Bob, my internet cut off right at the beginning of the presentation last Saturday, I'm watching it now, but lest we not forget the Charles Chandler paper "On the Electromagnetic Nature of Tornadic Supercells" who presents a related argument. Sadly, his website is not up at the moment but both you and I have the paper. Chandler says the same thing: some areas are totally devastated but not a few feet away. Doesn't fit with thermodynamic ideas but more with electricity. Also this link: https://collegetimes.co/on-the-electromagnetic-basis-of-tornadoes/
I recently spoke with someone from Missouri (phone rep with ATT) who survived being in the middle of an E5 tornado. She said everything in her field of vision turned green and stayed green for a while afterwards (ionization?), and objects in the middle of the vortex were not spinning around but seemed almost weightless. She was able to hold a drifting, big bookshelf away from her with ONE FINGER! Doesn't sound like 500 mph winds but more like electromagnetic fields. Also, some of the bones in her inner ears simply vanished but the rest of her ears were fine. Go figure. What can do that? Electronuclear collapse.
Thanks for the reference. Sure Chandler's work is voluminous and one of the best resources there are, however, for me, it alone does not explain the bizarre low friction boundaries, for me that has to come with changing the way charge can interact and that has to involve modifying the way the electron works, which also explains the changes in properties in materials.
A perceived light could be as a result of the change in way electrons work, in the affected gasses (spectral changes as we observed in LION samples and as observed by Zhou in 3 body alignments), in the eye or in the brain. We know for certain now that the toroidal moment is present in the conscious brain performing cognitive tasks. If this is affected, perception may take some time to return to normal, almost like coming out of anaesthetic.
Bob, I posted my summary of Chandler's main points. At the very end of his paper he says there is no funding in the US for EM interpretations of tornadoes in the last 40 years, only the thermodynamic point of view. This is allows meteorologists to say there is no evidence for EM causes of tornadoes in the last 40 years. How convenient!
In other news, I decided to watch one series this year, Amazon's Fallout, I knew nothing about the game or the adaptation, but several episodes in, it turns out the whole thing is based around Cold Fusion saving the world.
Of course. And in a few years mainstream science will come out and say "we've been telling it was real the whole time, but no one has been listening since F and P made their amazing discovery."
What would be the impact if dark matter and energy were no longer necessary to explain the expansion of the universe? Link from NASA Space News https://youtu.be/cdqqn9o7XS4?si=ZCQeLp9FVg65FJxH
I prefer not to speculate on the speculations of a redundancy in former speculations.
I like to review repeatable evidence across systems that shows nature has a particular way of working that may be on every scale that may or may not be supported by ancient architecture or writings.
The elegance and simplicity of your current understanding and how you are able to fit new findings systematically into the sacred geometry framework, lends a lot to the credibility of the approach. I was just curious, as an absolute neophyte, to know your thoughts on whether the fractal toroidal moments depend on (require) dark matter/energy or can merely accommodate it. Your depth of knowledge spanning so many subjects is awesome. Your willingness to share it and “open-source”it to keep it from being sequestered is both humbling and inspiring. Thanks.
Relic neutrinos are a real thing (they are absolutely not the same as nuclear neutrinos). For a proton and an electron to interact to form a neutron via inverse beta process, a cold anti-neutrino is needed (as determined by Dr. Alexander Parkhomov. The same is true for a neutron to convert to proton and electron, a cold neutrino is needed. The fractal toroidal moment has the means to cohere these particles to a point in its phase singularity which presents as a topological monopole.
It may be that the phase singularity just unwinds matter into a set of resonant energy waves which are re-organised on release and there is no need for the Cold or Relic [anti]neutrinos.
What matters most is the inputs to and outputs from a predictable structure that allows this effortless and largely safe matter<>energy conversion process to occur predictably.
I have made clear from the beginning of the process that I knew from being a little boy that I had to do something from my 40s and that it was my duty to do it. I believe it is my honour to share this work. This is not an invention, it cannot be owned, it just is and my role is to ensure it does not only get used to subjugate and hold dominion over us and the planet, but that its positive application in full clear knowledge of its truth can better the human condition and the biosphere.
Thanks bob when I demonstrated my effects to Canada news hour there where many foljs 2ho wanted to visit me ine was a pilot fo Canada airr who told me about counter rotating mercuy rings
Superfluid medium (so, incompressible) - otherwise known as aether, the same aether Tesla was studying and made use of in his “longitudinal electricity” radiant energy systems:
Particularly interesting is how the free to move copper strip is drawn toward the lightbulb when radiant energy is flowing through it as opposed to “regular” AC, demonstrating how electrons and aether interact to cause the copper strip to be “pulled toward” the light bulb … much like gravity … a not entirely co-incidental behaviour!!! In a universe bathed and grounded in aether, there is no need for any “mysterious dark energy or dark matter” and definitely no need for WIMPs - weakly interacting MASSIVE particles, which, of course, had to be massive so that their nothing like the aether - 🙄 sheesh - WIMPs that they have been unable to detect but now want an even more massive particle collider to find.
Yet, there’s the copper strip being pulled toward the light bulb driven by radiant energy…
Great demonstration, well spotted Gordon, it supports our observation, in many systems (LION, Ohmasa Gas Vs 10-Yen Coin, Henk Jurrien Cardiod Infarction, Huang DHX-2) that EVOs beam attracts spin nuclei such as copper and magnetic materials. I would be interested to see the same experiment conducted with a shim of fused quartz (to rule out inductive, magnetic and partially spin effects). Zinc foil may be a good candidate as it only has 4.11% spin nuclei.
I did have one last question which I couldn’t type out fast enough…since spheres of all sizes spin through space…from the stars down to the tiny “plasmoid” spheres on SEM, does the spin create the sphere or does the spherical shape cause it to spin?
If this isn’t too dumb a question I have another one…
Is there a specific part I should look at as I am being flooded with 30 1 hour + videos to look at a day, and logically it is impossible for me to review them all.
I am not sure! I noticed he only used what seemed like specific excerpt(s?), one of which was in Extraordinary Science, Steve from TeslaTech's former magazine/conferences. I know someone recently presented a Searl or Searl inspired device on his weekly livestream also (Isaiah Ritchey). Not to inundate you further. I mostly just put the link here for others if they happen to get curious and for myself if I ever get to it. I definitely haven't read the book nor watched Isaiah's whole presentation yet.
I just happened to find the whole book on archive after searching. I could probably get this copy of the magazine from Steve and look. Or also look up the other excerpt referenced. I will potentially get back to you about it.
In my opinion, the EVO does not consist of circulating electrons. The EVO is made up of unmoving electron quasiparticles. This particle is actually a photon that has assumed the property of spin from the electron but does not have charge. This quasiparticle called an exciton-polariton has negative mass.
Quasiparticles are bare particles (such as electrons) combined with characteristics from other excitations in their quantum field, such as photons.
These quasiparticles does need to move to produce magnetism. Just like a permanent magnet, these spin particles form a lattice where the spins of all these particles add up to form a powerful combined beam of angular momentum that rotates photons in a magnetic vortex flux tube, one tube for each magnetic pole in a magnetic dipole and only one tube for a monopole.
You have seen the footprint of this magnetic spin lattice in the witness marks produced by EVO impact on metal surfaces. Moving electrons would never produce such magnetic hexagonal impressions on metal.
“Long ago he (mankind) recognized that all perceptible matter comes from a primary substance, of a tenuity beyond conception, filling all space, the Ākāśa or luminiferous ether, which is acted upon by the life-giving Prana or creative force, calling into existence, in never ending cycles, all things and phenomena. The primary substance, thrown into infinitesimal whirls of prodigious velocity, becomes gross matter; the force subsiding, the motion ceases and matter disappears, reverting to the primary substance.” Tesla.
‘This world was never made by gods or men, but is, was, and always shall be, everlasting fire increasing and decreasing in measure” Heraclitus.
What was teslas idea of the ether? And what do these latest discoveries Bob is exploring tell us about the characteristics of the ether? Also does any of this support or conflict with Tesla’s idea of the ether. I’d like to know people’s thoughts on this - as well as Bob’s if he is inclined to express a view.
Also BOB here’s Dr John Milewski from Los Alamos turning Brown Glass into GOLD ! He’s found Other Elements EXACTLY like da NOBLE GAS particles that’s NOT on Periodic tables! This video 2 part Live show
Bob, my internet cut off right at the beginning of the presentation last Saturday, I'm watching it now, but lest we not forget the Charles Chandler paper "On the Electromagnetic Nature of Tornadic Supercells" who presents a related argument. Sadly, his website is not up at the moment but both you and I have the paper. Chandler says the same thing: some areas are totally devastated but not a few feet away. Doesn't fit with thermodynamic ideas but more with electricity. Also this link: https://collegetimes.co/on-the-electromagnetic-basis-of-tornadoes/
I recently spoke with someone from Missouri (phone rep with ATT) who survived being in the middle of an E5 tornado. She said everything in her field of vision turned green and stayed green for a while afterwards (ionization?), and objects in the middle of the vortex were not spinning around but seemed almost weightless. She was able to hold a drifting, big bookshelf away from her with ONE FINGER! Doesn't sound like 500 mph winds but more like electromagnetic fields. Also, some of the bones in her inner ears simply vanished but the rest of her ears were fine. Go figure. What can do that? Electronuclear collapse.
Thanks for the reference. Sure Chandler's work is voluminous and one of the best resources there are, however, for me, it alone does not explain the bizarre low friction boundaries, for me that has to come with changing the way charge can interact and that has to involve modifying the way the electron works, which also explains the changes in properties in materials.
A perceived light could be as a result of the change in way electrons work, in the affected gasses (spectral changes as we observed in LION samples and as observed by Zhou in 3 body alignments), in the eye or in the brain. We know for certain now that the toroidal moment is present in the conscious brain performing cognitive tasks. If this is affected, perception may take some time to return to normal, almost like coming out of anaesthetic.
Bob, I posted my summary of Chandler's main points. At the very end of his paper he says there is no funding in the US for EM interpretations of tornadoes in the last 40 years, only the thermodynamic point of view. This is allows meteorologists to say there is no evidence for EM causes of tornadoes in the last 40 years. How convenient!
https://newcrystalmind.com/2024/charles-l-chandler-2014-the-electromagnetic-nature-of-tornadic-supercell-thunderstorms/
Reading it now - thanks for the shout out.
In other news, I decided to watch one series this year, Amazon's Fallout, I knew nothing about the game or the adaptation, but several episodes in, it turns out the whole thing is based around Cold Fusion saving the world.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainment/gaming/is-cold-fusion-real-why-the-scientific-discovery-is-critical-for-fallout-s-future/ar-BB1lGILW
Of course. And in a few years mainstream science will come out and say "we've been telling it was real the whole time, but no one has been listening since F and P made their amazing discovery."
You know it.
Right Bob, Chandler moves the ball down the field in the right direction but he doesn’t score a goal.
What would be the impact if dark matter and energy were no longer necessary to explain the expansion of the universe? Link from NASA Space News https://youtu.be/cdqqn9o7XS4?si=ZCQeLp9FVg65FJxH
Some things would need to be re-written.
I prefer not to speculate on the speculations of a redundancy in former speculations.
I like to review repeatable evidence across systems that shows nature has a particular way of working that may be on every scale that may or may not be supported by ancient architecture or writings.
The elegance and simplicity of your current understanding and how you are able to fit new findings systematically into the sacred geometry framework, lends a lot to the credibility of the approach. I was just curious, as an absolute neophyte, to know your thoughts on whether the fractal toroidal moments depend on (require) dark matter/energy or can merely accommodate it. Your depth of knowledge spanning so many subjects is awesome. Your willingness to share it and “open-source”it to keep it from being sequestered is both humbling and inspiring. Thanks.
Relic neutrinos are a real thing (they are absolutely not the same as nuclear neutrinos). For a proton and an electron to interact to form a neutron via inverse beta process, a cold anti-neutrino is needed (as determined by Dr. Alexander Parkhomov. The same is true for a neutron to convert to proton and electron, a cold neutrino is needed. The fractal toroidal moment has the means to cohere these particles to a point in its phase singularity which presents as a topological monopole.
It may be that the phase singularity just unwinds matter into a set of resonant energy waves which are re-organised on release and there is no need for the Cold or Relic [anti]neutrinos.
What matters most is the inputs to and outputs from a predictable structure that allows this effortless and largely safe matter<>energy conversion process to occur predictably.
I have made clear from the beginning of the process that I knew from being a little boy that I had to do something from my 40s and that it was my duty to do it. I believe it is my honour to share this work. This is not an invention, it cannot be owned, it just is and my role is to ensure it does not only get used to subjugate and hold dominion over us and the planet, but that its positive application in full clear knowledge of its truth can better the human condition and the biosphere.
Out of interest these dust devils are capable of lifting relatively massive things and people.
https://youtu.be/oJpiKKAikJ8?si=WYnuwS1aKq1NZG3J
There are many amazing videos on YouTube of tornados.
They aren’t anywhere near being understood or explained with normal physics and aerodynamics surely?
There’s a great video of a roof turning to dust in the presence of a hefty tornado, somewhere I will post it if I find it.
That is in the Windhexe blogs - also, there are trucks lifted into air.
Thanks bob when I demonstrated my effects to Canada news hour there where many foljs 2ho wanted to visit me ine was a pilot fo Canada airr who told me about counter rotating mercuy rings
Merury gives of radio wave and light if agitated
Woukd Indiam do the same ?
Well - first it would need to be fluid.
Gallium mercury fun metals
Sure are, and have their own challenges.
Gallium one of my favourite metals, plus lead now day.
John what colour is Gallium mercury, please.
Superfluid medium (so, incompressible) - otherwise known as aether, the same aether Tesla was studying and made use of in his “longitudinal electricity” radiant energy systems:
https://youtu.be/DFa-IymyWHM?si=gwSUuqDS45we8HnT
Particularly interesting is how the free to move copper strip is drawn toward the lightbulb when radiant energy is flowing through it as opposed to “regular” AC, demonstrating how electrons and aether interact to cause the copper strip to be “pulled toward” the light bulb … much like gravity … a not entirely co-incidental behaviour!!! In a universe bathed and grounded in aether, there is no need for any “mysterious dark energy or dark matter” and definitely no need for WIMPs - weakly interacting MASSIVE particles, which, of course, had to be massive so that their nothing like the aether - 🙄 sheesh - WIMPs that they have been unable to detect but now want an even more massive particle collider to find.
Yet, there’s the copper strip being pulled toward the light bulb driven by radiant energy…
Yes great one
Great demonstration, well spotted Gordon, it supports our observation, in many systems (LION, Ohmasa Gas Vs 10-Yen Coin, Henk Jurrien Cardiod Infarction, Huang DHX-2) that EVOs beam attracts spin nuclei such as copper and magnetic materials. I would be interested to see the same experiment conducted with a shim of fused quartz (to rule out inductive, magnetic and partially spin effects). Zinc foil may be a good candidate as it only has 4.11% spin nuclei.
Currently working on the Windhexe presentation. Looking for more tornado dustification footage and ran into this one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxdFh8nYMgM
Saw the first clip on another channels compilation video, but there is much more here.
Thanks
I did have one last question which I couldn’t type out fast enough…since spheres of all sizes spin through space…from the stars down to the tiny “plasmoid” spheres on SEM, does the spin create the sphere or does the spherical shape cause it to spin?
If this isn’t too dumb a question I have another one…
and momzxxxooo is pronounced Momz
Thanks for elocution guidance on the handle.
Spheres form because of surface tension and like, likes, like - essentially a sphere is the minimum surface area for the maximum volume.
Hollow spheres are more interesting.
Refrenced by Sergei Godin in the presentation:
Antigravity: The Dream Made Reality, The Story of John R. R. Searl
https://archive.org/details/antigravity-the-dream-made-reality-john-a.-thomas-jason-thomas
Is there a specific part I should look at as I am being flooded with 30 1 hour + videos to look at a day, and logically it is impossible for me to review them all.
I am not sure! I noticed he only used what seemed like specific excerpt(s?), one of which was in Extraordinary Science, Steve from TeslaTech's former magazine/conferences. I know someone recently presented a Searl or Searl inspired device on his weekly livestream also (Isaiah Ritchey). Not to inundate you further. I mostly just put the link here for others if they happen to get curious and for myself if I ever get to it. I definitely haven't read the book nor watched Isaiah's whole presentation yet.
I just happened to find the whole book on archive after searching. I could probably get this copy of the magazine from Steve and look. Or also look up the other excerpt referenced. I will potentially get back to you about it.
In my opinion, the EVO does not consist of circulating electrons. The EVO is made up of unmoving electron quasiparticles. This particle is actually a photon that has assumed the property of spin from the electron but does not have charge. This quasiparticle called an exciton-polariton has negative mass.
Quasiparticles are bare particles (such as electrons) combined with characteristics from other excitations in their quantum field, such as photons.
These quasiparticles does need to move to produce magnetism. Just like a permanent magnet, these spin particles form a lattice where the spins of all these particles add up to form a powerful combined beam of angular momentum that rotates photons in a magnetic vortex flux tube, one tube for each magnetic pole in a magnetic dipole and only one tube for a monopole.
You have seen the footprint of this magnetic spin lattice in the witness marks produced by EVO impact on metal surfaces. Moving electrons would never produce such magnetic hexagonal impressions on metal.
I gave part of my perspective here:
https://remoteview.substack.com/p/o-day-flower-of-life
“Long ago he (mankind) recognized that all perceptible matter comes from a primary substance, of a tenuity beyond conception, filling all space, the Ākāśa or luminiferous ether, which is acted upon by the life-giving Prana or creative force, calling into existence, in never ending cycles, all things and phenomena. The primary substance, thrown into infinitesimal whirls of prodigious velocity, becomes gross matter; the force subsiding, the motion ceases and matter disappears, reverting to the primary substance.” Tesla.
‘This world was never made by gods or men, but is, was, and always shall be, everlasting fire increasing and decreasing in measure” Heraclitus.
What was teslas idea of the ether? And what do these latest discoveries Bob is exploring tell us about the characteristics of the ether? Also does any of this support or conflict with Tesla’s idea of the ether. I’d like to know people’s thoughts on this - as well as Bob’s if he is inclined to express a view.
http://tuks.nl/Mirror/frankgermano_net/viktorschauberger_b.htm schauberger water tornado machine.
Also BOB here’s Dr John Milewski from Los Alamos turning Brown Glass into GOLD ! He’s found Other Elements EXACTLY like da NOBLE GAS particles that’s NOT on Periodic tables! This video 2 part Live show
https://youtu.be/HZBCgPuvmzI?si=GgoqaYbaimLxysI7
Bob Watch this classified video FullMoon Reflects Plasmonic X-ray display of HUGE Land masses NOT on ANY MAP
https://youtu.be/3VQoctIH_wE?si=yAnCzdtN1YMe6oEn
Could you send the link for the 2D O image here?
Metaks are fun
https://youtu.be/VArK2cMsLtA?si=iU0Cy93Q__3ExZ00