In my eagerness to talk about the work of Barsoum, that IMHO is yet another proof that high velocity impacts can create coherence and cause cluster decay, I forgot to thank Bob for yet another great and insightfull presentation, David for the excellent bismuth bullet experiment replication, and Alan for the quick and impecable SEM and EDX results confirming transmutations. It feels like we live in a paralell universe where this kind of effect, that for 99.999% of the world is completely impossible, and for us is beginning to be expected and even possible to predict to a certain degree thanks to the Parkhomov tables and the excellent implementation of them into a web bases tool (thanks to Philip Powers for his great work doing that tool).
It was kind of worrisome to see the presence of Thalium, It made me recall a superman comic I read ages ago, where every bullet shot at superman had a small portion of it transformed into Kryptonite. What are the odds that a comic of the 1960s had that kind of sugestion in it?
All week long, I've been waiting and waiting for a decent thunderstorm, before the air gets too cool. I so want to catch some ball lighting, just once, on video.
I have purchased some special magnets, just in case, so i can collect something. (I have high hopes!) Weather did not cooperate this time.
Interesting idea. Supposed to storm, again, tonight! We're at the very bottom of Tornado Alley and the tip-top of Gulf storms (hurricanes, and we were hit by the rare hurricane, Harvey, 2 years back.) Sometimes, the two fronts get together, and produce something awesome. I keep watching and hoping we'll get it, in Central Austin. Changes in aether are something to feel!
Hey Bob, awesome presentation, and big thanks to David for doing all the leg work! :) I think this ranks in the top 3 of your presentations too date cause you touched on so many things. You mentioned afew things in this one is passing which I've never heard you say before that I think are ever so important!
Regarding the deformation of the nucleus. I think a similar effect has been known about since the 30's however there was no reference to it causing transmutation just "cold explosion". In that book "the secret of three bullets" they mention the work of Percy William Bridgman from November 1935 (It goes over introducing it a bit on page 61 if you search the book for Bridgman there are numerous references.
On page 84 there is an excerpt that says the following.
"""
reading the transcript of the report made by
Professor Fleischmann at the tenth international conference on cold fusion, I
found some important statements in a note. With regard to the so-called cold
explosions observed by Bridgman in the Thirties, he wrote that ‘Intense
compression and shear of lattices can lead to their fragmentation into small
particles in which the high energy of the initial system is converted into
kinetic energy of the fragments. We believed (and still believe) that this is a
process which can only be explained by Q.E.D.’ Then, a little further on, he
adds: ‘Furthermore, we knew that the absorption of hydrogen isotopes can
lead to a similar fragmentation.’
"""
I tracked down the original reference to this document
Bridgman in the 1930’s (7).f Furthermore, we knew that the absorption of hydrogen isotopes can
lead to a similar fragmentation.
...
f Intense compression and shear of lattices can lead to their fragmentation into small particles in which the high
energy of the initial system is converted into kinetic energy of the fragments. We believed (and still believe) that this
is a process which can only be explained by Q.E.D.
"""
Around 50:40 you talked about gravity and inertia coming from the same thing.
I have an interesting clip of Bruce DePalma mentioning this exact same thing and saying he tried to talk to wheeler at Princeton about it, but wheeler flat out denied it and wouldn't see the experimental proof. I honestly can't remember if I already told you this so I'll paste it again.
It's all starting ot make sense why large spinning bodies can generate electricity in excess of what is put in (faraday homopolar generators). Just like large rail guns can have energy output vastly in excess of the power put in. Condensing the local cold neutrino flux. It really makes me wonder if the orientation of these devices matter for their collection efficiency. I'm guessing that generally they don't matter because once a resonant monopole structure is established it just attracts compatible neutrinos from the environment regardless of orientation. The orientation would only be important if you wanted to leverage the thrust potential of the structure.
Anyways at the 32 minute mark you mentioned something about air guns being available in Japan. Did you actually want me to try something or were you just saying it might be a suitable device if one wanted to try :). I have zero experience with air guns. I do have low temperature bismuth solder I use for de-soldering large package components of PCBS. But I don't think it has Pb in it only Sn and Bi and Ag I can check later though.
Thanks for you kind comments and detailed references.
For the record - one way Shishkin CREATES "String Vortex Solitons" (AKA Neutral EVOs)- the neutral form of "Magneto-Toro-Electrical-Radiation" (AKA EVOs) - is by spinning at high velocity solid metal cones. This produces the 'birdies' / 'mushrooms' - which are magnetic monopoles which are condensed cold neutrinos - on x-ray film.
Yes, if you can get access to an air rifle - they are very easy to use - we had several as kids.
Well I'll be... a cone generating/(attracting?) neutral evo's, who would have guessed .... ;)
I wonder if either of the following would give a higher yield.
A hyperbolic cone, like the flow of water in a vortex.
Or a bell shape, like those that were spun and used in the Dellschau flying machines from the late 1800's, as well as the ancient vimana flying machines.
Both have a slight variation of surface profile from a regular cone, but are generally similar.
I will probably hold off on the air rifle for now, not keeping it off the table entirely, I did look online and the speeds seem to be measured in fps (feet per second) and they top out around ~1500 fps (the majority less than 1000 fps) far shy of the ~3200 fps (1000 meter per second) required to transmute material. Perhaps if you fired two at each other, with some automated system after mounting them in a rig.
Just to be clear I don't think firing two air rifles bullets at each other to get the required speed is really a smart idea, even if it were fully automated and in an enclosed container, you would probably destroy the guns in short order.
I was watching live from my mobile while having my lunch (we lunched very late today as we were doing some much postponed plumbing repairs) in desktop mode when my battery decided to die.
I wanted to mention about the work of a Dr. Roshdy Barsoum, a materials resistance researcher from the US Navy that called some attention a while ago. At the moment I got a lot of interest in getting more background and he happened to had work for some years on materials resistant to cavitation for high speed vessels. He also made a presentation about hyper velocity impacts in Soda Lime Glass in which he detected Cherenkov, X ray and Gamma emissions. He did not look for transmutations (at least doesnt mention it) but he was looking for cristalographic anomalies. Here's the presentation: https://www.lenr-forum.com/attachment/17108-a490-pdf/
Anyway, and apparently based on this work, at least in his own words, and a good load of what many think is baseless and wild speculation, Barsoum published a paper in a rather obscure outlet which claims that the same effect he observed in hyper velocity impacts in the Soda Lime Glass happens at molecular and micro scale in an ionized solution of an electrolyte where free electrons travelling at relativistic speeds collide within the Angstrom and micron sized porous cavities of an Aluminosilicate porous ceramic generating Cherenkov radiation and cause "cold fusion". He claims a common lead acid battery filled with these ceramic beads can produce electricity indefinitely, and offers some pictures as proof. I e.mailed him requesting more details, but never got an answer. The paper can be read here: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Barsoum_et_al_2021a
It mentions this same temp in the second paper. However, the second paper appears to claim an embodiment without ever showing one or any data for any tests - it just looks like a thought experiment.
It is indeed a thought experiment, and very convoluted. What picked my curiosity was the way it is said it was proven through a practical experiment, adding what looks like zeolite to the cells of a battery, and claiming it can now produce energy “forever”. I am tempted to try it but the detail is so scant.
A fantastic presentation Bob. I was unable to watch live due to family illness, but watched it tonight. I’m still a little sceptical that what you perceive as neutrinos are particles, but saw you referring to the sea of energy and the aether made me smile.
It appears the art of harnessing the cold flow energy lies with its ability to charge, discharge and recharge into the static field surrounding a statically charged surface.
I totally agree looking at your presented evidence Bob. You make it very easy to understand for a layman like me. Your passion for this subject also rubs off onto others. I don’t think it’ll be very long before you all get the recognition rightly deserved. That’s if the US DOD/Navy don’t steal it and produce a backdated patent first. At least we’ll all know who did the ground-breaking work and research. A really good presentation though. Well done.
Perhaps our finding of only Tl may also have something to do with the fact that we shot from a rifled gun and theirs was a smooth cannon - so they had mostly compression and we had shear and compression. In Alberto Capinteri's rock crushing experiments they only had fission when they had brittle and not ductile fracture.
Can anyone help find a solution to a problem with aluminum processing. Maybe EVO is the problem. In one process, many threaded holes need to be repaired because they are defective. This is done by running a pin through the thread. You can do this 200 times without problems but suddenly the pin becomes defective. It looks like the steel is getting soft. The steel has not been hot as it is lubricated with alcohol. Can EVOs occur during the process or is there something else that can make steel soft.
I have been gathering papers for a while that relate mechanical effects to transmutation, and this one showed that friction of certain ceramics with steel in presence of an aqueous glycerol fraction within the oil induced transmutations that were not observed with the oil devoid of the aqueous fraction. I think this could to some extent be happening in your conditions, as plasma may be forming and creating momentary conditions of coherence that cause the steel to suffer transmutations that affect its hardness. Probably a long shot but worth the inspection under SEM and EDAX. https://www.lenr-forum.com/attachment/15187-student2017-pdf/
I do not know the content of the aluminum alloy , but there may be iron in it. I see that they use different lubricating oils. I learned 50 years ago that one should use alcohol or is it called ethanol but I can see that they use different oils. Maybe that's a solution.
I have tried something more. I drilled a hole in some aluminum, 2 mm deep and then I switched to anti clock weis and continued for a minute. A small part of the pieces that were in the alcohol were paramagnetic. The alcohol contained 10 Percent Water. The video shows some strange movements in the alcohol that continued for several minutes.
MFMP got a mention from Ross Coulthart in this long interview, within the context of SAFIRE / Cold Fusion discussion. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JM3kxeU_oDE Around time stamp 2:18, precise mention of MFMP around 2:20 timestamp
Wow Bob, my head is still spinning with ideas after watching this presentation today. I've seen excellent demonstrations of PK in Japan, and have had it applied by the practitioner from a distance to my arm, briefly. Felt like pins and needles. Your ideas about how all these seemingly disparate topics connect makes sense. And it's great having all those Russian science papers to back you up. All I can say is, this is BIG.
In my eagerness to talk about the work of Barsoum, that IMHO is yet another proof that high velocity impacts can create coherence and cause cluster decay, I forgot to thank Bob for yet another great and insightfull presentation, David for the excellent bismuth bullet experiment replication, and Alan for the quick and impecable SEM and EDX results confirming transmutations. It feels like we live in a paralell universe where this kind of effect, that for 99.999% of the world is completely impossible, and for us is beginning to be expected and even possible to predict to a certain degree thanks to the Parkhomov tables and the excellent implementation of them into a web bases tool (thanks to Philip Powers for his great work doing that tool).
It was kind of worrisome to see the presence of Thalium, It made me recall a superman comic I read ages ago, where every bullet shot at superman had a small portion of it transformed into Kryptonite. What are the odds that a comic of the 1960s had that kind of sugestion in it?
All week long, I've been waiting and waiting for a decent thunderstorm, before the air gets too cool. I so want to catch some ball lighting, just once, on video.
I have purchased some special magnets, just in case, so i can collect something. (I have high hopes!) Weather did not cooperate this time.
How frustrating
However, if you live in a stormy area - then just take your magnets - cover them with say a daily thick plastic bag and run them though your gutters.
Interesting idea. Supposed to storm, again, tonight! We're at the very bottom of Tornado Alley and the tip-top of Gulf storms (hurricanes, and we were hit by the rare hurricane, Harvey, 2 years back.) Sometimes, the two fronts get together, and produce something awesome. I keep watching and hoping we'll get it, in Central Austin. Changes in aether are something to feel!
Those craters would make the people of the Electric Universe applaud! Clearly polygonal features inside.
Well - they should wait to see what it is first!
I sure am curious as well!!!
Hey Bob, awesome presentation, and big thanks to David for doing all the leg work! :) I think this ranks in the top 3 of your presentations too date cause you touched on so many things. You mentioned afew things in this one is passing which I've never heard you say before that I think are ever so important!
Regarding the deformation of the nucleus. I think a similar effect has been known about since the 30's however there was no reference to it causing transmutation just "cold explosion". In that book "the secret of three bullets" they mention the work of Percy William Bridgman from November 1935 (It goes over introducing it a bit on page 61 if you search the book for Bridgman there are numerous references.
On page 84 there is an excerpt that says the following.
"""
reading the transcript of the report made by
Professor Fleischmann at the tenth international conference on cold fusion, I
found some important statements in a note. With regard to the so-called cold
explosions observed by Bridgman in the Thirties, he wrote that ‘Intense
compression and shear of lattices can lead to their fragmentation into small
particles in which the high energy of the initial system is converted into
kinetic energy of the fragments. We believed (and still believe) that this is a
process which can only be explained by Q.E.D.’ Then, a little further on, he
adds: ‘Furthermore, we knew that the absorption of hydrogen isotopes can
lead to a similar fragmentation.’
"""
I tracked down the original reference to this document
https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Fleischmanbackground.pdf
page 6
"""
the observations of “Cold Explosions” by
Bridgman in the 1930’s (7).f Furthermore, we knew that the absorption of hydrogen isotopes can
lead to a similar fragmentation.
...
f Intense compression and shear of lattices can lead to their fragmentation into small particles in which the high
energy of the initial system is converted into kinetic energy of the fragments. We believed (and still believe) that this
is a process which can only be explained by Q.E.D.
"""
Around 50:40 you talked about gravity and inertia coming from the same thing.
I have an interesting clip of Bruce DePalma mentioning this exact same thing and saying he tried to talk to wheeler at Princeton about it, but wheeler flat out denied it and wouldn't see the experimental proof. I honestly can't remember if I already told you this so I'll paste it again.
https://youtu.be/_Tr2XYeMuwQ?t=553
"""
09:32
i tried to talk to dr wheeler princeton
the inventor of the black hole
and also with weber who was the guy that
came up with the gravitational wave
hypothesis and tried to get them
to
understand that it wasn't gravitational
waves that it was the waves of
inertial mass the inertial mass of
objects was slowly
fluctuating
and they just absolutely would not
hear this
(keep listening for other goodies)
"""
It's all starting ot make sense why large spinning bodies can generate electricity in excess of what is put in (faraday homopolar generators). Just like large rail guns can have energy output vastly in excess of the power put in. Condensing the local cold neutrino flux. It really makes me wonder if the orientation of these devices matter for their collection efficiency. I'm guessing that generally they don't matter because once a resonant monopole structure is established it just attracts compatible neutrinos from the environment regardless of orientation. The orientation would only be important if you wanted to leverage the thrust potential of the structure.
Anyways at the 32 minute mark you mentioned something about air guns being available in Japan. Did you actually want me to try something or were you just saying it might be a suitable device if one wanted to try :). I have zero experience with air guns. I do have low temperature bismuth solder I use for de-soldering large package components of PCBS. But I don't think it has Pb in it only Sn and Bi and Ag I can check later though.
Thanks for you kind comments and detailed references.
For the record - one way Shishkin CREATES "String Vortex Solitons" (AKA Neutral EVOs)- the neutral form of "Magneto-Toro-Electrical-Radiation" (AKA EVOs) - is by spinning at high velocity solid metal cones. This produces the 'birdies' / 'mushrooms' - which are magnetic monopoles which are condensed cold neutrinos - on x-ray film.
Yes, if you can get access to an air rifle - they are very easy to use - we had several as kids.
Well I'll be... a cone generating/(attracting?) neutral evo's, who would have guessed .... ;)
I wonder if either of the following would give a higher yield.
A hyperbolic cone, like the flow of water in a vortex.
Or a bell shape, like those that were spun and used in the Dellschau flying machines from the late 1800's, as well as the ancient vimana flying machines.
Both have a slight variation of surface profile from a regular cone, but are generally similar.
I will probably hold off on the air rifle for now, not keeping it off the table entirely, I did look online and the speeds seem to be measured in fps (feet per second) and they top out around ~1500 fps (the majority less than 1000 fps) far shy of the ~3200 fps (1000 meter per second) required to transmute material. Perhaps if you fired two at each other, with some automated system after mounting them in a rig.
Just to be clear I don't think firing two air rifles bullets at each other to get the required speed is really a smart idea, even if it were fully automated and in an enclosed container, you would probably destroy the guns in short order.
I was watching live from my mobile while having my lunch (we lunched very late today as we were doing some much postponed plumbing repairs) in desktop mode when my battery decided to die.
I wanted to mention about the work of a Dr. Roshdy Barsoum, a materials resistance researcher from the US Navy that called some attention a while ago. At the moment I got a lot of interest in getting more background and he happened to had work for some years on materials resistant to cavitation for high speed vessels. He also made a presentation about hyper velocity impacts in Soda Lime Glass in which he detected Cherenkov, X ray and Gamma emissions. He did not look for transmutations (at least doesnt mention it) but he was looking for cristalographic anomalies. Here's the presentation: https://www.lenr-forum.com/attachment/17108-a490-pdf/
Anyway, and apparently based on this work, at least in his own words, and a good load of what many think is baseless and wild speculation, Barsoum published a paper in a rather obscure outlet which claims that the same effect he observed in hyper velocity impacts in the Soda Lime Glass happens at molecular and micro scale in an ionized solution of an electrolyte where free electrons travelling at relativistic speeds collide within the Angstrom and micron sized porous cavities of an Aluminosilicate porous ceramic generating Cherenkov radiation and cause "cold fusion". He claims a common lead acid battery filled with these ceramic beads can produce electricity indefinitely, and offers some pictures as proof. I e.mailed him requesting more details, but never got an answer. The paper can be read here: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Barsoum_et_al_2021a
Interesting bullet point from first presentation.
"Hypervelocity impact on SLG results in temperature of 5700 Deg. K (the temperature
at the surface of the sun)."
From the second paper "Hydrated Alkali Aluminium Silicates"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminosilicate
It mentions this same temp in the second paper. However, the second paper appears to claim an embodiment without ever showing one or any data for any tests - it just looks like a thought experiment.
It is indeed a thought experiment, and very convoluted. What picked my curiosity was the way it is said it was proven through a practical experiment, adding what looks like zeolite to the cells of a battery, and claiming it can now produce energy “forever”. I am tempted to try it but the detail is so scant.
A fantastic presentation Bob. I was unable to watch live due to family illness, but watched it tonight. I’m still a little sceptical that what you perceive as neutrinos are particles, but saw you referring to the sea of energy and the aether made me smile.
It appears the art of harnessing the cold flow energy lies with its ability to charge, discharge and recharge into the static field surrounding a statically charged surface.
Particles or not - what ever it is is able to be condensed, transported and interacted with as well as play a role in weak interactions.
I totally agree looking at your presented evidence Bob. You make it very easy to understand for a layman like me. Your passion for this subject also rubs off onto others. I don’t think it’ll be very long before you all get the recognition rightly deserved. That’s if the US DOD/Navy don’t steal it and produce a backdated patent first. At least we’ll all know who did the ground-breaking work and research. A really good presentation though. Well done.
Perhaps our finding of only Tl may also have something to do with the fact that we shot from a rifled gun and theirs was a smooth cannon - so they had mostly compression and we had shear and compression. In Alberto Capinteri's rock crushing experiments they only had fission when they had brittle and not ductile fracture.
Can anyone help find a solution to a problem with aluminum processing. Maybe EVO is the problem. In one process, many threaded holes need to be repaired because they are defective. This is done by running a pin through the thread. You can do this 200 times without problems but suddenly the pin becomes defective. It looks like the steel is getting soft. The steel has not been hot as it is lubricated with alcohol. Can EVOs occur during the process or is there something else that can make steel soft.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/103G3B1Xa0CexgLHUihbf5gDKDHTxEymo/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EfYJuUmOqoe7zy7PZTPo2MDVfoirEbaJ/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-oscqri0b6J2KruBiOj4x5s4gLiRLCEF/view?usp=sharing
I have been gathering papers for a while that relate mechanical effects to transmutation, and this one showed that friction of certain ceramics with steel in presence of an aqueous glycerol fraction within the oil induced transmutations that were not observed with the oil devoid of the aqueous fraction. I think this could to some extent be happening in your conditions, as plasma may be forming and creating momentary conditions of coherence that cause the steel to suffer transmutations that affect its hardness. Probably a long shot but worth the inspection under SEM and EDAX. https://www.lenr-forum.com/attachment/15187-student2017-pdf/
I do not know the content of the aluminum alloy , but there may be iron in it. I see that they use different lubricating oils. I learned 50 years ago that one should use alcohol or is it called ethanol but I can see that they use different oils. Maybe that's a solution.
Avoiding the water is what seems key, if you want to evade the steel softening problem.
I have tried something more. I drilled a hole in some aluminum, 2 mm deep and then I switched to anti clock weis and continued for a minute. A small part of the pieces that were in the alcohol were paramagnetic. The alcohol contained 10 Percent Water. The video shows some strange movements in the alcohol that continued for several minutes.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/14ZkzNOjaLwyDBga2ngwU5OxmtqBh22qn/view?usp=sharing
MFMP got a mention from Ross Coulthart in this long interview, within the context of SAFIRE / Cold Fusion discussion. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JM3kxeU_oDE Around time stamp 2:18, precise mention of MFMP around 2:20 timestamp
Wow Bob, my head is still spinning with ideas after watching this presentation today. I've seen excellent demonstrations of PK in Japan, and have had it applied by the practitioner from a distance to my arm, briefly. Felt like pins and needles. Your ideas about how all these seemingly disparate topics connect makes sense. And it's great having all those Russian science papers to back you up. All I can say is, this is BIG.