Bob, thanks for the link for the shielding patent and the history of strange radiation. Do you think the shielding described would convert the MTER clusters into heat energy? It cites an example of a house being built over a fault line in the earths crust emitting strange radiation and this thin painted film protecting the inhabitants from the MTER clusters. So presumeably the clusters get absorbed into the film, right? I wonder if this would degrade the film due to this process? Also, regarding all cavitation systems in general, does this mean that even low intensity cavitation, such as your ultrasonic bath experiment, emit MTER clusters too, allbeit at a very low intensity, or does cavitation have to be over a certain intensity in order for the clusters to appear? Sorry to keep asking questions but I am just trying to get up to speed on the vast amount of content on your site...
Have you seen this device before? Surely these small companies cant all be on the wind up, right? It seems that all these cavitation startups seem to go quiet after postíng such claims on youtube! Why? Do you think they get a visit from the men in black?
In the comments someone mentions a windmill that’s using a water brake to heat water using cavitation, in a similar way, saying they had to remove or was removed by youtube.
I am new here to your blog and find your presentations fascinating but still struggling to understand the cavitation process as you describe it. The Russian cavitation device in your presentation seems to show the heat being created within the water stream so that the tubes don'tget eaten away by the cavitation jets, but in Leclaires experiment it would seem the aluminium mesh is critical to generate excess heat, albeit dangerous due to the strange radiation you described to me before. The CES device, I have linked above, doesn't mention whether the chamber gets destroyed in the process of cavitation. What are your thoughts..A seawater device with a CoP of 20 has got to be pretty useful for a diy heater no? They say in the presentation that the cavitation process releases the sodium in the seawater which presumeably creates a coulomb explosion . I am not an expert on chemistry, but do you think this all sounds legit..Even Leclaire was saying he was getting cop 3 i.e an 800w creating 2600w water heating, but starving the inlet of utility pump with a gate valve seems a pretty inefficient way to induce this process. Look forward to your thoughts. Many thanks Mark
Cavitation systems can produce Fractal Toroidal Clusters (Exotic Vacuum Objects / Magneto-Toro Electrical Clusters) which may be neutral, positive or negative. The neutral clusters can carry 1 ion for every 10^5 electrons. These can explode at distance away from the generator even inside bodies. They carry large potential energy and are a direct health risk according to Alexander Shishkin and other independent research.
Methods for capturing this radiation will increase thermal yield and protect organic life nearby.
They have made their calculations based on converting all of the water to steam, this assumption can result in totally false accounting of yield since the energy to produce dry steam is massive.
In the video above, you can see entrained water vapour immediately adjacent to the output of the device, dry steam is transparent. Therefore, one cannot be converting all of the water to dry steam.
Another researcher made this mistake and the MFMP spent over $20,000 only to find that the output energy recoverable in a mass flow calorimeter was 98% the input energy.
I expect there are nuclear reactions going on when they introduce salt water. Applying my understanding (Most energetic reactions using spin nuclei will proceed to non-spin stable products), I expect the most likely is
23Na + 23Na > 46Ti + 25.0693 MeV
23Na + 37Cl > 60Ni + 23.1812 MeV
23Na + 35Cl > 58Ni + 21.6908 MeV
I am placing this here so it cannot be patented.
EOR is valid regardless of whether the device produces over unity.
Thanks for the reply Bob, much appreciated. I wanted to try the Leclaire setup, as it seems the easiest way to proove excess heat as everything is easily available off the shelf, looking at his presentation photos which show all the plumbing parts clearly, including the make/model pump and aluminium mesh, all for about £100 - £150. As there is no steam involved with this experiment surely it would be simple enough to measure the temp increase of the fixed volume of water in the circuit over a fixed time. It was your comments about the strange radiation, that deterred me. Do you think the experiment could be switched on remotely without ramifications to health after the experiment, it would just be a matter of switching on the pump from a safe distance, on a remote on/off using wireless thermometers etc? If Leclaire is claiming cop 3, this magnitude of gain would be more than sufficient to eliminate any measuring errors from the pump electrical consumption and the temp measurements of the water..There needs to be a laymans proof of concept to confirm excess heat with these cavitation devices. What were you testing that cost $20k, if you don't mind me asking? Best regards, Mark
As Parkhomov says - I keeps a good distance from his reactors when they are operating - "dilution is the solution to pollution" - but there is a potential proven shielding approach.
Purchasing, preparing and testing a competent method of assessing excess. Flying the team from multiple countries, car rental, accommodation, sundries, SEM/EDS post analysis.
Thanks again Bob, these links really help me understand the dangers. So in summary, all these cavitation devices pose a significant risk to experimenters. I wonder if that's why these cavitation heater inventors go strangely silent, shortly after announcement, well apart from the threat they pose by offering cheap decentralised energy of course. The powers that be, must already know these radiation dangers and don't want these devices in domestic situations. You do realise, this shatters my hopes of telling British Gas to 'do one', the next time a bill drops through the door! I was hoping to have something up and running by this winter! :)
Thanks Bob, that was an interesting presentation. There is a company that are using modified diesel fuel injectors to inject a periodic water jet into a small water filled chamber, with the purpose of creating heat from the induced cavitation, in order to generate low cost steam. They claim COP 3 to 5 with tap water, but here is the interesting thing, they say using seawater increases the COP 5 fold, i.e. a COP of about 20..What are your thoughts on this? Do you think the additional elements found in seawater are causing a chemical reaction during the cavitation process?.
Bob 13 minutes in to this vlog, please watch.
https://youtu.be/Fcx0xTfjK2M
Or anyone.
The water temperature and potential biological behaviour, first empirical, second anecdotal - needs to be investigated further.
Sub aqua divers?
Bob, thanks for the link for the shielding patent and the history of strange radiation. Do you think the shielding described would convert the MTER clusters into heat energy? It cites an example of a house being built over a fault line in the earths crust emitting strange radiation and this thin painted film protecting the inhabitants from the MTER clusters. So presumeably the clusters get absorbed into the film, right? I wonder if this would degrade the film due to this process? Also, regarding all cavitation systems in general, does this mean that even low intensity cavitation, such as your ultrasonic bath experiment, emit MTER clusters too, allbeit at a very low intensity, or does cavitation have to be over a certain intensity in order for the clusters to appear? Sorry to keep asking questions but I am just trying to get up to speed on the vast amount of content on your site...
Always work safely.
Hey Bob, I didn't get a reply regarding the cavitation heater below, here is a link:-
https://youtu.be/Ji0GAt-q2EM?feature=shared
Have you seen this device before? Surely these small companies cant all be on the wind up, right? It seems that all these cavitation startups seem to go quiet after postíng such claims on youtube! Why? Do you think they get a visit from the men in black?
In the comments someone mentions a windmill that’s using a water brake to heat water using cavitation, in a similar way, saying they had to remove or was removed by youtube.
I am new here to your blog and find your presentations fascinating but still struggling to understand the cavitation process as you describe it. The Russian cavitation device in your presentation seems to show the heat being created within the water stream so that the tubes don'tget eaten away by the cavitation jets, but in Leclaires experiment it would seem the aluminium mesh is critical to generate excess heat, albeit dangerous due to the strange radiation you described to me before. The CES device, I have linked above, doesn't mention whether the chamber gets destroyed in the process of cavitation. What are your thoughts..A seawater device with a CoP of 20 has got to be pretty useful for a diy heater no? They say in the presentation that the cavitation process releases the sodium in the seawater which presumeably creates a coulomb explosion . I am not an expert on chemistry, but do you think this all sounds legit..Even Leclaire was saying he was getting cop 3 i.e an 800w creating 2600w water heating, but starving the inlet of utility pump with a gate valve seems a pretty inefficient way to induce this process. Look forward to your thoughts. Many thanks Mark
Fukushima more complex than H2 explosion
https://youtu.be/Ji0GAt-q2EM?t=600
Cavitation systems can produce Fractal Toroidal Clusters (Exotic Vacuum Objects / Magneto-Toro Electrical Clusters) which may be neutral, positive or negative. The neutral clusters can carry 1 ion for every 10^5 electrons. These can explode at distance away from the generator even inside bodies. They carry large potential energy and are a direct health risk according to Alexander Shishkin and other independent research.
Methods for capturing this radiation will increase thermal yield and protect organic life nearby.
Gain calculations
https://youtu.be/Ji0GAt-q2EM?t=905
They have made their calculations based on converting all of the water to steam, this assumption can result in totally false accounting of yield since the energy to produce dry steam is massive.
In the video above, you can see entrained water vapour immediately adjacent to the output of the device, dry steam is transparent. Therefore, one cannot be converting all of the water to dry steam.
Another researcher made this mistake and the MFMP spent over $20,000 only to find that the output energy recoverable in a mass flow calorimeter was 98% the input energy.
I expect there are nuclear reactions going on when they introduce salt water. Applying my understanding (Most energetic reactions using spin nuclei will proceed to non-spin stable products), I expect the most likely is
23Na + 23Na > 46Ti + 25.0693 MeV
23Na + 37Cl > 60Ni + 23.1812 MeV
23Na + 35Cl > 58Ni + 21.6908 MeV
I am placing this here so it cannot be patented.
EOR is valid regardless of whether the device produces over unity.
https://youtu.be/Ji0GAt-q2EM?t=1263
Thanks for the reply Bob, much appreciated. I wanted to try the Leclaire setup, as it seems the easiest way to proove excess heat as everything is easily available off the shelf, looking at his presentation photos which show all the plumbing parts clearly, including the make/model pump and aluminium mesh, all for about £100 - £150. As there is no steam involved with this experiment surely it would be simple enough to measure the temp increase of the fixed volume of water in the circuit over a fixed time. It was your comments about the strange radiation, that deterred me. Do you think the experiment could be switched on remotely without ramifications to health after the experiment, it would just be a matter of switching on the pump from a safe distance, on a remote on/off using wireless thermometers etc? If Leclaire is claiming cop 3, this magnitude of gain would be more than sufficient to eliminate any measuring errors from the pump electrical consumption and the temp measurements of the water..There needs to be a laymans proof of concept to confirm excess heat with these cavitation devices. What were you testing that cost $20k, if you don't mind me asking? Best regards, Mark
As Parkhomov says - I keeps a good distance from his reactors when they are operating - "dilution is the solution to pollution" - but there is a potential proven shielding approach.
https://remoteview.substack.com/p/o-day-method-of-protection-from-strange#details
Mark and Sergei nearly killed themselves with 1 hour exposure. This is what Shishkin calculated.
https://youtu.be/gcF-KSLIAWs
Purchasing, preparing and testing a competent method of assessing excess. Flying the team from multiple countries, car rental, accommodation, sundries, SEM/EDS post analysis.
We had to do it on claimants site.
Thanks again Bob, these links really help me understand the dangers. So in summary, all these cavitation devices pose a significant risk to experimenters. I wonder if that's why these cavitation heater inventors go strangely silent, shortly after announcement, well apart from the threat they pose by offering cheap decentralised energy of course. The powers that be, must already know these radiation dangers and don't want these devices in domestic situations. You do realise, this shatters my hopes of telling British Gas to 'do one', the next time a bill drops through the door! I was hoping to have something up and running by this winter! :)
Hey ya'll, watch this-
https://youtu.be/VVG1_p90McQ
Not related directly but def of interest.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZaB5B3pec-A
The Inner World of a Collapsing Bubble
Detailed high-speed visualizations present the complex dynamics within a bubble collapsing in the vicinity of a free surface.
Very nice thanks - Artefact shared a shorter version of this. I will add it to the blog
Thanks Bob,
Toi,toi,toi (meaning good luck in German theater context) for your filming.
Since your singing is not bad, I am still looking forward to "O-Day - The Musical" ;)
Thanks
It went well and I can pay a few of the kids schooling bills with it.
Thanks Bob, that was an interesting presentation. There is a company that are using modified diesel fuel injectors to inject a periodic water jet into a small water filled chamber, with the purpose of creating heat from the induced cavitation, in order to generate low cost steam. They claim COP 3 to 5 with tap water, but here is the interesting thing, they say using seawater increases the COP 5 fold, i.e. a COP of about 20..What are your thoughts on this? Do you think the additional elements found in seawater are causing a chemical reaction during the cavitation process?.
They fly so high
Nearly reach the sky
Like all my dreams
They fade and die