The importance of a strong static field has been known to some researchers in LENR for a long time. At the start of the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project (MFMP), we considered using Zeolites like Iraj Parchamazad - these are claimed to have permanent 3 billion V/m field, with no need to power it or set it up. That is a LOT, but is that level really needed?
Vacuum polarisation appears to be important in many of the technologies I have explored these past 10+ years and I will talk about this in my stream on Sun 15th Jan 2023 @ 22:00 in relation to other work that was conducted in the 1980s that replicated a subset of John Hutchison's findings that is currently being replicated in Russia and that we started to investigate last year.
Vacuum polarisation was critical in John Hutchison's work, he would use say a 500,000 V Van de Graaff at 15ft, approximately 100,000 V/m or 1000 V/cm. Is it required to be even this high though, as Ken Shoulders never used this level to the best of my knowledge.
Unidirectional high rate of change of discharge, possibly within this field is critical however. Obviously I have seen all of the key videos from Johns most prolific time now and in them, you hear a periodic "BANG" with a flash and this is a disruptive discharge, totally critical to Tesla's mobile demonstrations and John reproduced it accurately from Tesla's Colorado springs notes. John says no disruptive discharge, no effects and in the breakdown of the dielectric a strong electric field is first set up which itself polarises the vacuum, so this may be all that is needed.
You can see the steps of charge buildup and then periodic disruptive discharges noted in George Hathaway's book "Mindbending".
After several minutes to perhaps half an hour of filling the space and covering the equipment with electrostatic charge, he would switch on the power to the high voltage transformers which would charge up several capacitors, some with an air spark gap across them. These would discharge with a very loud BANG and flash of light every 30 – 60 seconds depending on the transformer rating and gap width.
Mindbending - The Hutchison Files: 1981 to 1995, by George D. Hathaway (Author), Thomas Valone (Editor), p.32. (2014)
At this point, it must be noted that ‘static charge’ covering the equipment, would imply a lot of ‘static electricity’, and I am minded to agree with Alexander Shishkin, that this is in fact the same as Exotic Vacuum Objects (EVOs)/Charge Clusters. The direction of these into and accumulation in Hutchison Effect target samples required the samples to be placed below the charge cluster generators with respect to earth, on a non conductive support. Typically John used a plywood or plastic crate with a piece of formica on it often with additional pieces of tissue paper under samples.

Of course if the samples were grounded, so would the charge clusters be and as we all know, lightning and its leading ball lightning, like to conduct to ground, via a metal preferably, hence the use of grounded metal in lightning conductors. Hutchison Effect and EVOs are in the same family as the natural phenomena of Ball Lightning.
EVOs were derived from study and replication of the considered core basics of Johns work by Ken Shoulders. John worked with static charge and disruptive discharges and this was ever present in the work of Tesla.
The polarisation will play a role in self organisation of these clusters in the environment as will the disruptive discharge. Further more, EVOs can be produced by the disruptive discharge itself and other means such as corona and gamma sources both of which John had, with the latter being in the form of a large piece of uranium ore.
Indeed Shishkin et. al. used 137Cs (a fission product of uranium), and a high voltage pulsed dielectric barrier discharge of 590V over a distance of 8mm in air, which equates to 737.5 V/cm which is in line with that 1000 V/cm calculated above from apparatus used by John, but proved to be active at this lower level.
John was working in air, a dielectric comprised mostly of Nitrogen and Oxygen. Shishkin et. al. have calculated that Hydrogen isotopes require 2-4000 less energy than any element from Lithium onwards (as little as 5eV) to produce EVOs. Of course, both Nitrogen and Oxygen are far larger nuclei than hydrogen isotopes. Therefore, in a low pressure gas environment containing hydrogen and a little Xe atoms for EVO stabilisation, it is very reasonable to consider that the few hundred V pulses over a number of cm used by Ken Shoulders would reasonably be able to realise long lived charge clusters.
Teslas production of EVOs before they had a name
It is not surprising that Ken Shoulders discovered unusual matter production given John Hutchison’s reliance on key aspects of Tesla’s apparatus and the latter’s statements on unusual electric discharge derived structures being launched from cathodes. [Material shared 1st Sept 2020 on MFMP FB] | [Additional material by FBI]
He [Tesla] illustrated the sort of thing that the particles will be by recalling an incident that occurred often enough when he was experimenting with a cathode tube. Then, sometimes, a particle larger than an electron, but still very tiny, would break off from the cathode, pass out of the tube and hit him. He said he could feel a sharp, stinging pain where it entered his body, and again at the place where it passed out. The particles in the beam of force, ammunition which the operators of the generating machine will have to supply, will travel far faster than such particles as broke off from the cathode, and they will travel in concentrations, he said.
As Dr. Tesla explained it, the tremendous speed of the particles will give them their destruction-dealing qualities. All but the thickest armored surfaces confronting them would be melted through in an instant by the heat generated in the concussion.
July 11, 1934, pp. 1, 15
Natural EVO production in Lightning
With respect to Lighting production in a storm (which necessarily has an EVO as an ionisation channel leader):
“The measured electric field inside a thunderstorm just prior to a lightning strike at 12,900 feet was 3400 volts/cm. The average maximum field for 9 different thunderclouds was 1300 volts/cm.”
“Electric Field Intensity Inside of Natural Clouds”, Journal of Applied Physics 19, 481 (1948); Published Online: 28 April 2004
As you can see from this 1945 data above, most of the field strengths are between ± 500 V/cm. One might imagine that exceeding this by a good margin might result in lightning formation. This is exactly consistent with the field strength used by John Hutchison and and Alexander Shishkin et. al. in air.
Though dry air has a breakdown voltage of 30 kV/cm, humidity and pressure can lower this. An EVO formed by disruptive discharge in a cloud replete with static charge build up, can drift to a higher potential (say ground) through air, ionising it on its way, once ionised, a larger scale electrical discharge can occur through the now ionised channel at a much lower V/cm. This is how Ken Shoulders describes the process of lightning.
Conclusion
Although Ken Shoulders stated that all spark discharges, like the ones used by Tesla, produced EVOs. Having studied John Hutchison’s effect, he highlighted that lightning discharges were lead by a macro EVO in the form of Ball Lightning. The data from 1945 on electric fields in a thundercloud is entirely consistent with the fields present in John Hutchison apparatus and, separately and independently, those found to produce EVOs by Shishkin et. al. that the latter’s group called Magneto-Toro Electrical Radiation / Clusters.
Hydrogen isotope containing low pressure chambers, combined with high rate of change, unidirectional pulsed discharges of a few 100V, from a low work-function, ideally self-healing cathode (like the fed tungsten wire or mercury as used by Tesla in his 1930s “electrical particles of matter” generation device AKA “Death Ray”) along a dielectric channel or capillary to induce [magneto] hydrodynamic shear would lead to effective production of EVOs.
Responding to Engineer48s conclusions based on queries of ChatGPT on E-Cat world:
Annihilation is not necessary to produce effects observed.
Taking energy from the vacuum is not needed in an EVO driven rectification system where energy from thermal photons or matter decay is rectified to high energy photons (UV to 2keV soft x-rays as determined by Shoulders and verified by Shishkin et. al. during EVO formation) through use of the photo-electric effect.
1. EVO is formed during pulsed unidirectional disruptive discharge.
2. As the EVOs constituent electrons cohere and condense, they release UV to 2keV sophe x-rays
3. These are high enough energy to knock electrons of photoelectric material such as Copper (I) Oxide or Yttrium coated copper. These electrons drift to anode alongside the condensed electrons.
4. The Cluster can be broken into constituent electrons and ions by a further disruptive discharge (due to magnetic pulse), a magnetic pulse, interaction with the anode etc.
5. The electrons are 10^5 greater in number than the ions (determined by Shoulders, verified by Shishkin et. al.), therefore in a Hydrogen atmosphere only 1 in 100,000 charges will be neutralised on break-up, so many more electrons (ultra-cold) arrive at the anode in addition to those released by photo-ionisation.
Conceivably, matter including potentially electrons could be synthesised inside the EVO. This was observed empirically by Brown (mid 1980s, replicated by us), Solin (1992, replicated by us), Matsumoto (1990s, replicated by us), Kladov (1997-2002, replicated by us), Adamenko (2000s and later verified by the US Fusion Program between 2015 and 2017) supporting observations by Hutchison and Shoulders.
Theory for how this could occur is in Solin's 1992 patent and Adamenko's 2007 book. The latter known by and supported by Shoulders.
Fryberger (2009), states that the clusters could cause baryon decay resulting in production of photons and electrons. 1 proton would yield over 900MeV. The coherent matter of the EVO could convert photons resulting to UV to 2keV electrons as well as the extra electrons joining the coherent state.
Net result would be more electrons synthesised as well as photons. Fryberger determines that only when the 'dyality angle' which is a proxy for 'Fractal Toroidal Moment' is in excess of a certain threshold, will a baryon decay. So, if the EVO is kept below a certain intensity, no baryon decay will occur.
Stressing the coherent matter with a magnetic field will cause more of the coherent matters energy to be released as photons. This is described well in Chukanov's BL patents. One might reasonably say though that if a coherent matter-wave of electrons looses 256 quanta of 2keV photons, then when the cohered electron cluster de-coheres there would be 1 less electron. If the photons were lower energy like UV and able to be converted to thermal photons, then the reactor would heat up. This would be a simple explanation for being able to vary the amount of light, heat or electrons coming out of the system, dependent on the state of the EVO and how it is stimulated.
If energy is taken from zero-point and put into kinetic electron energy of incoherent electrons, this would raise the thermal temperature and the device would heat up. This therefore cannot be the process as the claimant already says the device runs cool.
If zero-point annihilation occurs within the EVO and the coherent matters Fractal Toroidal Moment closed pointing vectors convert those two photon energies into 2 electrons (after all, they are exactly the same energy/mass) in the condensate before de-coherence, then we have a net yield of electrons which will have no kinetic energy and require thermal photons or phonons from the surrounding reactor or matter when they are emergent from bosonova. This will convert zero point energy fluctuations to extra electrons directly and leave the reactor cooler than ambient regardless of the number of electrons synthesised.
I believe my hypothesis presented above explains the claims and observables spanning many years from many authors including the claimant in question. Has theoretical and experimental support spanning around 40 years. It accounts for the claim of Heat, Light, Electricity output. It does not suffer from the logical problem present in the claimants hypothesis.
Though disruptive discharges can also destroy the phantom EVO's, per The Bagel Game.