I never know where to put this stuff, since so many things get talked about. Speaking of EVOs from your fingers http://amasci.com/weird/unusual/airthred.html Bill Beaty had a great experiment years back with an insolated cookies sheet dry ice and a static generator that showed your finger traces.
I know in the last article Omhasa was mentioned, but since it wasn't the point of the comment I didn't want to mention Brown's gas was part of my 'origin story' for lack of a better idiom. I remember Dad tired of struggling ranting about the fed, and mentioning water powered cars. Shortly after I found the InFolio/Rexresearch in the back of PopularSci where you could mail order photocopied articles; which I love that y'all quote from on this site.
I don't know what else to say at the moment, other than thanks for keeping the flame alive.
Hi, Bob! Great to see that my comment was useful! So this got me thinking some more. There is a megalithic site called Baalbek, which has I think some of the largest megalithic blocks anywhere. (https://i.imgur.com/43orGeB.jpg)
The quarry close to Baalbek also has the largest block ever found called "Stone of the pregnant woman", which is NOT MOVED YET. It's still attached to the bedrock at the quarry. (https://i.imgur.com/c7yrUqb.png)
So according to what you said, the unmoved stone should have much fewer/weaker magnetic fields compared to the ones that have been moved into place. This should definitely be tested by someone.
Also another question if I may. Many megalithic sites around the world have these weird protrusions in the stones (https://i.imgur.com/yOcXXf5.png). And the theories I've seen thrown around is that it proves that they were made from geopolymer, somehow melted and poured like concrete or whatever. Do you have any insight as to the reason for those protrusions? If you use those cone-type hand held things to move them around, maybe those are the spots where you hold on to? It kind of shapes the stone towards the cones or something?
- [ ] I have been reading Geral Pollack’s “the 4th phase of water” for a long time, still haven’t managed to get to the end, but just now I read a part where Pollack quotes the work of Italian Giorgio Pichardo, who performed a similar work to the one done by Parkhomov with radioactive decays variation but this time with chemical reaction times variation with water as solvent. His team performed more than 250.000 experiments and they were able to prove a relationship with sun activity by comparison of reaction times under a faraday cage vs outside of the cage. I think this is yet another proof of SR quanta from the environment affecting the rate of ordinary chemical reactions enough to have a measurable effect.
I never know where to put this stuff, since so many things get talked about. Speaking of EVOs from your fingers http://amasci.com/weird/unusual/airthred.html Bill Beaty had a great experiment years back with an insolated cookies sheet dry ice and a static generator that showed your finger traces.
I know in the last article Omhasa was mentioned, but since it wasn't the point of the comment I didn't want to mention Brown's gas was part of my 'origin story' for lack of a better idiom. I remember Dad tired of struggling ranting about the fed, and mentioning water powered cars. Shortly after I found the InFolio/Rexresearch in the back of PopularSci where you could mail order photocopied articles; which I love that y'all quote from on this site.
I don't know what else to say at the moment, other than thanks for keeping the flame alive.
Hi, Bob! Great to see that my comment was useful! So this got me thinking some more. There is a megalithic site called Baalbek, which has I think some of the largest megalithic blocks anywhere. (https://i.imgur.com/43orGeB.jpg)
The quarry close to Baalbek also has the largest block ever found called "Stone of the pregnant woman", which is NOT MOVED YET. It's still attached to the bedrock at the quarry. (https://i.imgur.com/c7yrUqb.png)
So according to what you said, the unmoved stone should have much fewer/weaker magnetic fields compared to the ones that have been moved into place. This should definitely be tested by someone.
Also another question if I may. Many megalithic sites around the world have these weird protrusions in the stones (https://i.imgur.com/yOcXXf5.png). And the theories I've seen thrown around is that it proves that they were made from geopolymer, somehow melted and poured like concrete or whatever. Do you have any insight as to the reason for those protrusions? If you use those cone-type hand held things to move them around, maybe those are the spots where you hold on to? It kind of shapes the stone towards the cones or something?
- [ ] I have been reading Geral Pollack’s “the 4th phase of water” for a long time, still haven’t managed to get to the end, but just now I read a part where Pollack quotes the work of Italian Giorgio Pichardo, who performed a similar work to the one done by Parkhomov with radioactive decays variation but this time with chemical reaction times variation with water as solvent. His team performed more than 250.000 experiments and they were able to prove a relationship with sun activity by comparison of reaction times under a faraday cage vs outside of the cage. I think this is yet another proof of SR quanta from the environment affecting the rate of ordinary chemical reactions enough to have a measurable effect.