- Live Q&A, Sunday 26 Feb 2023 @ 21:00 CET -
The bubbler is not simple. The mixture changes over time so I have to add petrol to keep the engine running. (to start the GEET process what was not started yet) I wonder how to create emulsions of heavier fuels. The aim is creating long running systems. I start to realize that a new type of carburetor is needed to control the fuel/mixture input.
My 2 cents:
With the GEET many advantages could be achieved, and I suggest some caution and planning is exercised. It will be fabulous to use oil spills, as fuels, gaining both inexpensive energy and removing the refuse, but I think is is wise to partition the tasks ahead.
First, the issue of getting the GEET to run like the proverbial clock. In getting it to run well, start when you want it to, regulate the power output, etc, I suggest that ordinary fuels of one kind are used (plus water), such as regular petrol, diesel or kerosene. If it can be made to run well from from one set of fuel, and produces more energy than is added, then we have an over unity device. If it is considerably more efficient than the normal ICE (power output over 35% of energy in fuel used perhaps), then this is also a very significant also.
Then, turn to the issue of the fuel burned. From sampling the gases that are produced at various points in the GEET, we will probably find out what the machine thrives on, and can get pointer to how the fuel should be composed. Many techniques for making the fuel ‘digestible’ have already surfaced, first of the all the Bubbler - ingenious device, but probably needs adaptation depending on the diet. Other suggestions are detergents. We should probably add pumps, high pressure, water mist, ultrasound and heating of the fuel to the fuel preparations.
But above all, don’t try to do all at once, because that testing space is way way too large.
This is the exact thing we needed right now
I updated the target Re to 20k based on Dan's comments, also an explainer page on how to use the plot. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WRnlhlLIZXYqdp9gopWO-wIBakDGVfJ9/view?usp=share_link
exactly. GEET makes the iron hot, so de-magnetizes the rod. But what is new to me that the rod becomes a soft bar magnet just enough to move the compass needle. This means that the magnetic flux of the earth is strong enough to create a bar magnet. It is even so strong it can change it into a permanent bar magnet in a 24 hour period. Your picture gives already some hints, need someone to explain this more in detail.
Just prior to your intro of GEET I was relatively convinced we'd be able to achieve relic neutrino resonance in a periodically spaced concentric array of toroids. This is per Dubovik's and Kovacs' work. So when this topic came up, the ball lightning object at the convex downstream end of the innermost restrictor rod and it's subsequent Earth-oriented magnetic field I thought this was as straight forward as charge sep occuring very close to the vortex filaments which themselves have curvature conentric to the rod. Even if they're not fully connected around the rod you still achieve a TDM albeit weighted closer to the surface. This would be like a directional antenna which feeds relic neutrino flux and causes a resonance within that flux. This is what I based my investigation on. I used Magnetscape on iphone to measure realtime change in B field for a constant flow, both heated and non-heated outer case. Neg results after 10 mins of compressed air at relevant Re. See https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-309134gHjWYQ8LvgWw0xa1DVPDDDcu9)
CFD of the inner restrictor rod at Re1500. Nb the dimensions in the patent, assuming it's for a single engine 500cc @ 2000RPM the flow in the narrowest part of the restricted flow is M0.3 and Re11000. I wasn't able to resolve much at a cursory glance, however I did notice the really nice toroid filament at the BL location. Noted as well that the it wouldn't be at a constant flow, more like pulsed flow at 17Hz.
I'm starting to speculate that it's more important to have that coaxial reverse flow. To steel man this though, the turbulence-only model would check out for Schauberger's designs. The relic rate of self-interaction is most likely the real electrogravitic cause, in my books.
Slowmo Pulsed Flow CFD: https://youtu.be/bDYlJJQADXg
My Qs would be:
- What are the flow parameters where it stops working (high/low)
- What materials do you have the most success with for the inner restrictor core - understand Fe and SiO2 work, does Al?
- How important is the heat exchange across to the inner tube?
- Is the bubbler and reflow necessary for it to function?
- It was mentioned a pickup coil could get current, is that a concentric coil or toroidal coil?
Tnx, ill see you sunday 😉👍🏼
Similar to GEET:
- The exhaust is suggested to be slightly restricted as it passes through the reactor. Is designing the scale of the reactor off the exhaust opening at the engine the best way to get your measurements?
- What are the pros and cons of a vertical and horizontal reactor?
- What have you found is the ideal way to support the rod vertically so it doesn't fall out of the reactor?
- How would you replace the bubbler with a gas feedstock so that the natural aspiration of the engine and reactor is not effected and so the exhaust can be fed back in as a closed loop.
Happy to help Dan with the Arduino, can't see how I can DM anyone on this platform?
Thanks Bob. I'm in Garden Valley. How about you?
Visit GEETInternational.com and GEETClub.com to make a donation to support GEET Research and Development, Sign-up for Online GEET Courses, See new GEET products as they become available, and much more!
In anticipation of the event, you might enjoy looking at Dan’s You Tube channel under Geet Life. Also many of the points in your comments are covered in theBook of Geet. Try Bob’s link to Scribd. Very exciting.
Now you know my questions relating to ball lightning and the atmosferic pressure in ball lightning. Sry, there should be questionmark after “superconductive”
Did this take place already? My phone is too full and I can’t install zoom. Plus I caught a flu since yesterday and barely managed to stop it from going worse. Hope you record and upload it later.
has the surface of the rod and the inner pipe to be treated? What is the influence of soot?