14 Comments
Dec 14, 2022Liked by Bob Greenyer

Thanks Bob for spending the time to get through this and summarize for us so i dont have to listen to the whole thing. I made it about 5 min in and decided there was other more important things on youtube to watch as it was obvious that this was another funding request to further more laser research for weapons and impossibly far from anything practical whatsoever.

Expand full comment
Dec 14, 2022Liked by Bob Greenyer

Hi Bob, I'm just starting to review your reaction comments and will respond afterward. Just wanted to say, two friends alerted me to this "announcement" and I shot back without reading it that it's a throw, and I am studying fission/fusion, not hot fusion. At least my assertions are registered among my loved ones....Onward!

Expand full comment
founding

Thanks Bob, It brings It into perspective!

Expand full comment

I want a rarefaction pulse heater, dang it! Very incisive review, thank you Bob. The USGs grasp of energy technology is so complete, it is imperative that such profound knowledge (as we at MFMP KNOW) remain Above Top Secret. The demonic use of such knowledge leads to a seemingly effective "OZs Curtain" to hide the only technology that matters: Condensed Matter Transmutations i.e. Nature's Wheelworks. We see your lab coat showing, professor Oz. Onward.

Expand full comment

Needless to say, the BBC covered this in their news bulletins and on their website, to which I wrote in the comments section in response to their online bullutin of this "breakthrough moment" (according to the BBC):

The lasers require more than 300 megajoules worth of electricity to produce around 2 megajoules of ultraviolet laser light. In other words, even if the energy from the fusion reactions exceeds the energy from the lasers, it's still only around one percent of the total energy used. Now, there are pre-commercial systems producing lots of excess energy that are already up and running - but, for some reason, they never get mentioned. Why is that? These fusion systems will never deliver as they will always consume way more energy than they produce because they work against nature, not with it - and so, of course, are a "safe bet" for preserving the status quo in the energy field. Come on BBC, how about reporting on systems that work NOW, rather than this sloppy spoon-fed approach to non-stories from lobby groups who benefit enormously from otherwise unjustifiable funding streams and non-delivery of these "energy" systems that will ALWAYS BE CONSUMERS.

to which someone replied:

it takes very little power to power a laser, the amount they say is what comes out, not what went in

to which I replied:

nope, it really does take 300 MJoules to charge the laser - and it is why they can’t fire pulses at one per second as would be needed for a commercial system - it takes time to charge the capacitor banks that power the laser.

What is interesting is that the lasers are used to pinch the target pellet containing the deuterons - but that there are far more efficient ways to exert an inward pressure- an implosion - using magnetic confinement- in fact, a $50 ultrasonic jewellery cleaner with Aluminium in a water bath can be used to create magnetic vorticles that create a magnetic pressure of 50,000,000 Tesla, with the vorticles ripping at the Aluminium and then subjecting the resultant flecks to such forces that the nuclei literally collapse in on themselves to create a boson stack of alpha particles that, when released, reform into alpha conjugate nuclei - 3-alpha (Carbon-12), 4-alpha (Oxygen-16), and so on, in relative abundances matching those found in the Earth’s crust (the experiment is called ULTR, and has been independently replicated many times). As Viktor Schauberger said, Comprehend and copy nature - for this Electro-Nuclear Collapse / Electro-Nuclear reGeneration process is by far the simplest, cleanest, safest, best and most efficient way to generate energy, transmute matter and remediate nuclear waste. Yet, from the BBC, not a word…

Anyway, as you probably guess, I wasn't best pleased by this one-sided coverage ... which gives me an idea, as the BBC are always going on about "impartiality", why should this not also be so in this case? I will test this out by sending an email to BBC newswatch ... you never know.

Expand full comment
Dec 14, 2022·edited Dec 14, 2022

It was a load of horseshit but most people don’t have the proper context or interest to become aware of it. It irks me that in 2006 really interesting results that could have been really conducent to an ICF system (4x thermal output vs kinetic energy imparted to the SS target by passing 20 million amps through it) were obtained, but as they were totally unexpected, were pretty much forgotten and brushed under the carpet. https://arstechnica.com/science/2006/03/3112/amp/

Expand full comment
founding

Hi Bob,

Happy New Year. A new article in Science Magazine identifies a previously unexplained fractal noise signature in crystals as new evidence for the existence of Dirac's magnetic monopoles. "Dynamic Fractal and Anomalous Noise in a Clean Magnetic Crystal." I think they're catching on! https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.ade2301

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.add1644

Cheers.

Expand full comment

When do I get my 192 lasers, deuterium, and enough diamonds to heat my house? Baby it’s cold outside! Merry Christmas!

Expand full comment

So basically the idea is they claim they produced fusion. Regardless of if was done in any useful manner and efficiently, they boringly and drably announced it... in typical government fashion?

And you are saying there’s plenty of much more COP efficient ways of producing electricity?

Expand full comment