A hexagonal shaped witness marked area is usually produced by a fully matured polariton condensate (aka EVO) that is generating a hugely intense self generated magnetic field. This field is strong enough to coherently magnetize the material that makes up the surface area of the witness mark so that the affected area reflects polarized light (Magneto-optic Kerr effect --https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magneto-optic_Kerr_effect).
In physics the magneto-optic Kerr effect (MOKE) or the surface magneto-optic Kerr effect (SMOKE) is one of the magneto-optic effects. It describes the changes to light reflected from a magnetized surface. It is used in materials science research in devices such as the Kerr microscope, to investigate the magnetization structure of materials.
My interpretation of the Emerald tablets text from wikipedia explained in the parentheses:
Tis true without lying, certain and most true. That which is below is like that which is above and that which is above is like that which is below to do the miracle of one only thing (same patterns no matter what scale and EVOs doing the same no matter what size they are). And as all things have been and arose from one by the mediation of one (first EVO meditated into existence by God?): so all things have their birth from this one thing by adaptation (EVOs giving birth to all the elements). The Sun is its father, the moon its mother (Sun is the destruction zone, moon is the maker zone), the wind hath carried it in its belly (EVOs can be produced in wind, like in thunderstorms?), the earth is its nurse (Earth as in particles, is the "nurse" of the Eather). The father of all perfection in the whole world is here (everything is based around the perfect geometry in which EVOs is based on). Its force or power is entire if it be converted into earth (Eather, which powers the EVO, have unfathomable energy potential if converted to matter). Separate thou the earth from the fire (breaking the bond of electrons to the nucleolus? Charge separation?), the subtle from the gross (subtle=Eather and gross=matter?) sweetly with great industry (helping nature do what nature does is the easiest way to produce a lot of EVOs). It ascends from the earth to the heaven and again it descends to the earth and receives the force of things superior and inferior (particles being condensed into the black hole and eventually come out changed by the force of the EVO. superior and inferior = yin and yang?). By this means you shall have the glory of the whole world and thereby all obscurity shall fly from you (Using EVOs to tap into the akashic records?). Its force is above all force, for it vanquishes every subtle thing and penetrates every solid thing (EVOs penetrating anything). So was the world created. From this are and do come admirable adaptations where of the means is here in this. Hence I am called Hermes Trismegist, having the three parts of the philosophy of the whole world (yin, yang and the black hole in the middle?). That which I have said of the operation of the Sun is accomplished and ended.
So from my understanding matter is formed from a frequency applied to the eather. I'm trying to find a good analogy and remembered sand forming shapes on a vibrating table
When applying frequency to a table with sand on top, you see the sand grouping together at the resonance spots. Same way that Eather is grouping together at resonance spots to form matter when a frequency is applied to it.
As EVOs, Strange Radiation etc are all coherent matter objects, is there a way to (easily) decohere them without physical contact with “normal” matter (so, basically, feeding them out-of-sync aether streams or disruptive fields)? If so, they would disintegrate quickly back into normal matter / enter back into a normal state with respect to normal matter
The recent discovery of the production of a monopole pair inside the EVO introduces the possible existence of new nuclear processes catalyzed by these monopoles.
The theoretical studies of the monopole catalysis of proton decay in grand unified theories are reviewed. Monopole catalysis, i.e. the ability of magnetic monopoles to induce nucleon decay at a strong interaction rate, is a non-perturbative quantum field theory phenomenon that incorporates the effects of the triangle anomaly and complex structure of the gauge theory vacuum and peculiar properties of fermions in the field of a monopole. This effect is of interest for experiment and astrophysics. By studying the properties of the Dirac equation in the background monopole field reveals that quantum mechanics fails in describing the fermion-monopole interactions. The quantum field theoretic treatment is possible within the s-wave approximation where only spherically symmetric fields are considered. The author reviews various techniques and results of the s-wave theory taking a toy SU(2) model and a realistic SU(5) grand unified theory as examples. He also discusses the corrections to the s-wave approximation and the model dependence of the catalysis.
I'm not entirely clear if you came to a definitive conclusion about strange radiation tracks. Is it a particle that moves in a circle while it moves forward and sometimes there are 2 that circle around together. When the track is photographed with a short exposure, the trail becomes short. Does it become a point if the exposure is ultra short.
Awesome presentation, impressive work! Safety obviously becomes an important bottleneck when developing applications for these phenomena. Still very much curious about the emissions from the stainless steel TSG setups. Would not be surprised if there are strange radiation tracks flying off the stainless steel ones since we've observed EVOs on the exterior and sprites from earlier GEET videos.
Would you reckon that carbon steel is a better absorber of these strange radiation tracks?
Anyway, still catching up. Looking at the great and incredible SEM photos now
With an attempt to visually simulate the dynamics of these structures in the most efficient and generative fashion I am able to program and starting to see a lot of similarities.
I will be presenting the windhexe project to interested parties in a couple of weeks. So I'm still creating the content on that one. Simultaneously broadening the scope from the windhexe to the practical application of the FTM with other projects like the ULTR and THOR to put the windhexe project in the right context and not as an isolated reverse engineering project. Either way there'll be more animated and rendered content coming soon.
as you warn us against the dangers of "disturbed" coherent matter, I invite you to read the story of a man who suffered a serious accident of this kind: and even if the man speaks of Ormus in this report, you will notice that many of the phenomena described are in line with what you are studying: very informative from my point of view
A Faraday cage cannot shield the magnetic field of a permanent magnet. A Faraday cage is made of a conductor that responds to electric fields, but it is not affected by strong magnetostatic fields.
A Faraday cage can protect against electromagnetic fields by shorting out the electric part, but it cannot block stable or slowly varying magnetic fields. For example, a compass will still work inside a Faraday cage.
This magnetic behavior points to the nature and origin of the magnetic field produced by the EVO. The lack of effectiveness of faraday shielding in the LENR reaction points to the existence of a lattice like spin footprint inside the EVO where the magnetically active spin particles take on a fixed and unmoving position inside the EVO. The witness hexagonal shaped marks produced by the EVO show that the lattice taken on by the spin particles take the shape of a hexagon shaped fixed lattice.
There is no movement of these spin particles as required by the plasmoid theory of the EVO reaction. If the magnetic field were being produced by a plasmoid effect that type of magnetic field would be shielded by a faraday cage.
If the transmutation process in LENR is based on magnetic power, then the best material that can be used to resist transmutation damage in the structure of a LENR reactor is those elements that have a high NMR active dipole value.
Mendelevium (258Md) has the highest possible nuclear spin for common isotopes
on the periodic table, with a value of 8. Niobium (90Nb) and tantalum (181Ta) also have a value of 8.
"After each triggering duty cycle , the magnetic field (at ~20
cm from the reactor) rose from ~0.6 Tesla to 1.6 Tesla during the reaction period (no triggering !)"
...
This is not about the 1.6 Tesla at 20 cm. figure being wrong. It is about how truly extraordinary it is, which did not seem to be readily acknowledged when brought up as a possible problem.
I heard Kim myself and didn't think much of it, because I didn't have the figures in my mind of what, say, the geomagnetic field was, or how strong powerful magnets were. So I first saw certain pseudoskeptics ridiculing the claim. So, as is my wont, I checked it out, I never assume that the pseudoskeptics are wrong. They were right about the field strength, though not necessarily about the sarcastic conclusions they drew.
That is one whopping magnetic field, far beyond a level where it would still be an important fact.
So far beyond that level, that the most likely explanation at this point, absent confirmation of something else, is a simple misreading of the instrument used. A Gauss indication read as Tesla. That idea is mine, I didn't read it anywhere.
...
Your hypothesis is one possible explanation. However, it depends on interpretation of information that is not clear. The statement was "After each triggering duty cycle..." My understanding of the DGT operation is that triggering is initiated only when the output drops below a desired level. Thus, the 0.6 T would be the mag-field output for operation below the desired level. I don't know if the detector system gives a zero reading on the same scale before application of the 1st trigger to get it to the operating regime. These are easily answered questions (along with the make and model of the detector and analyzer).
By presenting your comments in the manner that you did, I fear that you might deter other experimentalists from 'admitting' that they also had signs of 'anomalous' RF emission. Remember that the data that Kim presented was for a system that was different from most and much more productive of heat. I know of at least one other lab that has seen very strong RF emission measurements (sufficient to shut down laboratory instrumentation). If scaled to heat output, the levels might be comparable to what was presented. The other lab's data is not going to be published until all alternative explanation for the source of RF has been explored.
You have repeatedly suggested that the heat-to-4He ratio be reproduced. It might be that a simpler measurement is the RF to heat ratio.
I would request that people with an excess-heat-producing system put a loop antenna about it and feed it into an oscilloscope, if they don't have a frequency analyzer present. Even if they don't have an ability to turn the system on and off at will, or a trigger, they might be able to correlate an RF signal above background (if observed) with the excess heat production. If only a correlated 10x background is observed, for a 1 watt excess power output, a mention of this effect could be important. Turning on a portable radio in the lab might provide an effective qualitative RF-radiation detector.
The magnetic fields produced by the Defkalion system were large as witnessed by the disruption of computer and telephone equipment at 3 meters even through a double faraday shield box.
The conjecture to be considered is the possible activation of nuclear reactions caused by strong magnetic fields (aka Monopole catalyzed fusion and fission).
The order of magnitude magnetic field strength of a 1 micron magnetic field source to be measured at 20cm showing 1.6 tesla is (10^4)^3 or (10^12) tesla for a magnetic dipole and (10^4)^2 or (10^8) tesla for a EVO sized magnetic monopole.
The other factor that is stated in slide 5 of the Kim presentation is that all even isotopes of nickel produced overunity heat whereas the odd isotope (Ni61) usually does not produce gainful energy. In other words, the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) active isotopes are not nuclear active and the non NMR active isotopes are.
Also U238 is fissioned more that U235 is by the LENR reaction.
This lack of nuclear activity may be due to the magnetic energy lost in the vibrations produced in the nuclei of (NMR) active isotopes by the nuclear magnetic dipole of that type of isotope.
See this video to understand how NMR active isotopes behave in a magnetic field.
LENR is a very confusing phenomena. A very weak LENR reaction will produce gamma radiation and neutrons that have been generated from fusion. This fusion reaction is derived from islands of Exciton-polaritons within the lattice that have not yet achieved coherence. This coherence state comes about when the number of polaritons reaches a critical density. When this density is reached, a global state of coherence among all islands of polaritons begins. This change of state produces the EVO(s) which is a condensate of polaritons nucleated (surrounded) by a magnetic domain wall.
The domain wall does not allow any energy or matter to exit the EVO except for a magnetic beam produced by the monopole pair which begins from vacuum instantiation when the magnetic capacity of the EVO reaches a critical level. In this state, transmutation occurs as seen in strange radiation tracks but no associated transmutation based energy is released through the domain wall. In the strong LENR reaction state, this coherent state of the condensate is what distroys LENR reactors without any production of energy derived from nuclear processes.
Magnets can be sensitive to temperature. The strength of a magnet depends on the alignment of its magnetic moments, which are formed by the angular momentum and spin of its electrons. When a magnet is exposed to cold, its molecules move more slowly and cause less vibration, which creates a more concentrated magnetic field. However, heat can cause the molecules to move faster and become more sporadic, which can weaken the magnet's strength and magnetic field.
The degree to which temperature affects a magnet depends on the type of material. For example, most magnets with the exception of ferrite
will actually display an increase in strength as the temperature drops. All permanent magnets (including ferrite) will lose a percentage of their performance for every degree increase.
If a magnet is exposed to high temperatures, the delicate balance between temperature and the domains in a magnet is destabilized. At around 80 °C, a magnet will lose its magnetic force and it will become demagnetized permanently if exposed to this temperature for a period, or if heated above its Curie temperature
.
The maximum operating temperature and Curie temperature are determined by the material a particular magnet is made of and the size and shape of the magnet.
So any magnet is imperfect because the spins of the particles that created the magnetism wonder around at random based on temperature. This random motion lessens the magnetic fields that the magnet produces.
But in a condensate all the magnetic particles are identical. There is no random motion of the spins of these particles. In a condensate, it is as if the condensate acts as one huge single particle. This coherent behavior of the particles that make up the condensate insures that the magnetic field is always at maximum strength. The strength of that single huge composite particle is 10^23 times more powerful than any single particle that forms the condensate.
Georges Lochack predicted the existence of light magnetic monopoles that would be magnetically excited states of neutrinos. Those monopoles have been observed by Urutskoev in high current discharges on thin titanium foils in water. H also observed the production of new elements, in particular of copper. Here too the even number isotopes of titanium were involved in the transmutation. Urutskoev explains the runaway or the Chernobyl reactor by the creation of magnetic monopoles in a first electrical accident that produced them. Then, the monopoles reached the reactor core and fissioned U-238, which explains why the Chernobyl reactor had a high U-235/U-238 ratio. Again, it is the even number nucleus (U-238) that was fissioned, not the odd one (U-235).
It is very possible that what Defkalion has measured is not a magnetic field, but the interaction of magnetic monopoles with the detector. The magnetic monopoles could also each all the other electronics equipments around.
The papers related to the magnetic monopoles are in the ICCF 11 proceedings.
A hexagonal shaped witness marked area is usually produced by a fully matured polariton condensate (aka EVO) that is generating a hugely intense self generated magnetic field. This field is strong enough to coherently magnetize the material that makes up the surface area of the witness mark so that the affected area reflects polarized light (Magneto-optic Kerr effect --https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magneto-optic_Kerr_effect).
In physics the magneto-optic Kerr effect (MOKE) or the surface magneto-optic Kerr effect (SMOKE) is one of the magneto-optic effects. It describes the changes to light reflected from a magnetized surface. It is used in materials science research in devices such as the Kerr microscope, to investigate the magnetization structure of materials.
It feels so unreal that the mysterious videos about alchemy I used to binge watch are making sense to me now.
One of the videos I'm referring to is Mr. Mythos video about the Emerald tablet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siqhtnrM7T8
My interpretation of the Emerald tablets text from wikipedia explained in the parentheses:
Tis true without lying, certain and most true. That which is below is like that which is above and that which is above is like that which is below to do the miracle of one only thing (same patterns no matter what scale and EVOs doing the same no matter what size they are). And as all things have been and arose from one by the mediation of one (first EVO meditated into existence by God?): so all things have their birth from this one thing by adaptation (EVOs giving birth to all the elements). The Sun is its father, the moon its mother (Sun is the destruction zone, moon is the maker zone), the wind hath carried it in its belly (EVOs can be produced in wind, like in thunderstorms?), the earth is its nurse (Earth as in particles, is the "nurse" of the Eather). The father of all perfection in the whole world is here (everything is based around the perfect geometry in which EVOs is based on). Its force or power is entire if it be converted into earth (Eather, which powers the EVO, have unfathomable energy potential if converted to matter). Separate thou the earth from the fire (breaking the bond of electrons to the nucleolus? Charge separation?), the subtle from the gross (subtle=Eather and gross=matter?) sweetly with great industry (helping nature do what nature does is the easiest way to produce a lot of EVOs). It ascends from the earth to the heaven and again it descends to the earth and receives the force of things superior and inferior (particles being condensed into the black hole and eventually come out changed by the force of the EVO. superior and inferior = yin and yang?). By this means you shall have the glory of the whole world and thereby all obscurity shall fly from you (Using EVOs to tap into the akashic records?). Its force is above all force, for it vanquishes every subtle thing and penetrates every solid thing (EVOs penetrating anything). So was the world created. From this are and do come admirable adaptations where of the means is here in this. Hence I am called Hermes Trismegist, having the three parts of the philosophy of the whole world (yin, yang and the black hole in the middle?). That which I have said of the operation of the Sun is accomplished and ended.
Came across (yet another) mathematical treatment of what we could be seeing with ball lightning.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=PYR9worLEGo
https://philogb.github.io/page/hopf/#
So from my understanding matter is formed from a frequency applied to the eather. I'm trying to find a good analogy and remembered sand forming shapes on a vibrating table
https://youtu.be/wHr3Ys-sNHs?si=gQkUxsORg5U5mEmq
When applying frequency to a table with sand on top, you see the sand grouping together at the resonance spots. Same way that Eather is grouping together at resonance spots to form matter when a frequency is applied to it.
As EVOs, Strange Radiation etc are all coherent matter objects, is there a way to (easily) decohere them without physical contact with “normal” matter (so, basically, feeding them out-of-sync aether streams or disruptive fields)? If so, they would disintegrate quickly back into normal matter / enter back into a normal state with respect to normal matter
The recent discovery of the production of a monopole pair inside the EVO introduces the possible existence of new nuclear processes catalyzed by these monopoles.
https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/16/056/16056172.pdf
MONOPONUCLEOSIS - The wonderful things that monopoles can do to nuclei
i f they are there.
1. Mixing of deuteron triplet and singlet states
2. Monopole nuclear matter
3. Catalysis of spontaneous fission
4. Catalysis of nuclear fusion (with implications for solar neutrinos)
5. Enhancement of forbidden beta decays.
Also the monopoles can possibly produce proton decay.
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0034-4885/51/2/002
Monopole catalysis of proton decay
V A Rubakov
The theoretical studies of the monopole catalysis of proton decay in grand unified theories are reviewed. Monopole catalysis, i.e. the ability of magnetic monopoles to induce nucleon decay at a strong interaction rate, is a non-perturbative quantum field theory phenomenon that incorporates the effects of the triangle anomaly and complex structure of the gauge theory vacuum and peculiar properties of fermions in the field of a monopole. This effect is of interest for experiment and astrophysics. By studying the properties of the Dirac equation in the background monopole field reveals that quantum mechanics fails in describing the fermion-monopole interactions. The quantum field theoretic treatment is possible within the s-wave approximation where only spherically symmetric fields are considered. The author reviews various techniques and results of the s-wave theory taking a toy SU(2) model and a realistic SU(5) grand unified theory as examples. He also discusses the corrections to the s-wave approximation and the model dependence of the catalysis.
https://lss.fnal.gov/archive_notes/industrial/fermilab-industrial-1985-01.pdf
EXOTIC PARTICLE CATALYSIS
Magnetic monopole catalysis is somewhat different than
either muon or quark catalysis. One is no longer fusing two
hydrogen nuclei together to extract something like four percent
of the mass equivalent in energy. Instead the monopole turns
the proton into a quivering jelly of sub-atomic particles so
that a fair fraction of the mass equivalent is available as
energy (some part of the energy goes off as neutrinos that
don't interact). How this catalysis could happen has been one
of the more challenging puzzles of theoretical physics. It
took years for the idea to be accepted and understood after it
was first proposed by Callan and Rubakov. There is still some
uncertainty about the rate at which it would occur but it is
expected to be rather high. The cross section is
velocity-dependent and increases as the monopoles slow down.
Since there are no monopoles available to run tests on, one
can't be sure at all of what one is talking about. The process
might not work or there might be blind alleys similar to the
situation with muon catalysis.
In any case one monopole can catalyze enormous numbers of
protons and might provide about a milliwatt of power. (This
number has already been calculated in astrophysical studies to
set limits on monopole abundance in neutron stars. It is
straightforward to scale it to earth-based densities.) A
trillion monopoles could supply the power level of a gigawatt
reactor while 10 10 monopoles would catalyze a fair part of the
U.S. power needs. This should be compared to the number of
free quarks needed of about 1023. On the other hand, the
necessary free quarks would weigh only 1 gram while the
monopole charge would weigh five to ten tons since the
monopoles are expected to be very heavy
Fig1 (epsilon = 0.5) in this paper is 2D but looks like the spiraling flakes in the recent SEM scans.
Emergence of non-Gaussian coherent states through nonlinear interactions
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Examples-of-possible-evolutions-of-an-intense-macroscopic-coherent-state-of-the_fig1_369158533
I'm not entirely clear if you came to a definitive conclusion about strange radiation tracks. Is it a particle that moves in a circle while it moves forward and sometimes there are 2 that circle around together. When the track is photographed with a short exposure, the trail becomes short. Does it become a point if the exposure is ultra short.
Hey Bob!
Awesome presentation, impressive work! Safety obviously becomes an important bottleneck when developing applications for these phenomena. Still very much curious about the emissions from the stainless steel TSG setups. Would not be surprised if there are strange radiation tracks flying off the stainless steel ones since we've observed EVOs on the exterior and sprites from earlier GEET videos.
Would you reckon that carbon steel is a better absorber of these strange radiation tracks?
Anyway, still catching up. Looking at the great and incredible SEM photos now
https://youtu.be/_-Q_chXuLvs?t=8546
With an attempt to visually simulate the dynamics of these structures in the most efficient and generative fashion I am able to program and starting to see a lot of similarities.
Test animation 01
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vschpE1OnO3Ta9mOJXIr1WVuHmr82yZd/view?usp=drive_link
Test animation 02
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OJ4lsWOgZudVstqMOc7gDvrJcmjSsf8d/view?usp=drive_link
Test animation 03
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1y-m5zjGyvWm36d7DDmiBPzb9aVzMbWLo/view?usp=drive_link
Test animation 04
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cdh_yb-5W5w1dUxdFLajtJnoorQubXTH/view?usp=drive_link
Test animation 05
https://drive.google.com/file/d/14Rh1Y6HFGJUkkYuKlODmQeUZzpqROcPt/view?usp=drive_link
Test animation 06
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1d2YHKXN1K4iixunvUFvqebO4oCHol4hT/view?usp=drive_link
Test animation 07
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pKT68VROXsRIM8cAuvBh_eX8ryNVeDIN/view?usp=drive_link
I will be presenting the windhexe project to interested parties in a couple of weeks. So I'm still creating the content on that one. Simultaneously broadening the scope from the windhexe to the practical application of the FTM with other projects like the ULTR and THOR to put the windhexe project in the right context and not as an isolated reverse engineering project. Either way there'll be more animated and rendered content coming soon.
Hello Bob,
as you warn us against the dangers of "disturbed" coherent matter, I invite you to read the story of a man who suffered a serious accident of this kind: and even if the man speaks of Ormus in this report, you will notice that many of the phenomena described are in line with what you are studying: very informative from my point of view
the link ... http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/mystory.htm
Have a good read, Bob, if you have time, of course
triton
The case against the plasmoid theory of the EVO reaction.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_cage#:~:text=Faraday%20cages%20cannot%20block%20stable,will%20still%20work%20inside%20one).
A Faraday cage cannot shield the magnetic field of a permanent magnet. A Faraday cage is made of a conductor that responds to electric fields, but it is not affected by strong magnetostatic fields.
A Faraday cage can protect against electromagnetic fields by shorting out the electric part, but it cannot block stable or slowly varying magnetic fields. For example, a compass will still work inside a Faraday cage.
This magnetic behavior points to the nature and origin of the magnetic field produced by the EVO. The lack of effectiveness of faraday shielding in the LENR reaction points to the existence of a lattice like spin footprint inside the EVO where the magnetically active spin particles take on a fixed and unmoving position inside the EVO. The witness hexagonal shaped marks produced by the EVO show that the lattice taken on by the spin particles take the shape of a hexagon shaped fixed lattice.
There is no movement of these spin particles as required by the plasmoid theory of the EVO reaction. If the magnetic field were being produced by a plasmoid effect that type of magnetic field would be shielded by a faraday cage.
If the transmutation process in LENR is based on magnetic power, then the best material that can be used to resist transmutation damage in the structure of a LENR reactor is those elements that have a high NMR active dipole value.
Mendelevium (258Md) has the highest possible nuclear spin for common isotopes
on the periodic table, with a value of 8. Niobium (90Nb) and tantalum (181Ta) also have a value of 8.
See
https://mriquestions.com/predict-nuclear-spin-i.html#:~:text=Three%20isotopes%20have%20the%20highest,isotopes%20on%20the%20periodic%20table.&text=Grushow%20A.,NMR%20Periodic%20Table%20(website).
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/dc113e4759ec8726355f4cd8a566d5cf10657d5a136e8946bf7d615c65a5c300.gif
According to
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dipole#Vector_form
The strength of a magnetic source goes as 1/R^3 for a magnetic dipole and 1/R^2 for a magnetic monopole.
Here is a message about the magnetic behavior of the Defkalion reaction.
From: "Andrew Meulenberg"
Date: 2013-08-09 9:14 PM
Subject: Re: CMNS: Re: Magnetic field strength in Defkalion report. Kim?
To: <cmns@googlegroups.com>
Cc:
Dear Abd,
I agree with you that the claim is 'amazing' and appreciate your 'checking' the levels.
Comments below.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 7:04 PM, <abd@lomaxdesign.com> wrote:
...
... However, the slides presented by Kim are on-line.
https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/36783/TheoreticalAnalysisReactionMechanisms.pdf?sequence=1
Slide 5:
"After each triggering duty cycle , the magnetic field (at ~20
cm from the reactor) rose from ~0.6 Tesla to 1.6 Tesla during the reaction period (no triggering !)"
...
This is not about the 1.6 Tesla at 20 cm. figure being wrong. It is about how truly extraordinary it is, which did not seem to be readily acknowledged when brought up as a possible problem.
I heard Kim myself and didn't think much of it, because I didn't have the figures in my mind of what, say, the geomagnetic field was, or how strong powerful magnets were. So I first saw certain pseudoskeptics ridiculing the claim. So, as is my wont, I checked it out, I never assume that the pseudoskeptics are wrong. They were right about the field strength, though not necessarily about the sarcastic conclusions they drew.
That is one whopping magnetic field, far beyond a level where it would still be an important fact.
So far beyond that level, that the most likely explanation at this point, absent confirmation of something else, is a simple misreading of the instrument used. A Gauss indication read as Tesla. That idea is mine, I didn't read it anywhere.
...
Your hypothesis is one possible explanation. However, it depends on interpretation of information that is not clear. The statement was "After each triggering duty cycle..." My understanding of the DGT operation is that triggering is initiated only when the output drops below a desired level. Thus, the 0.6 T would be the mag-field output for operation below the desired level. I don't know if the detector system gives a zero reading on the same scale before application of the 1st trigger to get it to the operating regime. These are easily answered questions (along with the make and model of the detector and analyzer).
By presenting your comments in the manner that you did, I fear that you might deter other experimentalists from 'admitting' that they also had signs of 'anomalous' RF emission. Remember that the data that Kim presented was for a system that was different from most and much more productive of heat. I know of at least one other lab that has seen very strong RF emission measurements (sufficient to shut down laboratory instrumentation). If scaled to heat output, the levels might be comparable to what was presented. The other lab's data is not going to be published until all alternative explanation for the source of RF has been explored.
You have repeatedly suggested that the heat-to-4He ratio be reproduced. It might be that a simpler measurement is the RF to heat ratio.
I would request that people with an excess-heat-producing system put a loop antenna about it and feed it into an oscilloscope, if they don't have a frequency analyzer present. Even if they don't have an ability to turn the system on and off at will, or a trigger, they might be able to correlate an RF signal above background (if observed) with the excess heat production. If only a correlated 10x background is observed, for a 1 watt excess power output, a mention of this effect could be important. Turning on a portable radio in the lab might provide an effective qualitative RF-radiation detector.
Andrew
__________________________________________________
The magnetic fields produced by the Defkalion system were large as witnessed by the disruption of computer and telephone equipment at 3 meters even through a double faraday shield box.
The conjecture to be considered is the possible activation of nuclear reactions caused by strong magnetic fields (aka Monopole catalyzed fusion and fission).
The order of magnitude magnetic field strength of a 1 micron magnetic field source to be measured at 20cm showing 1.6 tesla is (10^4)^3 or (10^12) tesla for a magnetic dipole and (10^4)^2 or (10^8) tesla for a EVO sized magnetic monopole.
The other factor that is stated in slide 5 of the Kim presentation is that all even isotopes of nickel produced overunity heat whereas the odd isotope (Ni61) usually does not produce gainful energy. In other words, the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) active isotopes are not nuclear active and the non NMR active isotopes are.
Also U238 is fissioned more that U235 is by the LENR reaction.
This lack of nuclear activity may be due to the magnetic energy lost in the vibrations produced in the nuclei of (NMR) active isotopes by the nuclear magnetic dipole of that type of isotope.
See this video to understand how NMR active isotopes behave in a magnetic field.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XO_NHHn6Eg
LENR is a very confusing phenomena. A very weak LENR reaction will produce gamma radiation and neutrons that have been generated from fusion. This fusion reaction is derived from islands of Exciton-polaritons within the lattice that have not yet achieved coherence. This coherence state comes about when the number of polaritons reaches a critical density. When this density is reached, a global state of coherence among all islands of polaritons begins. This change of state produces the EVO(s) which is a condensate of polaritons nucleated (surrounded) by a magnetic domain wall.
The domain wall does not allow any energy or matter to exit the EVO except for a magnetic beam produced by the monopole pair which begins from vacuum instantiation when the magnetic capacity of the EVO reaches a critical level. In this state, transmutation occurs as seen in strange radiation tracks but no associated transmutation based energy is released through the domain wall. In the strong LENR reaction state, this coherent state of the condensate is what distroys LENR reactors without any production of energy derived from nuclear processes.
Magnets can be sensitive to temperature. The strength of a magnet depends on the alignment of its magnetic moments, which are formed by the angular momentum and spin of its electrons. When a magnet is exposed to cold, its molecules move more slowly and cause less vibration, which creates a more concentrated magnetic field. However, heat can cause the molecules to move faster and become more sporadic, which can weaken the magnet's strength and magnetic field.
The degree to which temperature affects a magnet depends on the type of material. For example, most magnets with the exception of ferrite
will actually display an increase in strength as the temperature drops. All permanent magnets (including ferrite) will lose a percentage of their performance for every degree increase.
If a magnet is exposed to high temperatures, the delicate balance between temperature and the domains in a magnet is destabilized. At around 80 °C, a magnet will lose its magnetic force and it will become demagnetized permanently if exposed to this temperature for a period, or if heated above its Curie temperature
.
The maximum operating temperature and Curie temperature are determined by the material a particular magnet is made of and the size and shape of the magnet.
So any magnet is imperfect because the spins of the particles that created the magnetism wonder around at random based on temperature. This random motion lessens the magnetic fields that the magnet produces.
But in a condensate all the magnetic particles are identical. There is no random motion of the spins of these particles. In a condensate, it is as if the condensate acts as one huge single particle. This coherent behavior of the particles that make up the condensate insures that the magnetic field is always at maximum strength. The strength of that single huge composite particle is 10^23 times more powerful than any single particle that forms the condensate.
A decades old message on the possible existence of monopoles in EVOs as follows:
From: "Jean-Paul Biberian" <jpbiberian@yahoo.fr>
Date: 2013-08-11 5:45 PM
Subject: CMNS: Defkalion report: Magnetic monopoles?
To: <cmns@googlegroups.com>
Cc:
To all,
Georges Lochack predicted the existence of light magnetic monopoles that would be magnetically excited states of neutrinos. Those monopoles have been observed by Urutskoev in high current discharges on thin titanium foils in water. H also observed the production of new elements, in particular of copper. Here too the even number isotopes of titanium were involved in the transmutation. Urutskoev explains the runaway or the Chernobyl reactor by the creation of magnetic monopoles in a first electrical accident that produced them. Then, the monopoles reached the reactor core and fissioned U-238, which explains why the Chernobyl reactor had a high U-235/U-238 ratio. Again, it is the even number nucleus (U-238) that was fissioned, not the odd one (U-235).
It is very possible that what Defkalion has measured is not a magnetic field, but the interaction of magnetic monopoles with the detector. The magnetic monopoles could also each all the other electronics equipments around.
The papers related to the magnetic monopoles are in the ICCF 11 proceedings.
--
Jean-Paul Biberian
Regards