Hi Bob, How far approximately does a coherent wave move during the exposure time of one frame and how long do you think it is. Is it relevant or have I misunderstood something.
Hey Bob thanks for the video today (it made my day after slicing up my finger with a saw cutting firewood), you and Allan both found stuff in my own video I totally missed. That cloudy evo donut that went in one of the three holes and came out the other blew me away. I reviewed some of the lesser focused videos I took and they are all over the place in them all. I 3d printed a mount to fit microscope objectives to my better camera directly and it seems to work. I'll need another week or so to repeat the experiments as I need the wife and little one to be out of the house. Hopefully it will be stable enough with the added magnification and narrower depth of field to be usable. the next round of videos will be 1920x1024 monochrome global cmos at 178 fps. The pixel size should be about 2.07um which is just below the theoretical "limit" of 2.3 for my 0.13NA objective.
One correction I wanted to make was the video you showed on today's stream was 30 fps 1080p recorded on a cheaper camera canon sx40 + dcr-250 macro lens.
The confusion was I posted some videos yesterday (which I think went under the radar they didn't have anything interesting in them though, to my eye at least.) which I captured with another camera that were 178 fps resampled to 30 fps with resolution 2048x1024. The issue with them was a lack of resolution as I was using a regular lens not an objective or macro lens, that resulted in much lower resolution than the ones you showed in the video. I'll paste the link again here for reference anyways. https://youtu.be/764IFTME0bg
Anyways hopefully next week I can get some good raw video with this camera, hope you all are well. I think I finally am getting an understanding for how the Viktor Schauberger's Repulsine worked. cavitate and make evo's, circulate the evo's in a geometry (nested torroidal pattern) made with copper plates that promotes aggregation and bunching. I do wonder what if any other metals were used in its construction. Honestly this stuff is all the same, its a bloody miracle they've been able to suppress it this long. I pray it's finally on its way to the masses. The global control grid is basically in place, and humanity will be artificially held back not by restriction of energy any longer but "morally" imposed restriction of productivity (carbon credits, biological threat determination). So they don't have a reason to hold the technology back any longer. It's no coincidence we are locked up at home and all the communications mediated through IT... (end rant)
Hi Bob, How far approximately does a coherent wave move during the exposure time of one frame and how long do you think it is. Is it relevant or have I misunderstood something.
You mentioned needing a fuel or burning up the reactor, it reminded me of a quote for an army paper in the 80s
Solomon Goldfein
An analogy would he a windmill or waterwheel made of wood. Both
can harness the elements to produce mechanical or electrical energy. When they are
taken apart and burned, t he components produce thermal energy.
Report 2247
ENERGY DEVELOPMENT FROM ELEMENTAL
TRANSMUTATIONS IN BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS
S. Gokifein
May 1978
https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a056906.pdf
I think I've shared this one before maybe.
Hey Bob thanks for the video today (it made my day after slicing up my finger with a saw cutting firewood), you and Allan both found stuff in my own video I totally missed. That cloudy evo donut that went in one of the three holes and came out the other blew me away. I reviewed some of the lesser focused videos I took and they are all over the place in them all. I 3d printed a mount to fit microscope objectives to my better camera directly and it seems to work. I'll need another week or so to repeat the experiments as I need the wife and little one to be out of the house. Hopefully it will be stable enough with the added magnification and narrower depth of field to be usable. the next round of videos will be 1920x1024 monochrome global cmos at 178 fps. The pixel size should be about 2.07um which is just below the theoretical "limit" of 2.3 for my 0.13NA objective.
One correction I wanted to make was the video you showed on today's stream was 30 fps 1080p recorded on a cheaper camera canon sx40 + dcr-250 macro lens.
The confusion was I posted some videos yesterday (which I think went under the radar they didn't have anything interesting in them though, to my eye at least.) which I captured with another camera that were 178 fps resampled to 30 fps with resolution 2048x1024. The issue with them was a lack of resolution as I was using a regular lens not an objective or macro lens, that resulted in much lower resolution than the ones you showed in the video. I'll paste the link again here for reference anyways. https://youtu.be/764IFTME0bg
Anyways hopefully next week I can get some good raw video with this camera, hope you all are well. I think I finally am getting an understanding for how the Viktor Schauberger's Repulsine worked. cavitate and make evo's, circulate the evo's in a geometry (nested torroidal pattern) made with copper plates that promotes aggregation and bunching. I do wonder what if any other metals were used in its construction. Honestly this stuff is all the same, its a bloody miracle they've been able to suppress it this long. I pray it's finally on its way to the masses. The global control grid is basically in place, and humanity will be artificially held back not by restriction of energy any longer but "morally" imposed restriction of productivity (carbon credits, biological threat determination). So they don't have a reason to hold the technology back any longer. It's no coincidence we are locked up at home and all the communications mediated through IT... (end rant)