This is good news indeed - breaking the ship of science out of the ice pack into which it had become frozen, as it were, before that ship was wrecked. Not only that, but setting that ship on a course toward sunnier climes and more fertile pastures 🙂
Hey Gordon, I had an all day meeting with Pavel Osmera yesterday and he started by proposing his new idea that the beginning of the universe started with our universe and a coupled opposite. I said I had had a similar idea I called 'the mirrorverse' but for the life of me, I can't find out where I went through that idea, can you remember?
Congratulations Bob. Good to be along for the ride! I do recall an episode where the mirrorverse was discussed, but not the details. It's in there somewhere.
But this update brings back two aspects of the explanatory power of LENR: Megalithic Methods, and Origin of the Oceans. These two massive areas of conjecture are deftly anchored in the action of the LENR phenomena. That it is "In our faces" really puts a cork in it. Victory lap!
I think one day it would help if there was maybe AI assistance to do a search for ALL existing scientific research papers on related topics. That way people doing the research don’t have to comb over millions of papers/titles of papers/etc. and seeing they didn’t know about your research or the research you found, clearly that isn’t being done
I decided long ago that YouTube videos get far more exposure than papers, moreover they are date-stamped and uneditable post publishing without a re-upload, which assigns a new date to them.
I agree. But I’m just thinking of why they may have missed out your amazing studies if they’re strictly looking thru scientific journals/research paper websites like EBSCO or JSTOR which they made us use at college.
Parkhomov's assumption that the products of transmutation can predict the outcome of the transmutation process is yet to be validated. Miley and Hora showed that the proportions of elements found in the universe corresponded to the three quark model of the proton and neutron and the function of these particles in the nucleus.
the theory is found in this paper:
Nuclear magic numbers based on a quark like model is compared with the Boltzmann distribution model from nuclear abundance in the universe and low energy nuclear reactions N. Ghahramani,1,a兲H. Hora,1,2,b兲G. H. Miley,3M. Ghanaatian,4M. Hooshmand,4K. Philberth,5and F. Osman
"A new threefold symmetry is presented for derivation of the magic numbers of nuclei and compared with the model based on the Boltzmann distribution from the standard abundance distribution of nuclei in the universe in the endothermic branch. This results in a 3n relation leading to the motivation to explore the quark state in nuclei. But, this is in contrast duality to the fact that the confinement of nuclei by a generalized Debye layer can be based only on a nucleon and not on a quark structure"
This theory of matter formation corresponds to the hypothesis that transmutation is a process that derives from the reformation of matter from a quark gluon plasma.
Yes, this sounds very, very familiar to those of us who have been following your work and MFMP. Great job and this article should be citing your presentations, in person and YouTube. (We're going to have to contact the authors of this paper so they can correct their reference section to include Matsumoto and MFMP.)
This is good news indeed - breaking the ship of science out of the ice pack into which it had become frozen, as it were, before that ship was wrecked. Not only that, but setting that ship on a course toward sunnier climes and more fertile pastures 🙂
Yes!
Hey Gordon, I had an all day meeting with Pavel Osmera yesterday and he started by proposing his new idea that the beginning of the universe started with our universe and a coupled opposite. I said I had had a similar idea I called 'the mirrorverse' but for the life of me, I can't find out where I went through that idea, can you remember?
I remember you taking about this, but also haven’t found it yet - Still looking
Congratulations Bob. Good to be along for the ride! I do recall an episode where the mirrorverse was discussed, but not the details. It's in there somewhere.
But this update brings back two aspects of the explanatory power of LENR: Megalithic Methods, and Origin of the Oceans. These two massive areas of conjecture are deftly anchored in the action of the LENR phenomena. That it is "In our faces" really puts a cork in it. Victory lap!
It was in Bob’s presentation about six months ago. Also see this New Scientist article from 2019 discussing the hunt for mirror neutrons. https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg24232330-200-weve-seen-signs-of-a-mirror-image-universe-that-is-touching-our-own/
Wish I knew which one!
Interesting New Scientist article
I'll find it. Here's my interpretation of these ideas, before I knew about that much about LENR or ball lighting. https://youtu.be/BsjG3-duDwo
Yes - it is a good that the process is being recognised.
Wow one of the most fascinating articles I’ve read in a while!
Shaking the ground of what I was taught in university which never sat well with my instinct.
Right! And they call for research to validate the theory, in my case I came to the theory by observing LENR research that they do not cite!
I think one day it would help if there was maybe AI assistance to do a search for ALL existing scientific research papers on related topics. That way people doing the research don’t have to comb over millions of papers/titles of papers/etc. and seeing they didn’t know about your research or the research you found, clearly that isn’t being done
It is weird that they found Parkhomov and Jaitner and LENR and did not see the MFMP or my work.
Is your article posted in any scientific journal? I know you had that one paper recently
I decided long ago that YouTube videos get far more exposure than papers, moreover they are date-stamped and uneditable post publishing without a re-upload, which assigns a new date to them.
I agree. But I’m just thinking of why they may have missed out your amazing studies if they’re strictly looking thru scientific journals/research paper websites like EBSCO or JSTOR which they made us use at college.
Parkhomov's assumption that the products of transmutation can predict the outcome of the transmutation process is yet to be validated. Miley and Hora showed that the proportions of elements found in the universe corresponded to the three quark model of the proton and neutron and the function of these particles in the nucleus.
the theory is found in this paper:
Nuclear magic numbers based on a quark like model is compared with the Boltzmann distribution model from nuclear abundance in the universe and low energy nuclear reactions N. Ghahramani,1,a兲H. Hora,1,2,b兲G. H. Miley,3M. Ghanaatian,4M. Hooshmand,4K. Philberth,5and F. Osman
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/243587849_Nuclear_magic_numbers_based_on_a_quarklike_model_is_compared_with_the_Boltzmann_distribution_model_from_nuclear_abundance_in_the_universe_and_low_energy_nuclear_reactions
"A new threefold symmetry is presented for derivation of the magic numbers of nuclei and compared with the model based on the Boltzmann distribution from the standard abundance distribution of nuclei in the universe in the endothermic branch. This results in a 3n relation leading to the motivation to explore the quark state in nuclei. But, this is in contrast duality to the fact that the confinement of nuclei by a generalized Debye layer can be based only on a nucleon and not on a quark structure"
This theory of matter formation corresponds to the hypothesis that transmutation is a process that derives from the reformation of matter from a quark gluon plasma.
Yes, this sounds very, very familiar to those of us who have been following your work and MFMP. Great job and this article should be citing your presentations, in person and YouTube. (We're going to have to contact the authors of this paper so they can correct their reference section to include Matsumoto and MFMP.)