It may be challenging to run a university department and maintain a theory that requires incredibly elaborate apparatus if a three-year-old can do fusion of silicon in a $35 ultrasonic cleaner in 7 mins. I had to try and get in that the Silicon was going on to fuse to Iron.
Hi Bob, I've identified an experimental gap in EVO research and written a replicable protocol to address it. I know this is your area of expertise and I'd appreciate your insight! The Zenodo link is: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19657209.
I am receiving about 20 seconds' worth of 'AI work' per week from many 'authors', constituting up to 4,000 pages of text, to give credence and recognition to. I don't mean to be rude, but when I look at this text, it smacks of AI output. Passing it through Grok, it concludes that it is almost certainly largely made by AI.
I do not have enough life left in me to be a verification agent for AI output. I am not aware of your previous work in this field or long term research credentials, so, without sharing the work that you have done to get to this point over many years, I would take a pass on expressing a view.
I am going to make a plea to the community to stop sending me AI output for my opinion.
If I am wrong in this and you can show me a long history of EVO research and specifically research related to the subject of the document, then I may reconsider looking at it.
I'm not going to argue the semantics of whether or not text is AI generated. I use AI as a formatter and editor. The ideas are entirely my own.
My hypothesis is nobody has ever publicly placed a gravimeter next to an EVO production apparatus during formation events and measured what happens. Standard physics predicts nothing measurable. I wrote a protocol to run that experiment and find out if standard physics is right.
You're one of the experts in this field. That's why I contacted you. I totally understand your time is valuable. I didn’t mean to waste it. I was simply pointing out an experiment that hasn't been performed yet as far as I was aware.
If you don't want to waste a researcher's time with a ream of AI text; then you could have just written:
"place a gravimeter next to an EVO generator"
And linked to a suitable device. Most people looking for a gravity effect put the apparatus on a balance. They then look to see if one way it goes up and the other way it goes down.
Hello, Do you think Glitter (side 1 aluminum / side 2 PET plastic) could be used as a feed stock for these kind of reactions? It’s a material that could flow pneumatically, say in a vortex.
As I have been witness of the progression of your train of thought all These years, I was very happy to watch this yesterday, and kind of proud of you actually, Bob.
I have an update on the small, informal lettuce seeds experiment I was conducting a few months ago, in case it helps other better-qualified people here who read your amazing Substack.
When it arrived, I first wanted to compare the cavitation force with the cheaper model I used to have with aluminium foil, but the moment I turned it on, I started to feel uncomfortable, not just because of the high-pitched sound it emitted, but I felt something weird on my face, like tiny needles or currents. I immediately remembered the anecdote you always tell about Tesla with his unidirectional disruptive discharges and the glass, copper, and aluminium sheets he set up. It freaked me out, so I turned it off. I don't know if I'm imagining things, if it was the sound that gave me gooseflesh, or if the machine is legitimately that powerful, but I don't dare use it too much now, especially after the next day, I got up tired and with a mild headache.
All this just to ask, could you remind me which specific materials to use for making a shielded box? I remembered you showed it in one of your livestreams, but I can't find it.
Hi Bob - Just want to compliment you again on a great TAP Talk you gave this past Saturday!
9/11's Hidden Physics: Exotic Tech or Controlled Demolition?
LENR researcher Bob Greenyer reveals microspheres, plasmoids & material anomalies that challenge everything we thought we knew
Discussion: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911s-hidden-physics-exotic-tech-or
tnx
Pfffffffft👏👏👏👏👏 😂…. Toooo funnny Bob like “LISTEN Conrad,it happen’s deal wae it!! Heeeee,heeeee 🙏 cheers Bob
It may be challenging to run a university department and maintain a theory that requires incredibly elaborate apparatus if a three-year-old can do fusion of silicon in a $35 ultrasonic cleaner in 7 mins. I had to try and get in that the Silicon was going on to fuse to Iron.
It.was great to spend some time with you in Bergamo.
It really was, enjoyed it greatly. Perhaps we will meet again in Canada.
Hi Bob, I've identified an experimental gap in EVO research and written a replicable protocol to address it. I know this is your area of expertise and I'd appreciate your insight! The Zenodo link is: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19657209.
Hi Justin,
I am receiving about 20 seconds' worth of 'AI work' per week from many 'authors', constituting up to 4,000 pages of text, to give credence and recognition to. I don't mean to be rude, but when I look at this text, it smacks of AI output. Passing it through Grok, it concludes that it is almost certainly largely made by AI.
I do not have enough life left in me to be a verification agent for AI output. I am not aware of your previous work in this field or long term research credentials, so, without sharing the work that you have done to get to this point over many years, I would take a pass on expressing a view.
I am going to make a plea to the community to stop sending me AI output for my opinion.
If I am wrong in this and you can show me a long history of EVO research and specifically research related to the subject of the document, then I may reconsider looking at it.
If this really was you, somehow, you have started to write exactly like AI.
Anyone can check if a document is wholly or partially written in AI. Here is grok's evaluation of the document you sent.
https://x.com/i/grok/share/61c6e95d5a834240b9b82be4312b4bfc
I'm not going to argue the semantics of whether or not text is AI generated. I use AI as a formatter and editor. The ideas are entirely my own.
My hypothesis is nobody has ever publicly placed a gravimeter next to an EVO production apparatus during formation events and measured what happens. Standard physics predicts nothing measurable. I wrote a protocol to run that experiment and find out if standard physics is right.
You're one of the experts in this field. That's why I contacted you. I totally understand your time is valuable. I didn’t mean to waste it. I was simply pointing out an experiment that hasn't been performed yet as far as I was aware.
If you don't want to waste a researcher's time with a ream of AI text; then you could have just written:
"place a gravimeter next to an EVO generator"
And linked to a suitable device. Most people looking for a gravity effect put the apparatus on a balance. They then look to see if one way it goes up and the other way it goes down.
https://youtu.be/Z5EAI5BN9Oc
Thank you for the Zatelepin reference, that's directly relevant. I appreciate your input and your time.
Hello, Do you think Glitter (side 1 aluminum / side 2 PET plastic) could be used as a feed stock for these kind of reactions? It’s a material that could flow pneumatically, say in a vortex.
Only one way to know is to try. If you differentially charged each side, logically.
This guy do exactly that, see at 29:30 and then all data about it from the beginning.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZdWcbJC9K0
As I have been witness of the progression of your train of thought all These years, I was very happy to watch this yesterday, and kind of proud of you actually, Bob.
Could not have got here without you. It has been a team effort. I am glad you made it through the nonsense to witness the change.
I do prefer my second presentation though. To come.
Hey Bob!
I have an update on the small, informal lettuce seeds experiment I was conducting a few months ago, in case it helps other better-qualified people here who read your amazing Substack.
So, after decent research on the market, I bought a better ultrasonic cleaner and received it a few days ago. Specifically, this model with 180W (which I fill with exactly 1.8L of water): https://www.aliexpress.us/item/3256808899306455.html?spm=a2g0o.order_list.order_list_main.5.c862194d5784qX&gatewayAdapt=glo2usa4itemAdapt
When it arrived, I first wanted to compare the cavitation force with the cheaper model I used to have with aluminium foil, but the moment I turned it on, I started to feel uncomfortable, not just because of the high-pitched sound it emitted, but I felt something weird on my face, like tiny needles or currents. I immediately remembered the anecdote you always tell about Tesla with his unidirectional disruptive discharges and the glass, copper, and aluminium sheets he set up. It freaked me out, so I turned it off. I don't know if I'm imagining things, if it was the sound that gave me gooseflesh, or if the machine is legitimately that powerful, but I don't dare use it too much now, especially after the next day, I got up tired and with a mild headache.
All this just to ask, could you remind me which specific materials to use for making a shielded box? I remembered you showed it in one of your livestreams, but I can't find it.
Thank you!
Good question and share of your experience, curious to know as well
WooHoo! Go get em Bob! Keep going, never give up, never surrender! :-D