Hi Bob, I would like to help with the RFP. Let me know if I can help. I am a semi-retired senior project manager from EG&G/URS. I have written multiple RFPs for nuclear waste remediation and the destruction of chemical weapons. I have also have written complex plans and schedules for the same. Uberzeitgeist @ Gmail.com. Best regards, Steve W
Now that I have read the RFP multiple time and highlighted the requirements, this is more of a technology survey than an RFP. RFP responses are usually much more complex. Since this is a survey, this should be no problem to respond before the deadline. I am currently turning each requirement into a question that we need to answer.
I should have this ready by tomorrow.
Since the readers of our RFP have probably never heard about the technology, I will also add questions that I am guessing they will ask.
Hey Bob, That's really great news about the RFP!!! I hope a compelling case can be made and pressure applied to ensure it is really considered! I think I found the page of the lady who is fielding the RFP requests based on the email in the video https://jp.linkedin.com/in/hiromichi-kono-6a1a8b141 Seems she worked at NEC on the board of directors prior, I really hope this isn't going to be a case of the revolving door between industry and government contractors. I'm really trying to suspend my normal jaded thinking for the next 4 months and use some positive "prayer" for lack of a better word to encourage a positive outcome.
This is slightly unrelated but I'm trying to get a better understanding of the role of consciousness and thought in this stuff. Like there's quite a lot of anecdotal evidence that if you have skeptics present they can disrupt some energy solutions. I think I loosely have an idea of why this might be the case, given the technology is reliant on establishing coherent states and resonance effects, and I think we've established that humans have the ability to influence these coherent fields through some mechanism. I'm just trying to understand if there is any risk that skeptical operators of a machine might be able to influence the outcome of a test. Or are you relatively confident that these effects can be observed irregardless of mindset of potentially present skeptical parties?
Hi Bob, do you have a preferred document format for editing documents: MS Word, LibreOffice, or other? I have the RFP all in questions that need responses according to the RFP in the same order has the RFP. This is just a draft, but it’s a good starting point for any recommended changes or discussion. If you don’t have a central repository yet, I will just provide a public link to one of my web accounts so anyone in the group can review.
I have been a bit distracted with the whole stuff of the magnetism in the body after the Covid vaccines, specially since both my parents got vaccinated and are experiencing this puzzling phenomena, quite unambiguously. But now I took a glance at the RFP and could not help notice that it restricts the technological approach to stuff that has been peer reviewed and academically accepted, which is really disappointing, is there any signal that making a proposal in the sense that has been discussed here really has a chance of being even considered?
Hi Bob, I would like to help with the RFP. Let me know if I can help. I am a semi-retired senior project manager from EG&G/URS. I have written multiple RFPs for nuclear waste remediation and the destruction of chemical weapons. I have also have written complex plans and schedules for the same. Uberzeitgeist @ Gmail.com. Best regards, Steve W
Now that I have read the RFP multiple time and highlighted the requirements, this is more of a technology survey than an RFP. RFP responses are usually much more complex. Since this is a survey, this should be no problem to respond before the deadline. I am currently turning each requirement into a question that we need to answer.
I should have this ready by tomorrow.
Since the readers of our RFP have probably never heard about the technology, I will also add questions that I am guessing they will ask.
Hey Bob, That's really great news about the RFP!!! I hope a compelling case can be made and pressure applied to ensure it is really considered! I think I found the page of the lady who is fielding the RFP requests based on the email in the video https://jp.linkedin.com/in/hiromichi-kono-6a1a8b141 Seems she worked at NEC on the board of directors prior, I really hope this isn't going to be a case of the revolving door between industry and government contractors. I'm really trying to suspend my normal jaded thinking for the next 4 months and use some positive "prayer" for lack of a better word to encourage a positive outcome.
This is slightly unrelated but I'm trying to get a better understanding of the role of consciousness and thought in this stuff. Like there's quite a lot of anecdotal evidence that if you have skeptics present they can disrupt some energy solutions. I think I loosely have an idea of why this might be the case, given the technology is reliant on establishing coherent states and resonance effects, and I think we've established that humans have the ability to influence these coherent fields through some mechanism. I'm just trying to understand if there is any risk that skeptical operators of a machine might be able to influence the outcome of a test. Or are you relatively confident that these effects can be observed irregardless of mindset of potentially present skeptical parties?
I was looking at this right before I watched your last presentation: Self-Focusing Streams https://sci-hub.do/https://journals.aps.org/pr/abstract/10.1103/PhysRev.98.1584
Hi Bob, do you have a preferred document format for editing documents: MS Word, LibreOffice, or other? I have the RFP all in questions that need responses according to the RFP in the same order has the RFP. This is just a draft, but it’s a good starting point for any recommended changes or discussion. If you don’t have a central repository yet, I will just provide a public link to one of my web accounts so anyone in the group can review.
Best regards,
Steve
Here is an earlier example of a vortex ring theory:
On Vortex Atoms By Professor Sir WILLIAM THOMSON, F.R.S. * https://books.google.com/books?id=2lgwAAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false
Go to page 15 to read article
I have been a bit distracted with the whole stuff of the magnetism in the body after the Covid vaccines, specially since both my parents got vaccinated and are experiencing this puzzling phenomena, quite unambiguously. But now I took a glance at the RFP and could not help notice that it restricts the technological approach to stuff that has been peer reviewed and academically accepted, which is really disappointing, is there any signal that making a proposal in the sense that has been discussed here really has a chance of being even considered?