in these experiments (at least using the tools "currently" available).
Either an independent lab does the testing or everything continues to be fake vaporware
I found an EXpensive xenon lamp on Amazon.com search "OSRAM XBO 75W /2, Xenon Short-Arc Discharge Lamp", it has the pointed tip cathode. The cheaper automotive ones, are probably a better choice, with their suboptimal tip geometry. Anyway, Bob encouraged me to post my comments on removeView, but it looks like I can only comment on existing posts. So for Bob, or anyone, here's some oddball questions:
A) when an EVO in water makes HHO, and the water molecules organize around it, does that water cluster have less gravity and will it rise up to the water surface?
B) An EVO can be made along a needle pointed cathode, or the inverse, the inner surface of a hollow cone with a hole at the end. In ancient symbols, a 'pinch point' is like the space between 2 circles side-by-side, almost touching, and it apparently has etheric access. I imagine it in 3D like 2 trumpet bells attached to each other, flaring in opposite directions. My question, I wonder if an EVO was formed from the contracting half of a trumpet bell, would it naturally expand and disapate in the expanding half.
C) I would like an explanation about words like 'cold neutrino' and 'relic neutrino'. I'll explain why after I become familiar with your understanding of these words. In symbolism, rings of energy give etheric access, the ether being depicted as a container of energy or a sea of energy.
D) Bob, I phoned that company Applied Quantum Materials, and spoke to David Antoniuk, CEO, and directed him to your most reccent video. He said they have a polymer that can hold their nano-crystal phosphors onto glass, and they have materials that can work in UV range, and they also have one project underway in the x-ray range. The melting point of their polymer might be a limiting factor. I hope he bypasses me and contacts you directly, after becoming familiar with this project, but if days pass, a follow-up call by you, (or anyone knowledgable) might be fruitful.
Hey Bob, what's the story behind the name 'Remote View'? Does it have something to do with the psychic phenomenon called remote viewing?
Why does he call it an LED if the light is coming from a plasma?