Hi Bob, I came across your work around 3 months ago, and have been watching your recent presentations and the old ones at the same time. Oddly enough, I've watched your presentation about 'your movie' regarding tragic events that happend in 2001 just a few days prior to watching this one. In those few days I discovered the work of juddy wood and I got my mind blown off when I saw in the collaps something that looked to me like the inverse of nuclear mushroom. Having in my mind your comments about normal water sprouts being just a half of much bigger vortex, I imediatly told myself : "I should go look for potential lights that appeard in the sky on that day, or maybe a few days later (because of c)". But after watching this one, I realised that the castel bravo test happend 47 years and 6 months appart from 9/11 ( whitin 10 days). So this could all have been part of a giant time span vortex. Assuming this speculation bares some truth, imagine what would have happend, had they decide to blow one tiny more nuke up on that day.... I m sorry for this super long message, thanks a lot for your tremendous work that's giving me a lot to think about. I had to chose wich topic I would comment on. Have a nice week-end! Stan.
All of these structures can have Yin and Yang in them, however, they present as ultimately one or other at the macro end. There is no need for time and space separation for this to occur in 'the event' though it is an interesting concept.
I'm not trying to link those events together, it was pure speculation.
But what if that "macro end" that you call was in fact, not the end of the phenomena but just the point were it goes out of our "realm", out of our "fractal scale of perception", somewhere below planck's constant or beyond whatever upper limit there is like maybe a wave lenght that's to big to interact with our local region of eather/reality.
Because fractal is not only about the scale invariance aspect, fractal also means an infinite mesuring stick with infinity between each marking.
What a nice coincidence that the EV industry needs to mine a lot of Lithium nowadays - in the age of diclosure.
And how nice it is for Tesla that they soon start to mine and refine their own Li, giving them the opportunity to enrich it in Li6 isotopes, which is the valuable part for cold fusion. 🙂
Elon Musk is literally holding all the technologies, that would be revolutionized by the exotic plasma tech being disclosed to the public.
EVs will never need to be charged again and will run by extracting ZPE from the vacuum. A little battery buffer might make the control system for energy generation easier and provide us with Li6 for grid scale cold fusion reactors with COP > 5.
SpaceX will be able to use gravitic propulsion systems to make humanity multiplanetary.
The Boring Company will be able to use plasmoids to create tunnels fast and with ease by desynthetizing matter.
And last but not least, NeuraLink will be able to utilize the consciousness related aspects of all this to revolutionize how a brain-machine interface can work without a need for a brain chip implant. 🙂
The golden age will be miraculously beautiful. The only remaining question is: at which cost - in terms of societal, political and maybe even biological, spiritual consequences. 🙃
This presentation was extremely profound, almost spellbinding. One could write a book on the subjects covered here. Specifically, we've seen these famous pictures of the US thermonuclear test blasts, yet the official story of what makes these reactions happen doesn't account for the seemingly coherent geometric patterns in the blasts themselves. Several years ago we were talking about relic neutrinos being an "active agent" that creates coherent reactions due to the neutrinos monochromaticity. This would seemingly apply to cold neutrinos too. So is the data from Shishkin presented at the end in the Q & A here the "missing matter" (waves) we haven't been told about by official channels? Why Ken Shoulder's work was borderline classified? Anyways, thanks for the breakthroughs here.
Hi Bob, thanks for this one - looking forward to the aluminium discussion!
In this one you touched on something I'm really curious about, the D4D ratio. I want to know what happend at say D6D (probably what you showed in this pres) and at say D2D. Is it all about the cone focus point? I feel like, in Cavitation at least, the process is dynamic and passes through D6D, D4D, D1D then poof in an implosion, but the D4D part of the process allows for a bit of aether flow and plasma generation/disaccociation. Which then compounds in the next Cavitation process.
I also link in the ideas from the proto-sphere presentation where they seem to suggest a spherical torus is more stable? Are there any losses in efficiency, or is this a question of optimising for stability against efficiency?
Final query - have you heard of the ripple technology used for efficient high yield, low pollution bombs? I'm sure you have... My understanding is this is timing the radiation some the trigger source to set up a resonance, rather than relying on 1 big hammer blow.
Yep, I can get that. Im thinking about the plasmak or spheromac(?) type arrangement where they seem to be looking to create an EVO with a different ratio to D4D.
Hi bob I’ll try to get you the di lithium from Nichole Whitney news for the soul tv was filmed they came from Fort Worth Texas haroldine lithium, labs
Thanks!
Will have to raid Star Trek cupboards for some Tri Lithium!! #veryfamiliar
Hi Bob, I came across your work around 3 months ago, and have been watching your recent presentations and the old ones at the same time. Oddly enough, I've watched your presentation about 'your movie' regarding tragic events that happend in 2001 just a few days prior to watching this one. In those few days I discovered the work of juddy wood and I got my mind blown off when I saw in the collaps something that looked to me like the inverse of nuclear mushroom. Having in my mind your comments about normal water sprouts being just a half of much bigger vortex, I imediatly told myself : "I should go look for potential lights that appeard in the sky on that day, or maybe a few days later (because of c)". But after watching this one, I realised that the castel bravo test happend 47 years and 6 months appart from 9/11 ( whitin 10 days). So this could all have been part of a giant time span vortex. Assuming this speculation bares some truth, imagine what would have happend, had they decide to blow one tiny more nuke up on that day.... I m sorry for this super long message, thanks a lot for your tremendous work that's giving me a lot to think about. I had to chose wich topic I would comment on. Have a nice week-end! Stan.
Hi Stan,
All of these structures can have Yin and Yang in them, however, they present as ultimately one or other at the macro end. There is no need for time and space separation for this to occur in 'the event' though it is an interesting concept.
Hi, sorry, I had troubles with my connection.
I'm not trying to link those events together, it was pure speculation.
But what if that "macro end" that you call was in fact, not the end of the phenomena but just the point were it goes out of our "realm", out of our "fractal scale of perception", somewhere below planck's constant or beyond whatever upper limit there is like maybe a wave lenght that's to big to interact with our local region of eather/reality.
Because fractal is not only about the scale invariance aspect, fractal also means an infinite mesuring stick with infinity between each marking.
I don't know, it's just a thought..
Thanks for the great insights, Bob! :-)
What a nice coincidence that the EV industry needs to mine a lot of Lithium nowadays - in the age of diclosure.
And how nice it is for Tesla that they soon start to mine and refine their own Li, giving them the opportunity to enrich it in Li6 isotopes, which is the valuable part for cold fusion. 🙂
Elon Musk is literally holding all the technologies, that would be revolutionized by the exotic plasma tech being disclosed to the public.
EVs will never need to be charged again and will run by extracting ZPE from the vacuum. A little battery buffer might make the control system for energy generation easier and provide us with Li6 for grid scale cold fusion reactors with COP > 5.
SpaceX will be able to use gravitic propulsion systems to make humanity multiplanetary.
The Boring Company will be able to use plasmoids to create tunnels fast and with ease by desynthetizing matter.
And last but not least, NeuraLink will be able to utilize the consciousness related aspects of all this to revolutionize how a brain-machine interface can work without a need for a brain chip implant. 🙂
The golden age will be miraculously beautiful. The only remaining question is: at which cost - in terms of societal, political and maybe even biological, spiritual consequences. 🙃
Yep
This is where the rest of all Elon Musk's companies like X, Grok AI and CureVac mit modRNA production come into the picture.
I'm not really sure whether I - as an organic human being of the species homo sapiens - should feel 100% positive about all of them. 🙃
This presentation was extremely profound, almost spellbinding. One could write a book on the subjects covered here. Specifically, we've seen these famous pictures of the US thermonuclear test blasts, yet the official story of what makes these reactions happen doesn't account for the seemingly coherent geometric patterns in the blasts themselves. Several years ago we were talking about relic neutrinos being an "active agent" that creates coherent reactions due to the neutrinos monochromaticity. This would seemingly apply to cold neutrinos too. So is the data from Shishkin presented at the end in the Q & A here the "missing matter" (waves) we haven't been told about by official channels? Why Ken Shoulder's work was borderline classified? Anyways, thanks for the breakthroughs here.
Hi Bob, thanks for this one - looking forward to the aluminium discussion!
In this one you touched on something I'm really curious about, the D4D ratio. I want to know what happend at say D6D (probably what you showed in this pres) and at say D2D. Is it all about the cone focus point? I feel like, in Cavitation at least, the process is dynamic and passes through D6D, D4D, D1D then poof in an implosion, but the D4D part of the process allows for a bit of aether flow and plasma generation/disaccociation. Which then compounds in the next Cavitation process.
I also link in the ideas from the proto-sphere presentation where they seem to suggest a spherical torus is more stable? Are there any losses in efficiency, or is this a question of optimising for stability against efficiency?
Final query - have you heard of the ripple technology used for efficient high yield, low pollution bombs? I'm sure you have... My understanding is this is timing the radiation some the trigger source to set up a resonance, rather than relying on 1 big hammer blow.
I imagine this is what it may look like (they're measuring L/D - length of plunger vs diameter of plunger I think)
But you can see that 1/1 is highly stable, then decreasing stability then L/D>4 starts to become unstable / messy
https://youtu.be/oGGRxE2ijl0?si=sREqu_re6qYFk9_r
There is a difference between a resonant MHD structure and a smoke ring (where there may be no meaningful resonance or charge separation.
Yep, I can get that. Im thinking about the plasmak or spheromac(?) type arrangement where they seem to be looking to create an EVO with a different ratio to D4D.