I never know where to put this stuff, since so many things get talked about. Speaking of EVOs from your fingers http://amasci.com/weird/unusual/airthred.html Bill Beaty had a great experiment years back with an insolated cookies sheet dry ice and a static generator that showed your finger traces.
I know in the last article Omhasa was mentioned, but since it wasn't the point of the comment I didn't want to mention Brown's gas was part of my 'origin story' for lack of a better idiom. I remember Dad tired of struggling ranting about the fed, and mentioning water powered cars. Shortly after I found the InFolio/Rexresearch in the back of PopularSci where you could mail order photocopied articles; which I love that y'all quote from on this site.
I don't know what else to say at the moment, other than thanks for keeping the flame alive.
What this person did with the CO2 chips is close to what has been done with “cloud chambers”. A couple of weeks ago I gave it a try to create a human improved version of a Google translation paper of Chizhov (don’t know if the correct spelling) but I dropped after the 7th page as the equations were too time consuming to properly translate. But he used a chamber with CO2 gas that revealed particle emissions, an old bit effective way by condensation of the CO2 gas in the chamber, perhaps something of the like is what is happening here.
Basically some kind of emission that makes the CO2 change phase by adding energy. It could well be “strange radiation” more than simply an electrostatic air movement.
I am not opposed to the idea, at all, and was very interested in knowing Parkhomov’s angle on the phenomena in his chapter 4. Also the PK party documents support that. I have in mind a possible variant, that we emit the particles all the time but we can handle them with intention. Just a thought that arises seeing that the emissions seem to be permanent, but that the difference is how we focus the emission. I have witnessed and experienced the dowsing for water and the tingling sensation is unmistakable.
Hi, Bob! Great to see that my comment was useful! So this got me thinking some more. There is a megalithic site called Baalbek, which has I think some of the largest megalithic blocks anywhere. (https://i.imgur.com/43orGeB.jpg)
The quarry close to Baalbek also has the largest block ever found called "Stone of the pregnant woman", which is NOT MOVED YET. It's still attached to the bedrock at the quarry. (https://i.imgur.com/c7yrUqb.png)
So according to what you said, the unmoved stone should have much fewer/weaker magnetic fields compared to the ones that have been moved into place. This should definitely be tested by someone.
Also another question if I may. Many megalithic sites around the world have these weird protrusions in the stones (https://i.imgur.com/yOcXXf5.png). And the theories I've seen thrown around is that it proves that they were made from geopolymer, somehow melted and poured like concrete or whatever. Do you have any insight as to the reason for those protrusions? If you use those cone-type hand held things to move them around, maybe those are the spots where you hold on to? It kind of shapes the stone towards the cones or something?
The engineers would have used different solutions for different materials. For some rocks like Prismatic Basalt, where the rock can be magnetised, then direct envelopment may be the simplest option for moving. If a rock is not so easily magnetised, lifting armatures may have been added that could be easily affected. These parts would be affected. I suggest that the Torus in Souther Africa may be one such approach with ropes. The lifting capacity would then be limited by the rope strength. Other materials may have required the use of simple metal or rock bands, cradles or corner brackets.
On the subject of 'melting rock', I have considered this a distinct possibility since Jan 2018.
We know that this technology is able to turn metals like aluminium to mouldable jelly at room temperature as I have reported from Hutchison, Russian Energetics, Ralph Ring, Ball Lightning etc. However, we have observed the boring through and even apparent liquidation of SiO2 (melting point 1650 °C) and Al2O3 ( melting point 2,072 °C) When the reactor did not exceed 1050ºC and the Kanthal wire remains INTACT (melting point 1500ºC). That is to say that METAL wire that melts BELOW the melting point of the ceramics REMAINS INTACT. Please see this video
It may be that a conductive metal (in the case of the LION 2 reactor Cu - which itself melts at above 1,085 °C) or crushed magnetisable material is needed as a 'flux', something like magnetite. One could then liquify the composite mixture as the EVOs would form in the metal or on the boundary of the magnetite and this would allow the whole matrix to flow into wooden moulds or leather bags with draining ports or just into masked off volumes. After a while, the composite would set rock hard as the EVOs drained in the same way as it did with all of the various aluminium cold forming techniques.
What you need to think about in relationship to LION is the steel cutlery or wood going inside Hutchison aluminium samples. In the case of the wood, the EVOs form on the outside of the Al and act as a localised fluidiser.
LION formed its coherent matter EVOs on the material to be worked in the 100s of degrees, whereas Hutchison did it at ambient room temperature. The latter approach is more likely and useful for building purposes.
- [ ] I have been reading Geral Pollack’s “the 4th phase of water” for a long time, still haven’t managed to get to the end, but just now I read a part where Pollack quotes the work of Italian Giorgio Pichardo, who performed a similar work to the one done by Parkhomov with radioactive decays variation but this time with chemical reaction times variation with water as solvent. His team performed more than 250.000 experiments and they were able to prove a relationship with sun activity by comparison of reaction times under a faraday cage vs outside of the cage. I think this is yet another proof of SR quanta from the environment affecting the rate of ordinary chemical reactions enough to have a measurable effect.
I never know where to put this stuff, since so many things get talked about. Speaking of EVOs from your fingers http://amasci.com/weird/unusual/airthred.html Bill Beaty had a great experiment years back with an insolated cookies sheet dry ice and a static generator that showed your finger traces.
I know in the last article Omhasa was mentioned, but since it wasn't the point of the comment I didn't want to mention Brown's gas was part of my 'origin story' for lack of a better idiom. I remember Dad tired of struggling ranting about the fed, and mentioning water powered cars. Shortly after I found the InFolio/Rexresearch in the back of PopularSci where you could mail order photocopied articles; which I love that y'all quote from on this site.
I don't know what else to say at the moment, other than thanks for keeping the flame alive.
This is very interesting, thankyou, I will incorporate this when I talk about emissions from fingers
What this person did with the CO2 chips is close to what has been done with “cloud chambers”. A couple of weeks ago I gave it a try to create a human improved version of a Google translation paper of Chizhov (don’t know if the correct spelling) but I dropped after the 7th page as the equations were too time consuming to properly translate. But he used a chamber with CO2 gas that revealed particle emissions, an old bit effective way by condensation of the CO2 gas in the chamber, perhaps something of the like is what is happening here.
Basically some kind of emission that makes the CO2 change phase by adding energy. It could well be “strange radiation” more than simply an electrostatic air movement.
Yes. And since Kieth Fredericks recorded SR like tracks being emitted from fingers onto film, this is highly likely.
https://restframe.com/downloads/tachyon_monopoles.pdf
Also there is Kirlian Photography
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirlian_photography
However, these are tracking emissions, I am stating that I will show evidence that the emissions are entangled with our consciousness.
I am not opposed to the idea, at all, and was very interested in knowing Parkhomov’s angle on the phenomena in his chapter 4. Also the PK party documents support that. I have in mind a possible variant, that we emit the particles all the time but we can handle them with intention. Just a thought that arises seeing that the emissions seem to be permanent, but that the difference is how we focus the emission. I have witnessed and experienced the dowsing for water and the tingling sensation is unmistakable.
"we emit the particles all the time but we can handle them with intention"
Exactly
My father tried to teach me to dowse, he was very good, I wasn't, but then I didn't quite see the point as a boy.
Ah that's the other thing a tesla coil builders video from the 90s, but its already been removed...maybe next time I'll be quicker to post
Found it, I didn't recognize the thumbnail it's part of the talks at the Tesla Society 1990 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuVTmwVb8D8&ab_channel=MrWarrensk enjoy!
Thanks Jacob
Hi, Bob! Great to see that my comment was useful! So this got me thinking some more. There is a megalithic site called Baalbek, which has I think some of the largest megalithic blocks anywhere. (https://i.imgur.com/43orGeB.jpg)
The quarry close to Baalbek also has the largest block ever found called "Stone of the pregnant woman", which is NOT MOVED YET. It's still attached to the bedrock at the quarry. (https://i.imgur.com/c7yrUqb.png)
So according to what you said, the unmoved stone should have much fewer/weaker magnetic fields compared to the ones that have been moved into place. This should definitely be tested by someone.
Also another question if I may. Many megalithic sites around the world have these weird protrusions in the stones (https://i.imgur.com/yOcXXf5.png). And the theories I've seen thrown around is that it proves that they were made from geopolymer, somehow melted and poured like concrete or whatever. Do you have any insight as to the reason for those protrusions? If you use those cone-type hand held things to move them around, maybe those are the spots where you hold on to? It kind of shapes the stone towards the cones or something?
The engineers would have used different solutions for different materials. For some rocks like Prismatic Basalt, where the rock can be magnetised, then direct envelopment may be the simplest option for moving. If a rock is not so easily magnetised, lifting armatures may have been added that could be easily affected. These parts would be affected. I suggest that the Torus in Souther Africa may be one such approach with ropes. The lifting capacity would then be limited by the rope strength. Other materials may have required the use of simple metal or rock bands, cradles or corner brackets.
On the subject of 'melting rock', I have considered this a distinct possibility since Jan 2018.
We know that this technology is able to turn metals like aluminium to mouldable jelly at room temperature as I have reported from Hutchison, Russian Energetics, Ralph Ring, Ball Lightning etc. However, we have observed the boring through and even apparent liquidation of SiO2 (melting point 1650 °C) and Al2O3 ( melting point 2,072 °C) When the reactor did not exceed 1050ºC and the Kanthal wire remains INTACT (melting point 1500ºC). That is to say that METAL wire that melts BELOW the melting point of the ceramics REMAINS INTACT. Please see this video
https://youtu.be/Rch8fkFRHRU
It may be that a conductive metal (in the case of the LION 2 reactor Cu - which itself melts at above 1,085 °C) or crushed magnetisable material is needed as a 'flux', something like magnetite. One could then liquify the composite mixture as the EVOs would form in the metal or on the boundary of the magnetite and this would allow the whole matrix to flow into wooden moulds or leather bags with draining ports or just into masked off volumes. After a while, the composite would set rock hard as the EVOs drained in the same way as it did with all of the various aluminium cold forming techniques.
What you need to think about in relationship to LION is the steel cutlery or wood going inside Hutchison aluminium samples. In the case of the wood, the EVOs form on the outside of the Al and act as a localised fluidiser.
LION formed its coherent matter EVOs on the material to be worked in the 100s of degrees, whereas Hutchison did it at ambient room temperature. The latter approach is more likely and useful for building purposes.
I think I will do a live-stream later to explain this and then fill out the supporting materials in the linked blog.
- [ ] I have been reading Geral Pollack’s “the 4th phase of water” for a long time, still haven’t managed to get to the end, but just now I read a part where Pollack quotes the work of Italian Giorgio Pichardo, who performed a similar work to the one done by Parkhomov with radioactive decays variation but this time with chemical reaction times variation with water as solvent. His team performed more than 250.000 experiments and they were able to prove a relationship with sun activity by comparison of reaction times under a faraday cage vs outside of the cage. I think this is yet another proof of SR quanta from the environment affecting the rate of ordinary chemical reactions enough to have a measurable effect.
Is Giorgio Picardi (bloody darn autocorrect)
At least exposure to cosmic flux of less organised N-Radiation.