I saw a version of the following video https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bHIhgxav9LY that was posted after it caused a lot of buzz, I think it has some importance for the understanding of how the bagels work.
Was watching some channeled videos today and one part I thought I'de pass along. Not because it includes any innate wisdom just because I like corroboration, even if it is from academic sources. This seemed like pretty good corroboration I provided the portion of the transcript from the video for context below (there's some slightly unrelated stuff In the transcript I pasted towards the end, but I found it interesting as it relates to the Mandela effect).
What she describes is the connection and nesting of torroidal fields as being the fields that underlie the "density" we inhabit and interconnect with all other fields. I found it very interesting how this connects back to the potential Mandela effect which I have been witnessing greatly as of late.
The more youtube forces me to watch Dan Winter, the more I'm starting to feel that the magnetic flux tunnels that the torroidal EVO's are following are probably precisely what Dan says, a matrix of (scalar?) energy lines. Numerous researchers have claimed there is some super-luminal element to the this network but I have no way to know how or why they claim this beyond equations that don't make sense to me ;).
Jun 27, 2022·edited Jun 27, 2022Liked by Bob Greenyer
I found this by Tesla recently. I thought it might be relevant:
“During the succeeding two years of intense concentration I was fortunate enough to make two far-reaching discoveries. The first was a dynamic theory of gravity, which I have worked out in all details and hope to give to the world very soon. It explains the causes of this force and the motions of heavenly bodies under its in- fluence so satisfactorily that it will put an end to idle speculations and false conceptions, as that of curved space. According to the relativists, space has a tendency to curvature owing to an inherent property or presence of celestial bodies. Granting a semblance of reality to this fantastic idea, it is still self-contradic- tory. Every action is accompanied by an equivalent reaction and the effects of the latter are directly opposite to those of the former. Supposing that the bodies act upon the surrounding space causing curvature of the same, it appears to my simple
mind that the curved spaces must react on the bodies and, producing the opposite effects, straighten out the curves. Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible. But even if it existed it would not explain the motions of the bodies as observed. Only the exis- tence of a field of force can account for them and its assumption dispenses with space curvature. All literature on this subject is futile and destined to oblivion. So are also all attempts to explain the workings of the universe without recognizing the existence of the ether and the indispensable function it plays in the phenomena.
My second discovery was a physical truth of the greatest importance. As I have searched the scientific records in more than half dozen languages for a long time without finding the least anticipation, I consider myself the original discoverer
of this truth, which can be expressed by the statement: There is no energy in mat- ter other than that received from the environment. On my 79th birthday I made a brief reference to it, but its meaning and significance have become clearer to me since then. I applies rigorously to molecules and atoms as well as the largest heav- enly bodies, and to all matter in the universe in any phase of its existence from its very formation to its ultimate disintegration.
273
Being perfectly satisfied that all energy in matter is drawn from the environment, it was quite natural that when radioactivity was discovered in 1896 I immediately started a search for the external agent which caused it. The existence of radio- activity was positive proof of the existence of external rays. I had previously in- vestigated various terrestrial disturbances affecting wireless circuits but none of them or any others emanating from the earth could produce a steady sustained action and I was driven to the conclusion that the activating rays were of cosmic origin. This fact I announced in my papers on Roentgen rays and Radiations contributed to
the Electrical Review of New York, in 1897. However, as radioactivity was observed equally well in other widely separated parts of the world, it was obvious that the rays must be impinging on the earth from all directions. Now, of all bodies in the Cosmos, our sun was most likely to furnish a clue as to their origin and character. Before the electron theory was advanced, I had established that radioactive rays consisted of particles of primary matter not further decomposable, and the first question to answer was whether the sun is charged to a sufficiently high potential to produce the effects noted. This called for a prolonged investigation which cul- minated in my finding that the sun's potential was 216 billions of volts and that all such large and hot heavenly bodies emit cosmic rays. Through further solar re- search and observation of Novae this has been proved conclusively, and to deny it would be like denying the light and heat of the sun. Nevertheless, there are still some doubters who prefer to shroud the cosmic rays in deep mystery. I am sure that this is not true for there is no pl~ce where such a process occurs in this or any other universe beyond our ken.
Afew words will be sufficient in support of this contention. The kinetic and potential energy of a body is the result of motion and determined by the product of its mass and the square of velocity. Let the mass be reduced, the energy is dimin- ished in the same proportion. If it be reduced to zero the energy is likewise zero for any finite velocity. In other words, it is absolutely impossible to convert mass into energy. It would be different if there were forces in nature capable of imparting to a mass infinite velocity. Then the product of zero mass with the square of infinite velocity would represent infinite energy. But we know that there are no such forces and the idea that mass is convertible into energy is rank non- sense.
While the origin and character of the rays observed near the earth's surface are sufficiently well ascertained, the so-called cosmic rays observed at great altitudes presented a riddle for more than 26 years, chiefly because it was found that they increased with altitude at a rapid rate. My investigations have brought out the astonishing fact that the effects at high altitudes are of an entirely different nature, having no relation whatever to cosmic rays. These are particles of matter projected from celestial bodies at very high temperature and charged to enormous electrical potentials. The effects at great elevations, on the other hand, are due to waves of extremely small lengths produced by the sun in a certai.n region in the atmosphere. This is the discovery which I wish to make known. The process involved in the generation of the waves is the following: The sun projects charged particles constituting an electric current which passes through a conducting stratum of the atmosphere approximately 10 kilometers thick enveloping the earth. This is a trans- mission of energy exactly as I illustrated in my experimental lectures in which one end of a wire is connected to an electric generator of high potential, its other end being free. In this case the generator is represented by the sun and the wire by the conducting air. The passage of the solar current involves the transference of electric charges from particle to particle with the speed of light, thus resulting in the production of extremely short and penetrating waves. As the air stratum men- tioned is the source of the waves it follows that the so-called cosmic rays observed at great altitudes must increase as this stratum is approached. My researches and calculations have brought to light the following facts in this connection: (1) the intensity of the so-called cosmic rays must be greatest in the zenithal portion of
274
atmosphere; (2) the intensity should increase more and more rapidly up to an eleva- tion of about 20 kilometers where the conducting air stratum begins; (3) from there on the intensity should fall, first slowly and then more rapidly, to an insignifi- cant value at an altitude of about 30 kilometers; (4) the display of high potential must occur on the free end of the terrestrial wire, that is to say, on the side turned away from the sun. The current from the latter is supplied at a pressure of about 216 billion volts and there is a difference of 2 billion volts between the illuminated and the dark side of the globe. The energy of this current is so great that it readily accounts for the aurora and other phenomena observed in the atmos- phere and at the earth's surface.”
As Fractal Woman says mass is on the forward diagonal (real plane) of a 2 by 2 matrix charge is on the backward diagonal (imaginary plane). They are mutually assuming/mutually opposing principles of a whole.
I was thinking can Dave consider also placing a shaped object in the plasma flow to further aid the formation of a plasma vortex, much like dragging a plate through water.
The more heads, the more discussion, the better off we all are, and that's something I see more clearly now thanks to you, Bob.
If it's not within your knowledge & will, can you help me find someone whose it is, who you also consider to be of a mentality similar to your own...? ... :)
Also, Canada now allows unvaccinated people to board aircraft to exit the country. Yay. But they probably still require a negative test at entry, and possibly 2 weeks quaranteen somewhere. Boo.
Or, maybe just passing through counterspace instead, the polar opposite of space...
We know space is likely defined by the N-Torus due to the geometric relation to Maxwell's laws, hence Zhvirblis'(?) assertion that the structure of the vacuum is this.
The inversion of the toroid is the hypertrochoidal funnel, is it not?
Seems a lot like a vortex..... FractalWoman agrees....
It seems to me that a planck-scale flux vortex (as you've described before) IS (essentially) electrodynamic counterspace, in the sense that its:
a) The geometric opposite of the structure of the vacuum in space, being the torus.
b) Occupying literally the smallest amount of space possible, virtually nothing.
c) The argument could be made that past a certain threshold of minimal breadth, that fields essentially don't exist in 'space' anymore, because they may become too small to perform some types of electrodynamic interactions.
( Impulse currents are a perfect example of how dimensionality of waves can prevent them from typical limitations & interactions, and are also known to penetrate all media, both conductors & dielectrics, with seemingly no impedance )
d)Perhaps anti-space or co-space would be a better word than counterspace/negative space which are more commonly used (Rudolf Steiner, George Adams, Nick Thomas, Dollard, Steinmetz, FractalWoman, Ken Wheeler, etc....), given this empirical instead of theoretical understanding of counterspace, from Bob! Thanks Bob!
(All glory to the hypno-Bob) *clap*..... *clap*..... *clap*.....
Apparently you could grind up a ferrite magnet. Then heat to 1000C apparently improves it, then mix with a binder, to 3D print new magnets. https://physics.aps.org/articles/v15/14
I saw a version of the following video https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bHIhgxav9LY that was posted after it caused a lot of buzz, I think it has some importance for the understanding of how the bagels work.
Hey Bob,
Was watching some channeled videos today and one part I thought I'de pass along. Not because it includes any innate wisdom just because I like corroboration, even if it is from academic sources. This seemed like pretty good corroboration I provided the portion of the transcript from the video for context below (there's some slightly unrelated stuff In the transcript I pasted towards the end, but I found it interesting as it relates to the Mandela effect).
What she describes is the connection and nesting of torroidal fields as being the fields that underlie the "density" we inhabit and interconnect with all other fields. I found it very interesting how this connects back to the potential Mandela effect which I have been witnessing greatly as of late.
The more youtube forces me to watch Dan Winter, the more I'm starting to feel that the magnetic flux tunnels that the torroidal EVO's are following are probably precisely what Dan says, a matrix of (scalar?) energy lines. Numerous researchers have claimed there is some super-luminal element to the this network but I have no way to know how or why they claim this beyond equations that don't make sense to me ;).
https://youtu.be/xxESP5uV1IM?t=2644
44:04 um now in the ether and in that energy field nothing is separated
44:10 it's all connected and nothing is isolated everything from a single particle to
44:17 galaxies complete galaxies are toroids toroidal fields that interact <--- THIS PART HERE
44:24 with other fields and other fields and other fields on top of other fields
44:30 so how can you just insert an isolated object uh so you you can't and it is explained
44:38 that uh as everything is inter related those
44:45 energy energy values uh are always always interrelated with the energy
44:50 values of the next objects and the next situation
44:55 for that reason the cause the cause
45:01 and the prior dynamic before the appearance of that object must be must
45:06 appear because nothing just appears out of nothing out of nowhere it has to have its
45:12 justification in the matrix field and its proper dynamic why it's there the
45:18 the previous dynamic of why it appeared there and uh
45:24 this is this is super interesting and super important and because i remember one time long time ago we we asked like
45:32 okay can you insert me a ticket to hawaii for example and i remember svarup era that was a
45:39 long time ago she said well i can't do that without inserting the whole chain
45:45 of events that led to why that ticket is on your table so uh you know the passenger
45:53 you you have a passenger a seat a reserved uh you know why this seat and
45:58 uh you know um who organized that ticket who bought that ticket why that ticket was bought
46:06 what airline so the it it it creates like a shockwave in the matrix if you insert something
46:13 like that and creates the whole dynamic around it and the interesting and super mysterious
46:18 thing here is that that dynamic around it appears by itself sometimes it's not
46:26 like that they have to insert that sometimes all they have to do is just drop the
46:31 object into the matrix and the matrix the energy field of the matrix any material matrix
46:38 will create the dynamic interactions
46:43 around that object including memories of people will appear
46:50 someone will actually remember selling me the ticket at the office
46:55 that's why this technology is so they have to be careful with that because it can be kind of invasive
47:02 because okay that that matrix creates uh the justification around that object
47:08 by itself and they call they it absorbs that object that object and create they
47:15 create the whole uh result around it
47:21 like i said even memories will appear people having memories of
47:27 having bought that object somewhere those memories
I found this by Tesla recently. I thought it might be relevant:
“During the succeeding two years of intense concentration I was fortunate enough to make two far-reaching discoveries. The first was a dynamic theory of gravity, which I have worked out in all details and hope to give to the world very soon. It explains the causes of this force and the motions of heavenly bodies under its in- fluence so satisfactorily that it will put an end to idle speculations and false conceptions, as that of curved space. According to the relativists, space has a tendency to curvature owing to an inherent property or presence of celestial bodies. Granting a semblance of reality to this fantastic idea, it is still self-contradic- tory. Every action is accompanied by an equivalent reaction and the effects of the latter are directly opposite to those of the former. Supposing that the bodies act upon the surrounding space causing curvature of the same, it appears to my simple
mind that the curved spaces must react on the bodies and, producing the opposite effects, straighten out the curves. Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible. But even if it existed it would not explain the motions of the bodies as observed. Only the exis- tence of a field of force can account for them and its assumption dispenses with space curvature. All literature on this subject is futile and destined to oblivion. So are also all attempts to explain the workings of the universe without recognizing the existence of the ether and the indispensable function it plays in the phenomena.
My second discovery was a physical truth of the greatest importance. As I have searched the scientific records in more than half dozen languages for a long time without finding the least anticipation, I consider myself the original discoverer
of this truth, which can be expressed by the statement: There is no energy in mat- ter other than that received from the environment. On my 79th birthday I made a brief reference to it, but its meaning and significance have become clearer to me since then. I applies rigorously to molecules and atoms as well as the largest heav- enly bodies, and to all matter in the universe in any phase of its existence from its very formation to its ultimate disintegration.
273
Being perfectly satisfied that all energy in matter is drawn from the environment, it was quite natural that when radioactivity was discovered in 1896 I immediately started a search for the external agent which caused it. The existence of radio- activity was positive proof of the existence of external rays. I had previously in- vestigated various terrestrial disturbances affecting wireless circuits but none of them or any others emanating from the earth could produce a steady sustained action and I was driven to the conclusion that the activating rays were of cosmic origin. This fact I announced in my papers on Roentgen rays and Radiations contributed to
the Electrical Review of New York, in 1897. However, as radioactivity was observed equally well in other widely separated parts of the world, it was obvious that the rays must be impinging on the earth from all directions. Now, of all bodies in the Cosmos, our sun was most likely to furnish a clue as to their origin and character. Before the electron theory was advanced, I had established that radioactive rays consisted of particles of primary matter not further decomposable, and the first question to answer was whether the sun is charged to a sufficiently high potential to produce the effects noted. This called for a prolonged investigation which cul- minated in my finding that the sun's potential was 216 billions of volts and that all such large and hot heavenly bodies emit cosmic rays. Through further solar re- search and observation of Novae this has been proved conclusively, and to deny it would be like denying the light and heat of the sun. Nevertheless, there are still some doubters who prefer to shroud the cosmic rays in deep mystery. I am sure that this is not true for there is no pl~ce where such a process occurs in this or any other universe beyond our ken.
Afew words will be sufficient in support of this contention. The kinetic and potential energy of a body is the result of motion and determined by the product of its mass and the square of velocity. Let the mass be reduced, the energy is dimin- ished in the same proportion. If it be reduced to zero the energy is likewise zero for any finite velocity. In other words, it is absolutely impossible to convert mass into energy. It would be different if there were forces in nature capable of imparting to a mass infinite velocity. Then the product of zero mass with the square of infinite velocity would represent infinite energy. But we know that there are no such forces and the idea that mass is convertible into energy is rank non- sense.
While the origin and character of the rays observed near the earth's surface are sufficiently well ascertained, the so-called cosmic rays observed at great altitudes presented a riddle for more than 26 years, chiefly because it was found that they increased with altitude at a rapid rate. My investigations have brought out the astonishing fact that the effects at high altitudes are of an entirely different nature, having no relation whatever to cosmic rays. These are particles of matter projected from celestial bodies at very high temperature and charged to enormous electrical potentials. The effects at great elevations, on the other hand, are due to waves of extremely small lengths produced by the sun in a certai.n region in the atmosphere. This is the discovery which I wish to make known. The process involved in the generation of the waves is the following: The sun projects charged particles constituting an electric current which passes through a conducting stratum of the atmosphere approximately 10 kilometers thick enveloping the earth. This is a trans- mission of energy exactly as I illustrated in my experimental lectures in which one end of a wire is connected to an electric generator of high potential, its other end being free. In this case the generator is represented by the sun and the wire by the conducting air. The passage of the solar current involves the transference of electric charges from particle to particle with the speed of light, thus resulting in the production of extremely short and penetrating waves. As the air stratum men- tioned is the source of the waves it follows that the so-called cosmic rays observed at great altitudes must increase as this stratum is approached. My researches and calculations have brought to light the following facts in this connection: (1) the intensity of the so-called cosmic rays must be greatest in the zenithal portion of
274
atmosphere; (2) the intensity should increase more and more rapidly up to an eleva- tion of about 20 kilometers where the conducting air stratum begins; (3) from there on the intensity should fall, first slowly and then more rapidly, to an insignifi- cant value at an altitude of about 30 kilometers; (4) the display of high potential must occur on the free end of the terrestrial wire, that is to say, on the side turned away from the sun. The current from the latter is supplied at a pressure of about 216 billion volts and there is a difference of 2 billion volts between the illuminated and the dark side of the globe. The energy of this current is so great that it readily accounts for the aurora and other phenomena observed in the atmos- phere and at the earth's surface.”
As Fractal Woman says mass is on the forward diagonal (real plane) of a 2 by 2 matrix charge is on the backward diagonal (imaginary plane). They are mutually assuming/mutually opposing principles of a whole.
I was thinking can Dave consider also placing a shaped object in the plasma flow to further aid the formation of a plasma vortex, much like dragging a plate through water.
https://youtu.be/pnbJEg9r1o8
Also I recall hearing Eric Dollars describing a tube design that had a ring between two cupped electrodes that created strange effects within.
@Bob: How comfortable are you with optics & NLO? I have something I would like you to review.
If this is within your knowledge & will, then:
Subject of debate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAy39ErqV34
Debate itself: https://baronarcanus.substack.com/p/the-electromagnetic-phantom-as-a/comment/7163680?s=w
The more heads, the more discussion, the better off we all are, and that's something I see more clearly now thanks to you, Bob.
If it's not within your knowledge & will, can you help me find someone whose it is, who you also consider to be of a mentality similar to your own...? ... :)
(PS: You've created a monster...)
Also, Canada now allows unvaccinated people to board aircraft to exit the country. Yay. But they probably still require a negative test at entry, and possibly 2 weeks quaranteen somewhere. Boo.
A great couple of videos here that show various ways to show electric fields, may be useful in detecting the bagel fields.
https://youtu.be/Y6YdC2UoDYY
https://youtu.be/bOLd2KVK-Mo
"passing through Corrugated iron sheet?"
Or, maybe just passing through counterspace instead, the polar opposite of space...
We know space is likely defined by the N-Torus due to the geometric relation to Maxwell's laws, hence Zhvirblis'(?) assertion that the structure of the vacuum is this.
The inversion of the toroid is the hypertrochoidal funnel, is it not?
Seems a lot like a vortex..... FractalWoman agrees....
It seems to me that a planck-scale flux vortex (as you've described before) IS (essentially) electrodynamic counterspace, in the sense that its:
a) The geometric opposite of the structure of the vacuum in space, being the torus.
b) Occupying literally the smallest amount of space possible, virtually nothing.
c) The argument could be made that past a certain threshold of minimal breadth, that fields essentially don't exist in 'space' anymore, because they may become too small to perform some types of electrodynamic interactions.
( Impulse currents are a perfect example of how dimensionality of waves can prevent them from typical limitations & interactions, and are also known to penetrate all media, both conductors & dielectrics, with seemingly no impedance )
d)Perhaps anti-space or co-space would be a better word than counterspace/negative space which are more commonly used (Rudolf Steiner, George Adams, Nick Thomas, Dollard, Steinmetz, FractalWoman, Ken Wheeler, etc....), given this empirical instead of theoretical understanding of counterspace, from Bob! Thanks Bob!
(All glory to the hypno-Bob) *clap*..... *clap*..... *clap*.....
Apparently you could grind up a ferrite magnet. Then heat to 1000C apparently improves it, then mix with a binder, to 3D print new magnets. https://physics.aps.org/articles/v15/14