33 Comments
Jun 8, 2022Liked by Bob Greenyer

Dave Boutilier should try a heavy iron ring interior to the coil in order to convert the Bagel coil field into a spin field. Iron is always used to amplify and transfer coil fields in such devices a transformers.

Expand full comment
Jun 9, 2022Liked by Bob Greenyer

I’m impressed of the capability and willingness of the community to set un experiments with so few resources… and achieve results. what if even a nano-fraction of the gazzilons of € spent by the mainstream (to go… nowhere) where put in these grassroots efforts. Bravi

Expand full comment
Nov 13, 2022Liked by Bob Greenyer

Thought I would give an update, I started the 5-Tor, but realized, even with the 4-Tor, I followed no ratio, and thinking about it, I'm not sure I would expect one to work without the d:4d, or some fractal ratio like the golden mean. I am guessing it would have more to do with that than running the coil at resonance, since it is a poynting effect, so I am already planning another one that will follow the d:4d scheme.

I am also building an argon chamber that will fit the 4-Tor and future ones that size, so I can see the UV plasma dynamics around the whole thing, and have ordered the parts for the 10Mhz plasma toroid oscillator. Maybe a month before it is all together.

Expand full comment

Question: if it is your belief (as stated in the video) that Wilhelm Reich's orgone is relic neutrino flux, then how do you differentiate between deadly & beneficial orgone as defined by Reich?

Expand full comment

The key to amping up the phantom is synchronous parameter variation.

The Variation of Inductance and Capacitance with respect to time – and synchronous parameter variations.

Read chapter 21 (XXI) titled REACTION MACHINES in Charles Proteus Steinmetz’s book titled “Alternating Current Phenomena”

Short version: Synchronous parameter variation breaks symmetry of equilibrium between the electric & magnetic fields, and breaks conservation of energy in the process, following from Noether's theory.

This collapse of symmmetry induces the production or destruction of energy, as predicted by Noether's Theorem of conversation & symmetry being geometrically connected, and as stated by Oliver Heaviside's Theory of Continuity of Energy.

Phase is involved (like implied in your chat-vid with cosmic dave/etc) because capacitance induces a phase shift. - just like I said, electrodynamically, over/under-unities come from shifting energy from one quadrant of energy to another.

+Future -Past and Counterspace are the non-unity quadrants, though +Future and -Past are considered as power-factor, not as non-unity, though they maybe should be....

BTW: if you plug a giant capacitor or inductor into any outlet in your house, and you aren't using the new smartmeters, your powerfactor skews and you only get billed for about half your power usage. Cool huh?

ATTN BOB:

-----------------------------------

Upon reviewing my notes, I've drawn some conclusions about Stan's process for the electronuclear product:

i suspect the keys to Stan's magnetic gas are the laser-pumped resonant cavity to pretreat the water: ionization & polarization, and then electrolysis at ~15 atmospheres, or so. I am fairly certain this was how Stan produced the magnetic gas.

1. Laser for coherence

2. Resonant cavity for energy pumping (ionization)

3. High pressure electrolysis

I did some digging in OLD writings on this subject and found something interesting, that pressure directly effects ionization voltage, and that at 15bars it becomes possible to strip all the electrons off gases at much lower temperatures & powers, and this is known is plasmoid physics as a causal or supportive mechanism of plasmoid formation. Can you confirm?

This hints to the condensation process in the yull brown setup, as the hydrogen must be entirely stripped to cluster, is that right?

A basic overview of the true functionality of Stan Meyer's water-fuel technology is as follows:

0. ** Electric Particle Generator(E.P.G.)**:

Closed-loop EVO pickup-tube-type electronuclear reactor as the powerplant.

1. **Digital Electronic Timing & Regulation**

Distributor signal is captures and delivered to the computer for engine-timing

2. **Gas ionization** *Gas Processing Technnology*

All air to be fed into the system must pass through an ionization chamber first, because gases hold electrostatic charge longer than water given their lower permitivity and dielectric constant, and in this sense, the air must be pretreated with ionization to act as a delivery method for charge to the combustion chamber.

3. **Fuel Polarization & Ionization** *Hydrogen Fracturing Technology*

All water to be fed into the system must pass through a laser-pumped resonant cavity ( the same technology used in microwaves ) to pretreat the water by polarization / ionization.

4. **Resonant Electrolysis**

While most of the polarized water was to be injected directly into the engine's cylinders, a small amount was diverted & redirected to a resonant electrolysis cell, to manufacture HHO gas (hydrogen & oxygen) for on-demand admixture with the fuel

5. **Fuel Thinning / Leaning**

An exhaust siphon channels exhaust-gases to a computer-controlled valve to be mixed in ratios determined on-demand by the computer. The purpose of the exhaust-gases is to dampen the explosivity of the raw hydrogen produced in the system, to be equal to that of gasoline, or any other desired fuel.

6. **Repolarization during Injection**

Just before the fuels-admixture is injected into the engine, it is again polarized & ionized together. The fuels-admixture consists of:

1. The Ionized & Polarized Water

2. The Ionized Combustible Gases

3. The Ionized Ambient Air Gases

4. The Incombustible Gases ( Reused exhaust-gases )

NOTE: only 3 of the above 6 are required for the electronuclear reactor:

0. Electric Particle Generator

2. Gas Ionization

3. Waterfuel Polarization & Ionization

(Special thanks to Bob for helping me figure out the reactor. You reap what you sow. Thank you for your generosity in taking the time & consideration to be my guide. I know I am probably annoying at this point. I will endeavour to show you that it was worth your time. )

(Not to mention all the songs I wrote! )

I will be announcing an official project soon, independent from the MFMP, to experimentally rebuild Stan Meyer's EVO reactor. A link will appear here when its ready. I would like to call Bob my 'science advisor' on this project but he will likely balk at this -- so, I will just call him a friend. Thanks again Bob!

Expand full comment
Jun 9, 2022·edited Jun 9, 2022

Hey guys I whipped up a parametric openscad model anyone can use who is interested.

OpenSCAD is open source and free from here.

https://openscad.org/downloads.html

I used a library that supports path extrude (which makes it relatively easy to do this)

https://github.com/JustinSDK/dotSCAD

I just did "git clone https://github.com/JustinSDK/dotSCAD" in the openscad library folder (which is how the includes are currently setup).

Here's a link to a screenshot and the code.

I'm not 100% certain I have the left-handed and right-handed stuff figured out.

Hopefully it will be useful for someone.

v1: initial version

code: https://pastebin.com/HFASfE87

image: https://postimg.cc/75DKtJb0

v2: some useability improvements prior to making video:

code: https://pastebin.com/mhi6rFSY

image: https://i.postimg.cc/vHbzhF7R/bagel-0102a.png

Expand full comment

Are you sure the last level is R? since it's just completing a circle and it's not going over/under to make a spiral, it doesn't seem to have chirality, i'd say it's neither R nor L, just O. If you push current through the RRRO coil, it'll make a topological monopole of electric character, let's say it's a big plus and a small minus. If you flip the current direction in that RRRO coil, it'll still produce a big plus and a small minus, just at the opposite sides. It stays the same type of monopole regardless of what direction the current is running in right? It's this idea that also made me understand how the oscillations could be present, i was worried it was flipping from N to S, N to S all the time. It just stays big N or big S, it's just that the location of the small s and small n flips. I wish i could use my hands in this explanation. Anyways what about the naming convention of, when ending in a loop without chirality/helicity, naming that loop O, so that'd make this one RRRO.

Expand full comment

Hello Bob and all. Further to the paper I referenced in my above comment (Pakhomov is mentioned), I am exploring biochemical/health effects of locally applied fields. To this end I have devised enclosed patches and enclosed discs containing certain elements, mixtures of certain elements and mixtures of certain elements and certain compounds that when applied topically have direct effect on physiological processes/wellbeing and in alignment with postulations by the authors of the above commented paper by Meijer and associated papers by the same author (& co authors) and papers of Irena Cosic . I draw your attention to these papers to give you heads up on research indicating that biochemical effects of fields are octave frequency (Pulse Repetition Rate) sensitive and also that complex spectrums are important part of the equation as you have commented, some materials 'play nice' and some don't, some combinations are beneficial and some are toxic ime !. The patches/discs I mention incorporating carefully selected ingredients exhibit very useful properties and trials are showing essentially immediate elimination of headaches and typical inflammatory pain conditions. Longer term contact with the fields of the patches/discs produces accelerated healing of wounds and lasting healing of chronic conditions. This I attribute to 'coherence/denoising' of bodily biochemical/neural systems. I am also suggesting that the harmful effects of radiations produced in VEGA experiments may be due at least in part to the elemental origins of the excitation spectrums, with intelligent modification perhaps VEGA and associated experiments can yield strongly beneficial radiations such that as I am observing. Bob, I am subscriber to this channel and I am most glad in helping in my small way within my means to supporting your paradigm shifting research into 'the gods toolbox'. You have my contact details, please get in touch. Kindest regards, Eric Mc.

Expand full comment