End of a previous comment that has relevance to future endevours ...
So, just as those "defining" the meter in 1795, we should not now be surprised when we see encoding "knowledge from the ancients" that we ourselves are now only uncovering as they are inherent behaviours in nature - and form part of the overall wheelworks of nature that have so often shown their presence, if only sometimes indirectly, in experiments of the past.
To which I would like to draw the readers attention to a "fraudster" of the late 19th Century - one John Ernst Worrell Keely , who claimed to have discovered a new motive power which was originally described as "vaporic" or "etheric" force, and later as an unnamed force based on "vibratory sympathy", by which he produced "interatomic ether" from water and air.
Was he really a fraudster, or just someine who recognized the forms and outlines of "something" in nature that formed a part of the overall wheelworks? Perhaps it is time to look more favourably and more kindly again upon Mr. Keely and recognize that he was, indeed, "on to something" but that it was a reality that was always just beyond his grasp, rather than as someone who was a direct out-and-out charlatan and fraudster. Perhaps if he had only more readily shared and socialized his ideas, but then, we will never know for sure.
What we can say, however, is that trying to "go it alone" is ultimately an exercise in futility and that freely sharing is, indeed, "the way to go"
I hope this link is not redandant and I Don't know if you know this but there is book for download at:
The "technical Document" is in the on page 65 and 66.
On a lighter note, we should bring this guy onboard for prototyping... https://youtu.be/NEaLWBT_Q1o
Look at the metal work below that flower pot in the picture then watch this- https://youtu.be/Rn5gPW51H2U
I've read his book and it goes into the significance of syzergy similarly to Space Earth Human. There is much here to be considered and integrated into what we are finding. Ed Leedskalnin did cut and move all that coral in this century.
Here are some similar Coptic stone artifacts in the Coptic museum in Cairo:
Bob, this is all greek to me but this may mean something to you
We need to make a collaboration of people to work on these devices, don’t you think Bob?
Just a thought - with the version of the torus / magnetic moment that "pulls in" matter / energy from the far field ("the black spot" version), if a rod electrode (carbon or other) is (continuously, if the rod is consumed) fed toward that spot (could be the tip, or the body behind), would that "power" the magnetic moment to produce a stronger effect. Also, I am assuming the "spot" is the mid point of the mouth of a neutrino vortex funnel - so:
_____O─o─O Torus / magnetic moment
______ / ↑ \ Feed
↑ - anode or cathode rod
Alternatively, instead of a solid rod, it could be a nozzle that either drip feeds or sprays charged water or HHO "into the place of the black spot"
Step three on the rex research pages says to bore out the ends of the tees to 27/32". But this doesn't make sense to me as it is being bored out so that a half inch tube can slide inside. Has anyone done this step?
edit: I figured out this is right, It just did not seem right.
Would you say seeing evos outside the reactor is a design flaw, you mentioned the big sphere in Malcolm's design for covering a bigger area to drop pressure and maybe capture some of those evos I think you said in the stream. In one of his test videos you can see hundreds of evos appearing outside the reactor.