Gravitational Field Propulsion

Dröscher & Hauser

Gravitational Field Propulsion
Walter Dröscher 1, Jochem Hauser 2

1. Institut für Grenzgebiete der Wissenschaft, 6010 Innsbruck, Austria

2. Faculty Karl-Scharfenberg, Univ. of Applied Sciences, Salzgitter Campus, 38229 Salzgitter, Germany

The above paper from 2009, published in American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, talks about the need for neutral leptons in gravitation field propulsion. It goes on to say “the existence of neutral leptons is postulated” it does not recognise natural mass bearing cold neutrinos [relic neutrinos] and their technological equivalents however, as proved by Dr. Alexander Parkhomov and suggested by him to be a component of dark matter. It also talks about the need to create coherent matter at cryogenic temperatures (like Tajmar, Graham, Podkletnov) and does not consider the possibility that this would be possible at any temperature, as stated by the Lockheed Martin ‘Coherent matter wave beams’ patent.

In my understanding, the technological formation of a natural ball lightning equivalent, produces both cold neutrinos (mass bearing neutral ultra low momentum leptons produced by the inter-particle dynamics during self organisation/condensation of the involved matter) and coherence.

Key points from the Dröscher & Hauser 2009 paper

“If spacetime is made of discrete pieces that is, atoms of spacetime exist, then spacetime might be susceptible to collective modes, representing a daunting many-body problem. A major rearrangement of the many-atom spacetime ground state could take place in the new symmetry-broken phase. Each phase of spacetime, similar to phenomena observed in condensed matter physics, may exhibit its proper fundamental symmetry, characterizing this phase.”

“At present, the mechanism of neutral lepton production is not known, but, as is directly obvious from Table 1, the photon is the only particle that can be converted into a gravitophoton, which is the interaction boson for neutral leptons. It is therefore assumed that in the initial phase of the Universe, when huge numbers of photons were present, these particles possibly could have formed. Since they are not subject to electromagnetic interaction they might have life-times long enough to be stable and thus take part in galaxy formation. Furthermore, the experiments by Tajmar et al. can be explained assuming the production of gravitophotons by condensed matter phenomena, see Sec. IV, while accelerators are producing individual particles.”

“Spontaneous symmetry breaking is associated with the formation of a new type of particles that in, general, are strongly correlated. For instance, in superconductivity, Cooper pairs (two electron interaction, boson like) are formed.”

“It is surmised that spontaneous symmetry breaking is instrumental for the laboratory generated large gravitomagnetic fields, since the magnitude of these fields suggests a coherent macroscopic phenomenon similar to superconductivity or ferromagnetism.”

“Gravitons interact with the space vehicle and cause its acceleration while the momentum of the quintessence particle is not felt by the space vehicle but by the surrounding spacetime.”

“there seem to exist two coupling mechanisms to generate gravity-like fields, termed fermion and boson coupling.

Fermion coupling: Imaginary charges are created by radiation coupling in form of virtual electron-positron pairs and their interaction with the complex Higgs field. This type of coupling requires very strong magnetic induction fields, and thus is no longer pursued.

Boson coupling: Experiments of Tajmar et al. Imaginary electron pairs (boson like), possibly created by some kind of two-electron interaction (similar to conventional BCS theory), are interacting with the imaginary vector potential from the imaginary quarks in the lattice, resulting in real physical interaction. The technical requirements for achieving boson coupling are less demanding than for fermion coupling. For instance, the strength of magnetic induction field is substantially lower for boson coupling.”

The Lockheed Martin ‘Coherent matter wave beam’ patent states that not only bosons, but also fermions can be coupled at any temperature.

“it seems to be feasible that, if our theoretical predictions are correct the realization of a space propulsion device that can lift itself from the surface of the Earth is within current technological limits.”

“These facts provide evidence for novel physics in the form of additional long range fundamental forces.”

“Moreover, an axial field might directly lead to some kind of gravity control.”

“Furthermore, gravity-like fields most likely would lead to novel technologies in the general field of transportation, and thus should be of major interest to the public and, in particular, to industry. In addition, these fields might also be usable in energy generation leading to energy research that is highly relevant to the future.”

What a difference a decade makes

In the paper given above, they mention neutrinos 5 times. In a later paper, from 29 Aug 2019 they mention some form of neutrinos 97 times and do discuss mass-bearing sterile neutrinos as well as negative mass ‘dark matter’ neutrinos. It is clear that they believe that some form of neutrino is critical to these kind of propulsion technologies.

Hauser, J., & Dröscher, W. (2019). Gravity Beyond Einstein? Part II: Fundamental Physical Principles, Number Systems, Novel Groups, Dark Energy, and Dark Matter, MOND. Zeitschrift Für Naturforschung A, 74(5), 387–446. doi:10.1515/zna-2018-0559

“It is a sobering fact that despite enormous, long-standing experimental efforts only indirect signs for the existence of DM have been found in the form of gravitational interaction with matter and radiation. So far, DM particles were never detected in our spacetime. On the other hand, a comprehensive mapping of the distribution of DM in the cosmos exists, based on its cosmic scale gravitational interaction.

The solution to this conundrum may be twofold. First, it needs to be accepted that there are no DM particles of positive mass m > 0. Hence, DM must have negative mass. However, this kind of exotic mass cannot exist in our spacetime. Second, as DM particles, denoted by χ, are known to exist but cannot be found in our spacetime, assumed to be a de Sitter space dS(1, 3), they have to reside in a dual spacetime, termed DdS(1, 3) [9], whose physical properties are discussed below. Such a dual space must allow the gravitational interaction of DM with OM of our spacetime, in order to be consistent with astrophysical observations. Furthermore, this gravitational interaction must be attractive. As no DM particle of positive mass was measured, the existence of a dual spacetime containing particles of negative mass m < 0 is postulated.”

Not knowing is an excuse

Of course, they had not learned of the work of Dr. Alexander Parkhomov who has shown the existence of mass bearing cold neutrinos and their interaction with ordinary condensed matter as well as means to technologically produce them. This was because Dr. Parkhomov’s book was not available in English until after the publication of their 2019 paper.

The paper also goes on to mock the EM Drive, which has apparently been tested by at least three nations in space. However, Roger Shawyer understands this position and explains why in the video below.

The production of neutrinos and axions from neutron stars has been considered in other work however.

“Neutrino and axion production in neutron stars occurs mainly as bremsstrahlung from nucleon-nucleon (/NN) scattering”

This is interesting as Lutz Jaitner calculated that the condensed matter in ‘condensed plasmoids’ (micro ball lightning / EVOs) reaches that of neutron stars.

I will talk more about the importance of this in the future.