Mar 31, 2023·edited Mar 31, 2023Liked by Bob Greenyer
Hey Bob! Thanks again for the wonderful presentation.
This apparatus looks like a very promising and practical application of the monopole/dualpole/evo/whatchamaycallit physics and will see if I can replicate one on a smaller scale ~60cm to 100cm diameter in order to test the validity of the claims made in the patent. I hope that'll be large enough.
I've reverse engineered a 3D file from the drawings in the patent. Link to folder below:
It's got step file, 3DM file (which is rhino and i very much recommend downloading for free 3 months trial at https://www.rhino3d.com/download/ in order to open the 3DM file) and of course the usual screenshots and such.
I noted that
- the device is completely airtight with gaskets at the bolted seams and welds on the other seams.
- the device is tuneable with air pressure, humidity and temperature
- the device is tuneable with the width and angle of the inlet slits in the upper chamber.
- the device is tuneable with the height of the exhaust in the upper chamber.
The smaller you make this device, the more precise the tuning has to be. Bigger windhexe means lower frequencies of oscillations and sound, means larger wavelengths, means smaller tolerances for error in the tuning process. I do believe the best step now is to replicate one of these as is with a diameter of approx one meter. which will be half or one third the size of the windhexes showed in de videos. See if it works, does the disintegration-doo-dippie thing and try some other tests with it.
It is spooky how the sacred geometry lines up! And yes, the is PATENT FREE technology that has massive, civilisation-changing applications.
The patent is for 3, but I prefer the 4 as per the ancient stone carvings all over the world and the clear evidence from VEGA that you get less disruptive inflows of dark matter preventing damage to the device - AND I would orient the device, with a little angular offset NSEW.
If you see the video of a not-too-powerful tornado sent to me by Sean this morning, you can see that at a little above ground it near-instantly starts dustifying non-organic materials in farm buildings it interacts with. I already knew that this could work in a free volume from the experimental data, but this video, like the Shakhparonov work, prove to me that a workable stone/metal carving tool should be realisable.
By all means feel free to use the images, 3D files and images I share on the Remote View blog. The content I share here is freely accessible to anyone who is interested and can make use of it.
The current 3D model has 4 inlets indeed. Just because that was easier to draw. Could easily transform it to 3, 5, 6 whatever may suit the inner vortex best. So I'm also considering trying to make a small 3D printable desktop version. with just a view adjustable parts to tune it.
I will also add your 3D model and the 2D plan drawings, and the golden ratio annotations to the Rhino file later on. I'll post the link as soon as I've uploaded them. I believe when tuned to the right sound/standing waves this thing will be pretty easy to operate. It's basically an elaborate whistle with disassembling/ disassociating capabilities. I do have to say that the Patent plans display very thick sheet metal for it's size. I wonder if that's for a reason or just scale of drawing. If I would 3D print a desktop version of this would you recommend using nylon for it does not gather positive charge?
I thing 4 is the right number and allows for easy NSEW alignment.
The metal does not need to be so thick on the main chamber. I do think a mild steel is best for areas close to the disruption beams at each fractal level.
I think proper understanding of the way it operates, will help optimise smaller versions.
They're all present in the folder I've shared earlier.
In contrary to the great pyramid, at a quick glance, I could not find any golden ratios present in the design except one. The exhaust bottom (which is tune-able in height) exactly hovers on the golden ratio of the total height of the upper chamber. What a funny coincidence, would you think that is deliberate?
Strangely I could not find any ratios in the diameters of the openings and cavities.
It could be that Mr Polifka found the one resonating (phi) ratio also known as a perfect fifth by chance and hasn't looked any further into the other proportions of the device.
I feel compelled to bring up this observation. Similarly to what we observed with the GEET reactor in that there is a fuel vaporization aspect AND a nuclear transformation aspect, I think we have a similar situation with the Winhexe. There is a physical grinding/pulverization aspect (probably related to the shear forces in vortexes and and or passing near the disruption zone AND a nuclear transmutation aspect related going through the disruption zone.
Something else to think about, while we may be touching on the nature of Manna/Ormus, we might also be getting into something akin to deadly orgone. I expect we can pretty quickly figure this out once we get to experimenting with a prototype, but it is something to think about before we start recommending that a Windhexe be used for food preparation. I suspect we can tune it accordingly and that chirality or drive/bias parameters will determine whether we make something akin to Ormus/Manna or Deadly Orgone.
The speed of the air inside the cyclone is around 200,000 km per hour when angular velocity is 16,000. Under normal circumstances the material would have been flung out the side of the cyclone.
0.5 to 1 kW must be used to evaporate 1 liter of water. It is not much better than normal heating.
Of course, if the energy is less than about 700wh, it must be done in a different way, so I thought that the water might be converted into Braun's gas.
The structure is self similar - each fractal vortex has its own disruption zone, this pulls in Dark Matter via the fractal toroidal moment and at this point, were matter and dense dark matter converge the electrons fail to hold metal lattices or ionic compounds such as SiO2, Al2O3 etc. together... same for water. Covalent stuff such as C-C bonds, BN or SiC are more resistant - that is why Parkhomov found that BN and SiC worked best and why BrLP (r) (tm) found that their reactors are best contained by C.
Teslas 'Carbon Button' light bulb was either made of diamond dust in carbonised bitumen or carborundum (SiC) - these were the only things that Tesla established could survive continued impact with Aetheric matter streams. (though they will fail ultimately ultimately)
We don't need to re-do this work. We have verified it so that should be enough.
The H-O bonds in water are covalent, however, the electrons and the protons have spin and the toroidal moment acts on spin matter. Moreover the molecule is polar. I maintain that the disruption pulls the water out od things and at the extreme - dissociates it.
When this happens, we have HHO and we have already shown what that can do.
Now I know what I'm building after the geet. Although I'm not too excited to eat dust foods I can see the applications there. If this can be used to turn rocks into a feedstock for geopolymer then that will be the first thing I'll do. Advanced compost decomposition, plastics recycling, e-waste separation, what else?
- PDF with all of the latest annotated drawings of the subassemblies, exploded view and detail views
- Turntable animation of all of the subassemblies and the exploded view.
- All of the steel laser files, gasket laser files, 3D print and latest Rhino 3D file/model.
Everything is double checked and ready for prototyping. Due to the cone having the bottom opening smaller than 200mm we decided to change the thickness of the bottom cone body to 1,5mm to make it a bit more flexible compared to the previous 2mm. The bottom opening is now 120mm. My next step is ordering the parts, gathering the materials and as soon the CNC cut metal parts are done I'll pass them on to the workshop.
Main questionmark in the way now is, does the prototype work? Perhaps.. anyhow It's worth a shot ;)
I'll be posting photos of the progress, if anything changes in the prototype design I'll update them drawings.
Thanks, great review! I'm also rooting for it to work! I'll keep posting updates in this thread. Photo's and some calculations coming soon :D! Hope you're having a great trip!
Apr 8, 2023·edited Apr 8, 2023Liked by Bob Greenyer
Hi Bob and everyone!
Small update on the prototype progress
I've discussed the parts with the metalshaper, who'll be happy to oblige with building the prototype, and optimized them for production in the workshop. I've added a welding and shaping jig to the 3D file in order to more easily form the cone.
All the sheet metal parts that were 1mm thick have now become 2mm thick, This added tension makes the metal easier to shape into the bent parts without folding and makes it easier to weld without burning through it. Some of the to be bent parts have some extra length added that'll be manually cut later in order to be able to bend the radii al the way through the length of the sheet metal. All of the laserfiles have been sent to the lasercutter and I've also uploaded them to the google drive folder over here:
I'll be getting a definitive quote from the lasercutter company by Monday or Tuesday and I'll immediately give them the green light to produce 1 set.
Starting on Monday I'll draft up the annotated individual parts drawings and a complete annotated assembly drawing mostly to highlight the things to pay attention to when assembling the windhexe.
Next week I'll also be ordering and gathering the rest of the hardware and parts so that as soon the lasercutter is done we can start building the prototype. Hopefully that'll be around the 17th of april.
The 3DM (rhino) file is also present in the google drive folder.
OK, I want a "pen" that cuts chunks out of rocks, and I put the chunks through a windhexe, and vaccum the powder through a tube, and thereby be carving my own caves and tunnels. Can you post a link to that book-like long article, I'd like to have a look at it.
My hypothesis for the 'pen' is that I observed the truth of the possibility in free space in examples such as the Kaminsky ULTR video and on the Surface of Ohmasa Gas treated Tungsten and Jurrien VEGA SiO2. I have seen the bore holes through Alumina.
Sean sent me an excellent video of a fairly weak tornado, nearly instantly converting parts of buildings to a dense plume of dust a little above the ground, given what I have seen in experiments, this video of an actual tornado and the Shakhparonov work, I have no reason at all to think this will not work as described.
Yes, to tunnelling, Geopolymer material production, stone carving etc. this was all in my original Jan 2018 O-Day slides.
I expect the flower of life on the temple of Osiris at Abydos was carved with such a 'pen'.
1). Has anyone seen an estimate of the vortex rpm speed in the Windhexe (probably varies from top to bottom)?
2). I’ve noticed a gentlemen in one of the videos stuffing cans, glass bottles, plastic bottles, etc. up into what we would consider the disruption zone. Wondering if that would be such a good idea?
3). I didn’t see a provision for grounding the vortex funnel chamber in the conceptual design for the prototypes. Might want to include that for us dummies!
2). You did not see him place cardboard or plastic and Chitin and Wood appears to fair better. I believe this is because of C-C covalent bonds that are, in my view, less easily disrupted. Also, the disruption zone in my view has an event horizon, popping the metal/glass up to that is not an issue.
3). It will be grounded. The latest prototype is just to minimise the costly steel parts. Having grounding on there clearly would be good.
EVOs, then Henk's reactor, then the GEET, and now the Windhexe. Yet when you look at the applications and visibility/amplification of these marvels....crickets. It truly shows me how Plato's Cave has a pathway out, and it is alighted by LENR. Wonderful shared insights. Thank you!
The plan was to work through this, first by gathering the experimental proof. Establishing the structure of 'O' and then demonstrating its truth - all the while carrying forward some that would have their 'O-Day' when they had seen enough but under the radar to ensure it was too late for those that would throw interference... They tried.
Apr 3, 2023·edited Apr 3, 2023Liked by Bob Greenyer
Hey Bob and y'all
For now I'll be uploading updates on the Windhexe in this thread to keep it all in one place.
I've updated the design to lower production costs as much as possible sacrificing a bit of sturdiness and durability for low cost prototyping efforts. The main objective is to get one up and running and confirm that the disintegration zone is present in the windhexe.
- I've substituted the metal support frame for a cheap and quick wooden frame.
- I've substituted the metal exhaust support frame and adjustable lid for cheap and quick plywood parts. For now I'll be securing the adjustable top with a couple of clamps.
- I've added some provisions to the inlet housing to make adjusting the whistle parts easier.
- I'll be doing the gaskets with sticky rubber tape for now which will suffice during the prototyping phase.
I managed to knock down the total cost including hardware and such to around 500 euro's (450 euros ex VAT)
In the folder you will find
- a parts list, with weight and cost calculated.
- a pdf annotated with dimensions for the prototype design as i'm planning to assemble it.
- a quick silent film to give yous a 3D impression and overview
- the 3DM file if you want to open it in Rhino
Coming wednesday I'll discuss the assembly and parts to be shaped/welded with the metalshaper. Might have to do some minor adjustments to the laserfiles to optimize the parts for shaping and welding them in the workshop. As soon that's done I'll finalize the prototype parts and upload all of the CNC lasercutting files as well.
So the carbon steel sheet metal will have to be finished with a primer or other substance to prevent it from rusting and such. If you want to do foodstuffs with it I would suggest looking at stainless steel or a finish that is food safe whilst being exposed to a monopole, square radii, whatchamaycallit disruption zone. Like will it start disassembling the paint or powder coating on the metal?
Apr 3, 2023·edited Apr 3, 2023Liked by Bob Greenyer
Yes that would come in handy! I'm going to prototype with a closed lid first, then drill a hole later on for adding the angled tube. I do believe the feed tube on the top is at an obscure angle for a reason and that having a hole in the top of the lid will either disrupt the vortices or have material spitting out of it when in operation.
There are lots of simple variables that could have an effect that I would like to examine.
Also keeping track of humidity, temperature, air pressure in to air flow out ratios, disintegrating behavior with different materials, orientation to earths magnetic field, etc. I'm also very curious how much it weighs before, during and after operation ;)
Henk has our extremely nice 4k 60FPS 30x large sensor studio camera and recording equipment that fully runs and is powered over 1 Cat5 cable, so with a suitable port one could record from a distance.
I've been 3D designing a makeable version of the Windhexe in Rhino and currently finetuning parts for CNC lasercutting, 3D printing and metal shaping. I've re-enginerded the windhexe as efficiently as I can get it for easy assembly, cost reduction, weight reduction (since the patent had like 10mm thick pieces of steel in there) and ease of manufacture. Also doing some optimizing to reduce the cost as much as possible. The interior ratios and smoothness of the chambers are unchanged. The outside has some simplifications that make it easier, cheaper to build or get from stock materials.
- There'll be a couple of metal sheet parts that need to be shaped into curvature in order to get the cone, upper chamber and exhaust. These parts will need a bit of welding.
- Most of the parts can be CNC lasercut and be bent into shape from the exported STP files. by a company like 24/7 tailorsteel for example (not affiliated)
- Gaskets can be CNC lasercut from the exported SVG/DXF files from silicon at your local lasercut business or done by hand.
- Metal frame can be with a metal cross saw and a drill. or exported to 24/7 tailorsteel as well.
- one part on the inlets will be 3D printed in order to have the angle of the inlet air stream just like in the patent. If it needs adjusting it'll be easier to replace a 3D printed piece than cutting and welding a new one.
Most of the windhexe can be assembled (and disassembled) with bolts and nuts, even with Glue/ Kit if one does not have the capability to weld. I tried to design it as handy and efficient as possible without compromising the inner ratios or structural strength.
Here's a link to a video with the overview of the assembly and parts.
In reply to asking a geopolymer friend about the granularity and if the windhexe would change the geopolymer process...
"Hey Tom, it depends one the rock. All normal rocks can be calcinated at 750°C for 3 to 5 hours after milling. Rocks from volcanic activities like perlite (not the expanded one) or tuff can be used after milling, although drying them properly helps. In generall, all stones can be used as a flour but in order to get good performances they have to be finely ground and treated with heat in any way. Either by applying heat or because of geological activity. Anyways, very very finely ground, can make a activation via burning obsolete. In very fine state, many characteristics of many materials change, as you probably know. I'd say to 100 g of stone flour, adding a mixture of 50 g waterglass mixed with 15 g NaOH, maybe 5 g water if needed are a good starting point. The heating at 750 °C drys the material but the changes in lets say kaolinit/clay which makes it a good GP raw material happen on a molecular level. Made in a proper way it adds energy to the system which can afterwards be used by the GP system to make up new chemical connections."
Hi Robb, I send your latest files (V3) to someone with a metal factory. He can laser-cut the materials. He has contacts toother companies to 'roll' the sheet into a cone. That might be a nice option, probably much easier to weld the cone.
Hey Henk! Nice I've already ordered all of the parts and a good friend-o-mine has his own metalshaping workshop so I'm already covered when it comes to manufacturing the parts and completely assembling the windhexe. Week 16 all of the parts will be delivered, hopefully we can assemble it and test in week 17. That'll probably be around april 27th if everything goes according to plan.
The only questions I have now are:
- Will it work?,
- How much airs, temperatures and humidities are needed to run it efficiently?
- What kind of sound will it make?
- Does it do the thing with the disruption zone?
and then the questions become more usecase oriented
- With which processes is the windhexe a viable machine to run?
I would not necessarily grind my coffee with it (yet) but if it disassembles and temporarily magnetizes aluminium I know of some low hanging fruit applying this thing in recycling plants for instance. The amount of usecases are literally endless if it's feasable to run the thing.
Anyhow, if all of those question marks can be checked off the list I would probably re-iterate another time on the prototype design, smoothing out any issues that pop up during assembly and testing. Only then I would recommend spending the time and/ or money building multiple windhexes. So the roadmap for now is:
1 - Design prototype. (Check)
2 - Build prototype. (in progress)
3 - Run prototype, confirm its operation, film it, and answer many questions (pending)
4 - Take feedback and apply it to prototype design (pending)
5 - Make a small batch of working windhexes and distribute for testing and home use (pending)
6 - Apply the windhexe wherever needed. (wherever)
It might not work, or it might, I might not know how to get it to work, or I might. So this is the grey area for now. ;)
We published a presentation by her last year on MFMP YT. It was very fascinating and ran very true. I must find time and energy to read it. It corroborated something John Hutchison said which is in line with understanding I have of collective matter formation.
I'm currently reading Joseph Cater. He has some really crazy ideas. I didn't dare tell them to anyone. Not even my wife and then you suddenly mention a hollow earth. He writes that the shell is 1600 km thick and describes why and how in detail.
Matsumoto, Adamenko et. al., Klimov, Stankovic, Goldwater/Greenyer, Jurrien/Greenyer - all observed hollow sphere production in these systems. Often with other elements spewing out of them.
The internal structure of ball Lightning is pretty clear now. At a certain level of excitement it produces a shell that cannot be breached by ordinary matter. Elements are synthesised by this process with O, Si, Ca and Fe being in the top of the list - this is 84% of the crust of the earth.
In other areas of the breakup, we see Al, K and Na - which in combination with the above, represents 96.5% of the mass of the earths crust. The starting material is Cu and Zn in brass, residual air and hydrogen.
Bob, thanks for fascinating presentation today, I only was able to attend part of it. I'll go through that tornado monograph to see if there are any more juicy nuggets that will be useful to our research. BTW, in German and "ei" together sounds like a long "i" so my last name sounds like "Hine." ("ie" sounds like long "e".) Cheers.
Hi Bob, I'm continuing to dig into the Tornadic Supercell article. Chandler's main point is that tornadoes cause a lot of damage and kill people every year but we don't know why some ordinary tornadoes turn into supercells, which occurs once in every thousand tornadoes. These storms have been described by scientists using thermodynamic and hydrodynamic models but these paradigms don't explain everything we see in tornadoes, especially luminous phenomena and extreme force. He's proposing an EM explanation but he doesn't go as far as endorsing plasmoids, solitons, or self-organized matter, ie., Ed Lewis. Will keep you posted as I read further.
Apr 4, 2023·edited Apr 4, 2023Liked by Bob Greenyer
Sure, so he keeps saying that none of the computer simulations ever resolve tornadoes into supercells, that the whole thing is frustratingly beyond science at this point. Maybe he should read Matsumoto, Shoulders, Fryberger, Parkhomov, and Adamenko/Shishken. Hello!
I'm trying to find the decisive thing that a tornado and a windtex have in common, because that must be what gives the effect. The way I see it, it's that the air swirls around one way down on the outside and then turns around and swirls up the other way inside. Perhaps this is the only effect you need to achieve in the windtex.
But I believe that it is the complex fractal vortex structure of charged particles, as occurs in ULTR (EZ water forming near hydrophilic water leads to rotation of charged water) and this leads to the toroidal moment and resultant disruption zone.
Podkletnov set up a superconducting disk and span it to produce a 'beam' that travelled faster than light in one direction and a disruption zone.
Does it indicate that water will have to be present. The air in the Woetex tube also rotates at 1000000 RPM. This must imply that the air that is blown in tangentially must have a very high speed and perhaps that is all that is needed.
So, I think of it like this. We are talking about the same process that produces ball lightning. They form in free air not always in storms (Hessdaalen, Australian Outback).
EVOs are ubiquitous and according to Shoulders and in the form of Magneto Toro Electrical Radiation (MTER) neutral clusters (condensed clusters of Relic neutrinos according to Shishkin et. al. that act like monopoles and are effectively the dense Aetheric matter of Tesla) are everywhere and can be cohered by fast spinning dense matter as shown by Shishkin et.al.
Parkhomov showed that cold/relic neutrinos of microns to millimetre scale could be partially reflected by dense matter, so in a building, these may have a slow diffusion through the walls. Zhou found that during 3 body alignments not only was something affecting spectral lines of elements and decay rates of beta atomic clocks, but it produced a sideways movement in a vertical brass sheet.
Shishkin also noted that in his lab, his water cavitator had to be moved to continue producing Magneto Toro Electrical Radiation.
In the GP, we are producing the Aetheric MTER clusters from Hydrogen and the resonant aspects of the pyramids form are driving the process.
When replicating the George Ohsawa's ball lightning like synthesis of elements by carbon arc under water, Sundarasen and Bockris found they only produced Iron when Oxygen was dissolved in nitrogen. Ergo it is critical to the transmutation.
HHO, of which DDO etc is present in many so-called LENR experiments. It was shown in Ohmasa Gas analysis that O2 is present and it is present in the air also.
in 2006, it was proposed by Fillipov, Urutskoev, Lochak and Rukhadze, that the very same monopole-like clusters were binding to Oxygen nuclei in the air causing the strange glow (not Cherenkov) above Chernobyl witnessed by 1000s.
Oxygen (O2) is a uniquely strong paramagnetic gas. It gets more paramagnetic the colder it gets - in the fractal vortex structure it may get super cold in places and the spinning will help cohere these naturally abundant clusters.
These will lead to the formation of the fractal toroidal moment and the destruction zone.
So yes, perhaps all that is needed is the injection and instability of high speed air. Water from wet material (or moisture in air at the startup) will enhance the effect.
Hey Bob! Thanks again for the wonderful presentation.
This apparatus looks like a very promising and practical application of the monopole/dualpole/evo/whatchamaycallit physics and will see if I can replicate one on a smaller scale ~60cm to 100cm diameter in order to test the validity of the claims made in the patent. I hope that'll be large enough.
I've reverse engineered a 3D file from the drawings in the patent. Link to folder below:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1vgEzcC8vd5Jm81sDCXz-fWVBVlqNwwIB?usp=sharing
It's got step file, 3DM file (which is rhino and i very much recommend downloading for free 3 months trial at https://www.rhino3d.com/download/ in order to open the 3DM file) and of course the usual screenshots and such.
I noted that
- the device is completely airtight with gaskets at the bolted seams and welds on the other seams.
- the device is tuneable with air pressure, humidity and temperature
- the device is tuneable with the width and angle of the inlet slits in the upper chamber.
- the device is tuneable with the height of the exhaust in the upper chamber.
The smaller you make this device, the more precise the tuning has to be. Bigger windhexe means lower frequencies of oscillations and sound, means larger wavelengths, means smaller tolerances for error in the tuning process. I do believe the best step now is to replicate one of these as is with a diameter of approx one meter. which will be half or one third the size of the windhexes showed in de videos. See if it works, does the disintegration-doo-dippie thing and try some other tests with it.
AWSOME! Can I share the video with a voiceover?
It is spooky how the sacred geometry lines up! And yes, the is PATENT FREE technology that has massive, civilisation-changing applications.
The patent is for 3, but I prefer the 4 as per the ancient stone carvings all over the world and the clear evidence from VEGA that you get less disruptive inflows of dark matter preventing damage to the device - AND I would orient the device, with a little angular offset NSEW.
If you see the video of a not-too-powerful tornado sent to me by Sean this morning, you can see that at a little above ground it near-instantly starts dustifying non-organic materials in farm buildings it interacts with. I already knew that this could work in a free volume from the experimental data, but this video, like the Shakhparonov work, prove to me that a workable stone/metal carving tool should be realisable.
Hey Bob!
By all means feel free to use the images, 3D files and images I share on the Remote View blog. The content I share here is freely accessible to anyone who is interested and can make use of it.
The current 3D model has 4 inlets indeed. Just because that was easier to draw. Could easily transform it to 3, 5, 6 whatever may suit the inner vortex best. So I'm also considering trying to make a small 3D printable desktop version. with just a view adjustable parts to tune it.
I will also add your 3D model and the 2D plan drawings, and the golden ratio annotations to the Rhino file later on. I'll post the link as soon as I've uploaded them. I believe when tuned to the right sound/standing waves this thing will be pretty easy to operate. It's basically an elaborate whistle with disassembling/ disassociating capabilities. I do have to say that the Patent plans display very thick sheet metal for it's size. I wonder if that's for a reason or just scale of drawing. If I would 3D print a desktop version of this would you recommend using nylon for it does not gather positive charge?
More coming soon!
Kind Regards, Robb
Hi Tony,
yes, that is how I imagine it, a whistle.
I thing 4 is the right number and allows for easy NSEW alignment.
The metal does not need to be so thick on the main chamber. I do think a mild steel is best for areas close to the disruption beams at each fractal level.
I think proper understanding of the way it operates, will help optimise smaller versions.
Ionising incoming air may prove advantageous
Hey Bob!
I've added the 3D model including the 3D structure in addition to the 2D sacred geometry template and a PDF with some annotations to the folder.
Link to new video:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jZHwZbekg0W7uv5PBPWmKLTHvOte6_Hp/view?usp=sharing
Link to annotated PDF:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-_fg3IGir0uBL0UDFkMB5vMy7VimlgP9/view?usp=share_link
Link to additional 3DM (Rhino) file:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lWUzbO58uh1v5ns5_3Y5ARiNgjG8lfBs/view?usp=sharing
They're all present in the folder I've shared earlier.
In contrary to the great pyramid, at a quick glance, I could not find any golden ratios present in the design except one. The exhaust bottom (which is tune-able in height) exactly hovers on the golden ratio of the total height of the upper chamber. What a funny coincidence, would you think that is deliberate?
Strangely I could not find any ratios in the diameters of the openings and cavities.
It could be that Mr Polifka found the one resonating (phi) ratio also known as a perfect fifth by chance and hasn't looked any further into the other proportions of the device.
Thanks again - I cannot seam to get the PDF working.
I re-uploaded the pdf, I believe it does the thing now.
btw, the tornado converting the non organic materials of the building into a ultra-fine grey dust, that does look very familiar.
I feel compelled to bring up this observation. Similarly to what we observed with the GEET reactor in that there is a fuel vaporization aspect AND a nuclear transformation aspect, I think we have a similar situation with the Winhexe. There is a physical grinding/pulverization aspect (probably related to the shear forces in vortexes and and or passing near the disruption zone AND a nuclear transmutation aspect related going through the disruption zone.
Something else to think about, while we may be touching on the nature of Manna/Ormus, we might also be getting into something akin to deadly orgone. I expect we can pretty quickly figure this out once we get to experimenting with a prototype, but it is something to think about before we start recommending that a Windhexe be used for food preparation. I suspect we can tune it accordingly and that chirality or drive/bias parameters will determine whether we make something akin to Ormus/Manna or Deadly Orgone.
Safety always.
I have noticed 3 things about the windhex.
The speed of the air inside the cyclone is around 200,000 km per hour when angular velocity is 16,000. Under normal circumstances the material would have been flung out the side of the cyclone.
0.5 to 1 kW must be used to evaporate 1 liter of water. It is not much better than normal heating.
The material particles become spherical.
If we are getting our heat from energy generated from a geet though
Having a more efficient generator producing the air-flow would reduce the power use per kg water vaporised.
Of course, if the energy is less than about 700wh, it must be done in a different way, so I thought that the water might be converted into Braun's gas.
Likely - that is my point about how the GP works.
The structure is self similar - each fractal vortex has its own disruption zone, this pulls in Dark Matter via the fractal toroidal moment and at this point, were matter and dense dark matter converge the electrons fail to hold metal lattices or ionic compounds such as SiO2, Al2O3 etc. together... same for water. Covalent stuff such as C-C bonds, BN or SiC are more resistant - that is why Parkhomov found that BN and SiC worked best and why BrLP (r) (tm) found that their reactors are best contained by C.
Teslas 'Carbon Button' light bulb was either made of diamond dust in carbonised bitumen or carborundum (SiC) - these were the only things that Tesla established could survive continued impact with Aetheric matter streams. (though they will fail ultimately ultimately)
We don't need to re-do this work. We have verified it so that should be enough.
The H-O bonds in water are covalent, however, the electrons and the protons have spin and the toroidal moment acts on spin matter. Moreover the molecule is polar. I maintain that the disruption pulls the water out od things and at the extreme - dissociates it.
When this happens, we have HHO and we have already shown what that can do.
To gain heat you have to somehow rectify the process as it appears to be a balancing process. I like to cite this as an example.
https://youtu.be/vgr4aoZZ4fI
Are there other processes you know that move matter at that speed?
It may not be better than normal heating, but one is getting fine free-flowing particles at the same time.
I would like to explore the magnetisation of metal powders that come out of it - is it permanent, or does it 'fade' after about 2 days?
Bob, I found this page that describes some background to the windhexe, amongst other things "Maxwell's Daemons" that may be of interest
https://velipohjonen.com/2010/04/29/tornado-in-a-can-29gytge2im5s4-65/
It also mentions a Swedish company "Airgrinder", located in the north, that also bought sub rights to the patent of the windhexe.
https://www.granitor.se/en/miljoteknik/airgrinder
Now I know what I'm building after the geet. Although I'm not too excited to eat dust foods I can see the applications there. If this can be used to turn rocks into a feedstock for geopolymer then that will be the first thing I'll do. Advanced compost decomposition, plastics recycling, e-waste separation, what else?
Not sure how plastics will turn out - as it is C-C covalent bonds.
It was not in the demo's I believe, will be a nice experiment!
Totally.
I see, I thought it might be a nice addition before microwave pyrolysis.
Hi Bob and everyone!
I've added the latest files to the Google drive folder.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1jjUnajGG88afx0FZmU3wHWVdwH3ttW5j?usp=share_link
Inside the folder you'll find the following
- PDF with all of the latest annotated drawings of the subassemblies, exploded view and detail views
- Turntable animation of all of the subassemblies and the exploded view.
- All of the steel laser files, gasket laser files, 3D print and latest Rhino 3D file/model.
Everything is double checked and ready for prototyping. Due to the cone having the bottom opening smaller than 200mm we decided to change the thickness of the bottom cone body to 1,5mm to make it a bit more flexible compared to the previous 2mm. The bottom opening is now 120mm. My next step is ordering the parts, gathering the materials and as soon the CNC cut metal parts are done I'll pass them on to the workshop.
Main questionmark in the way now is, does the prototype work? Perhaps.. anyhow It's worth a shot ;)
I'll be posting photos of the progress, if anything changes in the prototype design I'll update them drawings.
Greetings! TonyJaboney aka Robb
Fine work indeed Robb. I will do a quick review to get eyes on it.
Thanks, great review! I'm also rooting for it to work! I'll keep posting updates in this thread. Photo's and some calculations coming soon :D! Hope you're having a great trip!
Finished Archeologic trip... very informative. Preparing to leave for Japan.
Hi Bob and everyone!
Small update on the prototype progress
I've discussed the parts with the metalshaper, who'll be happy to oblige with building the prototype, and optimized them for production in the workshop. I've added a welding and shaping jig to the 3D file in order to more easily form the cone.
All the sheet metal parts that were 1mm thick have now become 2mm thick, This added tension makes the metal easier to shape into the bent parts without folding and makes it easier to weld without burning through it. Some of the to be bent parts have some extra length added that'll be manually cut later in order to be able to bend the radii al the way through the length of the sheet metal. All of the laserfiles have been sent to the lasercutter and I've also uploaded them to the google drive folder over here:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1jjUnajGG88afx0FZmU3wHWVdwH3ttW5j?usp=share_link
I'll be getting a definitive quote from the lasercutter company by Monday or Tuesday and I'll immediately give them the green light to produce 1 set.
Starting on Monday I'll draft up the annotated individual parts drawings and a complete annotated assembly drawing mostly to highlight the things to pay attention to when assembling the windhexe.
Next week I'll also be ordering and gathering the rest of the hardware and parts so that as soon the lasercutter is done we can start building the prototype. Hopefully that'll be around the 17th of april.
The 3DM (rhino) file is also present in the google drive folder.
Cheers!
Hi Robb,
I see you had to make a jig for welding the cone.
Exciting times!
OK, I want a "pen" that cuts chunks out of rocks, and I put the chunks through a windhexe, and vaccum the powder through a tube, and thereby be carving my own caves and tunnels. Can you post a link to that book-like long article, I'd like to have a look at it.
Hi Steven,
The article is in the references above now.
My hypothesis for the 'pen' is that I observed the truth of the possibility in free space in examples such as the Kaminsky ULTR video and on the Surface of Ohmasa Gas treated Tungsten and Jurrien VEGA SiO2. I have seen the bore holes through Alumina.
Sean sent me an excellent video of a fairly weak tornado, nearly instantly converting parts of buildings to a dense plume of dust a little above the ground, given what I have seen in experiments, this video of an actual tornado and the Shakhparonov work, I have no reason at all to think this will not work as described.
Yes, to tunnelling, Geopolymer material production, stone carving etc. this was all in my original Jan 2018 O-Day slides.
I expect the flower of life on the temple of Osiris at Abydos was carved with such a 'pen'.
Looking forward to this too! The secret is out, how kraft was planning to make bug protein powder efficiently :)
Absolutely!
1). Has anyone seen an estimate of the vortex rpm speed in the Windhexe (probably varies from top to bottom)?
2). I’ve noticed a gentlemen in one of the videos stuffing cans, glass bottles, plastic bottles, etc. up into what we would consider the disruption zone. Wondering if that would be such a good idea?
3). I didn’t see a provision for grounding the vortex funnel chamber in the conceptual design for the prototypes. Might want to include that for us dummies!
Fascinating stuff, Bob!
1). Allan Kusk estimated the speed above
2). You did not see him place cardboard or plastic and Chitin and Wood appears to fair better. I believe this is because of C-C covalent bonds that are, in my view, less easily disrupted. Also, the disruption zone in my view has an event horizon, popping the metal/glass up to that is not an issue.
3). It will be grounded. The latest prototype is just to minimise the costly steel parts. Having grounding on there clearly would be good.
EVOs, then Henk's reactor, then the GEET, and now the Windhexe. Yet when you look at the applications and visibility/amplification of these marvels....crickets. It truly shows me how Plato's Cave has a pathway out, and it is alighted by LENR. Wonderful shared insights. Thank you!
The plan was to work through this, first by gathering the experimental proof. Establishing the structure of 'O' and then demonstrating its truth - all the while carrying forward some that would have their 'O-Day' when they had seen enough but under the radar to ensure it was too late for those that would throw interference... They tried.
Hey Bob and y'all
For now I'll be uploading updates on the Windhexe in this thread to keep it all in one place.
I've updated the design to lower production costs as much as possible sacrificing a bit of sturdiness and durability for low cost prototyping efforts. The main objective is to get one up and running and confirm that the disintegration zone is present in the windhexe.
Link to the folders
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1xh1BFQDyaizx4H6abqsLFy3Ma6KOGxXX?usp=share_link
- I've substituted the metal support frame for a cheap and quick wooden frame.
- I've substituted the metal exhaust support frame and adjustable lid for cheap and quick plywood parts. For now I'll be securing the adjustable top with a couple of clamps.
- I've added some provisions to the inlet housing to make adjusting the whistle parts easier.
- I'll be doing the gaskets with sticky rubber tape for now which will suffice during the prototyping phase.
I managed to knock down the total cost including hardware and such to around 500 euro's (450 euros ex VAT)
In the folder you will find
- a parts list, with weight and cost calculated.
- a pdf annotated with dimensions for the prototype design as i'm planning to assemble it.
- a quick silent film to give yous a 3D impression and overview
- the 3DM file if you want to open it in Rhino
Coming wednesday I'll discuss the assembly and parts to be shaped/welded with the metalshaper. Might have to do some minor adjustments to the laserfiles to optimize the parts for shaping and welding them in the workshop. As soon that's done I'll finalize the prototype parts and upload all of the CNC lasercutting files as well.
So the carbon steel sheet metal will have to be finished with a primer or other substance to prevent it from rusting and such. If you want to do foodstuffs with it I would suggest looking at stainless steel or a finish that is food safe whilst being exposed to a monopole, square radii, whatchamaycallit disruption zone. Like will it start disassembling the paint or powder coating on the metal?
Cheers! Tony Jaboney aka Robb
Thankyou so much - nice optimisations for a prototype.
Could you include a port on the top to allow things to be fed in there also?
Yes that would come in handy! I'm going to prototype with a closed lid first, then drill a hole later on for adding the angled tube. I do believe the feed tube on the top is at an obscure angle for a reason and that having a hole in the top of the lid will either disrupt the vortices or have material spitting out of it when in operation.
There are lots of simple variables that could have an effect that I would like to examine.
Also keeping track of humidity, temperature, air pressure in to air flow out ratios, disintegrating behavior with different materials, orientation to earths magnetic field, etc. I'm also very curious how much it weighs before, during and after operation ;)
Agreed, and your approach is a good one.
Henk has our extremely nice 4k 60FPS 30x large sensor studio camera and recording equipment that fully runs and is powered over 1 Cat5 cable, so with a suitable port one could record from a distance.
Hey Bob!
I've been 3D designing a makeable version of the Windhexe in Rhino and currently finetuning parts for CNC lasercutting, 3D printing and metal shaping. I've re-enginerded the windhexe as efficiently as I can get it for easy assembly, cost reduction, weight reduction (since the patent had like 10mm thick pieces of steel in there) and ease of manufacture. Also doing some optimizing to reduce the cost as much as possible. The interior ratios and smoothness of the chambers are unchanged. The outside has some simplifications that make it easier, cheaper to build or get from stock materials.
- There'll be a couple of metal sheet parts that need to be shaped into curvature in order to get the cone, upper chamber and exhaust. These parts will need a bit of welding.
- Most of the parts can be CNC lasercut and be bent into shape from the exported STP files. by a company like 24/7 tailorsteel for example (not affiliated)
- Gaskets can be CNC lasercut from the exported SVG/DXF files from silicon at your local lasercut business or done by hand.
- Metal frame can be with a metal cross saw and a drill. or exported to 24/7 tailorsteel as well.
- one part on the inlets will be 3D printed in order to have the angle of the inlet air stream just like in the patent. If it needs adjusting it'll be easier to replace a 3D printed piece than cutting and welding a new one.
Most of the windhexe can be assembled (and disassembled) with bolts and nuts, even with Glue/ Kit if one does not have the capability to weld. I tried to design it as handy and efficient as possible without compromising the inner ratios or structural strength.
Here's a link to a video with the overview of the assembly and parts.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1a8t9amHQ2FXPkBtcfejp5Cpu5-6JdzRe/view?usp=sharing
Will do some more fine-tuning and checking on the assembly and I will be sharing drawings and files as soon as they're complete
Nicely done!
In reply to asking a geopolymer friend about the granularity and if the windhexe would change the geopolymer process...
"Hey Tom, it depends one the rock. All normal rocks can be calcinated at 750°C for 3 to 5 hours after milling. Rocks from volcanic activities like perlite (not the expanded one) or tuff can be used after milling, although drying them properly helps. In generall, all stones can be used as a flour but in order to get good performances they have to be finely ground and treated with heat in any way. Either by applying heat or because of geological activity. Anyways, very very finely ground, can make a activation via burning obsolete. In very fine state, many characteristics of many materials change, as you probably know. I'd say to 100 g of stone flour, adding a mixture of 50 g waterglass mixed with 15 g NaOH, maybe 5 g water if needed are a good starting point. The heating at 750 °C drys the material but the changes in lets say kaolinit/clay which makes it a good GP raw material happen on a molecular level. Made in a proper way it adds energy to the system which can afterwards be used by the GP system to make up new chemical connections."
With some powders in hand, this can be done very easily
Hi Robb, I send your latest files (V3) to someone with a metal factory. He can laser-cut the materials. He has contacts toother companies to 'roll' the sheet into a cone. That might be a nice option, probably much easier to weld the cone.
Hey Henk! Nice I've already ordered all of the parts and a good friend-o-mine has his own metalshaping workshop so I'm already covered when it comes to manufacturing the parts and completely assembling the windhexe. Week 16 all of the parts will be delivered, hopefully we can assemble it and test in week 17. That'll probably be around april 27th if everything goes according to plan.
The only questions I have now are:
- Will it work?,
- How much airs, temperatures and humidities are needed to run it efficiently?
- What kind of sound will it make?
- Does it do the thing with the disruption zone?
and then the questions become more usecase oriented
- With which processes is the windhexe a viable machine to run?
I would not necessarily grind my coffee with it (yet) but if it disassembles and temporarily magnetizes aluminium I know of some low hanging fruit applying this thing in recycling plants for instance. The amount of usecases are literally endless if it's feasable to run the thing.
Anyhow, if all of those question marks can be checked off the list I would probably re-iterate another time on the prototype design, smoothing out any issues that pop up during assembly and testing. Only then I would recommend spending the time and/ or money building multiple windhexes. So the roadmap for now is:
1 - Design prototype. (Check)
2 - Build prototype. (in progress)
3 - Run prototype, confirm its operation, film it, and answer many questions (pending)
4 - Take feedback and apply it to prototype design (pending)
5 - Make a small batch of working windhexes and distribute for testing and home use (pending)
6 - Apply the windhexe wherever needed. (wherever)
It might not work, or it might, I might not know how to get it to work, or I might. So this is the grey area for now. ;)
You are going fast, I like that!
Hey Bob,
Have you read Bob parr's friends work?
http://www.sciepub.com/reference/250967
Another sleepless night.
DIY with chuxxsss. Will get you TT Brown book soon. I have it on a harddrive here.
We published a presentation by her last year on MFMP YT. It was very fascinating and ran very true. I must find time and energy to read it. It corroborated something John Hutchison said which is in line with understanding I have of collective matter formation.
How do I upload a book to you by T.T.Brown's daughter, mate?
Upload to a cloud drive and share link. If not too big you can add it to a message on contact form at RemoteView.ICU
Just have to crack my Storage device as Netgear stopped supporting my NAS stora.
If it helps, I can provide storage space on our server and a log in.
I'm currently reading Joseph Cater. He has some really crazy ideas. I didn't dare tell them to anyone. Not even my wife and then you suddenly mention a hollow earth. He writes that the shell is 1600 km thick and describes why and how in detail.
Matsumoto, Adamenko et. al., Klimov, Stankovic, Goldwater/Greenyer, Jurrien/Greenyer - all observed hollow sphere production in these systems. Often with other elements spewing out of them.
The internal structure of ball Lightning is pretty clear now. At a certain level of excitement it produces a shell that cannot be breached by ordinary matter. Elements are synthesised by this process with O, Si, Ca and Fe being in the top of the list - this is 84% of the crust of the earth.
https://youtu.be/AZ9RJr_s31w?t=1941
In other areas of the breakup, we see Al, K and Na - which in combination with the above, represents 96.5% of the mass of the earths crust. The starting material is Cu and Zn in brass, residual air and hydrogen.
https://youtu.be/UNb-pHLagLc?t=1167
Bob, thanks for fascinating presentation today, I only was able to attend part of it. I'll go through that tornado monograph to see if there are any more juicy nuggets that will be useful to our research. BTW, in German and "ei" together sounds like a long "i" so my last name sounds like "Hine." ("ie" sounds like long "e".) Cheers.
Noted!
Hi Bob, I'm continuing to dig into the Tornadic Supercell article. Chandler's main point is that tornadoes cause a lot of damage and kill people every year but we don't know why some ordinary tornadoes turn into supercells, which occurs once in every thousand tornadoes. These storms have been described by scientists using thermodynamic and hydrodynamic models but these paradigms don't explain everything we see in tornadoes, especially luminous phenomena and extreme force. He's proposing an EM explanation but he doesn't go as far as endorsing plasmoids, solitons, or self-organized matter, ie., Ed Lewis. Will keep you posted as I read further.
Thanks for ploughing through that Simeon.
Sure, so he keeps saying that none of the computer simulations ever resolve tornadoes into supercells, that the whole thing is frustratingly beyond science at this point. Maybe he should read Matsumoto, Shoulders, Fryberger, Parkhomov, and Adamenko/Shishken. Hello!
Exactly - that is as I understood it - the simulations are missing something fundamental.
I'm trying to find the decisive thing that a tornado and a windtex have in common, because that must be what gives the effect. The way I see it, it's that the air swirls around one way down on the outside and then turns around and swirls up the other way inside. Perhaps this is the only effect you need to achieve in the windtex.
It it was, all we would need is this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex_tube
But I believe that it is the complex fractal vortex structure of charged particles, as occurs in ULTR (EZ water forming near hydrophilic water leads to rotation of charged water) and this leads to the toroidal moment and resultant disruption zone.
Podkletnov set up a superconducting disk and span it to produce a 'beam' that travelled faster than light in one direction and a disruption zone.
Does it indicate that water will have to be present. The air in the Woetex tube also rotates at 1000000 RPM. This must imply that the air that is blown in tangentially must have a very high speed and perhaps that is all that is needed.
So, I think of it like this. We are talking about the same process that produces ball lightning. They form in free air not always in storms (Hessdaalen, Australian Outback).
EVOs are ubiquitous and according to Shoulders and in the form of Magneto Toro Electrical Radiation (MTER) neutral clusters (condensed clusters of Relic neutrinos according to Shishkin et. al. that act like monopoles and are effectively the dense Aetheric matter of Tesla) are everywhere and can be cohered by fast spinning dense matter as shown by Shishkin et.al.
https://remoteview.substack.com/p/where-is-the-atom-battery#details
Parkhomov showed that cold/relic neutrinos of microns to millimetre scale could be partially reflected by dense matter, so in a building, these may have a slow diffusion through the walls. Zhou found that during 3 body alignments not only was something affecting spectral lines of elements and decay rates of beta atomic clocks, but it produced a sideways movement in a vertical brass sheet.
Shishkin also noted that in his lab, his water cavitator had to be moved to continue producing Magneto Toro Electrical Radiation.
In the GP, we are producing the Aetheric MTER clusters from Hydrogen and the resonant aspects of the pyramids form are driving the process.
When replicating the George Ohsawa's ball lightning like synthesis of elements by carbon arc under water, Sundarasen and Bockris found they only produced Iron when Oxygen was dissolved in nitrogen. Ergo it is critical to the transmutation.
HHO, of which DDO etc is present in many so-called LENR experiments. It was shown in Ohmasa Gas analysis that O2 is present and it is present in the air also.
in 2006, it was proposed by Fillipov, Urutskoev, Lochak and Rukhadze, that the very same monopole-like clusters were binding to Oxygen nuclei in the air causing the strange glow (not Cherenkov) above Chernobyl witnessed by 1000s.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=At2hUvA_-cI&t=1677s
https://youtu.be/ysvsdwHUETg?t=708
Oxygen (O2) is a uniquely strong paramagnetic gas. It gets more paramagnetic the colder it gets - in the fractal vortex structure it may get super cold in places and the spinning will help cohere these naturally abundant clusters.
These will lead to the formation of the fractal toroidal moment and the destruction zone.
So yes, perhaps all that is needed is the injection and instability of high speed air. Water from wet material (or moisture in air at the startup) will enhance the effect.
Or the vortex must have a very high angular velocity