O-Day - Relentless
Push forward to MVPs
A brief forward looking overview of some things in motion and some examples of 3rd parties inspired by the work shared so far.
LIVESTREAMed at 23:00 CET on Sun 18th Aug 2024
Discussion about this post
No posts
© 2025 Robert William Greenyer B.Eng. (Hons.)
Substack is the home for great culture
Thank you SO MUCH Bob! This video provided me with the final bits of information I needed to fully integrate the geometry with the dynamics -- I get it now. I can see it. I can see why it works the way it does now. I feel very blessed, and humbled. THANK YOU!
I had a literal Eureka moment and I wanted to share. I have had some of my most profound lateral and integrative thinking, while taking a shower a few times in my life. Watching this video by you I could finally see it -- and I can right now -- I can see the full dynamics of what that structure is doing. It really is a kind of nuclear siphon. If you look at that shape, or the series of shapes you shows later in that video, that is literally a funnel, and that funnel proceeds down through a tube basically of aether/plasma that is the shape of the fractal toroid. It's a very long torturous path with a very specific tight shape, and that's the pressure gradient of the aether, so to speak, where you can just imagine the sum of all forces converged to produce an underlying shape that reveals the basic pressure gradient of the universe, the underlying dynamics, the underlying shape. So that's why it always forms this particular shape when you punch it hard enough and narrow enough, because this is just the natural hydrodynamic effect of a very pointy very hard punch by a cavitation jet, for example, or a huge high-power Tesla apparatus or whatever. The structure sucks in on one side and spits out on the other side. On the output side, it forms a spiral outward, very similar to Malcolm Bendall's shape, where he shows the spiral pattern of the elements over a sphere. They will proceed out the exit in some shape like that. That's because it's more or less the weight of the matter as it gets flung out at different pressure gradients going out the exit funnel. As far as how do you get very specific outputs, I suspect the answer to that is controlling the environment around this structure when you create one, and basically feeding it particular wavelength of particles at a particular angle of a particular isotope. So choose your particular input element, and then basically pick a frequency and aim it into input funnel of this structure, and you have this nuclear-powered siphon / ball lightning object, depending on what scale's we're scaling about. Inside a PVC pipe siphon defying gravity the answer may be no more complex than positing a particular geometry of PVC fittings produces some quanta of cavitation bubbles which produces some quanta of nuclear siphons in the same of the magnetohydrodynamic structure that is the fractal toroidal aether/plasma tube / O. When they unwind or explode they release the world's smallest nuclear bomb, so to speak, so a tiny number of reactions can add up to a large propulsive power. Flowing water through a pipe made to intentionally cavitate the water at some point with geometry favorable to capture propulsion from the cavitation area seems very plausible. This may be the solution to end all solutions. The easiest end-game. The all-in-one that fixes Africa and America and everywhere. You can pump water and trivially turn that into electricity at arbitrary scales.
What a disapointment with the article dealing with the so-called "nuclear siphon" !
Did the author even bother to make an experiment by himself ? Apparently no, or at least he does not mention it. Nor does he give any description of a device that he could have witnessed.
Instead, he tells us that "The existence of such siphons in nature is based on thousands of videos..."
Could it be that these videos are fakes ? He writes "In many cases, this is true [that these videos are fakes]. However, there are many videos that require explanation."
Well... how can he tell the difference ?
In brief : this guy proposes a theory to explain a phenomenon that he did not even observe !
(ps : in french, the world for "disapointment" is "deception")