Bob, you might have seen this: paper from Fryberger arguing for the existence of “magnetic photons.” Magneticons as he calls them. Highly mathematical but worth a look.
In other news, I have read a good 2/3rds of your book and it is a great read. There are a few inaccuracies regarding Piantelli 'coherent light' event and one Matsumoto I think, but at one point, across two pages, you accidentally mix up Matsumoto and Parkhomov - so I need to work with you to correct this when I can. Other than that there are a few missed words etc. but brilliant. I think when these are corrected, I'd be very happy to do a formal review and recommend it.
On the subject however, I think some people have been reading the book. Enjoy!
Hi Bob, thanks, I'd love to go over it with you when you have a moment. I think you've got the first edition. The second edition was released in late August with single-spacing, wider margins, more of a traditional book look, and some grammar/spelling corrections. But I'm sure you've found some LENR subject matter fine-tuning which I can put in a third edition. Let me know when. And yes, that is a funny video from FOX news, and that woman on the panel from NorthWest is absolutely correct. In fact, I just spoke with a witness yesterday who came face to face with one on a Smithsonian archeology dig in the 1970s in CA. 9-feet tall, glowing yellow eyes on a completely dark night. The whole group saw it. I have permission from her to upload the interview to my YouTube which I'll do soon.
BTW, your discussion of the rotating mercury core in the last video, part of the Wallace patent, was very reminiscent of Edgar Fouche, whom I saw at a UFO conference in 2000, when he presented info about triangular ARVs. That's exactly what he said made them work. He said it wasn't literally anti-gravity but about 80 percent gravity reduction which is why the craft still need engines at each vertices on the triangle. And now you've explained how it works! Great stuff.
I noticed in YouTube comments Peter Lee references hyperboloid in the center of the toroid. This subject is discussed on the Theories Apophasis yt channel where he's derived his own theory of magnetism. Hopefully Peter Lee chimes in.
I think anyone can replicate Adamenko with much, much lower power. Instead of the Cu target anode, I used an upright liquid bismuth anode ~1.2mm dia so that it forms a 1/2 sphere. Hit it with an arc discharge (-80kv) and 3rd time it explodes and visible in the kernel of the crater is glassy looking quartz-like matter, large - 200microns at least. I happen to have an Snm-32 He-3 thermal neutron detector handy, this presentation has given me the push I needed to set it up. Thanks Bob.
Also, the SC RF cavity Fryberger used was Niobium, (doesn’t specify which of the two alloys it could have been). Being high half integer spin I found that curious.
Hey Bob, Great show! One question I am curious about. If you or anyone else has an opinion on it I'de love to hear it. Would a powder dispersed in liquid be as efficient at diffusing the coherent spin coupling state described in the kinematic force patent? Or should it really be a solid block material? The patent made it seem like it was really a ratio of spin state material to non spin state material that was key and that they didn't necessarily need to be directly "attached" but I wasn't sure. The reason I ask is because I'm building my donut right now and I'm putting silicone piping at each layer so I can test various substances in the center of the various flux loops. I was thinking of testing different metal powders dispersed in water as it would let me use the same setup for many tests, but I'm concerned now that maybe this isn't ideal if I need to use contiguous material.
Hi Peter, sounds great! If I understand it correctly, you induce a Toroid Dipole Moments TDM in each Tor level, being the centre of any toroid,( ie excluding the base level solenoid). TDM is itself scale invariant. A majorana neutrino exhibits TDM. *if* majoranas exist then they’re coherent, but also consistent with Parkhomov. Long way to say - put some nichrome or tungsten filament in each level and light it up, >1000deg.
Hey Chris, thanks for you input! honestly the theory is a bit beyond me :) I'm not sure I fundamentally know what is being induced at the different levels of each tor level. I assume (based on the original bagel paper) the smaller levels have magnetic flux loops, and the larger ones electric potential flux loops, but for 3 and above I'm not entirely sure what is being induced and how it differs from a straight magnetic flux loop or straight electric potential flux loop. This was part of the reason I wanted silicone tubing in each level. This way I could put different liquids in different levels. Like a highly insulating liquid in the primarily electric flux loops and a magnetic liquid in the magnetic flux loops. This presentation covering the patent talking about the kinematic force and high spin state elements has introduced another dimension to what kind of materials to use for the core of the various flux loops. It seems like high-half spin state elements may be easier to diffuse the coherence due the magnetic spin coupling(?) What I'm not clear about though is if the high spin state element would need to be a contiguous wire to achieve diffusion of coherence, or if a powder dispersed in a liquid would work. Based on various readings of historic devices including Dellschau's flying contraptions there was a metal powder dispersed in the liquid (It's unclear whether it was the liquid or the dispersed material which was the high half spin material). The red mercury in the Bell was reported by Dan Winter to be iron(?) dispersed in the mercury (So the mercury would be contiguous). Also Alsofon mentioned in the APEC 1 that the speckled flakes on the outside of the ARV were likely a high mass high half spin material to provide for coherence (Since they were speckled I think it was not contiguous high half-spin material in this case). So since I have no intention of using liquid mercury for safety reasons :) It's unclear whether a metal powder dispersed in water would be ok or not. I'm inclined to think it would be fine but perhaps just not optimal.
You, me and everyone I'm sure! I'll be honest I have to parse most of this presentation, I'm not understanding the 'kinematic field' completely right now.
For now let me paint the electrodynamics, as I see it, in the bagel. Keeping it to a DC current for simplicity.
Level 0, the solenoid: induced magnetic field.
Level 1, torus of solenoid: induced electric toroidal dipole moment. TDM^E or T^E in some literature.
Level 2, tor of tor of sol..: induced magnetic toroidal dipole moment. TDM^M or T^M
Level 3 and beyond: alternating between T^E and T^M
It's important to note TDM falls out of the geometry and it's current carrying capacity.
Any toroidal, chiral or twisted conductor or dielectric can and will have a non-zero TDM response to Transverse ElectroMagnetic excitation, light/xray/rf etc. For this excitation mode the bigger the object (in comparison to the wavelength of excitation) the higher it's TDM response, (to the power of 3!).
But a TDM response to a TDM field? Well I can't see a reason the size of the receiver size matters at all. Caveat- I may be wrong about this.
Red Blood cell TDM ~ 10micron dia.
mRNA ~ 100nm dia
Now some materials have a T^E induced in their lattice ~ <1nm dia.
Inside the nucleus you can have a TDM (not sure E or M or how spin effects this) ~ fm dia.
Parkhomov cold neutrino quanta don't possess any electromagnetic properties except for TDM. They're really really small? jury's out - maybe ~0.1fm dia
So the choice of a material to permeate TDM? well MTECs have the highest current carrying capacity, and we're pretty certain they are toroidally clustered, so would blow the pants off everything. Short of that though, per Parkhomov, you can create a ton of cold neutrinos by getting to ~1000deg. Benefits are - continuous supply, pretty sure the neutrinos can be reflected and contained, easy to produce.
Any field emission is capable of creating a T^E, which I'm sure is going to trap majorana neutrinos. Gravity flux is proportional to their self-interaction, according to McElrath. In a solid material, a high coherence length (Al) and narrow fermi surfaces (W) are your friend. In grain boundaries, the effect is magnified. This would be a reason to incorporate flaked material.
Finally, H and it's isotopes are ~ 1000 x easier to unpack than anything heavier. [Shishkin & Parkhomov pptx.] You may find HHO is the perfect filler :)
Hey again Chris, Thanks for such a detailed reply :) I guess I'll just stick to my original plan and use water / hho saturated water, then maybe later other more viscous fluids (or water with viscosity enhancers) with metal particles suspended in them. You have a lot of good details surrounding this stuff :) Thanks so much for responding to my question.
@Bob: The Faerie is in your box again. But its not coffee, this time. Thanks as usual.
You are a stellar role-model for the emerging new science, to whom I must bow, and tip my wizard's hat. Godspeed and keep up the good work....But remember.... take time to breathe...
Added Berndt: I contacted John very early in my research as he's just a stones throw from me over the bridge in New Westminster BC. John was very open and gracious and was more than willing to allow me into his world. And it's quite a world I don't mind saying. Without any real formal education, John is more of an intuitive tinkerer than a text book physicist but he also comes across as a very intelligent, gracious and quiet man. I guess most people have a hard time getting past his eccentricities and other aspects which sets him apart making it hard for some to open up enough to see beyond the overtly obvious (and not so obvious) and get to the "heart" of the man... which is a big & compassionate one at that!
AAG: Hutchison's had many people with cameras come to visit, but you're one of the very few who's actually seen the true, "classic" Hutchison-Effect up-close and in-person. What can you tell me about the event that you filmed last year with a rack of equipment slamming itself into a wall?
Paranormal Legend: Inventor John Hutchison at his lab during AAG-filming with Berndt in mid-2005.
AMERICAN ANTIGRAVITY PAGE 11
Berndt: It literally almost blew me away! Quite frankly, I didn't know what to expect when John called me asking if I would like to come over and video-tape the Hutchison Effect in action. John previously had "set-up" for National Geographic's TV show as they were there taping for an up- coming special. I was also a little concerned that John was actively experimenting again as the City of New Westminster, after numerous complaints from neighbors that ceramic plates were flying off their counters, noises and creaking sounds could be heard and other anomalous events happening. What the reader may not know... is that because of circumstances and various "lab- raiding" by ???... John now had his lab and every bit of his equipment, metal samples and living quarters all housed within a standard 700 square foot (+/-) one bedroom apartment. And the experimenting wasn't John's only problem with the city. After all, he had thousands of pounds of science and physics gear, a naval and gun collection, radar scopes, Tesla coils & frequency generators and to get a good idea of what the inside looks like... one just has to stroll by his balcony which has become a kind of weird tourist attraction in the City. When the City realized who this mad scientist really was... instead of continuing the plan to rid the town of John... engineers were sent out to determine if the apartment was safe and if not, what type of reinforcement and support structure would be needed. The solution served to stave off eviction but it also added to the crapped quarters he lived within as there are support cables and chains everywhere. These support cables have been suspected by a few with an untrained eye to be a part of a dastardly scheme to hoax and fake some of the experiments he conducts including the Hutchison Effect itself. Witnessing it for yourself aside, one needs only look at the metal samples and the reams and reams of government documents and correspondence to put that suspicion to rest definitively.
AAG: You're also one of the few people who's seen John's metal-samples up close, and I'm wondering if you could describe them a bit for me? Do they appear to be authentic, and what are your thoughts after seeing pieces of metal warped so dramatically?
Berndt: Without question, even with my limited experience, these metal samples have obviously undergone some type of unconventional transformation. They have also been analyzed and it's been determined what didn't happen to them. The only conventional explanation for the warping, twisting and the type of "stalactite-stalagmite" separation would be a process involving massive amounts of heat. Of course these samples were not subjected to heat and the transformation took place with the samples and the environment being at or about room/lab temperature. Again... if it were a hoax, I can't imagine all the various government agencies and people
The Effect: One of Hutchison’s many deformed samples of metals warped by the Hutchison Effect.
The Wallace Patent is very similar to "Die Glocke".
Now compare the cosmic egg torus in "The Gateway Process" CIA doc on Astral Projection to the Wallace patent diagrams.
There is something to these things.
"Magenets"....just sayin'.
You should have read that as -
Mage Nets
;-)
LOL.
Bob, you might have seen this: paper from Fryberger arguing for the existence of “magnetic photons.” Magneticons as he calls them. Highly mathematical but worth a look.
Cheers. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326621584_On_Magneticons_and_some_related_matters
Thanks Simeon. I'll check it out when possible.
In other news, I have read a good 2/3rds of your book and it is a great read. There are a few inaccuracies regarding Piantelli 'coherent light' event and one Matsumoto I think, but at one point, across two pages, you accidentally mix up Matsumoto and Parkhomov - so I need to work with you to correct this when I can. Other than that there are a few missed words etc. but brilliant. I think when these are corrected, I'd be very happy to do a formal review and recommend it.
On the subject however, I think some people have been reading the book. Enjoy!
https://youtu.be/Ibnz0kmcHFM?t=1625
Hi Bob, thanks, I'd love to go over it with you when you have a moment. I think you've got the first edition. The second edition was released in late August with single-spacing, wider margins, more of a traditional book look, and some grammar/spelling corrections. But I'm sure you've found some LENR subject matter fine-tuning which I can put in a third edition. Let me know when. And yes, that is a funny video from FOX news, and that woman on the panel from NorthWest is absolutely correct. In fact, I just spoke with a witness yesterday who came face to face with one on a Smithsonian archeology dig in the 1970s in CA. 9-feet tall, glowing yellow eyes on a completely dark night. The whole group saw it. I have permission from her to upload the interview to my YouTube which I'll do soon.
BTW, your discussion of the rotating mercury core in the last video, part of the Wallace patent, was very reminiscent of Edgar Fouche, whom I saw at a UFO conference in 2000, when he presented info about triangular ARVs. That's exactly what he said made them work. He said it wasn't literally anti-gravity but about 80 percent gravity reduction which is why the craft still need engines at each vertices on the triangle. And now you've explained how it works! Great stuff.
I noticed in YouTube comments Peter Lee references hyperboloid in the center of the toroid. This subject is discussed on the Theories Apophasis yt channel where he's derived his own theory of magnetism. Hopefully Peter Lee chimes in.
I hope so, I asked him to add references regarding his comments on YT, here.
I think anyone can replicate Adamenko with much, much lower power. Instead of the Cu target anode, I used an upright liquid bismuth anode ~1.2mm dia so that it forms a 1/2 sphere. Hit it with an arc discharge (-80kv) and 3rd time it explodes and visible in the kernel of the crater is glassy looking quartz-like matter, large - 200microns at least. I happen to have an Snm-32 He-3 thermal neutron detector handy, this presentation has given me the push I needed to set it up. Thanks Bob.
Also, the SC RF cavity Fryberger used was Niobium, (doesn’t specify which of the two alloys it could have been). Being high half integer spin I found that curious.
Hi Chis,
We may be able to take a look at the Bi sample you describe via SEM/EDS, where are you based?
Australia- happy to pay for postage. I took some Nurugo videos a while back:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-a-aRYPoa18kZI3SNg4juijY5RR8m8nU
It has kind of lost a little of that Bi lustre
Hey Bob, Great show! One question I am curious about. If you or anyone else has an opinion on it I'de love to hear it. Would a powder dispersed in liquid be as efficient at diffusing the coherent spin coupling state described in the kinematic force patent? Or should it really be a solid block material? The patent made it seem like it was really a ratio of spin state material to non spin state material that was key and that they didn't necessarily need to be directly "attached" but I wasn't sure. The reason I ask is because I'm building my donut right now and I'm putting silicone piping at each layer so I can test various substances in the center of the various flux loops. I was thinking of testing different metal powders dispersed in water as it would let me use the same setup for many tests, but I'm concerned now that maybe this isn't ideal if I need to use contiguous material.
Hi Peter, sounds great! If I understand it correctly, you induce a Toroid Dipole Moments TDM in each Tor level, being the centre of any toroid,( ie excluding the base level solenoid). TDM is itself scale invariant. A majorana neutrino exhibits TDM. *if* majoranas exist then they’re coherent, but also consistent with Parkhomov. Long way to say - put some nichrome or tungsten filament in each level and light it up, >1000deg.
Hey Chris, thanks for you input! honestly the theory is a bit beyond me :) I'm not sure I fundamentally know what is being induced at the different levels of each tor level. I assume (based on the original bagel paper) the smaller levels have magnetic flux loops, and the larger ones electric potential flux loops, but for 3 and above I'm not entirely sure what is being induced and how it differs from a straight magnetic flux loop or straight electric potential flux loop. This was part of the reason I wanted silicone tubing in each level. This way I could put different liquids in different levels. Like a highly insulating liquid in the primarily electric flux loops and a magnetic liquid in the magnetic flux loops. This presentation covering the patent talking about the kinematic force and high spin state elements has introduced another dimension to what kind of materials to use for the core of the various flux loops. It seems like high-half spin state elements may be easier to diffuse the coherence due the magnetic spin coupling(?) What I'm not clear about though is if the high spin state element would need to be a contiguous wire to achieve diffusion of coherence, or if a powder dispersed in a liquid would work. Based on various readings of historic devices including Dellschau's flying contraptions there was a metal powder dispersed in the liquid (It's unclear whether it was the liquid or the dispersed material which was the high half spin material). The red mercury in the Bell was reported by Dan Winter to be iron(?) dispersed in the mercury (So the mercury would be contiguous). Also Alsofon mentioned in the APEC 1 that the speckled flakes on the outside of the ARV were likely a high mass high half spin material to provide for coherence (Since they were speckled I think it was not contiguous high half-spin material in this case). So since I have no intention of using liquid mercury for safety reasons :) It's unclear whether a metal powder dispersed in water would be ok or not. I'm inclined to think it would be fine but perhaps just not optimal.
You, me and everyone I'm sure! I'll be honest I have to parse most of this presentation, I'm not understanding the 'kinematic field' completely right now.
For now let me paint the electrodynamics, as I see it, in the bagel. Keeping it to a DC current for simplicity.
Level 0, the solenoid: induced magnetic field.
Level 1, torus of solenoid: induced electric toroidal dipole moment. TDM^E or T^E in some literature.
Level 2, tor of tor of sol..: induced magnetic toroidal dipole moment. TDM^M or T^M
Level 3 and beyond: alternating between T^E and T^M
It's important to note TDM falls out of the geometry and it's current carrying capacity.
Any toroidal, chiral or twisted conductor or dielectric can and will have a non-zero TDM response to Transverse ElectroMagnetic excitation, light/xray/rf etc. For this excitation mode the bigger the object (in comparison to the wavelength of excitation) the higher it's TDM response, (to the power of 3!).
But a TDM response to a TDM field? Well I can't see a reason the size of the receiver size matters at all. Caveat- I may be wrong about this.
Red Blood cell TDM ~ 10micron dia.
mRNA ~ 100nm dia
Now some materials have a T^E induced in their lattice ~ <1nm dia.
Inside the nucleus you can have a TDM (not sure E or M or how spin effects this) ~ fm dia.
Parkhomov cold neutrino quanta don't possess any electromagnetic properties except for TDM. They're really really small? jury's out - maybe ~0.1fm dia
So the choice of a material to permeate TDM? well MTECs have the highest current carrying capacity, and we're pretty certain they are toroidally clustered, so would blow the pants off everything. Short of that though, per Parkhomov, you can create a ton of cold neutrinos by getting to ~1000deg. Benefits are - continuous supply, pretty sure the neutrinos can be reflected and contained, easy to produce.
Any field emission is capable of creating a T^E, which I'm sure is going to trap majorana neutrinos. Gravity flux is proportional to their self-interaction, according to McElrath. In a solid material, a high coherence length (Al) and narrow fermi surfaces (W) are your friend. In grain boundaries, the effect is magnified. This would be a reason to incorporate flaked material.
Finally, H and it's isotopes are ~ 1000 x easier to unpack than anything heavier. [Shishkin & Parkhomov pptx.] You may find HHO is the perfect filler :)
Hey again Chris, Thanks for such a detailed reply :) I guess I'll just stick to my original plan and use water / hho saturated water, then maybe later other more viscous fluids (or water with viscosity enhancers) with metal particles suspended in them. You have a lot of good details surrounding this stuff :) Thanks so much for responding to my question.
@Bob: The Faerie is in your box again. But its not coffee, this time. Thanks as usual.
You are a stellar role-model for the emerging new science, to whom I must bow, and tip my wizard's hat. Godspeed and keep up the good work....But remember.... take time to breathe...
I’ll be watching
Added Berndt: I contacted John very early in my research as he's just a stones throw from me over the bridge in New Westminster BC. John was very open and gracious and was more than willing to allow me into his world. And it's quite a world I don't mind saying. Without any real formal education, John is more of an intuitive tinkerer than a text book physicist but he also comes across as a very intelligent, gracious and quiet man. I guess most people have a hard time getting past his eccentricities and other aspects which sets him apart making it hard for some to open up enough to see beyond the overtly obvious (and not so obvious) and get to the "heart" of the man... which is a big & compassionate one at that!
AAG: Hutchison's had many people with cameras come to visit, but you're one of the very few who's actually seen the true, "classic" Hutchison-Effect up-close and in-person. What can you tell me about the event that you filmed last year with a rack of equipment slamming itself into a wall?
Paranormal Legend: Inventor John Hutchison at his lab during AAG-filming with Berndt in mid-2005.
AMERICAN ANTIGRAVITY PAGE 11
Berndt: It literally almost blew me away! Quite frankly, I didn't know what to expect when John called me asking if I would like to come over and video-tape the Hutchison Effect in action. John previously had "set-up" for National Geographic's TV show as they were there taping for an up- coming special. I was also a little concerned that John was actively experimenting again as the City of New Westminster, after numerous complaints from neighbors that ceramic plates were flying off their counters, noises and creaking sounds could be heard and other anomalous events happening. What the reader may not know... is that because of circumstances and various "lab- raiding" by ???... John now had his lab and every bit of his equipment, metal samples and living quarters all housed within a standard 700 square foot (+/-) one bedroom apartment. And the experimenting wasn't John's only problem with the city. After all, he had thousands of pounds of science and physics gear, a naval and gun collection, radar scopes, Tesla coils & frequency generators and to get a good idea of what the inside looks like... one just has to stroll by his balcony which has become a kind of weird tourist attraction in the City. When the City realized who this mad scientist really was... instead of continuing the plan to rid the town of John... engineers were sent out to determine if the apartment was safe and if not, what type of reinforcement and support structure would be needed. The solution served to stave off eviction but it also added to the crapped quarters he lived within as there are support cables and chains everywhere. These support cables have been suspected by a few with an untrained eye to be a part of a dastardly scheme to hoax and fake some of the experiments he conducts including the Hutchison Effect itself. Witnessing it for yourself aside, one needs only look at the metal samples and the reams and reams of government documents and correspondence to put that suspicion to rest definitively.
AAG: You're also one of the few people who's seen John's metal-samples up close, and I'm wondering if you could describe them a bit for me? Do they appear to be authentic, and what are your thoughts after seeing pieces of metal warped so dramatically?
Berndt: Without question, even with my limited experience, these metal samples have obviously undergone some type of unconventional transformation. They have also been analyzed and it's been determined what didn't happen to them. The only conventional explanation for the warping, twisting and the type of "stalactite-stalagmite" separation would be a process involving massive amounts of heat. Of course these samples were not subjected to heat and the transformation took place with the samples and the environment being at or about room/lab temperature. Again... if it were a hoax, I can't imagine all the various government agencies and people
The Effect: One of Hutchison’s many deformed samples of metals warped by the Hutchison Effect.
AMERICAN ANTI