With all this EVO activity, and the dominant role of fractal toroids and their moments play in a fractal universe, imagine if you will a world in which the environment was much more electrically active than appears today - and the consequently much greater effect of using EVOs generated in the body and linked to brain activity to affect the world around us. Imagine further the trauma of a significant change in the electrical environment, as previously "common" capabilities appeared to just draina away (as an aside, perhaps all those mysterious "false doors" were actually charging stations for the human body in the world as it was). Where is the evidence for such a world, however? It's not as if our ancestors described such a world ... only they did! Not only that, but such "world states" might well be the norm for worlds as new solar systems form: one thing's for certain, the "accretion disk" model of star and planet formation does not stand up to scrutiny, as the disks of all newly forming stars appear to disappear within 10,000,000 years or less - not enough time to actually form planets. Instead, Harbig-Haro objects that form along Birkeland Currents (with Stars, Gas Giants and Smaller Planets forming along the current IN POLAR ALIGNMENT) are a much more likely candidate, with main sequence stars being formed with Gas Giants / Brown Dwarfs axially aligned North and South and, likewise, rocky moons and planets forming North and South from the Gas Giants / Brown Dwarfs along the same axis (each at stable Z-pinch points). In this context:
that feeling of "something missing" ("sparks" from the fingertips!) begins to make a lot of sense.
I, for one, personally believe the Universe is Fractal, the basic building block is the Fractal Toroid with Moments, "Space" and "Particles" are not separate (any more than mountains are separate from the land they project from, even if you can only see the tops of them when they poke out of the sea) but are actually all just made of the same thing, that the Planck Constant is likely the lowest level in this fractal we can see / access (but there is likely more beneath we can't (yet) access!), that the universe we see is just one strand in an even bigger "neuron-like" structure (and, yes, it could be that it is "flowing" out of a truly giant "pinch point", just as the matter spews out of the white holes in the ULTR experiment - the universe is fractal!) - and that we - and our thoughts / consciousness are an integral part of this same infinite up/down/left/right/forward/backward structure (even if our limited brains can't fully imagine such infinities - it does not make them not so!).
I also believe the current narratives in the various scientific "disciplines" (actually, stories!) need to undergo a major revision, beyond little tweaks (like, the universe is suddenly 26.7 Billion Years, not 13.7 Billion Years, to accomodate the new JWST findings - but why stop at 26.7 Billion? Why not, "actually, the Big Bang is just a hypothesis, one with the evidence now firmly stacked against it - and, in like manner, what did our ancestors know anyway? Eye witnesses? Pah, just story tellers. Catastrophism? Pah, Uniformitarianism (stands to reason, don't it?). Plasma columns (Squatter man Petroglyphs)? Pah, more story telling. Electrical behaviour? Pah, gravity is all - no woo-woo ESP. Forget the evidence, forget the eyewitness accounts, forget the inconvenient observations, forget the lack of progress, forget the pollution, forget the environmental degradation ! We know the truth - we are always right - the science is settled - there is no other way - only "we" can save you, only "we" can protect you. Ah, the irony! And the stupidity. Still, as I said, just my opinion.
When I first started reading Parkhomov's book, I knew we'd eventually be able to tie everything together as you did in this convincing presentation. People who are good at PK also tend to be good remote viewers showing us that something like relic/cold neutrinos are involved. Just a note about Russ Targ: he was Puthoff's colleague at SRI, not a remote viewer per se. Targ is a laser physicist who invented the technology for the CIA to hear conversations through walls using a laser beam, as he described to us at conferences several times. So he went from one of type of remote viewing to another!
https://youtu.be/XUfkso6auPo I am so proud of Mr. Egely and MFMP, Bob. I woke up to this latest info. My own personal insights continue to flow inward. Thanks again for opening the flood gates. To paraphrase Musk: The Kosmos are the answer, let's get the questions right, and stay keen on the role of Consciousness. Peace Cheers Onward.
Many thanks. I shall give your stream of consciousness the consideration it most certainly merits and follow the links you've provided to learn more. For now, on the toroidal moment, I offer but one simple inference based on observation. I was struck by the hexagonal geometry of the static 'footprints' left by many of the EVOs in the presentations you've given. I note that benzine rings are also hexagonal and regular hexagons occur throughout nature, for example in the cells of bee hives, or basalt formations. The hexagon is the two-dimensional manifestation of the radian in the 'external' static geometry of Descartes, who drew an absolute distinction between mind and matter. A Riemann Sphere, on the other hand, allows for the geometry of movement, because what is observed is at the radius of the sphere and the observer is at its centre. The radius (radian) is a different kind of dimension from length, breadth and height, because it enables the charting of consciousness, which is both inside our heads and is 'out there' as the grounding from which the external world arises. You may know it as advaita vedanta.
My links to Substack via Google, for some reason, were not working, but they are now restored. In the meantime, I've dug out some of my sources for that Substack article which I tried to send you last night. I've come at this from the perspective of theoretical physics, as well as philosophical idealism, and I've come to realise that mathematical constants - as opposed to those of nature - are fundamental. One such is √2, another is pi, and a third is the golden ratio. (There are more). I got interested in your work, because EVOs are examples of how Pauli's Exclusion Principle can break down in certain circumstances, to transmute one element into another. If you watch this video clip of Eric Weinstein's interview with Roger Penrose on spinors: https://youtu.be/_EasLq6IQIw you'll notice that it's the unusual spin (angular momentum) of an electron that enables it to participate with its fellow fermions in atomic structures, rather than being plasma. As far as I've been able to understand them, the equations used in quantum mechanics to describe an electron's angular momentum - and other fermions - employ the inverse of √2 as a constant.
Roger Penrose's work with Stuart Hameroff has involved microtubules in the brain. Penrose, who is a mathematician, noticed that their structure takes the form of golden ratio vortices. Here's a good introduction to their work by Hameroff: https://youtu.be/iIyEjh6ef_8 This talk by both of them goes into more depth on the geometry and the physics: https://youtu.be/xGbgDf4HCHU
Towards the end of your presentation, you talk about the vortices that occur on the cerebral cortex. I'm sure you're aware of the work of the late Dr. Michael Persinger, but I found one of his experiments particularly informative, which involved asking participants to sit inside a rotating electromagnetic field, Here's the citation, which will be enough to find a downloadable pdf on line: Persinger, M, A, et al, Evidence of Macroscopic Quantum Entanglement During Double Quantitative Electroencephalographic Measurements of Friends vs Strangers, NeuroQuantology, Vol 7, Issue 4, December 2009,
An excellent presentation, if I may say so, Bob, which got me thinking. Your insight into the social engineering that has taken place over the last few years is so important and it's why it's so important to get this information out. Are you aware of the work that Roger Penrose has done with the anaesthetist, Stuart Hameroff? Although this article is about Mayan Palenque in the Yucatan, there's a link to an article on their work on the function of microtubules in the brain and how they are structured as golden ratio vortices: https://davidtruman.substack.com/publish/post/58513380
Damien Echols spend years in solitary confinement on death row, he teached himself a very specific and precise method for dealing with this experience. It wasn't a new method. Most would refer to it as Magick, visualization or meditation by adopting the (allegedly) most ancient religious tradition known to humans and it has quadrillions of parallels to what has been discussed in this presentation. Very interesting one again! Thanks
I see via update #1 that John Chang has come to your attention, Bob. My son, who seriously practiced martial arts for some years, shared his rare videos when YT was just spinning up, and we were comparing philosophical/spiritual notes. Working out how JC can operate in this way, is a testament to the truly robust Nature of your Model-in Progress/Process. Lastly I sent a link here at RV about Egely's latest post working with ENG8. "It's all the same thing." Cheers!
O-Day - ESP
Interacting spiral wave patterns underlie complex brain dynamics and are related to cognitive processing.
https://www.mediafire.com/file/3eslh2s8o7iw1re/Interacting_spiral_wave_patterns_underlie_complex_-safe.pdf
With all this EVO activity, and the dominant role of fractal toroids and their moments play in a fractal universe, imagine if you will a world in which the environment was much more electrically active than appears today - and the consequently much greater effect of using EVOs generated in the body and linked to brain activity to affect the world around us. Imagine further the trauma of a significant change in the electrical environment, as previously "common" capabilities appeared to just draina away (as an aside, perhaps all those mysterious "false doors" were actually charging stations for the human body in the world as it was). Where is the evidence for such a world, however? It's not as if our ancestors described such a world ... only they did! Not only that, but such "world states" might well be the norm for worlds as new solar systems form: one thing's for certain, the "accretion disk" model of star and planet formation does not stand up to scrutiny, as the disks of all newly forming stars appear to disappear within 10,000,000 years or less - not enough time to actually form planets. Instead, Harbig-Haro objects that form along Birkeland Currents (with Stars, Gas Giants and Smaller Planets forming along the current IN POLAR ALIGNMENT) are a much more likely candidate, with main sequence stars being formed with Gas Giants / Brown Dwarfs axially aligned North and South and, likewise, rocky moons and planets forming North and South from the Gas Giants / Brown Dwarfs along the same axis (each at stable Z-pinch points). In this context:
https://saturnsmasher.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/purpledawn_herbig_haro.pdf
that feeling of "something missing" ("sparks" from the fingertips!) begins to make a lot of sense.
I, for one, personally believe the Universe is Fractal, the basic building block is the Fractal Toroid with Moments, "Space" and "Particles" are not separate (any more than mountains are separate from the land they project from, even if you can only see the tops of them when they poke out of the sea) but are actually all just made of the same thing, that the Planck Constant is likely the lowest level in this fractal we can see / access (but there is likely more beneath we can't (yet) access!), that the universe we see is just one strand in an even bigger "neuron-like" structure (and, yes, it could be that it is "flowing" out of a truly giant "pinch point", just as the matter spews out of the white holes in the ULTR experiment - the universe is fractal!) - and that we - and our thoughts / consciousness are an integral part of this same infinite up/down/left/right/forward/backward structure (even if our limited brains can't fully imagine such infinities - it does not make them not so!).
I also believe the current narratives in the various scientific "disciplines" (actually, stories!) need to undergo a major revision, beyond little tweaks (like, the universe is suddenly 26.7 Billion Years, not 13.7 Billion Years, to accomodate the new JWST findings - but why stop at 26.7 Billion? Why not, "actually, the Big Bang is just a hypothesis, one with the evidence now firmly stacked against it - and, in like manner, what did our ancestors know anyway? Eye witnesses? Pah, just story tellers. Catastrophism? Pah, Uniformitarianism (stands to reason, don't it?). Plasma columns (Squatter man Petroglyphs)? Pah, more story telling. Electrical behaviour? Pah, gravity is all - no woo-woo ESP. Forget the evidence, forget the eyewitness accounts, forget the inconvenient observations, forget the lack of progress, forget the pollution, forget the environmental degradation ! We know the truth - we are always right - the science is settled - there is no other way - only "we" can save you, only "we" can protect you. Ah, the irony! And the stupidity. Still, as I said, just my opinion.
When I first started reading Parkhomov's book, I knew we'd eventually be able to tie everything together as you did in this convincing presentation. People who are good at PK also tend to be good remote viewers showing us that something like relic/cold neutrinos are involved. Just a note about Russ Targ: he was Puthoff's colleague at SRI, not a remote viewer per se. Targ is a laser physicist who invented the technology for the CIA to hear conversations through walls using a laser beam, as he described to us at conferences several times. So he went from one of type of remote viewing to another!
https://youtu.be/XUfkso6auPo I am so proud of Mr. Egely and MFMP, Bob. I woke up to this latest info. My own personal insights continue to flow inward. Thanks again for opening the flood gates. To paraphrase Musk: The Kosmos are the answer, let's get the questions right, and stay keen on the role of Consciousness. Peace Cheers Onward.
Many thanks. I shall give your stream of consciousness the consideration it most certainly merits and follow the links you've provided to learn more. For now, on the toroidal moment, I offer but one simple inference based on observation. I was struck by the hexagonal geometry of the static 'footprints' left by many of the EVOs in the presentations you've given. I note that benzine rings are also hexagonal and regular hexagons occur throughout nature, for example in the cells of bee hives, or basalt formations. The hexagon is the two-dimensional manifestation of the radian in the 'external' static geometry of Descartes, who drew an absolute distinction between mind and matter. A Riemann Sphere, on the other hand, allows for the geometry of movement, because what is observed is at the radius of the sphere and the observer is at its centre. The radius (radian) is a different kind of dimension from length, breadth and height, because it enables the charting of consciousness, which is both inside our heads and is 'out there' as the grounding from which the external world arises. You may know it as advaita vedanta.
My links to Substack via Google, for some reason, were not working, but they are now restored. In the meantime, I've dug out some of my sources for that Substack article which I tried to send you last night. I've come at this from the perspective of theoretical physics, as well as philosophical idealism, and I've come to realise that mathematical constants - as opposed to those of nature - are fundamental. One such is √2, another is pi, and a third is the golden ratio. (There are more). I got interested in your work, because EVOs are examples of how Pauli's Exclusion Principle can break down in certain circumstances, to transmute one element into another. If you watch this video clip of Eric Weinstein's interview with Roger Penrose on spinors: https://youtu.be/_EasLq6IQIw you'll notice that it's the unusual spin (angular momentum) of an electron that enables it to participate with its fellow fermions in atomic structures, rather than being plasma. As far as I've been able to understand them, the equations used in quantum mechanics to describe an electron's angular momentum - and other fermions - employ the inverse of √2 as a constant.
Roger Penrose's work with Stuart Hameroff has involved microtubules in the brain. Penrose, who is a mathematician, noticed that their structure takes the form of golden ratio vortices. Here's a good introduction to their work by Hameroff: https://youtu.be/iIyEjh6ef_8 This talk by both of them goes into more depth on the geometry and the physics: https://youtu.be/xGbgDf4HCHU
Towards the end of your presentation, you talk about the vortices that occur on the cerebral cortex. I'm sure you're aware of the work of the late Dr. Michael Persinger, but I found one of his experiments particularly informative, which involved asking participants to sit inside a rotating electromagnetic field, Here's the citation, which will be enough to find a downloadable pdf on line: Persinger, M, A, et al, Evidence of Macroscopic Quantum Entanglement During Double Quantitative Electroencephalographic Measurements of Friends vs Strangers, NeuroQuantology, Vol 7, Issue 4, December 2009,
An excellent presentation, if I may say so, Bob, which got me thinking. Your insight into the social engineering that has taken place over the last few years is so important and it's why it's so important to get this information out. Are you aware of the work that Roger Penrose has done with the anaesthetist, Stuart Hameroff? Although this article is about Mayan Palenque in the Yucatan, there's a link to an article on their work on the function of microtubules in the brain and how they are structured as golden ratio vortices: https://davidtruman.substack.com/publish/post/58513380
Damien Echols spend years in solitary confinement on death row, he teached himself a very specific and precise method for dealing with this experience. It wasn't a new method. Most would refer to it as Magick, visualization or meditation by adopting the (allegedly) most ancient religious tradition known to humans and it has quadrillions of parallels to what has been discussed in this presentation. Very interesting one again! Thanks
I see via update #1 that John Chang has come to your attention, Bob. My son, who seriously practiced martial arts for some years, shared his rare videos when YT was just spinning up, and we were comparing philosophical/spiritual notes. Working out how JC can operate in this way, is a testament to the truly robust Nature of your Model-in Progress/Process. Lastly I sent a link here at RV about Egely's latest post working with ENG8. "It's all the same thing." Cheers!
Perhaps this explains "Havana Syndrome", the mysterious malaise affecting US diplomats in Cuba, with no apparent EM cause.
Heres a link to the Nasa paper from Holt. I didnt see it linked in references https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19800010907/downloads/19800010907.pdf
https://phys.org/news/2023-08-smoking-gun-evidence-gravity-gaia-wide.html
An interesting paper that could end the "Dark Matter" hypothesis.
Found an interesting clip of the pyramids... not sure if this help?
https://youtube.com/shorts/ZU1agYyfkLI?feature=share