so are we talking about the compressed Ohmasa gas unpacking all those Hs stored in the clusters after loading into the metal? And did those tungsten images turn up in your remoteview substack email?
Great. So the grey material started as borax and tungsten carbide...was heated to glowing with a gas torch then 2 TIG welding rods were added to the crucible and the welder turned onto full current...not a big welder...80 amps on full beans. The molten borax allowed the current to flow between the rods and as it heated up further small points of white light were seen to go bright and wink out. A lot of smoke rose out. I ran the welder through the material until the whole lot became a uniform spongy grey material. It was thick and sticky when glowing red hot and when cooled, it had the feel of a silicate and sounded like pumice or bricks being rubbed together. Certain spots in the sponge would set off a gieger muller tube with a little higher than background. Not enough to have me worried but enough to make it easy to find the hot spots in the foam. There was also carbon from graphite lining the crucible. The images look greyscale but they are not. The image of the rod was taken on a grey background. I don't recall if it was a thoriated rod or not.
Can you do an in depth 'how to use' the tables on the nanosoft website...showing something like examples of reactions working in both directions? I fuddled around in there putting in elements but wasn't confident I was using it correctly.
Me too. I didn't want to clutter up the list of queries so I stopped after two. Just being able to delete failures would be helpful. We could probably find templates for what we want in the list of *working* queried. ;-)
It basically appeared instantly - which is exactly the claim of proof of quantum coherent nuclear reaction as written in Solin's 1992 patent.
so are we talking about the compressed Ohmasa gas unpacking all those Hs stored in the clusters after loading into the metal? And did those tungsten images turn up in your remoteview substack email?
I think that in the alpha conjugate nuclei based on Ti and on F, the carbon is captured from the PTFE. (see images above).
Yes, I have the pictures now - can you describe what I am looking at in them?
Great. So the grey material started as borax and tungsten carbide...was heated to glowing with a gas torch then 2 TIG welding rods were added to the crucible and the welder turned onto full current...not a big welder...80 amps on full beans. The molten borax allowed the current to flow between the rods and as it heated up further small points of white light were seen to go bright and wink out. A lot of smoke rose out. I ran the welder through the material until the whole lot became a uniform spongy grey material. It was thick and sticky when glowing red hot and when cooled, it had the feel of a silicate and sounded like pumice or bricks being rubbed together. Certain spots in the sponge would set off a gieger muller tube with a little higher than background. Not enough to have me worried but enough to make it easy to find the hot spots in the foam. There was also carbon from graphite lining the crucible. The images look greyscale but they are not. The image of the rod was taken on a grey background. I don't recall if it was a thoriated rod or not.
Can you do an in depth 'how to use' the tables on the nanosoft website...showing something like examples of reactions working in both directions? I fuddled around in there putting in elements but wasn't confident I was using it correctly.
Me too. I didn't want to clutter up the list of queries so I stopped after two. Just being able to delete failures would be helpful. We could probably find templates for what we want in the list of *working* queried. ;-)
It is a buffer, it will only store a number of queries.