It’s basically the testimony of an insider who is on the run from the Deep State. I came across him while researching the irregularities surrounding the recent U.S. election. He has a twitter handle johnheretohelp. His testimony about malfeasance at the top of U.S. politics has been recently released by Lin Wood. It all ties back to the lab origins of covid-19 and the politicisation and censorship that surrounds all this.
The link above though is to the same witness’s involvement in free energy research and where this led him and his fellow researchers - most of whom appear to have been disappeared. The start of his account is incredible enough, but it’s the second project that really blew me away.
My previous researches into this individual seem to back up the idea that he is credible, and Lin Wood who is a libel lawyer would not publish the stuff he has about top U.S. individuals without doing his due diligence on the credibility of the witness. So I kind of trust this witness and am inclined to believe what he says about things on the political level, but I don’t want to get into a political discussion here. It’s just to say that I am inclined to believe this man. What he gives testimony to here in the link I’ve provided is something called project looking glass, Pandora, and a separate project that he lamentingly refers to as ‘Deep Space 9’. I really don’t know what to think about it. It just seems so unbelievable.
But since this is for thinking a bit more outside the box I’m leaving it here like a cat leaves a dead frog on the rug. Perhaps people won’t like what I’ve bought in, but there it is. Make of it what you all will.
Hi Bob! Great presentation with a lot o valuable information. I will resume a small Ni plate that I used in some LENR experiments many years ago and I will put it on a CD and see if it is (still) somewhat active. BTW, the CD-Rs does not contain Al at all: they have just a very thin layer (in the order of 100 nm) of metal coating over the dye layer, and under the top laquer.
1) You mentioned at the end that PDF's were showing with a yellow tone. Thought there might be a chance it was the blue eye saving settings that most OS's have built into them now a days. Sometimes they get turned on after system updates so it might be worth a check.
2) I realize more testing is probably necessary but when you showed the chart here https://youtu.be/tOF9lp8R3GU?t=4208 that illustrated that 90% of the radiation was blocked by the first 2 CD's it made me think that perhaps the other 10% of the radiation is of such a HUGE energy quanta and an order of magnitude higher such that it couldn't realistically be stopped. I am not trying to disuade anyone I'm just hoping perhaps your aware of some data point that can clarify things for me. Like am I reasonable to understand that the 20 or so interactions on CD's 3-10 were all caused by the same 20 instances of strange radiation. As in 20 total instances of strange radiation each leaving one impression on each of the 10 cd's? Or am I more correct to assume the alterante, that when the strange radiation leaves a mark it means that it has effectively been eliminated? This would be trivial to settle and I think it would be a very good thing to clarify. You could perhaps do it very simply by just stacking 10 CD's and putting a shared mark on them all to allow you to see the orientation. Then after exposing them for afew days, isolate the strange radiation impressions and see if there is a spatial correlation between impressions on adjacent CD's. So for example does an impression on the outermost CD have an impression at the same location on all or any of the inner CD's. I do realize strange radiation can enter dark mode, and I also realize that the strange radiation or perhaps EVO's are more likely to travel along the surface of the CD's so perhaps they would just shoot around the edges and there would be no spatial correlation identifiable. But it seems to me from the images, that at least for the strange radiation that appears to leave penetration marks, there might be a correlation. And knowing whether the strange radiation that is penetrating the outer most CD also left penetration marks on the inner CD's would be perhaps useful to know. If it were leaving impressions on the inner CD's as well as the outer CD's at the exact same location, I would perhaps interpret that as meaning it was a much higher energy grouping and perhaps layering this type of shielding might be inadequate. Or perhaps it isn't the case that they are just a way higher order of magnitude energy (other wild speculation) but it is the case that the spacing or thickness of a dialectric or metal layer has the capacity to slow/capture a certain type of quanta of radiation, and anything that doesn't get captured by the first 1/2 layers isn't going to be captured by identical subsequent layers. In which case perhaps a variety of layers of different thicknesses or different materials is in order to capture the full spectrum of the radiation. I think we know of two different materials now that can be used CD's and film. So perhaps in addition to the layered CD's test above to test for spacial correlation, a similar test could be done layering different detection media and trying to identify special correlation.
Anyways just some ideas (of which you have no shortage) :)
I attempted to juman enhance the Google translate of a paper from Chizhov, one where he used CO2 gas chamber to find energetic particles in a Nickel Hydrogen reactor that was still emitting them over a year after the reactor had been left in storage withou being operated, perhaps is this one same you translated? But I gave up after a few pages because there was too many equations that were a pain to manually correct. Thanks for getting back to this fascinating topic!
Questions on quantum gravity...if gravity and mass are intertwined like electricity and magnetism...I’m assuming that the discovery of the Higgs field which gives particles mass could in fact give particles gravity......another guess or question is that if an electron was the shape of a spinor(plasmiod) or monopole ...if you rotate it fast enough it would look like a sphere...if an object rotates fast enough it can create a centrifugal force (like artificial gravity) and since the object in question (evos or neutrinos) has a charge could this result in gravity like effect at the quantum level(like that picture of the basic yin structure in your triangles and spirals video)
There are so many experimenters not being aware of the potential strange radiation that's being produced (for example a lot of vortex magnetic trap water experiments, although the charge is probably accumulated in the water and transferred to and stored in a salt afterwards).
For possible shielding materials: do you think that layering with triboelectric materials (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triboelectric_effect), which can hold a negative or positive charge, depending on the material. For example Teflon/PTFE?
This is also interesting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electret (a dielectric material that has a quasi-permanent electric charge or dipole polarisation).
The layering of materials sounds very similar as how orgone accumulators are constructed.
I don’t know what to do with this but I’m putting it here in the hope that Bob Greenyer sees it:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2J6AzibeZpl4/
It’s basically the testimony of an insider who is on the run from the Deep State. I came across him while researching the irregularities surrounding the recent U.S. election. He has a twitter handle johnheretohelp. His testimony about malfeasance at the top of U.S. politics has been recently released by Lin Wood. It all ties back to the lab origins of covid-19 and the politicisation and censorship that surrounds all this.
The link above though is to the same witness’s involvement in free energy research and where this led him and his fellow researchers - most of whom appear to have been disappeared. The start of his account is incredible enough, but it’s the second project that really blew me away.
My previous researches into this individual seem to back up the idea that he is credible, and Lin Wood who is a libel lawyer would not publish the stuff he has about top U.S. individuals without doing his due diligence on the credibility of the witness. So I kind of trust this witness and am inclined to believe what he says about things on the political level, but I don’t want to get into a political discussion here. It’s just to say that I am inclined to believe this man. What he gives testimony to here in the link I’ve provided is something called project looking glass, Pandora, and a separate project that he lamentingly refers to as ‘Deep Space 9’. I really don’t know what to think about it. It just seems so unbelievable.
But since this is for thinking a bit more outside the box I’m leaving it here like a cat leaves a dead frog on the rug. Perhaps people won’t like what I’ve bought in, but there it is. Make of it what you all will.
Hi Bob! Great presentation with a lot o valuable information. I will resume a small Ni plate that I used in some LENR experiments many years ago and I will put it on a CD and see if it is (still) somewhat active. BTW, the CD-Rs does not contain Al at all: they have just a very thin layer (in the order of 100 nm) of metal coating over the dye layer, and under the top laquer.
Hey Bob,
Enjoyed the presentation. Just afew thoughts.
1) You mentioned at the end that PDF's were showing with a yellow tone. Thought there might be a chance it was the blue eye saving settings that most OS's have built into them now a days. Sometimes they get turned on after system updates so it might be worth a check.
2) I realize more testing is probably necessary but when you showed the chart here https://youtu.be/tOF9lp8R3GU?t=4208 that illustrated that 90% of the radiation was blocked by the first 2 CD's it made me think that perhaps the other 10% of the radiation is of such a HUGE energy quanta and an order of magnitude higher such that it couldn't realistically be stopped. I am not trying to disuade anyone I'm just hoping perhaps your aware of some data point that can clarify things for me. Like am I reasonable to understand that the 20 or so interactions on CD's 3-10 were all caused by the same 20 instances of strange radiation. As in 20 total instances of strange radiation each leaving one impression on each of the 10 cd's? Or am I more correct to assume the alterante, that when the strange radiation leaves a mark it means that it has effectively been eliminated? This would be trivial to settle and I think it would be a very good thing to clarify. You could perhaps do it very simply by just stacking 10 CD's and putting a shared mark on them all to allow you to see the orientation. Then after exposing them for afew days, isolate the strange radiation impressions and see if there is a spatial correlation between impressions on adjacent CD's. So for example does an impression on the outermost CD have an impression at the same location on all or any of the inner CD's. I do realize strange radiation can enter dark mode, and I also realize that the strange radiation or perhaps EVO's are more likely to travel along the surface of the CD's so perhaps they would just shoot around the edges and there would be no spatial correlation identifiable. But it seems to me from the images, that at least for the strange radiation that appears to leave penetration marks, there might be a correlation. And knowing whether the strange radiation that is penetrating the outer most CD also left penetration marks on the inner CD's would be perhaps useful to know. If it were leaving impressions on the inner CD's as well as the outer CD's at the exact same location, I would perhaps interpret that as meaning it was a much higher energy grouping and perhaps layering this type of shielding might be inadequate. Or perhaps it isn't the case that they are just a way higher order of magnitude energy (other wild speculation) but it is the case that the spacing or thickness of a dialectric or metal layer has the capacity to slow/capture a certain type of quanta of radiation, and anything that doesn't get captured by the first 1/2 layers isn't going to be captured by identical subsequent layers. In which case perhaps a variety of layers of different thicknesses or different materials is in order to capture the full spectrum of the radiation. I think we know of two different materials now that can be used CD's and film. So perhaps in addition to the layered CD's test above to test for spacial correlation, a similar test could be done layering different detection media and trying to identify special correlation.
Anyways just some ideas (of which you have no shortage) :)
I attempted to juman enhance the Google translate of a paper from Chizhov, one where he used CO2 gas chamber to find energetic particles in a Nickel Hydrogen reactor that was still emitting them over a year after the reactor had been left in storage withou being operated, perhaps is this one same you translated? But I gave up after a few pages because there was too many equations that were a pain to manually correct. Thanks for getting back to this fascinating topic!
Questions on quantum gravity...if gravity and mass are intertwined like electricity and magnetism...I’m assuming that the discovery of the Higgs field which gives particles mass could in fact give particles gravity......another guess or question is that if an electron was the shape of a spinor(plasmiod) or monopole ...if you rotate it fast enough it would look like a sphere...if an object rotates fast enough it can create a centrifugal force (like artificial gravity) and since the object in question (evos or neutrinos) has a charge could this result in gravity like effect at the quantum level(like that picture of the basic yin structure in your triangles and spirals video)
Nice presentation! Safety first.
There are so many experimenters not being aware of the potential strange radiation that's being produced (for example a lot of vortex magnetic trap water experiments, although the charge is probably accumulated in the water and transferred to and stored in a salt afterwards).
For possible shielding materials: do you think that layering with triboelectric materials (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triboelectric_effect), which can hold a negative or positive charge, depending on the material. For example Teflon/PTFE?
This is also interesting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electret (a dielectric material that has a quasi-permanent electric charge or dipole polarisation).
The layering of materials sounds very similar as how orgone accumulators are constructed.