Surely the aluminum wrapped around a stick without a slightlest scorch mark and also the finger mark in the aluminum are impressive, but the piece from where the sample analyzed came, its affected in so many ways that thinking on a conventional process to even imitate it boggles the mind.
Yes on the non-burning wood, and there are others where the would went fully inside and there is no sign of carbonisation on the wood exterior.
From what I see, this is doing what the sun is doing, you get the same structures you see in sun spots, you get magnetic flux loops and rain from their meeting point.
I kept thinking to myself - there will be a conflict in the centre and that may cause some instability - I believe that we see this in magnetic flux loops on the sun and in what I shared in this video. For me this is showing that the sun works this way and the John Hutchison was able to create the same phenomena at room temperature in his experiments. Note, the flux loops were first observed in my own work in multiple consecutive LION experiments.
Interesting Bob, but can you tell in the introduction how this material came into this state. Obviously EVO did it, but how did Hutchison make these EVO’s, What was the original material? Sorry for asking I’m only a fraction of my time looking into this so I have a lot of holes in my knowledge of this.
There are many ways to make EVOs. I have discussed this widely.
In the case of Hutchison, he always had a HV bias of the environment (Tesla coil or VDG) typically about 500,000V at 15 ft from active area. He then had a Tesla Disruptive Discharge Generator - this will produce EVOs. He also had Uranite - which contains gamma emitters and Shishkin et. al. and Bogdanovich et. al. teams have both found that these produce 'birdies' - which are N and S pseudo magnetic monopole neutral EVOs/SR.
This is combined with RF targeted with field interference on the sample target zone.
This may allow focussing and aggregation of the EVOs in and on metal samples, which are placed on an insulator to prevent the EVOs from discharging to ground.
As clustering progresses, metals can be dishevelled, shear, split, jellify - depending on their elemental makeup/phase distribution. This will be discussed in the session on Sunday.
I never understood the accusations of hoaxing aimed at John, but when you started showing this level of detail, I think that those claiming hoax are either completely lazy and have never looked at the evidence, or scared to let this fascinating evidence become widely known and appreciated by what it implies.
It spends the first page going over several examples of technology that most people would consider woo woo, and then has no spatial element element mapping of the split surfaces, instead the author decides to slice it up, polish it and to look at the unnafected inside. This would be the equivalent of Matsumoto, cutting his Pd electrode in half, noticing the matter disappearance inside and instead of looking at that, choosing an area between the outside and the affected area and analysis that!
In my experience and that of Matsumoto and in the statements of Ken Shoulders, the effect occurs at impedance changes, this would be at surface, between metals in alloys or between crystal grains. This could be determined by even a very simple minded person, by seeing that the splayed aluminium is affected along the crystal grains of the drawn metal - he correctly notes this and then proceeds to look inside the metal, not very competent investigation sadly.
As usual, they tried to apply a previously existent protocol that starts from several assumptions, and among these assumptions, the inconceivable is left out. I liked the introductory statements that imply that they acknowledge the existence of “bizarre” phenomena, which at least deserve being researched (that bit about the corn yield influence was new to me and is baffling, but the issue that only the optical images worked and not the digital ones, hints at the much maligned “entanglement”. But I digress.
In any case, the sample they chose its spectacular on its own, and explaining it away as something conventional is near to impossible. They saw magnesium and copper, which it seems they took as perfectly normal, I think the sample is so complex they really got lost in the forest by abundance of trees. But outstanding that they at least attempted to look at it.
Well - it is a start, but a poor one. I agree, they approached it as if it were a standard metal sample and, in my mind, looked to see if there was an internal structure that would account for the mode of failure - that is the most interesting thing - they found no internal structure that would point to an explanation.
Hathaway, on the other hand, reviewing the EDX spectra seems to have thought that what the Hutchinson effect did into the metal was to separate or “unmix” the elements in the alloy (he found blobs of Cu). He was focused in the forces (he assumed they were magnetic or gravitational) that were exerted on the metal, he did not at all thought of anything nuclear happening. It is amazing how initial assumptions can completely “block the view”, so to speak.
Well - it is both magnetic and gravitic. To be fair to Hathaway - a lot has happened since then and he did suggest, as I was told by John after I published my conclusion, that he thought it was producing magnetic monopole like structures.
What I am surprised is that he must have known about metal disappearing inside the samples, how can that happen with just re-organisation, unless of course he is suggesting that the metals had a large number of smaller voids in them.
When you say reorganized is it a change in molecular structure or change in spin magnetic moment, a void you say...did the mass reduce as the metal disappeared?
Could extremely long wavelength IR photons be hidden sector photons/ dark photons, also I've done more research and realized that bremsstraulung radiation(maybe a bit less due to the scale at which each phenomena occurs) is closer to hawking radiation because of black hole evaporation which should cause a blackhole to lose mass. Another thing I've recently learned is that a photon can split into a matter-anti pair(I like to believe it's because the photon is slowing down in acceleration and that acceleration force of the photon converts to mass of a electron and positron) BUT heres the thing, if a black hole loses mass because the virtual matter-anti pair cant annihilate and one of the particles is eject out, IS this what you are observing in your experiments ,where you see some particles approaching the EVO and others repelled? Could evos be Axions and Exotic compact objects/MACHOs be large scale evos? And last but not least the multiverse hypothesis states there could be pockets universes/bubbled enclosed regions of spacetime cause by the expansion of the universe, if so by extracting energy from vacuum fluctuations are we basically using energy from from a microcosm universe and is that what the aether/zero point energy is?
Bob are black evos dark tachyons, and also are you basically synthesizing dark matter? Would natural occurring dark matter be matter that does nuclear fusion naturally (electro-nuclear collapse) where as regular matter is natural fission (beta decay). Would that explain why things were falling upwards in the Hutchinson experiments? My assumption is now The bremstralung radiation is heat absorption from electrons being excited it will emit a dark photon while electromagnetic radiation is heat release which emits photons.
Wow, Gardy, that is a lot to unpack in one comment!
Q. are black evos dark tachyons? - A. They are black EVOs, you can't see them and they have no mass and inertia, if they come back into our physical realm, they can release the matter they were carrying and/or lead to synthesis of other matter. When they explode, they can emit high kinetic energy electrons.
Q. are you basically synthesizing dark matter? - A. If you can't see or detect it, but it has at the capability to later become normal matter, then yes.
Q. Would natural occurring dark matter be matter that does nuclear fusion naturally (electro-nuclear collapse) where as regular matter is natural fission (beta decay).? A. All forms of isotope to stable isotope transitions can occur in EVOs, including conversion of other forms of energy into matter conversions. What you get out may be a spread of elements unrelated to the isotopes that went in. If not driven to hard, then production of super-heavy elements will be avoided. There are several types of fission. IMHO, Black EVOs can stimulate beta decay and in doing so, they may become white again.
Q. Would that explain why things were falling upwards in the Hutchinson experiments? I think you will find that 'falling upwards' is because EVOs encapsulate the matter and so the entire object acts as one electron, the matter inside looses its mass and inertia properties as the normal process of gravity does not 'see' it - in which case, it has basically no mass and can be attracted or repelled by extremely week magnetic or electric fields, including the Earths magnetic field and any electric fields in the environments. Moreover, the EVO structure itself may present an overall net propulsion depending on how it is being driven and its net interactions with the environment, to include the ether, it may move towards an increasing density of normally not physically interacting matter.
Bremstralung radiation produces all kinds of photons depending on the element being interacted with and the energy of the beta particle. This can include thermal (IR) photons.
Jeez at this point your basically a sorcerer, well I believe if a photon is the emission of an excited electron than the dark photon is reverse radiation released when an electron is absorbing energy. Thanks for all this work and information makes me feel like space travel is among us.
Surely the aluminum wrapped around a stick without a slightlest scorch mark and also the finger mark in the aluminum are impressive, but the piece from where the sample analyzed came, its affected in so many ways that thinking on a conventional process to even imitate it boggles the mind.
Yes on the non-burning wood, and there are others where the would went fully inside and there is no sign of carbonisation on the wood exterior.
From what I see, this is doing what the sun is doing, you get the same structures you see in sun spots, you get magnetic flux loops and rain from their meeting point.
https://youtu.be/ht1XsnKo8YA
When I made the flux loop between to pseudo-monopoles diagram,
https://youtu.be/8JY9_TtXuaE?t=11400
I kept thinking to myself - there will be a conflict in the centre and that may cause some instability - I believe that we see this in magnetic flux loops on the sun and in what I shared in this video. For me this is showing that the sun works this way and the John Hutchison was able to create the same phenomena at room temperature in his experiments. Note, the flux loops were first observed in my own work in multiple consecutive LION experiments.
Interesting Bob, but can you tell in the introduction how this material came into this state. Obviously EVO did it, but how did Hutchison make these EVO’s, What was the original material? Sorry for asking I’m only a fraction of my time looking into this so I have a lot of holes in my knowledge of this.
There are many ways to make EVOs. I have discussed this widely.
In the case of Hutchison, he always had a HV bias of the environment (Tesla coil or VDG) typically about 500,000V at 15 ft from active area. He then had a Tesla Disruptive Discharge Generator - this will produce EVOs. He also had Uranite - which contains gamma emitters and Shishkin et. al. and Bogdanovich et. al. teams have both found that these produce 'birdies' - which are N and S pseudo magnetic monopole neutral EVOs/SR.
This is combined with RF targeted with field interference on the sample target zone.
This may allow focussing and aggregation of the EVOs in and on metal samples, which are placed on an insulator to prevent the EVOs from discharging to ground.
As clustering progresses, metals can be dishevelled, shear, split, jellify - depending on their elemental makeup/phase distribution. This will be discussed in the session on Sunday.
I never understood the accusations of hoaxing aimed at John, but when you started showing this level of detail, I think that those claiming hoax are either completely lazy and have never looked at the evidence, or scared to let this fascinating evidence become widely known and appreciated by what it implies.
Here is a not very good paper that Felix dug up.
https://sci-hub.se/10.1179/143289109X12494867167242
It spends the first page going over several examples of technology that most people would consider woo woo, and then has no spatial element element mapping of the split surfaces, instead the author decides to slice it up, polish it and to look at the unnafected inside. This would be the equivalent of Matsumoto, cutting his Pd electrode in half, noticing the matter disappearance inside and instead of looking at that, choosing an area between the outside and the affected area and analysis that!
In my experience and that of Matsumoto and in the statements of Ken Shoulders, the effect occurs at impedance changes, this would be at surface, between metals in alloys or between crystal grains. This could be determined by even a very simple minded person, by seeing that the splayed aluminium is affected along the crystal grains of the drawn metal - he correctly notes this and then proceeds to look inside the metal, not very competent investigation sadly.
At least they tried
The Hathaway paper quoted did found more anomalies in the spectra, compared to the “typical aluminum sample” http://www.nzdl.org/cgi-bin/library?e=d-00000-00---off-0envl--00-0----0-10-0---0---0direct-10---4-------0-0l--11-en-50---20-about---00-0-1-00-0-0-11----0-0-&a=d&c=envl&cl=CL1.4&d=HASHa4422b7fbbfa2350e1c317.4.5#HASHa4422b7fbbfa2350e1c317.4.5
As usual, they tried to apply a previously existent protocol that starts from several assumptions, and among these assumptions, the inconceivable is left out. I liked the introductory statements that imply that they acknowledge the existence of “bizarre” phenomena, which at least deserve being researched (that bit about the corn yield influence was new to me and is baffling, but the issue that only the optical images worked and not the digital ones, hints at the much maligned “entanglement”. But I digress.
In any case, the sample they chose its spectacular on its own, and explaining it away as something conventional is near to impossible. They saw magnesium and copper, which it seems they took as perfectly normal, I think the sample is so complex they really got lost in the forest by abundance of trees. But outstanding that they at least attempted to look at it.
Well - it is a start, but a poor one. I agree, they approached it as if it were a standard metal sample and, in my mind, looked to see if there was an internal structure that would account for the mode of failure - that is the most interesting thing - they found no internal structure that would point to an explanation.
Hathaway, on the other hand, reviewing the EDX spectra seems to have thought that what the Hutchinson effect did into the metal was to separate or “unmix” the elements in the alloy (he found blobs of Cu). He was focused in the forces (he assumed they were magnetic or gravitational) that were exerted on the metal, he did not at all thought of anything nuclear happening. It is amazing how initial assumptions can completely “block the view”, so to speak.
Well - it is both magnetic and gravitic. To be fair to Hathaway - a lot has happened since then and he did suggest, as I was told by John after I published my conclusion, that he thought it was producing magnetic monopole like structures.
What I am surprised is that he must have known about metal disappearing inside the samples, how can that happen with just re-organisation, unless of course he is suggesting that the metals had a large number of smaller voids in them.
When you say reorganized is it a change in molecular structure or change in spin magnetic moment, a void you say...did the mass reduce as the metal disappeared?
Could extremely long wavelength IR photons be hidden sector photons/ dark photons, also I've done more research and realized that bremsstraulung radiation(maybe a bit less due to the scale at which each phenomena occurs) is closer to hawking radiation because of black hole evaporation which should cause a blackhole to lose mass. Another thing I've recently learned is that a photon can split into a matter-anti pair(I like to believe it's because the photon is slowing down in acceleration and that acceleration force of the photon converts to mass of a electron and positron) BUT heres the thing, if a black hole loses mass because the virtual matter-anti pair cant annihilate and one of the particles is eject out, IS this what you are observing in your experiments ,where you see some particles approaching the EVO and others repelled? Could evos be Axions and Exotic compact objects/MACHOs be large scale evos? And last but not least the multiverse hypothesis states there could be pockets universes/bubbled enclosed regions of spacetime cause by the expansion of the universe, if so by extracting energy from vacuum fluctuations are we basically using energy from from a microcosm universe and is that what the aether/zero point energy is?
Found a better link to the Hathaway paper, they were completely focused in the electromagnetic and RF aspects. https://www.hutchisoneffect.com/Research/pdf/TheHutchisonFile.pdf
The site www.theHutchinsoneffect.com is very interesting also.
This is random but since Dirac used y=x^2 for positive matter could negative matter be -1/y=-x^-2
Don't know, I like to steer clear of equations and go on observations.
Bob are black evos dark tachyons, and also are you basically synthesizing dark matter? Would natural occurring dark matter be matter that does nuclear fusion naturally (electro-nuclear collapse) where as regular matter is natural fission (beta decay). Would that explain why things were falling upwards in the Hutchinson experiments? My assumption is now The bremstralung radiation is heat absorption from electrons being excited it will emit a dark photon while electromagnetic radiation is heat release which emits photons.
Wow, Gardy, that is a lot to unpack in one comment!
Q. are black evos dark tachyons? - A. They are black EVOs, you can't see them and they have no mass and inertia, if they come back into our physical realm, they can release the matter they were carrying and/or lead to synthesis of other matter. When they explode, they can emit high kinetic energy electrons.
Q. are you basically synthesizing dark matter? - A. If you can't see or detect it, but it has at the capability to later become normal matter, then yes.
Q. Would natural occurring dark matter be matter that does nuclear fusion naturally (electro-nuclear collapse) where as regular matter is natural fission (beta decay).? A. All forms of isotope to stable isotope transitions can occur in EVOs, including conversion of other forms of energy into matter conversions. What you get out may be a spread of elements unrelated to the isotopes that went in. If not driven to hard, then production of super-heavy elements will be avoided. There are several types of fission. IMHO, Black EVOs can stimulate beta decay and in doing so, they may become white again.
Q. Would that explain why things were falling upwards in the Hutchinson experiments? I think you will find that 'falling upwards' is because EVOs encapsulate the matter and so the entire object acts as one electron, the matter inside looses its mass and inertia properties as the normal process of gravity does not 'see' it - in which case, it has basically no mass and can be attracted or repelled by extremely week magnetic or electric fields, including the Earths magnetic field and any electric fields in the environments. Moreover, the EVO structure itself may present an overall net propulsion depending on how it is being driven and its net interactions with the environment, to include the ether, it may move towards an increasing density of normally not physically interacting matter.
Bremstralung radiation produces all kinds of photons depending on the element being interacted with and the energy of the beta particle. This can include thermal (IR) photons.
What is your definition of a "Dark Photon" ?
Jeez at this point your basically a sorcerer, well I believe if a photon is the emission of an excited electron than the dark photon is reverse radiation released when an electron is absorbing energy. Thanks for all this work and information makes me feel like space travel is among us.