91 Comments
Apr 17, 2021Liked by Bob Greenyer

Hey Bob, Great presentation as always! I really loved the song. Looking forward to a high quality version some day so I can recommend it be played as part of the freedom music rotation on an alternative internet radio station I listen too (media monarchy for those who might be interested). I haven't had an opportunity to repeat my ultra experiments yet as my daughter has a cold and hasn't been out of the house for the last week and a bit. Hopefully they'll be a chance next week, I have my camera and microscope stuff ready.

Related to the comment about planetary destruction you made. I often felt based on various readings that nuclear weapons being co developed in two locations was not an coincidence, and done precisely for the purpose of providing a fail safe redundant self destruct deterrent to potential off world influences. I now find it curious that the worlds super powers are all racing to build larger and larger particle accelerators. I realize it's rather a leap, but I've suspected for a long time, there may be an argument to be made that a super conducting torus might be an oppropriate geometry for some kind of torsion weapon, perhaps even the next generation fail safe redundant self destructive weapon (as you alluded this type of technology would be capable of in your presentation).

I sometimes try to see it from the perspective of our unfortunate rulers, and wonder are they so foolish and drunk with superiority as to believe that a termination switch for the entire planet is really a necessity for humanity as a collective to retain it's sovereignty in the cosmos. It's good to be cautious I guess, but it feels like humanities fear is continually leveraged against us to put us in terrible situations. I really hope this technology and with it a grander vision of the cosmos might lesson humanities fear and bring us back from the precipice which we always seem to foolishly border on.

All the best, looking forward to o day presentations, and perhaps in the next few months I will have my own space (not the family kitchen) to do experiments in!

Expand full comment
Apr 17, 2021Liked by Bob Greenyer

I was able to follow the live stream sparsely but got lucky to be just on when the SEMs / EDX of Alan's foils where being shown by you. As always, and thinking on the skeptic criticisism, in the conditions the experiment is being conducted, is impossible to rule out contamination either from the material (Al foil) itself or the reaction vessel. A way to isolate from the influence of the vessel material itself would be to use a Polipropilene (PP) container inmersed in the ultrasound bath, I recall that the waves will be present anyway as the PP will transmit them, might be some attenuation / distorsion, but should work anyway. I plan to do this in my experiments with reference solutions, to discard iron coming from the basin itself.

Now, Isolating from contaminants in the material is always more complex, and in solid samples, practically impossible to remove the doubt completely, at least for skeptical's sake. The work around it would be to have a control experiment with the same material but I can hardly think of another process that would produce the same mechanical shredding effect. In my case, as I am working with solutions, is easier as one can have a reference experiment with non cavitating mechanic stirring and the same energy input that should not show any transmutation. The only other workaround is to work with certified purity materials, or even with purity patrons, which is always expensive, but might be worth a try, tho.

Expand full comment
Apr 16, 2021Liked by Bob Greenyer

Is Alan’s SEM able to differentiate between iron isotopes? If the magnetic pieces of foil are primarily Fe54 then we have a slam dunk!

Expand full comment
Apr 20, 2021Liked by Bob Greenyer

Hey Bob, Awesome presentation! I finally had 5 hours today to try afew more ULTR experiments at higher framerates with a microscope lens. I didn't see anything too shockingly interesting so only watch them when you have some free time. The main takeaway for me was stuff appeared to pulsate at around 100-120hz (bubble expansion collapse cycles and even some of the spinning vortices). The other thing I think I gathered was that all the things flying around quickly (no the aluminum flakes usually) are bubbles of some form. I think you are probably right that the paramagnetic oxygen is important. I look forward to hearing why. I have all the videos in raw format so if you want any specific portions extracted and slowed down just let me know in the next 3 months.

First four are regular tap water

https://youtu.be/ZQo_9G--m4s

220 fps downsampled to 30 fps

https://youtu.be/Vkg9atQ3x6I

440 fps downsampled to 30 fps

bubble seems to be pulsating at around 100hz at timestamp 2:10

another interesting bubble at timestamp 2:35

https://youtu.be/lSWlzSf2WN0

440 fps downsampled to 30 fps erosion and cracking along grain boundaries?

https://youtu.be/qzxMUD5mOqA

830 fps downsampled to 30 fps

bubble cycle at 22 second mark takes 5-7 frames usually 6 between stable frames that works out to a cycle of 120-160 hz

Last 3 are tap water with HHO bubbled through it for 30 mins before hand. Not sure if it made any difference really. I did see a grid like pattern of sprites but I think that may have been related to the spacing between the foil and the cd cover I used for my boat.

https://youtu.be/Q4gHC0f6_QU

176 fps downsampled to 30 fps

lots of sprites appearing to form a network of condensate as well as some impacts.

https://youtu.be/006Vy9VWClU

176 fps downsampled to 30 fps

https://youtu.be/LbUTW4wyrGM

500-600 fps downsampled to 30 fps

what would appear to be a spinning aluminum in the middle at timestamp 14-15 appears to pause every 5 frames this kind of fits with the 120hz frequency spotted in earlier video for bubble pulsation frequency.

Also I just realized my aluminum foil actually has a thin silicon coating on the back to make it non stick (no wonder it cost more and only had a piddly 6 meters on the roll...)

Expand full comment
Apr 17, 2021Liked by Bob Greenyer

Bob, can you provide the reference to the Matsumoto paper describing the new kind of electricity. Was it published somewhere? I think I missed it...

Expand full comment
May 3, 2021Liked by Bob Greenyer

This last structure added is comparatively much bigger and has a little higher Iron so it must be denser. It looks “layered”, and as you say the part we can’t see looks like it could be similar to the surface of the spheres. Might this be a bigger sphere that was destroyed? Fascinating effects of Ultrasound in the aluminum foil.

Expand full comment
May 3, 2021Liked by Bob Greenyer

I was pondering the other day that many people do the “aluminum foil test” on their ultrasonic jewel cleaners because it is the way one is supposed to test if they are working properly, and no one ever realizes the complex and fascinating processes that are happening, literally, right under their noses. Looking at these crenelated spherules I can only wonder what forces and phenomena can produce such a seemingly perfect spherical particle with such a complex surface features and elemental composition out of an apparently simple hydraulic system. How much people has simply completely overlooked this fascinating observation?

Expand full comment
Apr 20, 2021Liked by Bob Greenyer

So far no answer from professor Fernández nor from Dr. Islev. about the possibility of having their guidance for the practical aspects of a replication. The ultrasound source is a kidney stone smashing device, have tried to get a sense of how much would it cost, to no avail, but being it a medical equipment, is probably expensive.

The other paper of Dr. Islev where he pondered the emission of X rays from metals exposed to laser, reminds me a lot to the work of the Russian team that found "Strange Radiation" from water exposed to the sun and surrounded by magnets, so I agree that is possible EVOs being blasted by the laser. I also think it has some degree of relationship to the work of Holmlid in that sense.

I think that the emission is interpreted as being solely X rays, mostly because of the unawareness of the more complex"SR", and given that Dr. Islev is a Quantum Mechanics theorist. I have got a sense that he has been trying to prove macroscopic quantum tunneling and the dissapearance of matter fits in his line of work, in that sense.

Expand full comment
Apr 19, 2021Liked by Bob Greenyer

Evening Bob, Question of the day is ,was the WardenClyff a giant Tesla coil housing a nuclear fusion reactor. Did it use the ionosphere (as a means of free energy)to jumpstart the energy requirements to perform cold fusion?

Expand full comment
Apr 18, 2021Liked by Bob Greenyer

Bob, Yesterday the MFMP YouTube channel had a video scheduled to be streamed today titled “what is O”, and now its not there, did I dream it?

Expand full comment

https://www.vice.com/en/article/939g5p/physicists-are-studying-mysterious-bubbles-of-nothing-that-eat-spacetime

Physicists Are Studying Mysterious ‘Bubbles of Nothing’ That Eat Spacetime

“[A bubble of nothing] describes a possible channel for 'universe destruction;' in that the bubble of nothing expands and can 'eat' all of spacetime, converting it into 'nothing'"

“It would be interesting to work out under what conditions an observer could 'ride' on the bubble of nothing and see a universe that is similar to the one we live in"

The universe might be on track to eat itself from the inside out.

Luckily for us, physicists studying the phenomenon, called “spacetime decay”, believe this is very unlikely. Still, the possibility is interesting enough to explore in mind-boggling detail, covering “bubbles of nothing” in spacetime, hidden extra dimensions, and a hypothetical observer hitching a ride on the outer surface of our universe.

This "bubble of Nothing" behaves just like the EVO, doesn't it?

Expand full comment

I haven’t done any research really but I’m just wondering how Tesla would use the Wardenclyff as a energy source instead of transmitting energy.Can you give me any hints on how a process would operate?

Expand full comment

As I commented below in reply to Stevenson, I had mixed up in my mind the technique that Herbert Kliem was interested into, is not AFM but APT (atom probe tomography) that is indeed capable of elemental analysis, y destroys the sample atom by atom and maps the position and composition of each in a 3D map. It has several constraints but if one wants to study materials and effects of conditions on materials at the nano scale, this analytical method is really useful. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atom_probe

Expand full comment