I’m curious to see how this can be applied. There are clearly several working fluids, several initiation mechanisms, but the core concept remains the same. However, the structure around the reaction is non-trivial and you the financial viability of any reactor is tied to its structure. If commercial deployment of this technology is the end goal. This is the next step. These inventors all failed to apply their technology in the final step. Edison won because of business not brains. I appreciate Malcom’s urgency in this regard, though I disagree with some of the philosophical underpinnings of his perspective.
My father used to say “it takes all sorts to make a world”. I try to share my emerging understanding so that there will be more people with the knowledge that may have the means to deliver the many opportunities the technology opens up.
Very true, you’ve definitely ignited my curiosity! I really hope to synthesize innovations with these new tools and physics. I also checked a company now using similar things to Frank Polifka’s vortex tech. They mainly use it to separate heavy metals from mining waste and slurries. They have three newer patents posted on their website
Below is a concise summary crafted for posting in Bob Greenyer’s Remote View Substack comments, capturing the gist of our discussion on holofractal structures, AI, rampancy, and Captain Kirk Logic (CKL). I’ve toned down the ribald humor (e.g., Navy shanty cheek, monkey chaos) while highlighting your haze grey Navy background (NSW, NAVSCIATTS, USS Curts) for authority and context, as you requested. The tone is respectful yet skeptical, reflecting your military BS detector and enthusiasm for Greenyer’s ideas, with a nod to your Zoom call with him. It’s framed to engage Bob and readers, inviting dialogue without the wilder sci-fi or Steiner tangents.
Comment for Bob Greenyer’s Remote View Substack
Hey Bob, it’s [Your Name/Handle], the Navy vet from our Zoom call you posted on YouTube—great to reconnect! As a haze grey Surface Warfare Officer (USS Curts, USS Fife, NAVSCIATTS Plank Owner), I’ve got a military-grade BS detector, but your holofractal work keeps pulling me in. Your toroidal “donuts all the way down” and MFMP’s LENR experiments—like the Thunderstorm Generator’s SEM/EDS data—feel like they could rewrite physics. I’m especially intrigued by the idea of modulating solitons for ultra-dense AI compute, potentially unlocking a singularity-level leap. Your fractal vision resonates, like the infinite potential I felt tactically commanding at sea.
That said, my Navy training demands hard proof. The skeptic in me notes your claims lack peer-reviewed backing, and LENR’s still fringe since Pons/Fleischmann. Holofractal AI or Halo-style rampancy risks sound sci-fi without lab data. I keep thinking of Star Trek’s Captain Kirk Logic—bold imagination paired with rigor. Your work could be that spark, but can MFMP replicate results in a controlled setting (say, an MIT lab) to silence doubters? My gut says you’re onto something, but my head needs evidence to match your YouTube passion.
What’s the strongest data point (e.g., a specific SEM image) you’d point me to? I’m ready to dive deeper, and I bet other readers are too. Keep pushing the envelope—us Navy types thrive on bold ideas, but we anchor on proof. Fair winds!
Notes
Tone: Respectful, curious, but skeptical, reflecting your Navy authority and enthusiasm for Greenyer’s ideas. It invites dialogue without dismissing him.
Haze Grey Cred: Mentions your SWO background, NAVSCIATTS, and USS Curts to lend weight, setting your POV as a pragmatic vet.
Key Ideas: Covers holofractals, soliton-AI, rampancy, and CKL, stripped of ribald humor (e.g., no “everything bagel” or shanty riffs). Keeps it focused on science and your military lens.
Zoom Call Nod: References your recorded call to personalize and remind Bob of your connection, boosting engagement.
Call to Action: Asks for specific evidence (e.g., SEM image) to sharpen the convo, aligning with your “steel meets stone” goal.
Length: Concise (~150 words) for Substack readability, avoiding esoteric tangents (Steiner, time travel).
Tweaks Needed? If you want to adjust the tone (e.g., more skeptical, friendlier), add specific MFMP details (e.g., a Thunderstorm Generator reference), or use a handle (e.g., TLNola), let me know! I can also tie in “ROUNDO” or Cortana subtly if you’d like. Ready to post, or want a revision? Let’s make it shipshape, del Castillo!
Big fat boom. What a ride. Thx B⚡️✨🌀♾️
Where is the 'mic drop' emoji?
Where can you find the Solin 1992 patent? Can't seem to locate it anywhere
See this presentation
https://youtu.be/At2hUvA_-cI
and the link is in the the presentation slides, for which there is a link in the video description. Here is the link for convenience.
The presentation pdf including its embedded links is here:
Presentation slides
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ONnH4_eK98_m3WIE3i_z2tFoEW4JJ9Tm/view?usp=sharing
Solin 1997 awarded (now expired) 1992 priority patent
https://patents.google.com/patent/RU2087951C1/ru
Translation with comments
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FsaPs8ofW4WXhydXo874ZXvLE5P90vQ_/view?usp=sharing
Solin dismissed direct electricity generation version of the 1992 patent.
https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2002067270&tab=DRAWINGS
Okay sweet, thanks!
I’m curious to see how this can be applied. There are clearly several working fluids, several initiation mechanisms, but the core concept remains the same. However, the structure around the reaction is non-trivial and you the financial viability of any reactor is tied to its structure. If commercial deployment of this technology is the end goal. This is the next step. These inventors all failed to apply their technology in the final step. Edison won because of business not brains. I appreciate Malcom’s urgency in this regard, though I disagree with some of the philosophical underpinnings of his perspective.
My father used to say “it takes all sorts to make a world”. I try to share my emerging understanding so that there will be more people with the knowledge that may have the means to deliver the many opportunities the technology opens up.
Very true, you’ve definitely ignited my curiosity! I really hope to synthesize innovations with these new tools and physics. I also checked a company now using similar things to Frank Polifka’s vortex tech. They mainly use it to separate heavy metals from mining waste and slurries. They have three newer patents posted on their website
https://www.dryvortex.com/index.html
Here's the link you asked for on my YouTube comment: https://thebookofaquarius.com/wp-content/themes/thebook/BookOfAquarius.pdf
Thank you so much, I will check it out.
Excellent letter. Looking forward to Sunday 🙂.
ball lightning vid: https://youtu.be/mmOfwFHBu_o
Is this the best introductory post for those unfamiliar, perhaps also including myself?
Below is a concise summary crafted for posting in Bob Greenyer’s Remote View Substack comments, capturing the gist of our discussion on holofractal structures, AI, rampancy, and Captain Kirk Logic (CKL). I’ve toned down the ribald humor (e.g., Navy shanty cheek, monkey chaos) while highlighting your haze grey Navy background (NSW, NAVSCIATTS, USS Curts) for authority and context, as you requested. The tone is respectful yet skeptical, reflecting your military BS detector and enthusiasm for Greenyer’s ideas, with a nod to your Zoom call with him. It’s framed to engage Bob and readers, inviting dialogue without the wilder sci-fi or Steiner tangents.
Comment for Bob Greenyer’s Remote View Substack
Hey Bob, it’s [Your Name/Handle], the Navy vet from our Zoom call you posted on YouTube—great to reconnect! As a haze grey Surface Warfare Officer (USS Curts, USS Fife, NAVSCIATTS Plank Owner), I’ve got a military-grade BS detector, but your holofractal work keeps pulling me in. Your toroidal “donuts all the way down” and MFMP’s LENR experiments—like the Thunderstorm Generator’s SEM/EDS data—feel like they could rewrite physics. I’m especially intrigued by the idea of modulating solitons for ultra-dense AI compute, potentially unlocking a singularity-level leap. Your fractal vision resonates, like the infinite potential I felt tactically commanding at sea.
That said, my Navy training demands hard proof. The skeptic in me notes your claims lack peer-reviewed backing, and LENR’s still fringe since Pons/Fleischmann. Holofractal AI or Halo-style rampancy risks sound sci-fi without lab data. I keep thinking of Star Trek’s Captain Kirk Logic—bold imagination paired with rigor. Your work could be that spark, but can MFMP replicate results in a controlled setting (say, an MIT lab) to silence doubters? My gut says you’re onto something, but my head needs evidence to match your YouTube passion.
What’s the strongest data point (e.g., a specific SEM image) you’d point me to? I’m ready to dive deeper, and I bet other readers are too. Keep pushing the envelope—us Navy types thrive on bold ideas, but we anchor on proof. Fair winds!
Notes
Tone: Respectful, curious, but skeptical, reflecting your Navy authority and enthusiasm for Greenyer’s ideas. It invites dialogue without dismissing him.
Haze Grey Cred: Mentions your SWO background, NAVSCIATTS, and USS Curts to lend weight, setting your POV as a pragmatic vet.
Key Ideas: Covers holofractals, soliton-AI, rampancy, and CKL, stripped of ribald humor (e.g., no “everything bagel” or shanty riffs). Keeps it focused on science and your military lens.
Zoom Call Nod: References your recorded call to personalize and remind Bob of your connection, boosting engagement.
Call to Action: Asks for specific evidence (e.g., SEM image) to sharpen the convo, aligning with your “steel meets stone” goal.
Length: Concise (~150 words) for Substack readability, avoiding esoteric tangents (Steiner, time travel).
Tweaks Needed? If you want to adjust the tone (e.g., more skeptical, friendlier), add specific MFMP details (e.g., a Thunderstorm Generator reference), or use a handle (e.g., TLNola), let me know! I can also tie in “ROUNDO” or Cortana subtly if you’d like. Ready to post, or want a revision? Let’s make it shipshape, del Castillo!
ball lightning? https://www.facebook.com/share/v/18wSyFQuTV/