The phrase "getting up to speed" in scientific discourse reveals an interesting tension. You're trying to compress years of CErT field evolution into a 75-minute conversation. That kind of knowledge transfer rate is inherently lossy - speed always trades against depth in these contexts. The real value here isn't velocity, it's the connective tissue between what Bennett knew from his patent work and what's emerged since. Sometimes the fastest way forward is actually taking time to build shared context.
Coherent Energy Transformations is the full expanded phrase, but it is harder for someone to say 'set' because they might see it as 'ket'. In English, first syllable of 'certification' is pronounced 'sert' but starts with 'cert'. The 'r' is lowercase because it is part of the word eneRgy.
Embedded in this is an acronym, is the process, both conversion from energy to matter and matter to energy, and from matter forms to other matter forms, and also its ability to provide a translocation in the sense of transformation. It is implicit in the statement that the energy isn't magically appearing from somewhere. It is always coming from some other form of energy, whether that be condensed energy or rarefied.
It was discussed in detail, the reasonings for and was voted on by the community.
Yes, I meant CET vs another. I hadn't caught the potential CET vs [K]ET pronunciation mixup. CEnT mixes up with US currency also. CErT sounds okay but it makes me think of another mixup since the "r" doesn't immediately follow the "E" in "Energy."
It was a discussion and an introduction for him to see that I was serious about this research, and for me to see if he could give any more details regarding the status or otherwise of the patents that he described in New Energy News. It was also to show that there was a man behind the ideas.
He says it's the dissolved minerals and gives his own theory about it (which he doesn't seem very convinced about, and he isn't considering CErT), but what caught my attention was the specific elements he mentioned (iron and sulfur), the volcanic rock they came from that becomes porous over time (iron, sulfur, and aluminium-rich), and the anecdote about a tree growing on that rock that a Japanese scientist found. He even talks about ancient texts.
The rock seems to be ticking boxes for a standard product of CErT. 😆
Don’t know if you seen this yet …. Bobby Broccoli just post his completed work on YouTube
https://youtu.be/jkAw87ZIwQA?si=pY8Mar4t969plF0y
The phrase "getting up to speed" in scientific discourse reveals an interesting tension. You're trying to compress years of CErT field evolution into a 75-minute conversation. That kind of knowledge transfer rate is inherently lossy - speed always trades against depth in these contexts. The real value here isn't velocity, it's the connective tissue between what Bennett knew from his patent work and what's emerged since. Sometimes the fastest way forward is actually taking time to build shared context.
Hence the importance of a physical visit.
CErT? re or something or typo?
Coherent Energy Transformations is the full expanded phrase, but it is harder for someone to say 'set' because they might see it as 'ket'. In English, first syllable of 'certification' is pronounced 'sert' but starts with 'cert'. The 'r' is lowercase because it is part of the word eneRgy.
Perhaps one of the other acronyms is nicer to language haha
Embedded in this is an acronym, is the process, both conversion from energy to matter and matter to energy, and from matter forms to other matter forms, and also its ability to provide a translocation in the sense of transformation. It is implicit in the statement that the energy isn't magically appearing from somewhere. It is always coming from some other form of energy, whether that be condensed energy or rarefied.
It was discussed in detail, the reasonings for and was voted on by the community.
https://remoteview.substack.com/p/coherent-energy-transformation
Yes, I meant CET vs another. I hadn't caught the potential CET vs [K]ET pronunciation mixup. CEnT mixes up with US currency also. CErT sounds okay but it makes me think of another mixup since the "r" doesn't immediately follow the "E" in "Energy."
Who is interviewing whom?
It was a discussion and an introduction for him to see that I was serious about this research, and for me to see if he could give any more details regarding the status or otherwise of the patents that he described in New Energy News. It was also to show that there was a man behind the ideas.
I think we need to rethink some things here...
https://open.substack.com/pub/stevenalexanderyoung/p/elemental-constitution
Hey Bob!
Here is another researcher talking about healing waters and treatments: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2T7HLEpJbo
He says it's the dissolved minerals and gives his own theory about it (which he doesn't seem very convinced about, and he isn't considering CErT), but what caught my attention was the specific elements he mentioned (iron and sulfur), the volcanic rock they came from that becomes porous over time (iron, sulfur, and aluminium-rich), and the anecdote about a tree growing on that rock that a Japanese scientist found. He even talks about ancient texts.
The rock seems to be ticking boxes for a standard product of CErT. 😆
Enjoy!