We have already shared a lot of other physical evidence and conclusions that are in line with Rodionov's hypothesis which I will further integrate and tie this back with the work of Bostick, Shoulders, Matsumoto, Bogdanovich and many others.
Back in 2018, I shared a paper by Rodionov and Savvatimova on strange radiation.
NOTE: from re-reading this above paper, they came to the same conclusion I did from analysis of LENR experiments
"The huge gradient of a magnetic field promotes an attraction to magnetic poles of particles with nonzero magnetic dipole moment (electrons, protons, neutrons, many atomic nucleus, atoms and molecules, ions) which can enter in nuclear interaction."
"As the result of е-capture the filaments of neutrino at the northern magnetic pole create jet traction which pulls the filament after North Pole (like a locomotive pulling its cars). At the southern magnetic pole force of reaction of neutrino pushes (compresses) the filament, because of which unstable movement of South Pole of the filament is possible."
We have literally seen this on video in our VEGA experiments.
"Due to output power of capacity during the nucleus transmutations, a part of "new" nucleus is formed on fluxes, in particular, nucleus with zero spin and, hence, with zero magnetic dipole moment. They should scatter, forming a "hot" shell of these "new" nuclei near fluxes filament which are inside dense nuclear-molecular substance."
This is exactly what I have been sharing - in particular, flux forming toroids (basic EVO) - clustering using their toroidal moment into fractal clusters, which, after collapse leave the observed CaO (40Ca and 16O) fractal toroidal clusters in a sea of SiO2 (28 and 30 Si and 16O) and C (12C) predominently. Additionally non-spin Fe + O in spheres and toroids and spindle tori, from fractal toroidal moment induced structures.
Flux - flow - a stream - makes perfect sense. I do believe, however, that the "flow" is a flow of spheres / toruses formed at a greater depth in a fractal universe - and that, like stars or galaxies, these "particles" are free to move out of the flow in which they formed (yet still, possibly, be connected to it) - otherwise, these particles, and "particles" at a lesser depth (stars, galaxies) could just - almost randomly - instantaneously skip from one place to another - and do so on a continual basis - clearly not what we see... so, spheres / toruses can form on flows and then move outside of them, but likely remain connected in some way (even if the branch point of such particle connection threads move along the larger threads from which they branch). Just a thought.
Very interesting! I have read the article almost once. It is difficult to grasp, I need to read it a few times at least. The ' ''properties of fluxes'' list is ' strange'. Every bullet needs to be explained and the relations need to be clear. I have never seen a theory like this, how ' solid' is it? What other scientists are talking about it? And how does the classical model ' morph' into this model?
I learn more every time I listen to this transcription. Almost like there's a time-delay effect for the significance to completely sink into your consciousness. You mentioned the mysterious strength of tornados in one of your presentations about 2 years ago. So tornados are neutrino/dark matter pumps? It all clicks.
This is not related to your current post so I apologize. I was going to email it but I'm no longer certain if my emails arrive at your gmail or not so I'll stick it here instead. I just came across this discussion of GEET the interesting part is from the 20 min mark (linked) up until at least the 29 min mark. https://youtu.be/47o7YJFjcL8?t=1226
Sounds like another branding for plasma gass generator that some how I'de never heard of. The guy makes a lot of comments regarding coherent plasma field and what not. Worth keeping on ones radar I think. They don't offer any free plans other than those provided 30 or so years ago, but to be fair I haven't built it so perhaps the 30 year old plans work fine.
Perhaps controversial but maybe relevant. A part of the presentation by the late Wal Thornhill from Thunderbolts Project talking about a certain gyroscope phenomenon and what might be happening. (The founder of the Electric Universe paradigm Wal Thornhill, passed away on 7th February 2023).
https://youtu.be/YkWiBxWieQU?si=XaX5d85bSjl8e3kX&t=3140 He is saying the gyro appears as a positive charge in the presence of the negative charge of the rest of the universe and the negative charge of the earth, and seems to be more strongly influenced by the rest of the universe, with an apparent loss of weight. The orbs in the video MH370 seem to spin like gyros.
Device has a capacitor bank with energy ready for release,. Strange MH370 having those batteries onboard. Was the aircraft fuselage to be the inner tube of a plasma device, while the orbs (maybe gyros) effectively created an outer tube. At the time of the zap somehow were both connected creating a penumbra and plasmoid, the flash. Fanciful speculations. Really just making the point that Thunderbolts Project has a lot of information on the topic and plasmacosmology.net has a summary.
Magnetic current is the same as electric current. Current is [actually] the wrong expression. Really it is not one current, they are two currents, one current is composed of North Pole individual magnets in concentrated streams and the other is composed of South Pole individual magnets in concentrated streams, and they are are running one stream against the other stream in whirling, screwlike fashion, and with high speed.
We have already shared a lot of other physical evidence and conclusions that are in line with Rodionov's hypothesis which I will further integrate and tie this back with the work of Bostick, Shoulders, Matsumoto, Bogdanovich and many others.
Back in 2018, I shared a paper by Rodionov and Savvatimova on strange radiation.
https://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RodionovBunusualstr.pdf
NOTE: from re-reading this above paper, they came to the same conclusion I did from analysis of LENR experiments
"The huge gradient of a magnetic field promotes an attraction to magnetic poles of particles with nonzero magnetic dipole moment (electrons, protons, neutrons, many atomic nucleus, atoms and molecules, ions) which can enter in nuclear interaction."
"As the result of е-capture the filaments of neutrino at the northern magnetic pole create jet traction which pulls the filament after North Pole (like a locomotive pulling its cars). At the southern magnetic pole force of reaction of neutrino pushes (compresses) the filament, because of which unstable movement of South Pole of the filament is possible."
We have literally seen this on video in our VEGA experiments.
"Due to output power of capacity during the nucleus transmutations, a part of "new" nucleus is formed on fluxes, in particular, nucleus with zero spin and, hence, with zero magnetic dipole moment. They should scatter, forming a "hot" shell of these "new" nuclei near fluxes filament which are inside dense nuclear-molecular substance."
This is exactly what I have been sharing - in particular, flux forming toroids (basic EVO) - clustering using their toroidal moment into fractal clusters, which, after collapse leave the observed CaO (40Ca and 16O) fractal toroidal clusters in a sea of SiO2 (28 and 30 Si and 16O) and C (12C) predominently. Additionally non-spin Fe + O in spheres and toroids and spindle tori, from fractal toroidal moment induced structures.
Also this 2009 paper by Ed Lewis.
https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LewisEtracksofba.pdf
Read the references in both.
Flux - flow - a stream - makes perfect sense. I do believe, however, that the "flow" is a flow of spheres / toruses formed at a greater depth in a fractal universe - and that, like stars or galaxies, these "particles" are free to move out of the flow in which they formed (yet still, possibly, be connected to it) - otherwise, these particles, and "particles" at a lesser depth (stars, galaxies) could just - almost randomly - instantaneously skip from one place to another - and do so on a continual basis - clearly not what we see... so, spheres / toruses can form on flows and then move outside of them, but likely remain connected in some way (even if the branch point of such particle connection threads move along the larger threads from which they branch). Just a thought.
Very interesting! I have read the article almost once. It is difficult to grasp, I need to read it a few times at least. The ' ''properties of fluxes'' list is ' strange'. Every bullet needs to be explained and the relations need to be clear. I have never seen a theory like this, how ' solid' is it? What other scientists are talking about it? And how does the classical model ' morph' into this model?
Bob, is this the predecessor to Proton Scientific? https://proton-21.com.ua/science_01_en.html
I learn more every time I listen to this transcription. Almost like there's a time-delay effect for the significance to completely sink into your consciousness. You mentioned the mysterious strength of tornados in one of your presentations about 2 years ago. So tornados are neutrino/dark matter pumps? It all clicks.
About the Flux properties. With the 'Information density ~ 10^14 bits/m' I get totally 'lost'. What does this imply?
Hey Bob,
This is not related to your current post so I apologize. I was going to email it but I'm no longer certain if my emails arrive at your gmail or not so I'll stick it here instead. I just came across this discussion of GEET the interesting part is from the 20 min mark (linked) up until at least the 29 min mark. https://youtu.be/47o7YJFjcL8?t=1226
Sounds like another branding for plasma gass generator that some how I'de never heard of. The guy makes a lot of comments regarding coherent plasma field and what not. Worth keeping on ones radar I think. They don't offer any free plans other than those provided 30 or so years ago, but to be fair I haven't built it so perhaps the 30 year old plans work fine.
Funny this article popped up today showing “mother of pearl” https://ground.news/article/sky-gazers-spot-rare-and-vivid-mother-of-pearl-cloud-in-scotland
Perhaps controversial but maybe relevant. A part of the presentation by the late Wal Thornhill from Thunderbolts Project talking about a certain gyroscope phenomenon and what might be happening. (The founder of the Electric Universe paradigm Wal Thornhill, passed away on 7th February 2023).
https://youtu.be/YkWiBxWieQU?si=XaX5d85bSjl8e3kX&t=3140 He is saying the gyro appears as a positive charge in the presence of the negative charge of the rest of the universe and the negative charge of the earth, and seems to be more strongly influenced by the rest of the universe, with an apparent loss of weight. The orbs in the video MH370 seem to spin like gyros.
A later video with graphic in presentation https://youtu.be/LF6S68cRgxo?si=Vo9PsfAhJ1K9mrr_&t=1927
Plasma focus device https://youtu.be/338of49iF0k?si=sn8yzx40tGud4L2N&t=2209
Plasma gun https://www.plasmacosmology.net/tech2.html#pgun
Device has a capacitor bank with energy ready for release,. Strange MH370 having those batteries onboard. Was the aircraft fuselage to be the inner tube of a plasma device, while the orbs (maybe gyros) effectively created an outer tube. At the time of the zap somehow were both connected creating a penumbra and plasmoid, the flash. Fanciful speculations. Really just making the point that Thunderbolts Project has a lot of information on the topic and plasmacosmology.net has a summary.
Magnetic current is the same as electric current. Current is [actually] the wrong expression. Really it is not one current, they are two currents, one current is composed of North Pole individual magnets in concentrated streams and the other is composed of South Pole individual magnets in concentrated streams, and they are are running one stream against the other stream in whirling, screwlike fashion, and with high speed.
Edward Leedskalnin