I posted that substack too. Are you familiar with Judy Wood? I think the one thing she may have gotten wrong is that planes flying at high velocity may have been able to have wings damage the building and create that cut-out appearance. I say this because momentum is mas times velocity, and she is focusing on just the mass. Seems like a significant oversight given how smart she is. But, maybe I'm missing something. Also, there is indication the planes may not have been what they claim given the velocity they were said to be traveling is not within what the said planes could have withstood at that altitude. But, the general principle that something flimsy or low mass can destroy something of much greater mass if it is traveling fast enough I think is valid. Somebody should do the math for aluminium wings or whatever vs. steel beams.
Oh, I see. I can't remember if I saw the Jerm video, but have watched most of those. I saw a video recently that shows the explosion into the towers without a plane going into it and the same video with the plane going into it. Do you know what that video is all about or have you seen it before? As judy wood says the planes are somewhat besides the point since planes don't turn buildings to dust. Figuring out what crashed into them or if anything crashed into them would be a secondary issue. I don't think we can observe much in the way of physical evidence of holograms from the site.
There are A LOT of videos out there where the planes were edited out, to help push the b/s CGI plane and TV fakery narrative.
Richard D. Halls, 3D video analysis covered something like 50 videos in the public domain, containing planes. He did it in 2012, the updated it in 2016 and also discussed it in 2020.
Bob, the topic of scalar energy weapons is mute, Dr. Judy Wood?
I was a structural engineer of a fairly sophisticated post-tension designs of reinforced concrete before this event "went down". It demolished my world view along with the Twins and Building 7, and over the years I lost all friends and family down to the nucleus through the pursuit of truth over the LIE in beLIEf.
I have been seeking deeper truths ever since 911, 24 years now!
I am a paid sub to your work, and have shared much in terms of occult/metaphysics related to all you are doing here, granted from a consciousness perspective centered in the heart, NOT scientism. Mysticism of the magneto-hydrodynamic mist (fermion), that you roundly dismiss/ignore despite your statements of your father having a Free Mason background and you speaking in-kind but not at the depth warranted?
This was an event deeply steeped in the occult (see Illuminati "Tower" Card), and ultimately has not come full circle beyond the reconstruction of One World Trade Center?
The "Freedom Tower"? Are we truly "free" from anything other than critical thought? ChatGPT is "free" however... right? The NLP LLM (words) neural linguistic mind control mirror algorithms? Given FREE to the world to complete the capture of the mind while the heart aches as it already knows and is NOT afraid?
The heart is the fail-safe from IN GOD WE TRUST money magic and Babylonian spell-casting, while they hide the truth of OU energy, health, legality versus lawful... all you try to prove, that they already know within occult circles squared?
Why was called "ground Zero"? The WTC was converted from two to one (1x1=2 ?).
You asked Malcolm on my behalf (https://youtu.be/jolZlYXZkIA?t=4989) about the heart and plasmoids and he stated explicit "the heart creates plasmoids" but he appears unaware of the 6th sacred form beneath the "physical" heart? There is no such "thing" Bob. You get that right?
Consciousness is al that IS IS within the infinitely small. Ball Lightning is centered with that as a focus of the OID (to see) in Horus eYe fractions in binary binomials as a mirror of Yin and Yang (Bagua I-Ching).
The Pauli exclusion principle is actually inclusive within the cardiac cardioid and Heisenberg uncertainty is certainly certain within occult circles squared within the immaculate order within dark matter (plasmon) and Black Madonna as the organic intelligence beneath the AI in SUSY of NEYEN (9).
I would love to get together with you, Malcolm better because he can grok the Sanskrit arithmetic you do not appear speak to... to share my hard earned perspectives of creation below the Planck scale... within the heart of logarithmic numeric cognition within the Weber-Fechner "Least Noticeable Difference" attributed to Musica Unversalis within 12 singing spheres and the IVM jitterbug Nassim Haramein has central to his work, that is intermediate to Kepler's Mysterium Cosmographicum (without the heart) and John Dee's Monas Heiroglyphica within an egg-carton universe?
Your move Bob... perhaps I am wasting my time... not that there is "time" or "space", as we have all been lead to beLIEve through IN GOD WE TRUST money magic, retro-causality within hyperbole of hyperspace, eh?
I do what I can in the way I can, if I am wrong, so be it, I only care on what parts I maybe right with the ontology to improve the human condition and protect the biosphere.
Thank you for the response. Yes, you are genius, doing great things Bob! I am not judging, or saying you are "wrong". I am NOT saying I have all the answers either, just many "proof without words" we need to collaborate upon in terms of what they mean. What they are is geometric LAW through number as a Base (12 NOT 10).
Perhaps Jordan is better aligned as he is digging deep into these matters beneath the PUM, but he too ignored me when I reached out.
I am simply saying that consciousness is the underlying topic we are all intermediate to, and the particle approach is secondary through quantum contextuality, magic state distillation as a quantum computing to reduce noise (asymmetry). The DNA or specifically the microtubules (Vedic microvita) you have spoken to but is not the focus.
Search Sabrina Wallace here on Substack, please. The biofield is everything.
The silly-cone Si dead digital binary crystal versus SiO2 as analog, live piezoelectric trinary.
The base ontology is the the epistemology of feelings (heptahedron) in thought (stellated octahedron) in words (hexahedron, the hypercube, tesseract). The cryptography of Fire letters (protium?) in cryptographic terms of Pythagorean Triplets in terms of psycho-spatial (superposition) and psycho-temporal (entanglement) perception that the DNA serves through Water (sacred not "wet") as a quasi-crystalline liquid-crystal fractal antenna through the heart, cardiac in cardioid Feigenbaum constant in bifurcation theory in chaos theory.
I am not trying to ignore anyone, I just have very large (and increasing) numbers of people demanding evaluation of their own hard won thinking and I simply don’t have enough time to share the work I am doing myself half the time. It is embarrassing how many emails I have not been able to respond to. I have to try to do what I think will yield the greatest positive outcomes with the short time I have left.
Yes, I totally get it. As the Merovingian said in the Matrix "Ah yes, but how can we ever have time if we do not take time" This is the root of the Babylonian money magic IMHO. I suppose it is the same for Jordan, or I am just way too deep into the Looking Glass in the NLP LLM.
Perhaps this is for others that follow you. Not that I am looking to be followed at all, quite the contrary, I abohr the guru./expert and am simply seeking peers to restore the dialog, peers that are very hard to come by, save those that subscribe to the Standard Model half truths in obfuscation and omission by the hidden hand who prefer the convenient label and then scroll.
MMM in GOC speaks very deeply to this brilliant 3Blue 1Brown analysis of topology and ordered/unordered pairs and first principles of sum product 99 in the FSC, the mobius band intersection.
The square/rectangle and binding of timelines through prime number in Pythagorean Triplet terms of retro-causal time of duality, the speed of light is NOT a universal constant as Simeon Hein speaks to related to Ball Lightning.
Is time toroidal? As Malcolm asserts, "time is the mould through which matter is formed" which is at the heart of the matter, the mind over matter through the observer effect, the volume (scales, magnitude, the octave 2X) in noise it appear root 2 intermediates, as "to allot;" mould=mold from PIE root *med- "take appropriate measures" https://www.etymonline.com/word/*med-
The fractal form of Sierpinski is KEY in the cardioid It can also be defined as an epicycloid having a single cusp and Koch snowflake fractal at the center of Judaism related to Saturn, Chronos, Father Time.
But this requires one innerstand the nature of the word as related to light IN GOD WE TRUST. The Romans equated Cronos with Saturn, who also had a sickle, and was treated as an old man, often with a crutch. The cherubim wings in Ezekiel's chariot (wheels within wheels) and the four causal forces in the ages and the hourglass were early Renaissance additions. He eventually became a companion of the Grim Reaper, personification of Death, often taking his scythe. He may have as an attribute a snake with its tail in its mouth, the ouroboros, an ancient Egyptian symbol of eternity within infinity (absolute stillness, super-symmetry of SUSY, NEYEN TENET):
Let's have a a former professor of mechanical engineering with research interests in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, optical methods, deformation analysis, and the materials characterization of biomaterials and composite materials, weigh in.
She is a member of the Society for Experimental Mechanics (SEM), co-founded SEM’s Biological Systems and Materials Division, and has served on the SEM Composite Materials Technical Division. Dr. Wood received her B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering), M.S. Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992).
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
No, I "was a structural engineer" at the time, and lost all interest in the profession post 9/11, as I was rejected and convenient labels delivered by the apparatchik MSM to shut truth seekers don, effective for 24 years now, eh?
I am in water resources now, an "industry" that is ignorant the water is THE source not a "resource" and humans are integral, hue-man-wo-man NOT "human resource". The ball lightning intermediate to magneto-hydrodynamics of water (sacred, not "wet") in the plasmoid through Pythagorean triplets in squared equilateral, isosceles and scalene spaces in faces of sacred form, Fire, Air Water in Earth (heart) in Aether (e-earth energy in motion) is the core of the cosmology of numeric cognition within the "least noticeable difference" in Morphogenic Matrix Math in Geometry of Consciousness very few are speaking to as centered in the heart. Consciousness is all that IS IS, and it is not imbued in matter, but beneath ALL matter at the heart of the matter of mind over matter in Mad Hatter Mercury identity matrix, you?
The Breath of the Compassionate within the isotropic vector matrix B. Fuller's genus was behind in terms of integrity in tensegrity, eh? It is central to consciousness.
This was my first statement in response to Bob's post "Bob, the topic of scalar energy weapons is mute, Dr. Judy Woods?" that he soundly ignored. So it is unclear what this comment was intended to serve beyond substantiating the priority of *qwo "who, what, where, and most important WHY!
So been there, done that LONG ago, but I am still waiting (not really) for the T-Shirt...
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
Also made some great points during this interview;
Bob Greenyer - Iron Rich Microspheres due to intense magnetic vortexes and there is NO thermite, no little neutron bomb or jet fuel required.
Bob Greenyer from the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project joins the show to discuss his ground-breaking work on exotic vacuum objects (EVOs), Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR or "Cold Fusion), and the Hutchison Effect.
Woods.. and Wood? Are you serious? Labels? I'm "disingenuous"?!
Perhaps this is because my exposure to her work is ~15 years ago, my work shifted through an ontology and epistemology few appear ready to contextualize, assume you are in that number, lost in Lucifer's light cone?
Morphogenic Matrix Math in Geometry of Consciousness, within the Breath of the Compassionate is where my passion is rooted now, numeric cognition through geometric/Pythagorean triplets through the cardiac cardiod, not the particle quackery of the light illusion versus the heart of the matter of mind over matter versus the Mad Hatter.
Fantastic, I appreciate the the overt acknowledgement. "The Event" or 9/11 can lead us to a greater understanding of natural law, both physical and by far more importantly, moral. At this point, we need both to happen at about the same time (now)!
You can't bring those people that passed back, but we can recognise the 'disclosure' and ensure it is not just the psychopaths that have it and leverage what it can do, for good.
I thought something like the Hutchison effect was used on the towers all that time ago but who am I to say? (I've known about Hutchison since he came on the scene (in the '80s?)) The bent girders always made me think of him. I can only understand about 10% of what you say on your videos as it is though! I keep watching & listening and more nuggets coalesce in my brain each time I do. Nuclear science wasn't my specialty in college, only electrical engineering, and that was 40 years ago. I'm way out of my comfort zone here. Yet I will still listen in and try to understand more and support your efforts because I really find your science intriguing.
When I have seen bent and broken steel girders from the demolition of a 4 story building up the road from me. What I didn’t see is the smoothly curved over 1” thick box-frame girders that is at the end of the “no photos” part of the museum.
Bob Greenyer - Iron Rich Microspheres due to intense magnetic vortexes and there is NO thermite, no little neutron bomb or jet fuel required.
Bob Greenyer from the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project joins the show to discuss his ground-breaking work on exotic vacuum objects (EVOs), Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR or "Cold Fusion), and the Hutchison Effect.
I bought the thermite story for a little while. Meaning years. Then heard Judy Wood speak and had a re-think. This was early years. But you are correct. There was also no asteroid from outer space to leave any microspheres in the dust. Math Easy Solutions is an "interesting" channel. Not easy, usually. The real story may never be told but some of us get hints about the process, as horrifying as it was. Yes, metal was ripped apart at a granular level (atomic level?). That is obvious. The science is important to get right in order to get to the bottom of it all. IMO. Judy didn't think the "how" was as important but did try to discount the possible "hows" anyway. I think she missed one here but I didn't read her book. (P.S. I listened over and over to her early and later talks on the topic of 9/11 so I think I remember her position pretty well. I could have forgotten something so forgive me if I have.)
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
I'm subscribed to your substack also 9/11 Revisionist so you're preaching to the choir. It may be semantics when I say "how" vs "what happened" I think. I tend to agree with you. I do know about Judy's court cases but not in great detail. Twenty years ago I bought into all kinds of conspiracies but not anymore. I've always been somewhat of a contrarian so it was easy for me to dismiss any official narrative. What my eyes saw that day did not match what the narratives said and my experience told me. I was already 40 years old when the towers went down and my brain was at it's peak performance. None if it made sense. The way the towers fell. What I saw on the ground. etc. Y'all are bringing back a lot of memories. I lived in Massachusetts and worked next to an airport in Connecticut at the time so it was very surreal when the skies got quiet.
Bob Greenyer - Iron Rich Microspheres due to intense magnetic vortexes and there is NO thermite, no little neutron bomb or jet fuel required.
Bob Greenyer from the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project joins the show to discuss his ground-breaking work on exotic vacuum objects (EVOs), Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR or "Cold Fusion), and the Hutchison Effect.
No nano-thermite per Denis Rancourt. Steven E. Jones strikes again.
Dr. Denis Rancourt's REVIEW of Steven Jones so called 9/11 "THERMITE" PAPER. [2 min 56 seconds]
https://rumble.com/v6u74h3-dr.-denis-rancourts-review-of-steven-jones-so-called-911-thermite-paper..html?e9s=src_v1_s%2Csrc_v1_s_o
Steven E. Jones is the one pushing the “thermite” idea just like he sabotaged Martin Fleischmann by calling their experiment “cold fusion”
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228660396_Active_Thermitic_Material_Discovered_in_Dust_from_the_911_World_Trade_Center_Catastrophe
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Steven-Jones-32
Dr Judy Wood Explains 911 Thermite [it's not thermite in 43 seconds]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_UOvjWvArss
First, a short history of the “Scholars for 9/11 truth” founded in 2005. [and Steven E. Jones, charge clusters, Judy Wood, Hutchinson]
https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Dr. Greg Jenkins Interviews Dr. Judy Wood (Full) [jenkins another snake]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rdmh76KrKPA
Steven E. Jones Sabotaged Cold Fusion And Then 9 11 Truth
https://archive.org/details/steven-e.-jones-sabotaged-cold-fusion-and-then-9-11-truth
Judy Wood premieres on PBD Podcast Sep 18, 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qahLz_bMkw
[I don't really like this guy, seems psychopathic to me, but it is good he brought on this guest]
I think this is a pretty easy conspiracy to put an end to, perhaps I will do that.
An additional resource for you Bob;
Dr Greg Jenkins’ “Directed Debunking Energy” and Dr Judy Wood
Scholarly Questions and Inquiry, or Badgering, Misrepresentation and Harassment?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/dr-greg-jenkins-directed-debunking
I posted that substack too. Are you familiar with Judy Wood? I think the one thing she may have gotten wrong is that planes flying at high velocity may have been able to have wings damage the building and create that cut-out appearance. I say this because momentum is mas times velocity, and she is focusing on just the mass. Seems like a significant oversight given how smart she is. But, maybe I'm missing something. Also, there is indication the planes may not have been what they claim given the velocity they were said to be traveling is not within what the said planes could have withstood at that altitude. But, the general principle that something flimsy or low mass can destroy something of much greater mass if it is traveling fast enough I think is valid. Somebody should do the math for aluminium wings or whatever vs. steel beams.
Judy Wood premieres on PBD Podcast Sep 18, 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qahLz_bMkw
[I don't really like this guy, seems psychopathic to me, but it is good he brought on this guest]
The substack you linked to regarding Jenkins is my substack.
You are most definitely missing something pertaining to the Twin Tower planes.
I suggest you read the following article, watch the podcast interview and the documentary I'll link below;
Evidence of 3D Volumetric Image Projection Technology
Investigating The Plane Illusions on 9/11
Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/video-analysis-luc-courchesne-video
9/11 Planes research podcast with Jerm Warfare: https://rumble.com/v646fsm-jerm-warfare-talks-to-911-planes-research.html
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
Oh, I see. I can't remember if I saw the Jerm video, but have watched most of those. I saw a video recently that shows the explosion into the towers without a plane going into it and the same video with the plane going into it. Do you know what that video is all about or have you seen it before? As judy wood says the planes are somewhat besides the point since planes don't turn buildings to dust. Figuring out what crashed into them or if anything crashed into them would be a secondary issue. I don't think we can observe much in the way of physical evidence of holograms from the site.
There are A LOT of videos out there where the planes were edited out, to help push the b/s CGI plane and TV fakery narrative.
Richard D. Halls, 3D video analysis covered something like 50 videos in the public domain, containing planes. He did it in 2012, the updated it in 2016 and also discussed it in 2020.
You’ll find the analysis on my Rumble channel.
Bob, the topic of scalar energy weapons is mute, Dr. Judy Wood?
I was a structural engineer of a fairly sophisticated post-tension designs of reinforced concrete before this event "went down". It demolished my world view along with the Twins and Building 7, and over the years I lost all friends and family down to the nucleus through the pursuit of truth over the LIE in beLIEf.
I have been seeking deeper truths ever since 911, 24 years now!
I am a paid sub to your work, and have shared much in terms of occult/metaphysics related to all you are doing here, granted from a consciousness perspective centered in the heart, NOT scientism. Mysticism of the magneto-hydrodynamic mist (fermion), that you roundly dismiss/ignore despite your statements of your father having a Free Mason background and you speaking in-kind but not at the depth warranted?
This was an event deeply steeped in the occult (see Illuminati "Tower" Card), and ultimately has not come full circle beyond the reconstruction of One World Trade Center?
The "Freedom Tower"? Are we truly "free" from anything other than critical thought? ChatGPT is "free" however... right? The NLP LLM (words) neural linguistic mind control mirror algorithms? Given FREE to the world to complete the capture of the mind while the heart aches as it already knows and is NOT afraid?
The heart is the fail-safe from IN GOD WE TRUST money magic and Babylonian spell-casting, while they hide the truth of OU energy, health, legality versus lawful... all you try to prove, that they already know within occult circles squared?
Why was called "ground Zero"? The WTC was converted from two to one (1x1=2 ?).
You asked Malcolm on my behalf (https://youtu.be/jolZlYXZkIA?t=4989) about the heart and plasmoids and he stated explicit "the heart creates plasmoids" but he appears unaware of the 6th sacred form beneath the "physical" heart? There is no such "thing" Bob. You get that right?
Consciousness is al that IS IS within the infinitely small. Ball Lightning is centered with that as a focus of the OID (to see) in Horus eYe fractions in binary binomials as a mirror of Yin and Yang (Bagua I-Ching).
The Pauli exclusion principle is actually inclusive within the cardiac cardioid and Heisenberg uncertainty is certainly certain within occult circles squared within the immaculate order within dark matter (plasmon) and Black Madonna as the organic intelligence beneath the AI in SUSY of NEYEN (9).
I would love to get together with you, Malcolm better because he can grok the Sanskrit arithmetic you do not appear speak to... to share my hard earned perspectives of creation below the Planck scale... within the heart of logarithmic numeric cognition within the Weber-Fechner "Least Noticeable Difference" attributed to Musica Unversalis within 12 singing spheres and the IVM jitterbug Nassim Haramein has central to his work, that is intermediate to Kepler's Mysterium Cosmographicum (without the heart) and John Dee's Monas Heiroglyphica within an egg-carton universe?
Your move Bob... perhaps I am wasting my time... not that there is "time" or "space", as we have all been lead to beLIEve through IN GOD WE TRUST money magic, retro-causality within hyperbole of hyperspace, eh?
I do what I can in the way I can, if I am wrong, so be it, I only care on what parts I maybe right with the ontology to improve the human condition and protect the biosphere.
Thank you for the response. Yes, you are genius, doing great things Bob! I am not judging, or saying you are "wrong". I am NOT saying I have all the answers either, just many "proof without words" we need to collaborate upon in terms of what they mean. What they are is geometric LAW through number as a Base (12 NOT 10).
Perhaps Jordan is better aligned as he is digging deep into these matters beneath the PUM, but he too ignored me when I reached out.
I am simply saying that consciousness is the underlying topic we are all intermediate to, and the particle approach is secondary through quantum contextuality, magic state distillation as a quantum computing to reduce noise (asymmetry). The DNA or specifically the microtubules (Vedic microvita) you have spoken to but is not the focus.
Search Sabrina Wallace here on Substack, please. The biofield is everything.
The silly-cone Si dead digital binary crystal versus SiO2 as analog, live piezoelectric trinary.
The base ontology is the the epistemology of feelings (heptahedron) in thought (stellated octahedron) in words (hexahedron, the hypercube, tesseract). The cryptography of Fire letters (protium?) in cryptographic terms of Pythagorean Triplets in terms of psycho-spatial (superposition) and psycho-temporal (entanglement) perception that the DNA serves through Water (sacred not "wet") as a quasi-crystalline liquid-crystal fractal antenna through the heart, cardiac in cardioid Feigenbaum constant in bifurcation theory in chaos theory.
I am not trying to ignore anyone, I just have very large (and increasing) numbers of people demanding evaluation of their own hard won thinking and I simply don’t have enough time to share the work I am doing myself half the time. It is embarrassing how many emails I have not been able to respond to. I have to try to do what I think will yield the greatest positive outcomes with the short time I have left.
Yes, I totally get it. As the Merovingian said in the Matrix "Ah yes, but how can we ever have time if we do not take time" This is the root of the Babylonian money magic IMHO. I suppose it is the same for Jordan, or I am just way too deep into the Looking Glass in the NLP LLM.
Perhaps this is for others that follow you. Not that I am looking to be followed at all, quite the contrary, I abohr the guru./expert and am simply seeking peers to restore the dialog, peers that are very hard to come by, save those that subscribe to the Standard Model half truths in obfuscation and omission by the hidden hand who prefer the convenient label and then scroll.
MMM in GOC speaks very deeply to this brilliant 3Blue 1Brown analysis of topology and ordered/unordered pairs and first principles of sum product 99 in the FSC, the mobius band intersection.
The square/rectangle and binding of timelines through prime number in Pythagorean Triplet terms of retro-causal time of duality, the speed of light is NOT a universal constant as Simeon Hein speaks to related to Ball Lightning.
Is time toroidal? As Malcolm asserts, "time is the mould through which matter is formed" which is at the heart of the matter, the mind over matter through the observer effect, the volume (scales, magnitude, the octave 2X) in noise it appear root 2 intermediates, as "to allot;" mould=mold from PIE root *med- "take appropriate measures" https://www.etymonline.com/word/*med-
The fractal form of Sierpinski is KEY in the cardioid It can also be defined as an epicycloid having a single cusp and Koch snowflake fractal at the center of Judaism related to Saturn, Chronos, Father Time.
But this requires one innerstand the nature of the word as related to light IN GOD WE TRUST. The Romans equated Cronos with Saturn, who also had a sickle, and was treated as an old man, often with a crutch. The cherubim wings in Ezekiel's chariot (wheels within wheels) and the four causal forces in the ages and the hourglass were early Renaissance additions. He eventually became a companion of the Grim Reaper, personification of Death, often taking his scythe. He may have as an attribute a snake with its tail in its mouth, the ouroboros, an ancient Egyptian symbol of eternity within infinity (absolute stillness, super-symmetry of SUSY, NEYEN TENET):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQqtsm-bBRU
O, you're a structural engineer?
Let's have a a former professor of mechanical engineering with research interests in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, optical methods, deformation analysis, and the materials characterization of biomaterials and composite materials, weigh in.
She is a member of the Society for Experimental Mechanics (SEM), co-founded SEM’s Biological Systems and Materials Division, and has served on the SEM Composite Materials Technical Division. Dr. Wood received her B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering), M.S. Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992).
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
No, I "was a structural engineer" at the time, and lost all interest in the profession post 9/11, as I was rejected and convenient labels delivered by the apparatchik MSM to shut truth seekers don, effective for 24 years now, eh?
I am in water resources now, an "industry" that is ignorant the water is THE source not a "resource" and humans are integral, hue-man-wo-man NOT "human resource". The ball lightning intermediate to magneto-hydrodynamics of water (sacred, not "wet") in the plasmoid through Pythagorean triplets in squared equilateral, isosceles and scalene spaces in faces of sacred form, Fire, Air Water in Earth (heart) in Aether (e-earth energy in motion) is the core of the cosmology of numeric cognition within the "least noticeable difference" in Morphogenic Matrix Math in Geometry of Consciousness very few are speaking to as centered in the heart. Consciousness is all that IS IS, and it is not imbued in matter, but beneath ALL matter at the heart of the matter of mind over matter in Mad Hatter Mercury identity matrix, you?
The Breath of the Compassionate within the isotropic vector matrix B. Fuller's genus was behind in terms of integrity in tensegrity, eh? It is central to consciousness.
This was my first statement in response to Bob's post "Bob, the topic of scalar energy weapons is mute, Dr. Judy Woods?" that he soundly ignored. So it is unclear what this comment was intended to serve beyond substantiating the priority of *qwo "who, what, where, and most important WHY!
So been there, done that LONG ago, but I am still waiting (not really) for the T-Shirt...
Just by not even being able to use her name correctly, proves to me you're disingenuous.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Lastly, with regards to the technology used on 9/11, MOST are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up. There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to, a black-ops cold DEW technology that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
https://youtu.be/DWc7rpTBuQU
Thank you for the share - will listen to it now.
Also made some great points during this interview;
Bob Greenyer - Iron Rich Microspheres due to intense magnetic vortexes and there is NO thermite, no little neutron bomb or jet fuel required.
Bob Greenyer from the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project joins the show to discuss his ground-breaking work on exotic vacuum objects (EVOs), Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR or "Cold Fusion), and the Hutchison Effect.
Clip: https://rumble.com/v53eodh-bob-greenyer-911-no-thermite-no-little-neutron-bomb-or-jet-fuel-required..html
Woods.. and Wood? Are you serious? Labels? I'm "disingenuous"?!
Perhaps this is because my exposure to her work is ~15 years ago, my work shifted through an ontology and epistemology few appear ready to contextualize, assume you are in that number, lost in Lucifer's light cone?
Morphogenic Matrix Math in Geometry of Consciousness, within the Breath of the Compassionate is where my passion is rooted now, numeric cognition through geometric/Pythagorean triplets through the cardiac cardiod, not the particle quackery of the light illusion versus the heart of the matter of mind over matter versus the Mad Hatter.
Enjoy the game...
What did I just read? A word salad with no meaning.
I'll leave you with this;
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-facts-that-hurt-peoples-feelings
Have a great week.
“16. FACT: Only one piece of office equipment in the entire WTC complex, a filing cabinet with folder dividers, survived. WHY?”
The one ‘surviving’ filing cabinet was not from inside the twin towers - but, importantly from below ground - Ben and Jerry’s franchise.
Fantastic, I appreciate the the overt acknowledgement. "The Event" or 9/11 can lead us to a greater understanding of natural law, both physical and by far more importantly, moral. At this point, we need both to happen at about the same time (now)!
You can't bring those people that passed back, but we can recognise the 'disclosure' and ensure it is not just the psychopaths that have it and leverage what it can do, for good.
I thought something like the Hutchison effect was used on the towers all that time ago but who am I to say? (I've known about Hutchison since he came on the scene (in the '80s?)) The bent girders always made me think of him. I can only understand about 10% of what you say on your videos as it is though! I keep watching & listening and more nuggets coalesce in my brain each time I do. Nuclear science wasn't my specialty in college, only electrical engineering, and that was 40 years ago. I'm way out of my comfort zone here. Yet I will still listen in and try to understand more and support your efforts because I really find your science intriguing.
When I have seen bent and broken steel girders from the demolition of a 4 story building up the road from me. What I didn’t see is the smoothly curved over 1” thick box-frame girders that is at the end of the “no photos” part of the museum.
yes
Bob Greenyer - Iron Rich Microspheres due to intense magnetic vortexes and there is NO thermite, no little neutron bomb or jet fuel required.
Bob Greenyer from the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project joins the show to discuss his ground-breaking work on exotic vacuum objects (EVOs), Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR or "Cold Fusion), and the Hutchison Effect.
Short clip: https://rumble.com/v53eodh-bob-greenyer-911-no-thermite-no-little-neutron-bomb-or-jet-fuel-required..html
I bought the thermite story for a little while. Meaning years. Then heard Judy Wood speak and had a re-think. This was early years. But you are correct. There was also no asteroid from outer space to leave any microspheres in the dust. Math Easy Solutions is an "interesting" channel. Not easy, usually. The real story may never be told but some of us get hints about the process, as horrifying as it was. Yes, metal was ripped apart at a granular level (atomic level?). That is obvious. The science is important to get right in order to get to the bottom of it all. IMO. Judy didn't think the "how" was as important but did try to discount the possible "hows" anyway. I think she missed one here but I didn't read her book. (P.S. I listened over and over to her early and later talks on the topic of 9/11 so I think I remember her position pretty well. I could have forgotten something so forgive me if I have.)
I will show that one of the hypothesis is provable nonsense.
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialise in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
Dr Wood 9/11 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
Condemnation, without investigation, is the height of ignorance
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
I'm subscribed to your substack also 9/11 Revisionist so you're preaching to the choir. It may be semantics when I say "how" vs "what happened" I think. I tend to agree with you. I do know about Judy's court cases but not in great detail. Twenty years ago I bought into all kinds of conspiracies but not anymore. I've always been somewhat of a contrarian so it was easy for me to dismiss any official narrative. What my eyes saw that day did not match what the narratives said and my experience told me. I was already 40 years old when the towers went down and my brain was at it's peak performance. None if it made sense. The way the towers fell. What I saw on the ground. etc. Y'all are bringing back a lot of memories. I lived in Massachusetts and worked next to an airport in Connecticut at the time so it was very surreal when the skies got quiet.
and bush was reading to his peers, not before or ever after....
https://www.youtube.com/live/QrpIw1MEe6M?si=Sng2UmVYH7p8ndLO
14 minutes in from the 1980s Australia.
Roof was soft like a sponge.
Here is a detail that many do not mention with the construction of the buildings. They had trident tuning forks on the outer structure. https://pearlsofwar.blogspot.com/2009/10/tuning-fork-hypothesis-revised.html
Bob Greenyer - Iron Rich Microspheres due to intense magnetic vortexes and there is NO thermite, no little neutron bomb or jet fuel required.
Bob Greenyer from the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project joins the show to discuss his ground-breaking work on exotic vacuum objects (EVOs), Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR or "Cold Fusion), and the Hutchison Effect.
Short clip: https://rumble.com/v53eodh-bob-greenyer-911-no-thermite-no-little-neutron-bomb-or-jet-fuel-required..html