19 Comments
author

Here was a note sent to me by Curbina

"I wanted to send you this link from a LENR workshop to be held by Arpa-e on October 21st and 22nd, as one could say is quite a development, in the sense of recognition of the LENR field..."

https://arpa-e.energy.gov/events/low-energy-nuclear-reactions-workshop"

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here is my response.

Earlier in the year, I wrote an update on the state of the field based on a well connected US individual for the purpose of getting things moving in the US. I am happy to see this, but am dismayed at the military overtones. It is also interesting to see some of the self-declared 'old guard' in the program. It is factual accurate to state that this kind of research has always be enveloped with national security state partners in the US. I hope that there is an honest accounting of the real underlying process and the charade will end soon.

Dr. David Nagel reached out to me after my Assisi presentations to seek copies of my slides and clarifications on what is going on / process. After having ran lab research programs for many years at the US Navy (that released the Salvatore Pais patents) he is currently the CHIEF SCIENCE ADVISOR at "World Power Production Energy" based in Geneva Switzerland.

http://wppenergy.com/service/wpp-energy-team-7/

Look at their industrial partners

https://wppenergy.com/home-page-2/partners/

When I was trying to speak to Francesco in Rome Airport, having met him by coincidence, I had to wait in line behind this guy.

http://wppenergy.com/service/wpp-energy-team-22/

My chat with Celani on how his and many other LENR systems work.

https://remoteview.substack.com/p/explaining-coherent-nuclear-transmutation

In Assisi, I was described by the head of the French CMNS society, a now EU funded researcher, that I was an outsider to the field. That has been clear to me for years, I expected it when I became 'divergent' in Jan 2017. The summary rejection of our EU Horizon 2020 application with Parkhomov helped clarify how I was to be dealt with, but really it was when I was asked over 3 years ago by a former director of the MFMP, now also funded by the EU, to resign from the MFMP and stop talking about what I was talking about, that it became crystal clear. I said to him, this is not you talking, who has put you up to this - I was told it was "the old guard'. I said, I did not hold it against him and understood why he may have done it - I then asked him to ask those that wished to silence me to debate me in a live open discussion. This situation only stiffened my resolve.

NO MORE LIES.

Expand full comment
Oct 12, 2021Liked by Bob Greenyer

Thanks for posting this!

Expand full comment

Very interesting Dirac was great plus many other old timers hm thermite is used railroad welding there is very advanced technology going in for many years at the notional labs I met a number of scientists and contractors they enjoyed showing me things very advanced I was on the dtic SBIR program I met many folks talked to many I’ll draw out the battery replacer drawn on tissue paoer over lunch 1993 in the millitary industrial complex they are about ten years ahead of what we know , dr labond was able to do transmutations simply Hathaway was going to get the book into English anyway I had wood in metal sold that stuff to a friend

Pezaro had a rock that was magnetically actives at 5 cycles per second one time it flipped around in its own with a string on it hung from a chair it interested Roland bredow who took it to Germany 1986 to max planct and Peter kokoshinegg a very invigorating video folks mass moving causes reading on magnetometers and mass mind events a simple iPad magnetometer tells you lots art bells mass consioness test was impressive useing his coast to coast neotics science gruop years ago Edgar mitchel and gruop hosted by Henry dakin Ken shoulders friend Our friend gee yin Gazda knew so many folks

Expand full comment

Victor Krasnobrizhev Macroscopic quantum teleportation, coherent matter and technology

May 24, 2018 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-za5kyfVM_c

Expand full comment

Hey Bob, I watched this last night, there was one thing I'm a little uncertain on even though I think you've touched on it a few times in slightly different ways. Perhaps fittingly for the name of the channel you discussed two different mechanisms to cohere matter of which one I believe would be a type of "scalar field interference" :)

I was hoping that you might in the future at some point further elaborate on the following points you made (see below for the quotes regarding what you said)

1) Why does adding more and more electrons to a double layer where they have no room to re-arrange themselves lead to coherence? I think you touched on this before saying, by virtue of it being a spherical gradient there is one spherical cross section around the whole spherical gradient where the vibratory energy must be equal. I just don't understand why if you stuff enough electrons in, then it must ultimately become in phase and thus coherent? My intuition would have expected electrons to just be pushed out and the system to tend away from being in phase.

2) Why does removing degrees of freedom (as in the center of a vortex) lead to coherence? I understand this follows the same line of reasoning as above, as you stuff more stuff in using the energy of the vortex you are kind of overcoming the natural tendency for them to push apart. Is the excess energy you are pumping into the system (that normally would be explained as causing increase thermal waste), the energy that is ultimately used to adjust the phase of the particles so that they do indeed become coherent?

3) Same as above but regarding resonant nodes. At a resonant node where you have a lot of energy moving through it, is it the same thing, basically the energy you are pumping in that cancels out is being used to adjust the phase of the particles vibration and keeps them in phase.

It's quite funny to me as I think I'm finally understanding all these "health" devices that have spiral wound scalar antennas that generate in phase signals pointing at each other. Basically we are just pumping energy in that cancels out, and some how this energy adjusts the phase of the particles.

This all seems very similar to the effect of laser cooling (used when generating bose einstein condensates) where energy pumped in via laser must overcome the energy that pushes towards entropy, to maintain phase coherence. (from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_cooling) "Laser cooling techniques rely on the fact that when an object (usually an atom) absorbs and re-emits a photon (a particle of light) its momentum changes. For an ensemble of particles, their thermodynamic temperature is proportional to the variance in their velocity. That is, more homogeneous velocities among particles corresponds to a lower temperature. Laser cooling techniques combine atomic spectroscopy with the aforementioned mechanical effect of light to compress the velocity distribution of an ensemble of particles, thereby cooling the particles. "

Excerpts from video interview with Bob:

1)

51:30

BG: And when you've got ball lightning, as far as I understand it,

the inner sheath of the ball lightning,

effectively you have a pressure pushing out for whatever reason, we don't need to go into that,

and we've got the ions and electrons coming in,

and it has this kind of equilibrium point which is the inside of the double layer,

And as that gets more and more electrons, they are forced to re-arrange themselves to the point

they have no more space to rearrange themselves

and then they can start forming effectively one coherent piece of matter.

2)

1:42:40

FI: Do you think this relates to Victor Schauberger and perhaps the experiments...

BG: 100% 100% he was talking about converging energy through a vortex

At the center of a vortex, you have something trying to move that way, and something trying to move that way,

that is removing all degrees of freedom, what does that lead to, that leads to coherence,

what does coherence lead to, this technology.

3)

2:09:10

BG: and essentially what you are doing is creating resonant nodes

and at the resonant node it's got a lot of energy moving through it

but it's not moving anywhere.

This forces coherence, and if you've got coherence

And if you've got coherence on the individual atom layer what does this cause?

So I suggested the reason John Hutchinsons technology is working is because he's getting coherence.

And you typically see the effect in the middle, or one third in from the ends, or some fraction... depending on the interacting frequencies.

And what you would need to do is coat it with some kind of piezo electric material.

Expand full comment