Maverick

Will, overcome

Why freedom of thought and expression are so valuable.

LIVESTREAM Sun 6 April @ 22:45

Pavel Osmera's - water treatment faucet attachment

Premiere 22:00

Old Soviet-era water discovery

Premiere 22:15

Duane and others have been unable to detect any J characteristic radiation excited in aluminium when bombarded by cathode rays. This may mean either that the J characteristic radiation is very weak in comparison with the heterogeneous X-radiation produced in aluminium - for it must be remembered that by analogy with the other characteristic radiations, J radiation is produced only in association with the emission of J electrons, and these may be very few or difficult to displace - or it may just possibly indicate that J radiation cannot be excited at all or only in the most exceptional cases by the impact of cathode particles…
It may, however, be that a J radiation is emitted by electrons in a system of different kind, as for instance in the nucleus itself instead of outside it.

Charles Glover Barkla, Nobel lecture, June 3 1920 [9]

---

F: Now the transmutation. Of course, I can think of several ways in which something like transmutation could take place.
T: Any form of nuclear reaction is transmutation anyway. So it's a very, very small step.
F: But we do now know that there are high energy X-rays. Gozzi has observed them to over 120 keV.
T: That's a big number.
F: That's a big number, which, incidentally, can't arise from the electrons in k-shells.
T: What is the maximum for that? About 15 keV?
F: Well, whatever it is, but.....
T: It's a lot more.
F: Yes. It cannot arise from anything in the electronic shells.
T: 100 keV? No way.
F: No way, no way. So this has got to be some peculiar phenomenon. Incidentally, this is a fairly important question because, as Preparata pointed out in Japan, if you have got high energy X-rays coming out - and this goes back to Stan Szpak - lots of people then say, "Well it's soft X-rays," but soft X-rays would never get out of the cells. So they had to be hard X-rays. Those could dump their energy outside the cell, so you can see a lot of the complications with the thermal measurements could be just that people have missed the excess enthalpy with their cell design: the cell is too small, it won't catch the excess energy, and in any case it's only the lower bound that you catch, you must design a cell to trap all the energy in the X-rays. Once you have got the X-rays, you can ask what sort of X-rays, what is going on? Are these coherent X-rays? What would they do? Will they yield some sort of photo-fission processes in the nuclei?

Christopher P. Tinsley (T). Professor Martin Fleischmann (M) [10]

References

1. CleanHME Project

2. Hermes Project

3. VortexPower SPRING

4. Ošmera, P. (2025) “Revitalized water– magnetically treated water”

5. Osmera, P. (2009) “Vortex-ring-fractal Structure of Atom and molecule”

6. Matsumoto, T. (1989) “Cold Fusion Observed With Ordinary Water”, American Nuclear Society, FUSION TECHNOLOGY Vol.17 MAY. 1990, pp. 490-492

7. Greenyer, R.W. (22 February, 2016) “The Cookbook is in the signal...”, Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project

8. Higgins, B. (23 February, 2016) “Iceberg in the Glowstick 5.2 Data”, Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project

9. Barkla, C.G., (]une 3, 1920) “Characteristic Röntgen radiation”, Nobel Lecture

10. Tinsley, C.P., Fleischmann, M. (November, 1996) ( “An interview with Professor Martin Fleischmann”, Infinite Energy Magazine Issue #11

11. Shishkin, A., (2018) “New type of penetrating radiation”

12. Hutchison, J. K., (2007) (November, 1996) “Solid Iron Bar twists, bends, collapses and fumes”

13. Carat, R., Howarth, M. “Discover Cold Fusion”, Curtiss Press

14. Kickstarter to produce the second edition of Matsumoto's “Steps to the discovery of Electro-Nuclear Collapse”