Bob, you wouldn't be able to clarify how open sourced vs licence-able the Thunderstorm Generator is?
I could just ask Strike Foundation directly, but what do you think?
My assumption is that individuals could always make them, but with our collective hope being that mass production and popularity of retro fitting units being readily available, perhaps some licencing payment will be expected. Cheers.
and need to add the hypothesis for the Alumino-silicate 5% taking it to > COP 11, then I had about 2/3rds of the translation to finish the podcast for and then I can publish it. Oh, and the table to finish translating (nearly done).
I hope to have it out tonight or early tomorrow morning.
Hope you can share with us the translation soon, I wish I had some money around to give it to you in exchange right now, times have been tough around here.
I am still wondering if the COP presented in the table of examples is calculated in a KW or KWh basis, as we know the power of the motor was 6 KW, and looking at the table you could think that he operated it during 12 hours, hence the total input was 72 KWh, and the output 860+ KWh to produce the COP of 11,XX (working from memory here). But it would be a total energy in vs total energy out calculation.
A comment on the video with Max Fomitchev-Zamilov. Why does he use oil? I just tried an ULTR experiment with oil and aluminum foil. It took about 2 minutes to produce the same marks in the foil in oil as the water did in 5 seconds. My idea is that aether particles must be present in order for EVOs to form.
Max Fomitchev-Zamilov used oil because he was working in processing oil, and stumbled into the anomaly. He was trying to break oil bonds, not to transmute matter. This makes his results even more valuable, because they were serendipitous, not intentional, and he then decided to explore it.
Hi Allan, I think your thought is reasonable. Oil is harder to build up the energy at points of resonance, it will have a very different viscosity - but getting O2 dissolved in it and getting atomic H and then breaking that down is going to be hard.
Excellent presentation - I bailed at 23:00 and watched the rest on catch-up. I believe the thing I thought might by a spark--gap (7) is actually a valve for return flow.
Anyway, many thanks to Bob (again!)
Now, thinking about pulses through a liquid under pressure:
1. pure liquids are incompressible (e.g. hydraulic fluids)
2. the more gas in the liquid, however, the more the liquid becomes compressible ("spongy brakes, for example")
3. the larger the gas bubbles, the more any compression wave will be damped (like an air bubble in a braking system - can be lethal)
4. the sharper the compression wave (the shorter the rise and fall times - aiming at square waves) the greater the effect of the (shock) wave the potentially greater the shear force resulting from the shock "hitting a brick wall" and being deflected orthogonal to the wave - exactly the effect Tesla used (in a different medium) to separate out electrons from radiant energy.
So, the sharpness of the rise and fall, the frequency of the "shocks" (smaller repeated shocks in the same place, when the frequency is correctly attuned, lead to an effect much greater than that achieved by a single shock even of much greater magnitude), the resistance to wave propagation (permeability coefficient), and the size and distribution (dispersion profile) of gas bubbles within the liquid all play a part.
This is exactly as discovered and highlighted in Anatoly Fedorovich Kladov's work. What is also so good about his device is that it sets up a unidirectional flow, that is, the current is generally flowing in one direction only and over significantly long periods of time. thus aiding in the transmission of regular shocks in one direction creating, in effect, repeated hammer taps.
On an unrelated note, for those not familiar with the YouTube presentations of Professor Simon Holland re. UK "research" work that fills in some of the gaps for those familiar with the topics discussed :
A little bit off-topics but I think relevant anyway. I've received a spam-like email from an investor newsletter that try to sell "insider" information for stocks. Apparently nothing special, I receive quite frequently this kind of ads, but this one was "uncanny". They claim that an undisclosed company (of course they disclose it after buying their service) that is developing "UFO weapon". So, if we are at the point that a stock-consulting (TBD if can be trusted) is selling such a claim, giving as an assumption that UFO technology exists and it is ready to be exploited in the stock market, the "opportunity window" you talk about is veeeery narrow. Just for the record, the link is "https://go.behindthemarkets.com/btm-ufo-weapon-vsl/?_ef_transaction_id=59777730157d4066b8642187cdd61d7f&id=ambrogio.rossetti%40gmail.com&iocid=&aff=82&creative_id=&oid=131&message_id=&link_id="
This presentation really nailed it for me, especially after enduring all that BS from those clowns on Twitter/X! The precision of Kladov's work is amazing. Thanks.
Bob, you wouldn't be able to clarify how open sourced vs licence-able the Thunderstorm Generator is?
I could just ask Strike Foundation directly, but what do you think?
My assumption is that individuals could always make them, but with our collective hope being that mass production and popularity of retro fitting units being readily available, perhaps some licencing payment will be expected. Cheers.
At risk of being annoying, have I missed the upload of the patent translation? :D
I really want to read it wall to wall.
No, I got tied up. I have added the hypothesis for neutrons to this blog
https://remoteview.substack.com/p/ultr-method-for-obtaining-energy
and need to add the hypothesis for the Alumino-silicate 5% taking it to > COP 11, then I had about 2/3rds of the translation to finish the podcast for and then I can publish it. Oh, and the table to finish translating (nearly done).
I hope to have it out tonight or early tomorrow morning.
Thanks Bob, I know you have plenty on your plate, I am just so hooked with the topic since I watched this presentation 😅
It is done, I still have to detail my hypothesis for the extra yield using Aluminosilicate 5% additive, but I'll do that later
Hope you can share with us the translation soon, I wish I had some money around to give it to you in exchange right now, times have been tough around here.
I am still wondering if the COP presented in the table of examples is calculated in a KW or KWh basis, as we know the power of the motor was 6 KW, and looking at the table you could think that he operated it during 12 hours, hence the total input was 72 KWh, and the output 860+ KWh to produce the COP of 11,XX (working from memory here). But it would be a total energy in vs total energy out calculation.
Translation should be published tomorrow.
I've just spotted this article which peaked my interest, maybe someone can think of a way that it might be used to facilitate the formation of EVO's.
https://www.hackster.io/news/oliver-child-s-raspberry-pi-pico-powered-sonolithographic-machine-makes-pretty-patterns-with-sound-f68afe7f3c7b
Has there been any real talk about making a powerplant with this yet?
Do you have something in mind?
No, I don't know any group working on it.
A comment on the video with Max Fomitchev-Zamilov. Why does he use oil? I just tried an ULTR experiment with oil and aluminum foil. It took about 2 minutes to produce the same marks in the foil in oil as the water did in 5 seconds. My idea is that aether particles must be present in order for EVOs to form.
Max Fomitchev-Zamilov used oil because he was working in processing oil, and stumbled into the anomaly. He was trying to break oil bonds, not to transmute matter. This makes his results even more valuable, because they were serendipitous, not intentional, and he then decided to explore it.
Hi Allan, I think your thought is reasonable. Oil is harder to build up the energy at points of resonance, it will have a very different viscosity - but getting O2 dissolved in it and getting atomic H and then breaking that down is going to be hard.
Excellent presentation - I bailed at 23:00 and watched the rest on catch-up. I believe the thing I thought might by a spark--gap (7) is actually a valve for return flow.
Anyway, many thanks to Bob (again!)
Now, thinking about pulses through a liquid under pressure:
1. pure liquids are incompressible (e.g. hydraulic fluids)
2. the more gas in the liquid, however, the more the liquid becomes compressible ("spongy brakes, for example")
3. the larger the gas bubbles, the more any compression wave will be damped (like an air bubble in a braking system - can be lethal)
4. the sharper the compression wave (the shorter the rise and fall times - aiming at square waves) the greater the effect of the (shock) wave the potentially greater the shear force resulting from the shock "hitting a brick wall" and being deflected orthogonal to the wave - exactly the effect Tesla used (in a different medium) to separate out electrons from radiant energy.
So, the sharpness of the rise and fall, the frequency of the "shocks" (smaller repeated shocks in the same place, when the frequency is correctly attuned, lead to an effect much greater than that achieved by a single shock even of much greater magnitude), the resistance to wave propagation (permeability coefficient), and the size and distribution (dispersion profile) of gas bubbles within the liquid all play a part.
This is exactly as discovered and highlighted in Anatoly Fedorovich Kladov's work. What is also so good about his device is that it sets up a unidirectional flow, that is, the current is generally flowing in one direction only and over significantly long periods of time. thus aiding in the transmission of regular shocks in one direction creating, in effect, repeated hammer taps.
On an unrelated note, for those not familiar with the YouTube presentations of Professor Simon Holland re. UK "research" work that fills in some of the gaps for those familiar with the topics discussed :
UK EMP Weapon - Cobra Mist ? - https://youtu.be/82oGLeLu8do
Cobra Mist EMP (part 2) - https://youtu.be/Yi19JDxYsTk
Tesla Death Ray Power Secret - https://youtu.be/WpKVwrRf9TI
Prof Simon and Mend It Mark - Tesla Death Ray - https://youtu.be/fwG-ck8Xb4g
and includes some familiar organizations in the telling.
Does relic neutrinos relate to cavitation in some way?
They should be synthesised in the intense energy concentration events and are then available for on-going reactions.
https://www.youtube.com/live/UH76XaTz4qE?si=Jn3bAic0ccMRTFHK&t=3231
Unrelated to stream.
Got recommended a video about cavitation happening between gears in fluid, thought it was interesting.
https://youtu.be/a_o0v9mPkhU?si=tsuxXW2OKzdwMqTr
Great videos!
A little bit off-topics but I think relevant anyway. I've received a spam-like email from an investor newsletter that try to sell "insider" information for stocks. Apparently nothing special, I receive quite frequently this kind of ads, but this one was "uncanny". They claim that an undisclosed company (of course they disclose it after buying their service) that is developing "UFO weapon". So, if we are at the point that a stock-consulting (TBD if can be trusted) is selling such a claim, giving as an assumption that UFO technology exists and it is ready to be exploited in the stock market, the "opportunity window" you talk about is veeeery narrow. Just for the record, the link is "https://go.behindthemarkets.com/btm-ufo-weapon-vsl/?_ef_transaction_id=59777730157d4066b8642187cdd61d7f&id=ambrogio.rossetti%40gmail.com&iocid=&aff=82&creative_id=&oid=131&message_id=&link_id="
Great work- looking forward to our zoom call...
Sure - let me know, and thanks for the paid sub! It really helps.
What would be a good time / day?
Tomorrow may work.
Not much was said about strange radiation. Is there a risk that the reactor emits RS.
I really hope he didn't get sick from his research
He was an old man, lived a good life and new and respected how to work with radiation.
Of course, he died right around the time it was being discovered.
I did mention it at the end and that it needs to be considered.
I just wrote a piece in regards to this. Hope you like it!
https://open.substack.com/pub/williamschwandt/p/the-potential-energy-of-cavitation?r=1nugaa&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
This presentation really nailed it for me, especially after enduring all that BS from those clowns on Twitter/X! The precision of Kladov's work is amazing. Thanks.
It is a special paper. Working on finalising my version of the translation - hope to make available today.
Kladov is the juice. If he were running for President here in the US, I'd vote for him.