So far so good. Off topic but meant to ask this question a while back: How would you define "Critical Fiction?" My wife happens to be an expert in English lit and fiction in particular. I am also a fan of the notion of faction: The simulated nature of facts and stipulated realities. Thanks for any response Bob. Always food for thought!
A wonderful response. Four questions for further ponderance. Prana as thought-objects, become matter forged in the mold of time, to paraphrase MB. To wit: 1. Hypothesis as collapsed partiality, shaped and changing. Hyperthesis would stand over not under. 2. Star Trek tech comes to mind. Morphogenic fields forever....3. 100th monkey test never fails. If placebos work, imagine the possibilities. 4. Be judicious of the irreal, and liminal nature of being and becoming. A frothy edge of ever unfolding potentials. Make shapes happen and see them in their Order. In closing, as an old East meets West fan, TM's work puts Qi in a whole new Key. Much appreciated, Bob.
Came across this link for the 5th International Symposium on Ball Lightning presenter schedule held in 1997 in Japan. Matsumoto gave a presentation, #61, related to BL and earthquakes. Many other BL researchers that Bob has discussed were there including Bychkov, Rodionov, Ohfuroton, Ohtsuki, Klimov and others. https://www.gbv.de/dms/tib-ub-hannover/303010479.pdf
So far so good. Off topic but meant to ask this question a while back: How would you define "Critical Fiction?" My wife happens to be an expert in English lit and fiction in particular. I am also a fan of the notion of faction: The simulated nature of facts and stipulated realities. Thanks for any response Bob. Always food for thought!
What is a hypothesis if not an invented story?
If prose that is imagined turns out to be true, was it remote-viewed facts and never actually false?
How can we evaluate the merit and faults of using insight that leads to a potential future that could have been a truth that few could realise?
How do you judge what is real?
A wonderful response. Four questions for further ponderance. Prana as thought-objects, become matter forged in the mold of time, to paraphrase MB. To wit: 1. Hypothesis as collapsed partiality, shaped and changing. Hyperthesis would stand over not under. 2. Star Trek tech comes to mind. Morphogenic fields forever....3. 100th monkey test never fails. If placebos work, imagine the possibilities. 4. Be judicious of the irreal, and liminal nature of being and becoming. A frothy edge of ever unfolding potentials. Make shapes happen and see them in their Order. In closing, as an old East meets West fan, TM's work puts Qi in a whole new Key. Much appreciated, Bob.
Looking good, Bob; keen to hit that link as soon as it appears!
Yeh - got released from jury duty today, have to have meeting in Rome, then back on it. It should be live this week assuming it gets approved.
♾️🌀✨thx Bob!
Came across this link for the 5th International Symposium on Ball Lightning presenter schedule held in 1997 in Japan. Matsumoto gave a presentation, #61, related to BL and earthquakes. Many other BL researchers that Bob has discussed were there including Bychkov, Rodionov, Ohfuroton, Ohtsuki, Klimov and others. https://www.gbv.de/dms/tib-ub-hannover/303010479.pdf